Search Documents
Search Again
Search Again
Refine Search
Refine Search
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
Sort by
- Relevance
- Most Recent
- Alphabetically
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Ries's Paper on the Effect of Fineness of Grain on the Fusibility of Clay (see p. 205)
H. 0. Hofman, Boston, Mass. (communication to the Secretary*) :—The experimental demonstration by Professor H. Ries, of the fact that a mixture of clay and finely-ground flux will melt more readily th
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Riter’s Paper on Mine-Survey Notes (see Trans., xli., 790)
E. R. Rice, Wickenburg, Ariz. (communication to the Secretary*):—While this paper is primarily intended as a discussion of Mr. Riter's, I think it will be best to indicate my criticism by describ
Jan 1, 1912
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Roe's Paper on Puddled Iron and the Mechanical Means for its Production (see p. 551)
Since I have had the pleasure of watching the development of this process very closely, I feel that I ought to say a few words on the subject, although I cannot add much to what Mr. Roe has already sa
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Roe's Paper on The Manufacture and Characteristics of Wrought-Iron (see p. 203)
C. Edward Stafford, Chester, Pa.:—Doring all my business life, I have been engaged in the manufacture of Bessemer and open-hearth steels, but, during my long connection with the Shoenberger Steel Co.
Jan 1, 1906
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Rutledge's Paper on The Clinton Iron-Ore Deposits in Stone Valley, Huntingdon County, Pa. (see p. 134)
William Kelly, Vulcan, Mich.:—In the northern part of Bedford county, Pa., the county immediately south of Huntingdon, the Clinton measures appear along the eastern slope of Tussey mountain near its b
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Sargent's Paper on A Study of the Effect of Heat-Treatment on Crucible Steel Containing One Per Cent. of Carbon (see p. 303)
Henry D. Hibbard, New York City (communication to the Secretary): The title of Mr. Sargent's paper is somewhat misleading, since the paper itself relates chiefly to various kinds of annealing and
Jan 1, 1902
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Scholz's Paper on Effect of Humidity in Mine-Explosions (see Trans., xxxix., 328)
Howard N. Eavenson, Gary, W. Va. (communication to the Secretary*):—For some time before the publication of Mr. Scholz's paper, I had been collecting data bearing upon its subject, and I now take
Jan 1, 1910
-
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Smith's Paper on the Garnet-Formations of the Chillagoe Copper-Field, North Queensland, Australia (see p. 467)
K. W. Turner, Sail Francisco, Cal. (communication to the Secretary*): The recent papers in the Transactions by Vogt,' Lindgren2 and Weed: on ore-deposits that have formed as a direct result of ig
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Sperry's Paper on the Sperry Vanning-Buddle (see p. 572)
Edwin A. SpeRry, Denver, Colo. (communication to the Secretary*) :—Since writing my former paper on this subject I have had several discussions concerning some of the statements contained therein, wit
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Spurr's Paper on A Consideration of Igneous Rocks and their Segregation or Differentiation its Related to the Occurrence of Ores (see p. 288)
Alexander N. Winchell, Butte, Mont. (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Spurr calls attention to the fact that an ore-deposit may be due to a succession of concentrations at different geological epo
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Stow's paper on Pressure-Fans vs. Exhaust-Fans (see p. 398)
R. V. Norris, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (communication to the Secretary*):—Mr. Stow's paper presents a series of arguments, numbered from 1 to 18, concerning the relative merits of four systems of collie
Jan 1, 1910
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Tay's Paper on the Bryan Mill as a Crusher and Amalgamator Compared with the Stamp Battery (see vol. xxix., pp. 776,1054)
Mr. Tays (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Wynne's criticism of my paper* brings forward a few points which are really important, and might properly have been considered in the original paper
Jan 1, 1902
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Van Liew's Paper on the Relative Elimination of Impurities in Bessemerizing Copper-Matte (see p. 418)
Allan Gibb, Mount Perry, Queensland, Australia (communication to the Secretary):—In drawing conclusions from his observations, Mr. Van Liew has apparently overlooked the reduction in weight that takes
Jan 1, 1904
-
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Watson's Paper on Geological Relations of the Manganese-Ore Deposits of Georgia (see p. 207)
Charles Catlett, Staunton, Virginia (communication to the Secretary*): I have had occasion to examine a few of the irondeposits in the immediate section of which Mr. Watson speaks, but have not had an
Jan 1, 1904
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Webster's Paper on Proposed Standard Specifications for Steel Forgings and Castings (see p. 170)
Gus C. Henning, New York City: In taking up the discussion of these specifications it is necessary that I give definitions of what I understand under the term " Specifications." There may be three kin
Jan 1, 1903
-
Discussions - Of Mr. Webster's Paper on Specifications for Steel Rails (see p. 449)
R. Trimble, Pittsburg, Pa (communication to the Secretary) : There are in the proposed specifications only two points on which I wish to comment at this time.
Jan 1, 1902