Search Documents

By W. Reisz

Blast area security is the responsibility of everyone involved in the blasting operation and goes well beyond simply controlling access by unauthorized personnel.

Jan 1, 2009

By Tapan Goswami, Geoff Keith

"At Bulga Coal, the objectives of drilling and blasting are to maximise safety and to minimise the totalcost of mining. A recent audit of two overburden blasts established that the standard of drilling and blasting is excellent. No apparent hazards were identified. Laser profiling showed that highwall free faces are reasonably planar with some exceptions, thereby promoting uniform burden distances along front-row charges. However, in three isolated areas along one face, small burden distances existed. The mean and the standard deviation of errors in the collar positions of front-row blastholes was found to be 0.3 + 0.03 m. A borehole video camera was used to show that blastholes did not feature open bedding plane partings, cavities or damage produced by the blast in front of them."

Jan 1, 1999

There is an intuitive tendency to equate rock strength with rock stability, yet the two must be evaluated separately. A slope in strong hard rock is not necessarily stable, nor is a slope in weathered weak rock necessarily unstable. In some cases the reverse is true, depending on the geometry of joints and weak planes. The time element is a matter of special concern, that is how suddenly the failure begins and how rapidly it progresses. Sudden failures can be catastrophic, whereas creep usually is not. In soils and weathered rock, the process is usually incremental and is more likely to give some warning of impending failure. With careful observation, the failure process in these materials can be detected and monitored instrumentally or visually. In some cases, the slope may be stabilized, reinforced or modified. When that is not possible, there is usually enough time on this type of slope to remove men and equipment from the area before complete failure occurs.

Jan 1, 1996

By W. Reisz

Dealing with misfires can be one of the most difficult and serious issues that blasters must confront. Most of us will - at some point, have to deal with a misfire situation.

Jan 1, 2009

By Melvin A. Sannes

The explosives industry is recognized as one of the most dangerous occupations in the world, yet it is rare to see actual training procedures. As our industry becomes increasingly technical, it is imperative that we train the personnel in OUI industry properly.

Jan 1, 1999

Vibration resulting from blasting has been a source of concern from the inception of the use of explosives. As a result many investigations have been made concerning the seismic effects of blasting and at present there is available an adequate set of standards with which to judge seismically the damage capability of a blasting operation.

Jan 1, 1976

By Thomas L. Barkley, Steve Salli

In the past, blasters have attempted to evaluate the results of their blast designs and make corrective adjustments to improve the blasts' productivity and value to the mining operation. The methods employed have nearly always been "eyeball" evaluations and "trial and error" corrections.

Jan 1, 1997

By David Lilly

The introduction of electronic caps with significantly more precise timing is forcing an examination into the practical effects of timing precision upon vibration, air blast, fragmentation and crusher productivity. These investigations have produced suggestions that techniques using multiple delays of the same period with conventional detonators might approximate electronic high precision.

Jan 1, 2006

By J Lyall Workman

This paper examines the comparative economics of cast blasting to alternative stripping techniques. There are several scenarios where a mine may consider introducing cast blasting. However, there are other alternatives such as adding dragline capacity or introducing a prestripping operation. The question becomes which alternative will be more economical.

Jan 1, 1998

By Carlos Agreda

The rock blasting environmental impacts such as: flyrock, groud vibrations,airblast,and/or noise, dust and fumes are identified and mentioned. Some comments on the correction factors that might be taken into consideration to calculate the initial velocity and the maximum projection of the rock fragments are mentioned as well.

Jan 1, 1995

By T. Bajpayee, G. Mowrey, D. Ingram, T. Rehak

Blasting operations are an essential element in the recovery of our Nation’s mineral resources. The mining industry uses billions of pounds of explosives annually. The majority of blasting occurs in surface mining .operations. Blasting results in the fragmentation and often the projection of rocks. Frequently, the rocks are thrown beyond the expected limits. Flyrock and failure to secure the blasting area dominate blasting-related accidents in mining, especially in surface mining.

Jan 1, 2001

By Jaime Huidobro, Michele Hall

The desensitization of an explosives column by the transmitted effects of the earlier detonations in nearby explosive charges is of vital concern to the explosives and blasting industries. Stress waves from detonations of borehole charges have the capacity to desensitize adjacent delayed borehole charges. This desensitization can be of a transient or a permanent nature.

Jan 1, 1994

By Frederick R. Cosgrave

Blasting near buried Natural Gas pipelines has always been an area of great concern. Given the many variables that the blaster must contend with in determining how to break the rock while trying to keep the vibration low and doing so while not compromising the pipeline.

Jan 1, 1995

By Bruce B. Redpath

This paper reviews empirical and analytical information about window breakage due to airblast. As is the case with damage to structures caused by ground vibrations, a fixed break/no break threshold is inapplicable and window damage must be expressed in terms of a statistical probability. The information is summarized in a graph showing the probability of windows being broken by a given level of overpressure.

Jan 1, 1976

By Beau Bryson, Tony Cooley

The following paper is a technical discussion depicting the type of blasting procedures used to control vibration levels. The blast vibration control criteria that was established and the type of monitoring program that was used. Also, the importance of good communication with the concerned neighbors.

Jan 1, 1985

By Stanley J. Vitton

An important factor to consider during blast damage investigations is whether the structure was constructed on collapsible soils. Traditionally, these soils have been considered to be soils such as loess deposits, which occur along the Mississippi River in locations such as Vicksburg, MS. However, recent research into collapsible soils has indicated that a number of soils may also fall into this category. A collapsible soil is any soil that is susceptible to large decreases in bulk volume upon saturation.

Jan 1, 1997

By R Wing, D Corkery

"Several mines in the region of Sudbury, Ontario, occur in or near populated areas. In anattempt to examine the effects of environmental changes and blast induced vibrations onhomes in the area, a monitoring study was conceived. The study was conducted fromNovember 1990 to May 1991 in homes located near the 880 Stope at INCO Ltd.'s CopperCliff South Mine."

Jan 1, 1993

By David A. Smith, B L. Jr Lindsey

Arkansas bauxite varies enormously in its consistency and composition which makes blasting a very difficult operation. Blasting rounds have to be designed based on each particular mine's ore characteristics. The variances are so great in some mines that blasting procedures have to be changed almost daily.

Jan 1, 1979

By T Michael LeBlanc

Drill trajectory deviation is a recurring problem in vertical retreat stoping operations. As a result of this deviation, 60 kilogram (165 millimetre diameter) and 103 kilogram (302 millimetre diameter) explosive charges are routinely detonated beyond ore/waste contact zones. Consequently, there follows a reduction in finished stope wall stability and an increase in ore dilution.

Jan 1, 1996

The use of angled shot holes can be extremely effective in blasting faces that either have a great deal of toe burden or where it is difficult to give a drill access to a face due to backbreak and face erosion. However many quarry operators are wary of using angled holes because of the perceived possibility of increased flyrock and uncertainty of the driller's abilities to drill at the designed angle.

Jan 1, 1994