Search Documents

By W C. Burkle

A rather common observation over the last several decades at least has been that rock or ore properties influence blasting results more than does the explosive type that has been used in the blast. It we accept that premise than it is held here that the material to be blasted should receive even closer attention as to its properties. Several years ago, Dr. Richard Ash published papers that pointed out the rock properties that mostly influence blasting. These principles are given attention in this paper. We have gone somewhat further - or lets say expanded this subject in regard to the role of rock structure in open pit blasting. Though open pit work is given some prominence, we believe that much can be observed and applied to underground mining.

Jan 1, 1979

This paper is written in response to a request from the UTRC Committee on Perimeter Control Blasting. That Committee is conducting "follow-on" research on the selection of appropriate blasting designs and products for perimeter control of rock excavations. This paper will deal with the rock mechanics principles which affect the outcome of such blasting, and explain to the reader how to apply techniques which will modify the typical site response one would expect for conventional blasting methods. For convenience of reference, and to emphasize the important concept that the application of this technique is site specific, that is it must be custom-designed for each site, the technique is being called "Modified Site Response Blasting".

Jan 1, 1984

By Richard Dooley

This paper is one sided because it presents the problem, but not the solution. The problem of blisters (bubbles) and occasional tears in caisson liners occurred when blasting and we have not found a conclusive cause nor a preventive solution. (For back ground information, consult Techniques of Precision Blasting in the Excavation of Drilled Piers, by George Mosteller at the Sixth Conference on Explosives & Blasting Technique in Tampa, Florida 1980).

Jan 1, 1983

By Sandor Nagy

The Explosive and Blasting Department of the Hungarian Mining Research Institute is responsible for the research and development of industrial applications of explosives. Appropriate explosives technology is developed for each application, including the explosive demolition of structures, which belongs within our charge.

Jan 1, 1977

By Douglas R. Burns

Complying with SARA-Title III and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act as a Non-Manufacturing Facility. As of August 23, 1988 non-manufacturing facilities storing end using chemicals which require MSDS (Materia1 Safety Data Sheets) must fi1e with SERC (State Emergency Response Commission), the LEPC (Loca1 Emergency Planning Commission), and the loca1 Fire Department a list or copies of all MSDS sheets with the Tier I and Tier II forms completed.

Jan 1, 1989

By Jennifer P. Harrell, D. Joseph Hagerty

In many areas of the eastern United States, especially in the Midwest, past mining activities have left large and extensive underground openings. Now, renewed mining is occurring in such areas in surface pits. Also, construction blasting often occurs in rock over such old openings. Within the last fifteen years, some attention has been given to the interaction between surface blasting and underground cavities; concern has been expressed about the possible changes in vibrations transmitted through areas underlain by old mine workings (Siskind, Stachura and Nutting 1987). Previous studies also had indicated that underground openings could influence transmission of surface mine blast vibrations (see, for example, Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1977). The principal concern is that underground openings under surface blasting may intensify low-frequency vibrations. If such intensification occurs, use of available equations to predict peak particle velocities and to design blasting patterns and select blasting parameters could lead to possibly damaging ground shaking.

Jan 1, 2002

By Goran Cirkovic, Zvonimir Ester, Josip Krsnik

During the reconstruction of the motorway Zagreb-Krapina three reinforced concrete bridges were demolished, for their width was not adequate for the new motorway. Demolition of the three bridges was carried out by blasting as duration of the traffic cut on the motorway and the railway was limited to maximally 4 hours. During that period of time the demolished bridges had to be removed. Therefore, very tiny granulation was requested suitable for loading and not endangering the surrounding structures. Before each of three main blasting, trial blasting were carried out including the seismic measurements registering the seismic effects. The nearest residential building was at the distance of less than 30 m from the place of blasting. Additional difficulty was the fact that by each of the three bridges there is a new bridge, with minimal distance between the old and the new bridge being 30 cm. As each of the bridges is of different construction and of various thickness, particular blasting technique has been prepared for each one of the bridges.

Jan 1, 1997

By Kenneth Medearis

The accurate prediction of possible damage to historic structures subjected to blasting-related ground motions is not infrequently the dominant factor in whether or not a mining or quarrying operation is allowed to proceed. A recent scenario involving an 1802 Pennsylvania Historic House was resolved satisfactorily, primarily because of the use of modern structural dynamics analysis techniques rather than simplistic peak particle velocity guidelines. One of the associated dominating factors was the truly significant agreement of the analysis results and the values obtained from actual on-site test shot blast motion recordings.

Jan 1, 1993

By Jack Eloranta

Building on previous work, this paper expands the template for modeling the economic relationship between blasting and grinding. The actual efficacy of various blasting enhancements is not addressed, however, placing costs and potential benefits in proper context should aid in designing mine/mill optimization trials.

Jan 1, 2014

By B R. Spencer

Using bulk repumpable water gel explosives in underwater shooting results in even more benefits to the user than a "dryland" customer. It is nearly impossible to reshoot underwater, so a bad shot causes tremendous problems. The huge expense of operating drill boats, dredging buckets and clamshells makes shot loading, hookup and digging cycle times critically important.

Jan 1, 1990

By Tom Hale

Developers and blasters are faced with increasing public demand and regulatory restrictions to maintain the lowest possible levels of noise and vibration from blasting operations in populated urban areas. Pyrotechnic products have proven to be a low noise, low vibration alternative to conventional blasting for close-in rock excavation and concrete demolition applications. Pyrotechnic breaking charges often yield 1/10th the vibration and noise compared to traditional explosives, and have been demonstrated to increase public confidence and decreased damage potential where they have replaced explosives, thus allowing new opportunities for work and greater job profitability. This paper presents a practical approach to utilizing pyrotechnic products in various applications including trenching, mass excavation, demolition, and dimension stone production, providing methodology for pattern design, vibration probability and loading calculations. Field research data is reviewed and compared to conventional explosives.

Jan 1, 2008

By Bob de Raadt

For a long time industrial underwater blasting has stood in need of a calculation method, for the determination of shockwave-proof as well as shockwave-effective charge distances to objects in water. After a brief discussion of the physical background of the shockwave mechanism in water, the author discusses an empirical theoretical computing method based on the "Bubble boundary" concept. The practical application of this model is finally shown in an account of a few underwater blasting operations in which charge weights of c.1-1000 kg were involved.

Jan 1, 1980

By O E. Jr Crenwelge

Recently promulgated regulations governing blast induced ground vibrations in the mining industry contain a frequency criterion as one option for verifying compliance. This criterion is based upon an oversimplified method which assigns the entire peak particle velocity amplitude to one frequency. Depending upon the nature of the vibration time history, it is possible that this frequency may not even be one of the predominant frequencies of the signal. In addition, the criterion does not specifically define the data analysis approach to be used by the industry for obtaining either the amplitudes or the frequencies of the vibration components. And because personnel in this industry generally have little understanding of vibration phenomena, a number of different approaches are currently being used for satisfying the criterion. This paper presents a method for obtaining both the Fourier amplitude-frequency spectrum and the integrated predominant amplitude-frequency components for the vibration record. The method is both physically and mathematically correct and is in common use in a number of other industries. Therefore, it should be of help to regulators, blasters, and consultants charged with developing, enforcing, or implementing ground vibration criteria.

Jan 1, 1988

By Charles L. Greening

MARTIN MARIETTA CEMENT at Martinsburg, West Virginia, has been and presently is engaged in coupling present open pit with old underground workings. Various drilling and blasting techniques have been introduced in an endeavor to achieve optimum results. This paper will relate to three roof shots at Martinsburg, one of which realized a controlled blast of 248,000 tons of material.

Jan 1, 1982

By Chuck Kliche, Bill Clements

This paper relates some of the experiences, good and bad, of blasting adjacent to residences of the primary author during his 15+ years of field blasting in the Northern Great Plains region. During this highly-rewarding blasting career, the author has become aware of two major issues in residential blasting: 1) What we call “Risk/Reward Ratio.”Some questions that must be asked by the blaster prior to taking on any blasting job include: - Can we eliminate or minimize the risk? - Is the reward worth the risk? - Do I have a measure of “nervous confidence” about the shot? 2) Public Relations. Two key elements to public relations are: - Notification - Education All the education in the world to the adjacent populous of what’s happening, of blasting in general, or of what to expect from the blasting does little good without notification. Good public relations is a key to controlling the cost of liability in a litigious society.

Jan 1, 2009

Almost one half of Canada's total land surface is underlain by permafrost. This term describes the thermal condition of earth materials when their temperature remains below 0°C continuously for a number of years. The drilling and blasting of frozen materials requires more energy than the blasting of same in its unfrozen state. The cost of comminution could double in permafrost even with adequate organization, drilling equipment and proper explosives.

Jan 1, 1975

By Krishna Nand

For assessing the safety of structures during underground explosions, ground particle velocity gives the best damage criteria, and 100 mm/see of ground particle velocity has been internationally accepted as the threshold value of safety (no damage). Results of extensive controlled underground explosion experiments conducted by the author to study the effects of ground vibrations on specially prepared concrete blocks, and also on low rise buildings and dams showed that no damage normally occurred when ground particle velocities were less than 100 mm/sec. Analysis of a large number of accelerograms from a dam site in India also indicated that no damage occurred to normal structures when integrated ground particle velocities were less than 100 mm/sec. Major damage in well built structures like a dam was noticed for ground particle velocity as high as about 350 mm/sec. These results are also generally substantiated from damage data obtained for various structures during other earthquakes, including Elcentro (1940), Taft (1952), Parkfield (1965), and San Fernando (1971). These studies, therefore, suggest that the damage criteria during underground explosions and earthquakes are similar; and 100 mm/see of ground particle velocity seems to be the general threshold value of safety (no damage) against ground vibrations.

Jan 1, 1988

BLASPA is the name for a computer code which can assist in the rapid optimisation of blasting procedures in an open-pit mine. BLASPA is based on a mathematical model of the blasting process, a model which has been developing since 1963 as a result of blasting research carried out at the College Militaire Royal de Saint-Jean under sponsorship of the Defence Research Board, and in co-operation with the mining and explosives industry. The model presently includes the following aspects: (1) Geometry, i.e. spacing, burden, bench height, collar, sub-grade drilling; (2) Explosives, i.e. types and grades of explosives, distribution into bottom and top load or decking, size of hole and coupling; (3) Hookup, i.e. parallel or angled firing, delays, location of primers. Computer costs are very small, by comparison with purely spherical AEC codes, so that any number of simulations can be carried out very efficiently. The system has already been used to carry out thousands of simulations for over 40 mines in Canada and abroad. It will be explained how such simulations become a useful guide for a mine's blasting engineer who wishes to optimize his blasting and drilling costs.

Jan 1, 1980

By Dworzak, Andrzej Biessikirski, Jozef Pyra

During the detonation process 20-30% of the energy is being consumed only on the quarrying pro-cess. The remaining amount of the energy generates harmful effects such as: shock wave, acoustic wave, fly rocks and ground vibrations. The ground vibrations effect is the most dangerous especially to structures which are situated nearby an open pit mine.

Jan 1, 2015

By M. L. Mendes, J. Q. Nojiri, S. C. Botelho, A. P. Campanha

In February 28, 2001 JOULE coordinated the first tests with an electronic detonator in South America at an iron ore operation - ITABIRA MINES from the Brazilian COMPANHIA VALE DO RIO DOCE (CVRD) - the largest producer and exporter of iron ore in the world. ITABIRA MINES (CAU and CONCEI O) belong to one of the complexes, called the Southern System, producing 56 million tons of ROM as well as concentrated products and pellets. This paper is going to describe the tests at ITABIRA MINES with results indicating the improvement in the excavator productivity and reduction of the mining global costs (due to the better performance of the equipment and potential reduction of the maintenance cost).

Jan 1, 2002