Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys - The Flow and Fracture Characteristics of the Aluminum Alloy 24ST after Alternating Tension and Compression (Metals Tech., June, 1948, TP 2392)

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
S. I. Liu G. Sachs
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
12
File Size:
432 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1949

Abstract

Introduction In a previous investigation on the effects of repeated strains of large magnitude on the aluminum alloy 24 ST, it was found that the reduction in ductility by straining in tension was partially restored by a subsequent compression.&apos; As illustrated by the dashed line in Fig I,$ the ductility (e~) retained after prestraining in tension by a certain amount (el) and measured in a subsequent tension test is represented by a straight line sloping down under 4s°. If a compression of the same magnitude as the first tension is inserted (€2 = — €1) between prestraining and final testing in tension, such a "balanced" tension-compression cycle yields a ductility considerably higher than that present after prestraining in tension only. The results of these tests can be correlated with those of an investigation on the effects of prestraining in compression.~ As also shown in Fig I, the ductility in subsequent tensile tests decreased with com- pression, at a rate considerably slower than that after prestraining in tension. The above discussed testing conditions can be considered as special cases of a general straining cycle, consisting of first, straining in tension by an amount el, subsequently straining in compression by an amount e2, and finally determining the retained &apos;ductility, e,, in a tensile test. Prestraining in tension is then represented by el > o and e2 = o. Prestraining in compression is given by e~ = o and e~ < o. Balanced cyclic straining is defined by the condition el > o and cz = — 61. In order to obtain further information on the effects of straining cycles consisting of tension and subsequent compression, further tests were made, varying both the tension strain, el, and the compression strain, e2, within extreme limits; el varied between 0.06 and 0.28 and e2 between — 0.008 and —0.h approximately. Apparently, such tests have not been previously performed. They revealed phenomena which have not been recognized to date, The results of the investigation are herewith reported, without attempting to correlate them with internal processes within the metal structure. However, in order to assist in an analysis of this type, the results have been represented in various manners. In addition, further test data on the effects of prestraining by compression were provided by using specimens of various contours (notched specimens) in the sub-
Citation

APA: S. I. Liu G. Sachs  (1949)  Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys - The Flow and Fracture Characteristics of the Aluminum Alloy 24ST after Alternating Tension and Compression (Metals Tech., June, 1948, TP 2392)

MLA: S. I. Liu G. Sachs Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys - The Flow and Fracture Characteristics of the Aluminum Alloy 24ST after Alternating Tension and Compression (Metals Tech., June, 1948, TP 2392). The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1949.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account