Search Documents

By Joshua Hoffman, Rhys Baker, Tim O’Brien

Numerous agencies in the Executive Branch of the United States Federal Government have regulatory jurisdiction over the explosives industry. These agencies develop the rules by which the explosives industry must operate, and many have the authority to enforce those rules. Likewise, there are entities in the Legislature that have oversight of those agencies and develop the laws that agencies must operate under. These entities in the Legislative Branch are Congressional Committees. Each committee has their respective jurisdictional authority over various agencies and issues. There are several Congressional Committees with jurisdiction over the agencies that govern the explosives industry and they differ slightly between the House of Representatives and the Senate. This paper discusses this division of power as it relates to the explosives industry. Each branch is responsive to the public and the processes through which each promulgates regulation and legislation require public input in different forms. Options for civic involvement for engaging each of these bodies of power in their respective processes are presented. The differences between legislation and regulation are highlighted along with the processes by which each are promulgated. A proper understanding of the governmental mechanics that affect the explosives industry are critical for the industry to be able to be proactive in playing a role in these processes in a democratic way.

By Charles A. Kliche

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) established a national program for responding to releases of hazardous substances into the environment. The funding mechanism for this program is the Hazardous Substance Response Trust Fund (commonly referred to as Superfund), which provides funding for the implementation of removal and remedial response actions.

Jan 1, 1997

By Rahim G. Haghighi, Calvin J. Konya

Fragmentation is the fundamental concern of rock blasting and it measures the effectiveness of blasting. Fragmentation is sensitive to not only the interrelationship among the design variables, but also is sensitive to local geology. Local geologic conditions have a significant impact on the success of a blasting operation.

Jan 1, 1986

By Paul Downing

While safety and security have always been concerns of the U.S. explosives community, events throughout the world during the past few years have caused us to re-examine our industry’s potential vulnerability and change the way we do business on a day-to-day basis.

Jan 1, 2006

By G F. Baur

Even though the benefits of an effective, perimeter control program in production and development blasting are evident to most everyone involved in the mining industry, there continuer to be only select properties where such a program is in effect and is producing on-going and measurable results.

Jan 1, 1992

By John F. Vynne

This paper will discuss the application of available monitoring technology on blasthole drills with the goal being to reduce costs and increase productivity. Case studies from the monitoring of blasthole drills in North American open pit mines will be used to illustrate the ability to meet these objectives.

Jan 1, 1997

By Mark S. Stagg, Stephen A. Rholl

The Bureau of Mines is studying blast delay timing influences on rock fragmentation in a series of tests that started in 3-ft concrete blocks, progressed to 45in-bench reduced-scale tests in massive dolomite, and has now included 22-ft-bench full-scale tests in a thin-to-thick horizontally bedded dolomite. This paper discusses the full-scale test results and how they compared to the concrete block and reduced-scale studies.

Jan 1, 1988

By Claude Cunningham

Blasthole pressure is the starting point for many blast design calculations, but the way in which it is usually derived, from measured detonation velocity, indicates that more thought is needed as to its true meaning and implication. The general impression is given that the energy in the hole is defined by VoD, but rarely is this the case. VoD is defined by the energy released in the Detonation Driving Zone between the shock front and the Sonic (or 'CJ') surface, and for commercial explosives it is normal for reaction not to be complete within this zone. Reaction and energy delivery continues behind it, not reflected by VoD. Thus it would be more appropriate to use the theoretical VoD, not the measured VoD, to derive the starting pressure, since this would reflect the energy input of full reaction. In decoupled situations, the derivation of pressure at the blasthole wall using a polynomial decay concept is also of debatable value, and an alternative is offered.

Jan 1, 2006

By Carlos Agreda

The rock blasting environmental impacts such as: flyrock, groud vibrations,airblast,and/or noise, dust and fumes are identified and mentioned. Some comments on the correction factors that might be taken into consideration to calculate the initial velocity and the maximum projection of the rock fragments are mentioned as well.

Jan 1, 1995

By Jack C. Leader

The success of a blast using ANFO in wet boreholes is dependent on the quality of the bag the ANFO is packaged in. When a shot fails the dragline may stop and expensive redrilling may be necessary. The total loss to the mining operation can be hundreds-of-thousands-of-dollars.

Jan 1, 1981

By Kenneth Eltschlager

Post-blast assessment techniques using off-site data which includes location, seismograph and photographic data were discussed during the Blaster’s Weekend at this year’s ISEE Conference. Blast and property locations with commonly available GPS units allow for the spatial relationships surrounding the blasting to be documented. When distances are coupled with the charge weight per delay, the scaled distance can be calculated to any structure for either compliance with the rules, or to project limitations. When blasting seismograph data is obtained, the scaled distances are then able to be plotted against ground and air vibration levels for post-blast assessment purposes.

Jan 1, 2007

By Anne Charline Sauvage

Blast designers and blasters need to know the rock mass influence on blast to increase explosive effi-ciency and to optimize costs, but also to succeed in limiting blast emissions (vibration, overpressure, flyrock) This paper presents an applied approach which makes it possible to structure the information con-cerning the rock mass and the blasting.

Jan 1, 2013

By Roy Rose, Bruce Bowles, Wesley L. Bender

Numerous large diameter water wells are used to dewater the pit at the Sleeper Mine. Occasionally, a well will be located inside the boundaries of a blast. Although one might expect that wells so located would become inoperable due to blast-induced damage, in most instances this has not proven to be the case.

Jan 1, 1991

By Stanley J. Vitton

An important factor to consider during blast damage investigations is whether the structure was constructed on collapsible soils. Traditionally, these soils have been considered to be soils such as loess deposits, which occur along the Mississippi River in locations such as Vicksburg, MS. However, recent research into collapsible soils has indicated that a number of soils may also fall into this category. A collapsible soil is any soil that is susceptible to large decreases in bulk volume upon saturation.

Jan 1, 1997

By Robert Hopler

Accidents associated with the storage of explosives prompted regulating the locations of such storage at least as early as 1719, when an act was passed in Great Britain. During the following years various refinements to the regulations were made, but a major explosion in 1864 in which there was destruction and loss of life as far away as 10 miles, led to the landmark Explosives Act of 1875. This act certainly had influence on regulators in the United States: when Massachusetts established an explosives distance/weight table in 1904 they referred to the prior British work. Later, Colonel Dunn of The American Railway Association convened a conference of explosives manufacturers to discuss safe storage. From this conference the American Table of Distances was established in December, 1910.

Jan 1, 2007

By Michael S. Stern, Gordon P. McDonald

The increasing costs and problems associated with transporting and safely disposing of used engine oils from remote mine sites have caused mining companies to consider other ways to consume their used oil. One practical method of disposing of these used oils is to blend them with the diesel component of ANFO and Heavy ANFO type explosives.

Jan 1, 1993

By Paul Worsey, Gerald Rupert, Mark Kirkbride

The realignment of Highway H in the proximity of Crystal Cave (Springfield MO.) required the development of a blasting program that was both economical and efficient for construction, yet ecologically safe for the cave. Three component seismographs were strategically placed underground near prominent and sensitive cave features and the vibration levels from the construction blasting continuously monitored. Peak particle velocity (PPV) values were found to obey the square root scaling law and a peak particle velocity value of 0.3 in/sec was chosen as the safe maximum limit. This value proved adequate in preserving the integrity of the cave and its features. Scaled distances for the maximum and lower values enabled blasting personnel to select explosive charge weights per delay for given distance to the cave. Delays were determined from the dominant frequencies recorded underground.

Jan 1, 1997

By Gary B. Hemphill

Each year the demand for precision blasting increases due to the reduction in the amount of prime land. More site preparation and hone building requires blasting than they did a decade ago, Because of this increased need for blasting in more populated areas, the need for blasters and engineers knowledgeable in work involving blasting nets has increased.

Jan 1, 1978

By Timothy Stark

At present blasters are strictly liable under tort law for personal injury and property damage caused by ground vibrations and/or air overpressures. The application of strict tort liability to vibration and air overpressure damage has resulted in litigation that has hampered and probably will continue to hamper the blasting industry. There are many case histories in which blasters have been sued for the appearance of cosmetic cracking, some of which have involved frivolous claims and marginal expert testimony (Oriard 1999). This litigation has resulted in additional costs to the blasting and construction industries and the American public because there are usually many plaintiffs involved and each case is usually adjudicated separately instead of under a class-action format. It is proposed herein that blasters not be held liable for vibration or air overpressure damages unless their conduct is proven to be negligent. A number of reasons are presented for raising the legal standard from strict liability to negligence including: (1) improvements in blasting technology that allow blasting to be conducted without substantial risk of damage and if damage does occur it is likely to be cosmetic, (2) establishment of conservative ground vibration and air overpressure damage limits for typical structures, and (3) established industry standards for construction blasting.

Jan 1, 2002

By Barbara A. Sciever, John H. Sr Schue

Riverboat gambling has caused quite a sensation among people since its talk of coming to Illinois. The year 1992 marked the start of an era for people that had a penchant for gambling, it was the year that riverboat gambling was legalized in the State of Illinois.

Jan 1, 1995