Search Documents

Furnace Builder. Engineer with extensive experience in furnace building. Position with well-established firm, branching into new fields. Location Ohio. 11-1343. Erecting and Operating Engineer to take charge of erection of gas-producer equipment and to teach customers how to operate such equipment. Location Ohio. Salary $250 per month. R-1339. Assistant Professor in Mining School, for instruction work; must have had experience in ore dressing and metallurgy. Location Missouri. Salary $1500-$2100 per school year (8 mo.). R-1332. Consulting Engineer, familiar with construction of artesian wells to act in a consulting capacity. Location New York City. R-1324. Mining Engineer and Investigator to do non-metallic mineral investigations in both field and office for United States Government. Position will last at least a year, and may become permanent. Location Washington, D. C. Salary $1800-$2700 depending on qualifications of appointee. R.-1317. Crushing Plant Superintendent, cement mill and construction experience essential. Prefer man who has had limestone crushing experience. Location New York. R-1314. Assistant Professor of Coal Mining, must be a graduate of mining engineering and have had some coal mining experience. Location Philadelphia.. Salary $2200 for school year of 10 months. R-1312.

Jan 9, 1919

The following is a 'partial list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period Oct. 10, 1917, to Nov. 10, 1917. Edwin T. Blake, Berkeley, Cal. Alfred C. Lane, Tufts College, Mass. H. M. Boylston, Cambridge, Mass. W. G. Matteson, Houston, Texas. W. B. Cogswell, Syracuse, N. Y. E. Francis M'Crossin, Birmingham, Ala. Paul R. Cook, Zaruma, Ecuador. R. E. Murray, Butte, Mont. F. W. DeWolf, Washington, D. C. Edmund Newton, Minneapolis, Minn. A. Faison Dixon, Venezuela. J. J. Ormsbee, El Paso, Texas. W. H. Dufur,, Oil City, Pa. Pablo Ortega, Havana, Cuba. Maxwell E. Erdofy, Lieut. Engr. Officers'. W. E. Pomeroy, El Paso, Texas Reserve Corps, New York. J. C. Ralston, Spokane, Wash. Evan Fraser-Campbell, Scotland. W. L. Remick, Chrome, N. J. David B. Gemmill, Crown King, Ariz. Howard D. Smith, San Francisco, Cal. F. Lynwood Garrison, Philadelphia, Pa. Harold C. E. Spence, Steeple Rock, N. M. C. J. Hall, Spassky, Siberia. R. K. Stockwell, Salt Lake City, Utah. H. Hamada, Tokyo, Japan. Maurice W. Summerhayes, Timmins, Rush M. Hess, Bouse, Ariz. Ont., Canada. A. Howard Higgin, London, England Malcolm M. Thompson, Morsemere; N. J. A. O. Ihlseng, Joplin, Mo. Nicholas Truschkoff, Petrograd, Russia. T. Ishikawa, Japan. H. J. Wendler, Los Angeles, Cal. C. H. James, Tucson, Ariz. Ira T. Wright, Hurley, N. M. R. R. Landon, Philippine Islands. C. Yabe, Japan. Robert W. Bissell has now become associated with Gunn, Richards & Co., of New York, N. Y. Major Reginald W. Brock is giving a course in a school for commanding officers in England.

Jan 12, 1917

By Oswald J. Heinrich

(Read at the Philadelphia Meeting, February, 1878.) DURING the last twenty years much has been done to investigate and define the Mesozoic formation of the United States along the Atlantic States, as well as in the Territories. The investigations of Professors Hitchcock, Emmons, Hayden, H. D. Rogers, and those now in progress in connection with the geological surveys of Penn-

Jan 1, 1878

GENERAL COMMITTEE GERALD F. G. SHERMAN, Chairman. ARTHUR NOTMAN, Secretary. NORMAN CARMICHAEL, JOHN C. GREENWAY, W. L. CLARK, W. G. McBRIDE, B. BRITTON GOTTSBERGER, FOREST RUTHERFORD. General Committee on Transportation WALTER DOUGLAS, Chairman. CLEVELAND E. DODGE, Secretary. ARTHUR S. DWIGHT, JOHN C. GREENWAY, JULIUS KRUTTSCHNITT, JR. Committee at El Paso W. D. GORDON, ROBERT McCART, JR., W. W. ROSE. Committee at Santa Rita JOHN M. SULLY, Chairman.

Jan 12, 1916

NORTH AMERICA. CANADA Canadian Army Overseas. Ball, H. D. Bridges. C. Butterill, H. J. If. Ladner, F. E. Lane, H. C. Alillar, W. A. ALBERTA Calgary.-Chonette, W. C. Clark, L. At. Corbett, C. S. de Hart, J. B. Dingman, C. W. Fath. A. E. Fulton. J. If. Cray, J. G. Johnson. R. V. McCutchin, J. A. *Slipper, S. E. Vin Buckirk H. A.

Jan 1, 1944

NEW MEMBERS The following list comprises the names of those persons who became members during the period Oct. 10 to Nov. 10, 1915: Members BECK, WESLEY HUDSON, Civ. and Min. Engr., Ellsworth Collieries Co., Ellsworth, Pa. BRADSHAW, GRANT D., Pres., Andrews-Bradshaw Co, 409 Diamond Bank Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa. BUTLER, BERT S., Geol U. S. Geological Survey, Washington, D. C. CAMERON, FRANK, Asst. Mine Foreman, Braden Copper Co., Rancagua, Chile, So. Amer. CHEN, YEFAH FRANCIS, Asst. Min. Engr., Pinghsiang Colliery, Pinghsiang-Ki, via Changsha, China. CLAGHORN, DAVID MONTGOMERY, Mining Engr., Timekeeper, Wilkeson Coal & Coke Co., Wilkeson, Wash. DAVIS, REUBEN WALDO, Min. Engr., Supt., Cannel Coal Co., Dolores, Webb Co., Tex. DOUTHETT, GEORGE M., Supt Crescent Metals Co., Glenwillard, Pa. DUNSFORD, ENSOR R., Min. Engr., Asst. Supt., Victoria Gypsum Min. & Mfg. Co., Ltd., Quarry, St. Alms. C. B.. Nova Scotia. Canada.

Jan 12, 1915

By W. H. Bassett

W H. BASSETT was elected first vice-president at . the executive session of the new Board on Tues- day afternoon. Karl Eilers, H. Foster Bain, Thomas T. Read, and H. A. Maloney were respectively re-elected as treasurer, secretary, assistant secretary and assistant treasurer. The new Executive Committee will consist of W. H. Bassett, Chairman, and Richard Peters, Jr., H. C. Bellinger, E. De Golyer, Edgar Rickard. The Finance Committee will be J. V. W. Reynders, Chair- man, Henry Krumb and H. G. Moulton. George D. Barron was reappointed Chairman of the Admissions Committee, and F. Julius Fohs put in charge of the Papers and Publications Committee.

Jan 1, 1929

By V. R. Degner

The trend in both the metallic and nonmetallic mining industry is toward processing increasingly higher tonnages of lower grade ores, thereby resulting in a growing interest in progressively larger volume individual machines in the flotation circuit. Because of the relatively high cost of large flotation machine development and evaluation, it is important to establish a rational basis by which the existing smaller flotation machine experience can be extrapolated to establish the configuration of the next larger family of flotation machines with a minimum of development modification in the field. This Paper reviews the R&D approach used in translating smaller flotation machine experience to the configuration of a 28.3 m3 (1000 cu ft) induced air machine. Internal cell hydrodynamic principles, which governed this extrapolation, and cell (liquid) surface and froth management considerations will be reviewed, and prototype machine mill tests will be summarized.

Jan 1, 1981

By C. Zener

HE present paper has its origin in an attempt A by the author, extending over the last several years, to understand the influence of the magnetic properties of the constituent atoms upon the various properties of metals and alloys. During this study the author has been impressed by the important role which magnetism plays in the many facets of metallurgy. In writing this paper he has attempted to convey to his colleagues some concept as to the role magnetism will play in the future development of metallurgy. In some of the subjects herein discussed, such as the influence of magnetism upon phase boundaries and upon mechanical properties, only general thermodynamical properties associated with ferromagnetism are introduced. For these subjects, it is not anticipated that any serious differences of opinion will be encountered. A discussion of the other subjects requires the adoption of a quite specific model of the magnetic structure of the metal. This model is discussed under "Magnetic Shells and Their Interactions." The simple model adopted in this paper has been criticized' as being mathematically inconsistent. This criticism has been ably silenced by Dr. W. J. Carr' of this laboratory. The simple model adopted in this paper has been criticized as being inconsistent with observations on magnetic structure using neutron diffraction. This apparent discrepancy has been resolved by Bader3 who has shown that the finite velocity of neutrons prevents neutron beams from detecting the anti-ferromagnetic structure of the type predicted by the simple model adopted in this paper. Magnetic Shells and Their Interactions An electronic shell of an atom is specified by two symbols.' The first symbol is a number and denotes the total quantum number of the shell. The second symbol is a letter and denotes the orbital angular momentum of each electron within the shell. The letters s, p, d, f are used to denote an orbital angular momentum of 0, 1, 2, 3, respectively, in units of h/2a, where h is Planck's constant. As we pass from scandium to nickel in the first transition period, we eraduallv fill the 3d shell. This shell is responsible for ferromagnetism and hence may be called the magnetic shell. The component of the orbital angular momentum along some specified direction must be an integral multiple of h/2~. Thus, for a d electron this component can have any one of the values —2, —1, 0, 1, 2 times h/2a. In addition to its orbital angular momentum, each electron has an intrinsic angular momentum, hereafter called spin, due to a rotation about its own axis. This spin can have either of two components + Yz (h/2a) or — Yz (h/2~) along the specified direction. A fundamental principle of atomic structure, known as Pauli's exclusion principle, is that no two electrons in a given shell may have identical components of orbital angular momentum simultaneous with identical components of spin. The 3d shell thus may have at most ten electrons. Since an intrinsic angular momentum of a charged particle is necessarily associated with a magnetic moment, the spin of an electron may be thought of as referring to either this angular momentum or to the associated magnetic moment. The electron configuration of the ground state of the isolated atoms in the first transition row is reproduced in Table I. The superscript represents the number of electrons in each shell. For the purpose of this paper, the most important principle of atomic structure relates to the manner in which electrons are added to a shell as the atomic number is increased. This principle, commonly known as the principle of highest multiplicity or more simply as Hund's rule, states that within a given shell the maximum number of electrons have spins pointing in the same direction as is consistent with Pauli's exclusion principle. An application of this principle to the d shell is illustrated in Fig. 1, where the spin structure is given for shells containing from 1 to 10 electrons. The physical basis of Hund's rule is the exchange energy discussed first by Heisenberg in 1928. This is a coupling between electrons with parallel spins (spins pointing in the same direction), the coupling

Jan 1, 1956

By Chester S. Conrad

SEVERAL years ago Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co. intensified efforts to combat the hazard of mine fires. The program consisted of three parts in the order of likely accomplishment: 1) Purchase and installation of newer and more practical fire fighting equipment. 2) Establishment of trained fire fighting teams at every mine plant. 3) A drive to remove the causes of mine fires. Experimentation with alternating current on section equipment is a major development in this part of the program. Use of alternating current to power mining equipment had been recognized as being most practical from the standpoint of safety. A means to re- place the d-c traction motor is all that has delayed complete section mechanization with a-c power.

Jan 1, 1958

By W. J. Romanow

RECENT papers by Williams, Sherwood, and Boothby,1 Seybolt et al.2 Heikes; and Roberts4 attest to the increasing importance of the hexagonal ferromagnetic compound MnBi. Since the magnetic properties of MnBi crystals are highly anisotropic, it is useful and necessary to have appropriate aids for determining their orientations—a (00.1) standard stereographic projection and a corresponding table of crystallographic angles for this structure. The tables of crystallographic angles for the hexagonal system available in the literature5 are computed for c/a ratios greater than that of MnBi and cannot satisfactorily be used to find the crystallographic angles of MnBi. A table of angles between the crystallographic planes (HK.L) and (hk.1) was calculated for MnBi from the formula0 F=are cos Hh+Kk+ 1/2(Hk+hK) + 3/4 (a/c)2Ll/v(H2 + K2 + HK + 3/4 (a/c)2L2) (h2+ k2+hk + 3/4 (a/c)2l2) on an IBM Type 650 Magnetic Drum Data Processing machine. The lattice constants used are listed in Table I and are those determined by Willis and Rooksby7 at 20°C. More recently published values obtained by both X-ray and neutron diffraction"' show no difference from these significant to the calculation. From the crystallographic angles between the basal plane (00.1) and the general plane (hk.1) in Table I, an (00.1) standard stereographic projection was made for MnBi which is shown in Fig. 1. Acknowledgments The author wishes to thank R. G. Treuting and J. N. Hobstetter for their technical assistance, and Miss D. P. Booth for programing the IBM machine for the calculations. He appreciates the opportunity to read the paper of B. W. Roberts of General Electric Co. prior to its publication. References 1H. J. Williams, R. C. Sherwood, and 0. L. Boothby: Bulletin Amer. Physical Soc., 1956 vol. 1, p. 132. 2 A. U. Seybolt, H. Hangen, B. W. Roberts, and P. Yurcisin: AIME Trans., 1956, vol. 206, p. 605: Journal oF Metals, May 1956. 3R. R. Heikes: Physical Review, 1955, vol. 99, p. 446. .B. W. Roberts: A Neutron Diffraction Study of the Structures of Manganese B.W.Roberts:ANeutronDiffractionBismuthide, Physical. Review, 1956, vol. 104, p. 607. 5 A. Taylor and S. Leber: AIME Trans., 1954, vol. 200, p. 190; JouRNal of Metals February 1954. « C. S. Barrett: Structure of Metals, 2nd Ed., p. 635. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York and London, 1952. 7B. T. M. Willis and H. P. Rooksby: Proceedings Physical Soc., London, 1954, vol. 67B, p. 290.

Jan 1, 1958

By G. Sachs, S. I. Liu

Introduction In a previous investigation on the effects of repeated strains of large magnitude on the aluminum alloy 24 ST, it was found that the reduction in ductility by straining in tension was partially restored by a subsequent compression.&apos; As illustrated by the dashed line in Fig I,$ the ductility (e~) retained after prestraining in tension by a certain amount (el) and measured in a subsequent tension test is represented by a straight line sloping down under 4s°. If a compression of the same magnitude as the first tension is inserted (€2 = — €1) between prestraining and final testing in tension, such a "balanced" tension-compression cycle yields a ductility considerably higher than that present after prestraining in tension only. The results of these tests can be correlated with those of an investigation on the effects of prestraining in compression.~ As also shown in Fig I, the ductility in subsequent tensile tests decreased with com- pression, at a rate considerably slower than that after prestraining in tension. The above discussed testing conditions can be considered as special cases of a general straining cycle, consisting of first, straining in tension by an amount el, subsequently straining in compression by an amount e2, and finally determining the retained &apos;ductility, e,, in a tensile test. Prestraining in tension is then represented by el > o and e2 = o. Prestraining in compression is given by e~ = o and e~ < o. Balanced cyclic straining is defined by the condition el > o and cz = — 61. In order to obtain further information on the effects of straining cycles consisting of tension and subsequent compression, further tests were made, varying both the tension strain, el, and the compression strain, e2, within extreme limits; el varied between 0.06 and 0.28 and e2 between — 0.008 and —0.h approximately. Apparently, such tests have not been previously performed. They revealed phenomena which have not been recognized to date, The results of the investigation are herewith reported, without attempting to correlate them with internal processes within the metal structure. However, in order to assist in an analysis of this type, the results have been represented in various manners. In addition, further test data on the effects of prestraining by compression were provided by using specimens of various contours (notched specimens) in the sub-

Jan 1, 1949

By John B. Dilworth

In September, 1930, H. N. Eavenson, then Chairman of the Coal Division, appointed a Committee on Methods of valuing Coal Propelvties, with John B. Dilworth as chairman. The latter prepared a schedule&apos; of features for consideration under the general headings of Undeveloped and Developed Coal Properties. These subjects were divided among the members of the committee and during the next year written discussions of his allotted subjects were received from each member. Mr. Grimes and Mr. Eavenson discussed the entire list,. These discussions were mimeographed and a set sent to each member before the meeting of the Institute in February, 1932. There was a general discussion at that meeting. At the meeting in February, 1934, Mr. Dilworth submitted a report12 which summarized the accumulated opinions and data and presented the conclusions of the committee as a whole on the subjects embraced in it&apos;s schedule. Members of the committee expressed the desire that some of the individual opinions be published for reference. Mr. R. Damon Hall&apos;s abstracts of these papers arc therefore presentrd herewith.3 Personnel of Committee John B. Dilworth (Chairman), Consulting Mining Engineer, Edward V. D&apos;Invilliers Engineering Co., Philadelphia, Pa. Eli T. Conner, Consulting Mining Engineer, Seranton, Pa. W. G. Duncan, Jr., Superintendent, W. G. Duncan CoaI Co., Greenville, Ky. Howard N. EAveNson, Consulting Mining Engineer; Eavenson, Alford & Hicks. Pittshurgh, Pa. George Watkin Evans, Consulting Mining Engineer, Seattle, Wash. J. A. Garcia, Consulting And Constructing Engineer, Allen & Garcia Co., Chicatgo. III. John Alden Grimes, Valuation Engineer, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C. Otto Herres, Assistant Manager, United States Fue1 Co., Salt Lake City, Utah. J. R. Hicks, Consulting Mining Engineer, Eavensorl, Alford & Hicks, Pittsburgh, Pa. Robert D. Reeder, Mining Engineer, U. S. Bureau of Mines, Washington, D. C. Samuel, A. Taylor, Consulting Engineer, Pittsburgh, Pa. Bleeckee L.. WHeeler, Mining Engineer, Ford, Bacon & Davis, New York, N. Y.

Jan 1, 1934

J. L. CHRISTIE, Chairman T. S. FULLER, Past-chairman W. M. PEIRCE, Vice-chairman W. A. SCHEUCH, Vice-chairman E. M. WISE, Secretary International Nickel Co., Bayonne, N. J. W. M. CORSE, Treasurer Executive Committee H. A. BEDWORTH G. O. HIERS D. K. CRAMPTON R. H. LEACH E. H. DIX, JR. R. F. MEHL J. A. GANN J. WALTER SCOTT&apos; JEROME STRAUSS Finance Committee T. S. FULLER, Chairman W. M. CORSE H. S. RAWDON C. H. MATHEWSON SAM TOUR

Jan 1, 1934

By K. P. Gupta, P. A. Beck, N. S. Rajan

By determining the a phase boundaries in the following ternary systems: V-Fe-Si (at 1175oC), V-Co-Si (at 1175°C), V-Ni-Si (at 1175oC), Cr-Mn-Si (at 1000°C), Cr-Co-Si (at 1175°C), Cr-Ni-Si (at 1175°C), V-Fe-A1 (at 1175°C) and Cr-Co-A1 (at 1175°C), it was found that Si exerts a stabilizing effect on these a phases, while A1 tends to destabilize them. Si atoms in solid solution occupy sites D in the a structure, The co/ao ratio increases with increasing Si-, Mn- or Fe-content. The volume of the unit cell decreases with increasing Si-content. THE stabilization of certain metal silicides (the Nowotny phases) by the addition of relatively small

Jan 1, 1961

PRESIDENTS DAVID THOMAS 1871 R W RAYMOND 1872-1874 A L HOLLEY1875 ABRAM S HEWITT 1876 T STERRY HUNT 1877 ECKLEY B COXE 1878 - 1879 WILLIAM P SHINN 1880 WILLIAM METCALF 1881 RICHARD P ROTHWELL 1882 ROBERY W HUNT 1883 JAMES C, BAYLES 1884-1885 ROBERT H RICHARDS 1886 THOMAS EGLESTON 1887 WILLIAM B POTTER 1888 RICHARD PEARCE 1889 ADAM S HEWITT 1890 JOHN BIRKINBINE 1891-1892 H M HOWE 1893 JOHN FRITZ 1894 J D WEEKS 1895 E G SPILSBURY 1896

Jan 1, 1923

Adams, Bernard, Student, South Dakota School of Mines. Rapid City, S. D. &apos;30 Ahlskog, Harold A., Student, Washington State College Pullman, Wash. &apos;30 Aldridge, John, Student, New Mexico School of Mines Socorro, N M. &apos;30 Almstrom, Adne A., Student, Met. Engrg., Washington State College Pullman, Wash. &apos;29 Ancell, Virgil F., Student, Missouri School of Mines Rolla, Mo. &apos;30 Ankudinoff, N., Mill Draftsman, Arthur G McKee & (:o., 2422 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, Ohio. &apos;30 Apablasa, Salvador C., Student, Univ. of California Los Angeles, Cal. &apos;31 Armstrong, Robert H., Student, Lafayette College Easton, Pa. &apos;31 Armstrong, Thomas E., Student, Univ. of California Los Angeles, Cal &apos;31 Aud, Robert A., Student, Lafayette College Easton, Pa. &apos;30 Backus, Robert Small, Student, Mass.- Inst. of Tech . Cambridge, Mass. &apos;30 Bailey, William C., Student, Univ. of California Los Angeles, Cal &apos;30 Banning, Lloyd H., Student, South Dakota State School of Mines Rapid City, S D. &apos;81 Barclay, M. G., Student, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colo. &apos;30 Barger, Thomas, Student, Univ. of North Dakota Grand Forks, N. D. &apos;29 Barker, C. L., Student, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colo. &apos;30 Barker, Edgar Morgan. Student, Univ. of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah. &apos;31 Barnwell, Earl E., Student, Oregon State College. Corvallis, Ore. &apos;30 Bartholomees, Geo. C Box 304, Bonne Terre, Mo. &apos;29 Bartholomees, Louis P., Student, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colo. &apos;30 Bary, Robert L., Student, Univ. of Kansas Lawrence, Kans. &apos;30 Basham, Lester G., Student, South Dakota School of Mines Rapid City, S D. &apos;31 Bates, Walter H., Student, School of Mines, Univ. of Utah .. Salt Lake City, Utah. &apos;30 Beardshear, George T., Student, South Dakota State School of Mines.Rapid City, S D. &apos;31

Jan 1, 1923

By Clifford Wilson

SCREENED pipe is designed with the view of restraining the fine, free-running sands of the production zone from entering oil wells. Its successful use is dependent on a number of factors. The nature and effects of some of these factors can be determined through experiment and observation, but some of the elements that have a distinct bearing on the use of screened pipe can be evaluated only by estimate. The important subsurface conditions which affect the use of screened pipe are: 1. Depth of production zone. 2. Extent of production zone. 3. Reservoir pressure. 4. Character and relative quantity of oil and gas. 5. Character of sediments a. Consolidation of beds. b. Variation in beds. c. Grain-size gradation of sands. d. Free-running characteristics of sand from different levels. Aside from the use. of mechanical equipment and tools, the measures to be taken in the installation of screened pipe involve: 1. Size of liner. 2. Length of liner. 3. Design and mesh of screen. 4. Portion of liner to be screened. 5. Manner of setting liner. 6. Preparation of or washing of the well before or during the setting of the screen. 7. Manner of bringing in the well. 8. Manner of flowing the well. Values applicable to the actual subsurface conditions that exist at any well can only be approximated. The accuracy of the estimate will be measured by the amount and quality of the evidence at hand and the personal factor of ability to interpret the evidence fairly, whether

Jan 1, 1932

By Orville R. Lyons, A. C. Richardson

F. X. Ferney—We are pleased that this paper was presented at this meeting and thank Mr. Richardson and Mr. Lyons for their effort and work in preparing it. We agree with the authors that it was unfortunate that more comprehensive data were not available when the paper was prepared, this being particularly true since we had no knowledge that the paper was being written and could not make available data which were in our process files. Further, it is our opinion that because the data are not sufficiently comprehensive the results which are presented are erratic and will lead to false conclusions. As we see it, there are three Specific reasons why the data which are presented cannot be considered accurate. 1. The preparation plant was not at equilibrium while the samples were being taken. This is indicated by the fact that the percent of solids in the circulating water varied from 3.9 pct to 10.7 pct during the period when the plant was sampled. 2. We do not believe that the samples of Bird feed which were taken were representative and could indicatc the true feed to the filter. Evidence of this is shown in the data where the dewatered product leaving the centrifuge contains more coarse material than the feed to it, that is, material which is +6-mesh in size. 3. We question if the data concerning screen analysis in the fine sizes is accurate and would conclude (from the data) that these tests were made by a dry-screen method. We have found that wet screening is always necessary to obtain a true picture of the quantity of —200-mesh fines which is present. The test work described in the Lyons-Richardson paper was conducted some time ago and the tests were carried on during a period when the preparation plant had not ironed out all of their start-up problems. Since that time most of these problems have been corrected and now this is a smooth running, well-operated prep-

Jan 1, 1951

By Orville R. Lyons, A. C. Richardson

F. X. Ferney—We are pleased that this paper was presented at this meeting and thank Mr. Richardson and Mr. Lyons for their effort and work in preparing it. We agree with the authors that it was unfortunate that more comprehensive data were not available when the paper was prepared, this being particularly true since we had no knowledge that the paper was being written and could not make available data which were in our process files. Further, it is our opinion that because the data are not sufficiently comprehensive the results which are presented are erratic and will lead to false conclusions. As we see it, there are three Specific reasons why the data which are presented cannot be considered accurate. 1. The preparation plant was not at equilibrium while the samples were being taken. This is indicated by the fact that the percent of solids in the circulating water varied from 3.9 pct to 10.7 pct during the period when the plant was sampled. 2. We do not believe that the samples of Bird feed which were taken were representative and could indicatc the true feed to the filter. Evidence of this is shown in the data where the dewatered product leaving the centrifuge contains more coarse material than the feed to it, that is, material which is +6-mesh in size. 3. We question if the data concerning screen analysis in the fine sizes is accurate and would conclude (from the data) that these tests were made by a dry-screen method. We have found that wet screening is always necessary to obtain a true picture of the quantity of —200-mesh fines which is present. The test work described in the Lyons-Richardson paper was conducted some time ago and the tests were carried on during a period when the preparation plant had not ironed out all of their start-up problems. Since that time most of these problems have been corrected and now this is a smooth running, well-operated prep-

Jan 1, 1951