Search Documents

By James Ballard, Charles H. Dowding

Recent Office of Surface Mining regulations have called for pre-blast surveys of residences within one-half mile of blasting. Unless lighting effects and the multiple origins of cracks are recognized, hurried (lowest bid price) pre-blast surveys may be more harmful than beneficial. Unrecorded, but pre-existent, cracks can be noticed by homeowners during blasting under special lighting conditions. This paper discusses important factors to note during pre-blast surveys, presents data collection forms and discusses the importance of photographic technique in recording cracks (both present and previously patched).

Jan 1, 1979

By Chuck Kliche, Bill Clements

This project involved the removal of the top of an old water supply reservoir tank for the City of Lead, SD by explosives. The general contract called for the removal of the concrete top without damaging the sides or floor of the reservoir. The option of a rock hammer was eliminated, due to the possibility of an unpredictable collapse damaging the sides or floor of the reservoir. Different blasting options were discussed between the primary contractor and the blasting contractor, along with the pros and cons of each. The primary contractor settled on the option of drilling the structure for blasting versus using shaped charges

Jan 1, 2007

By Alan Bauer

During the past several years, the trend to large-diameter blastholes in both open pits and underground mines along with the continuing developments in slurried explosives and delay systems has kept things exciting for the drilling and blasting engineer. This has been particularly so in underground mining, where new mining systems having lower cost and higher productivity have emerged. Crater technology has produced new large-scale methods for resisting front penetration in tar sand mining and also new underground retreat mining methods and methods of raising.

Jan 1, 1978

By Jaak J. K Daemen, Clayton R. Morlock

A study was performed to evaluate the predictability of airblast overpressures induces by production mine blasting. Thirty-seven production blasts were monitored using 3 blasting seismographs giving over 100 blast overpressure records. Blasts were monitored at 5 coal highwall operations and at a limestone quarry, all in the midwest. Blasts consisting of small surface charges were monitored to permit an assessment of prediction methods under controlled conditions, as well as to observe actual delay intervals and their influence on the overpressure.

Jan 1, 1983

By Advanced Initiation Systems Inc

10 years in R&D Last 5 years available commercially Worldwide Met strict approvals for manufacturing and use

Jan 1, 2004

By D O. Tan Sky

This paper will describe the mechanisms involved in delay blasting and how they are applied with the use of D.S.B. It will examine the control of potential damage resulting from detonations, and show how good fragmentation and efficient recovery of this material blasted can be achieved.

Jan 1, 1980

By Francis O. Otuonye

A time series and system analysis modeling technique was applied to signals from strain egages mounted on a fully grouted resin roof bolt and signals from accelerometers mounted on the bolt head and roof rock to determine the roof bolt's response to repeated blast loading. The derived model gives a comprehensive quantitative description of the modes of vibration of the roof bolt response to each blast loading. The damping ratios and natural frequencies of the modes of vibration can reveal the alteration of the process dynamics due to the deterioration of the roof rock and can be used to identify the incipience of instability in the roof bolt system.

Jan 1, 1987

By Lars Osen

Both fragmentation and safety can be improved by following proper procedures in loading boreholes. Proper loading procedures such as primer location, borehole sealing, decking, and stemming along with the hazards of dropping on primers are presented. Discussions follow on the reason for the use of each procedure along with the possible consequences such as hazards, misfires, or poor fragmentation.

Jan 1, 1985

By Mark S. Stagg, Rolfe E. Otterness, Stephen A. Rholl

The Bureau of Mines fired seven test blasts in a 22-ft bench of limestone, screening the material to investigate the influence of explosive type and between row delays on fragmentation. Four 4-hole, single-row test shots were conducted evaluating dynamite, ANFO, emulsion, and a 60-40 emulsion-ANFO mix. Three 12-hole shots, with three rows of 4-holes, evaluated delays between rows of 24, 36, and 120 ms. Accurate in-hole electronic delays were used, firing within 1.5-ms of the nominal delay. All seven shots had a 6- to 7-ft burden, 10-ft spacing, with a hole diameter of 3-1/2 in fired on a 12-ms delay between holes in the row. The tests were instrumented with strain gauges grouted in the burden region examining stress wave and gas pressure effects. Fiber optic probes were used to confirm timing and to obtain detonation velocities.

Jan 1, 1989

By Ali Kahriman

This paper presents the results of ground vibration and air blast measurements from tunnel blasting activities during the construction of the Beylerbeyi-Kucuksu waste water tunnel under a residential area in Istanbul, Turkey. Within the scope of the study, the blasting pattern of the tunnel was engineered using Tunnel2000 design software and field studies and measurements for evaluating the productivity and safety of shots were realized for 136 rounds. During the study, the advance of the tunnel, face condition, ground vibration, air blast and neighbours’ complains and comments after every round were observed and the tunnel pattern was improved. Finally, an empirical relation for this tunnel route was developed between scaled distance and maximum amount of explosives, to continue activities in a safe and productive manner.

Jan 1, 2006

By John M. Bolger, Keith E. McMaster

Excessive salt fines are undesirable in underground salt mining as they are considered a costly waste byproduct. This paper describes an extensive explosive application program conducted at The Canadian Salt Company Ltd, located in Pugwash, Nova Scotia, Canada. The prime objective of the program was to reduce the quantity of fines generated from this company’s underground production blasts. The program was known as the “The Fines Reduction Program”.

Jan 1, 1996

By T. Szendrei, S. Tose

This paper will review several flyrock incidents that occurred recently in the South African mining industry to highlight that potential difficulties of the historical approaches to the problem of flyrock based on correlation studies and regression analysis, including artificial neural networks and similar techniques. These process are not capable of addressing two core issues – root causes of flyrock and projection velocity. A further shortcoming of correlation techniques is that they give no information on the influence of rock size and shape on the flight distance. The scaled depth of burial model for crater blasting in the collar zone and bench face does not specifically address the question of flyrock velocity. A third approach, based on flight trajectory calculations, often neglects the very significant effects of air resistance on the trajectory. Some trajectory models incorporate air resistance but use an implausible fragment velocity model that cannot propel sizeable rocks to distances much beyond 150 m. (Approximately 500 ft.) Nonetheless, trajectory calculation incorporating the effects of air drag affords the most promising approach to the prediction of flyrock range. A unique and insightful feature of the proposed realistic flight modelling is that it collapses all suspected causes of flyrock, many of which are not well understood, to just a single parameter – the launch velocity. This indicates that the root causes of flyrock lie in the mechanisms of momentum transfer to broken rock and suggests new avenues of study for the explosives industry. In this paper we use the trajectory model to identify certain conditions on the bench whereby the impulse of gas pressure acting on fractured material on or close to a free face is enhanced, resulting in a greater transfer of momentum to potential flyrocks.

Jan 1, 2024

By Larry Schneider

In 1998, the Blast Vibration and Seismograph Section of the International Society of Explosives Engineers formed a working group to collect and compile a list of regulations limiting ground vibrations from blasting. The goal was to locate those countries, states, provinces, and cities that have such regulations, identify which governmental body enforces them, and determine what limits on ground vibrations are imposed upon the blasting operations. In the course of this study, data was collected from over 60 jurisdictions where peak particle velocity restrictions range from non-existent to very stringent. Some of the regulations were found to be based upon standards grounded in good science, while others possess little or no technical justification. This presentation will summarize the findings of the subcommittee, focusing primarily on what the limits are, which type of blasting operations must adhere to them, and to what structures they apply. The degree to which these regulations are based upon valid scientific and engineering research will be discussed. A listing of specific locations having such regulations and information about those regulations will be provide

Jan 1, 2000

By D T. Froedge

The state of Kentucky is making some changes in it's blasting program namely instituting a training program for blasters and instituting a new classification of blaster titled "Class A Kentucky Blaster". These changes will take place within the next year and are felt to be of great interest and benefit to those in the blasting industry.

Jan 1, 1978

By María Virginia Ramírez, Alejandro Alarcón, Alea Reyes

Reactive grounds (presence of FeS2, CuFeS2) can create hazards in a mine; misfires to premature deflagration or detonation of loaded blast holes. This occurs because some minerals can react to ANFObased explosives. Due to a high potential event that occurred in The Mine in 2013, The Mine and the Explosive Provider (“The Company”) are conducting a soil characterization of the areas containing reactive sulfides. This study was planned along with The Mine and it is being developed by a multidisciplinary team.

Jan 1, 2018

When CIL presented their new theory of the Breakage Process and Delay Blasting at the 74th Annual Meeting of the CIM in 1972(1), there was hardly any open pit operation in Canada that was using longer than 25 msec. delays. To the contrary, 10 and 15 msec. surface relays were common, which in our opinion were no delays at all for open pit blasting.

Jan 1, 1979

By Surinder Singh, Vassilios Kazakidis, Damian Gregory

Safety, stability, and functionality of mine excavations depend on the structural integrity of the surrounding rock mass. Various explosives and perimeter control blasting techniques have been developed in order to minimize rock damage associated with the conventional drilling and blasting operations. The success of perimeter control blasting depends on many factors grouped in three categories: rock mass features, blast design and implementation, and explosive parameters.

Jan 1, 2008

By Douglas R. Burns

Complying with SARA-Title III and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act as a Non-Manufacturing Facility. As of August 23, 1988 non-manufacturing facilities storing end using chemicals which require MSDS (Materia1 Safety Data Sheets) must fi1e with SERC (State Emergency Response Commission), the LEPC (Loca1 Emergency Planning Commission), and the loca1 Fire Department a list or copies of all MSDS sheets with the Tier I and Tier II forms completed.

Jan 1, 1989

By Andrew F. McKown

This paper will discuss the mechanisms of potential damage from close-in construction blasting, concentrating on two mechanisms: elastic ground vibrations and non-elastic (permanent) ground deformations. The latter will be shown to be the most dangerous for close-in blasting. With respect to elastic ground vibrations, discussion will center on the differences in vibration frequencies and impacts between typical close-in construction blasting and typical mine and quarry blasts, and how using vibration criteria derived for residential structures near mines can lead to very conservative criteria for close-in construction blasting. The effects of high frequency vibrations seen in close-in blasting will be commented on. Factors affecting the magnitude of ground motions will be discussed. Simple, practical techniques will be presented to minimize the potential for damage from close-in blasting, by minimizing the potential for rock block movement or ground heave. Case histories will be presented to illustrate some of the techniques discussed, and give examples of successful close-in blasting projects.

Jan 1, 1991

By Thierry Bernhard, Johan Finsteen, Charles Dowding, Mathias Jern

To bring some clarity to how different standards relate to each other a project was initiated within the European Federation of Explosives Engineers (EFEE). The first part of the project was a literature study and a survey including an evaluation of the answers provided by members of EFEE. The results were presented at the International Society of Explosives Engineers (ISEE) conference in Denver 2020 as well as the EFEE conference in Helsinki in 2019.

Feb 1, 2020