Search Documents

By Ettore Contestabile, Cameron Thomas

Implosive-type electrical/mechanical connectors such as XECONEX have been used extensively for joining electrical transmission lines. This implosive action of explosives has also been applied to other forms of high energy metal working with excellent results. However, as with many other products, the inherent blast energy of these units has caused some environmental concerns especially when used in proximity to inhabited areas.

Jan 1, 1995

By Michail G. Egorov

As well as destruction and moving rock, the blast energy sets up a seismic wave in the ground and a shock wave in the air, which can present danger to buildings and disturbance to human occupants. This shock air wave potentially can cause to destruction of a window glass, the window and door frames and partitions of buildings. In modern buildings, distinguished with high flexibility, the shock air wave can cause to the intensive wall vibration, dangerous for these buildings.

Jan 1, 1996

By Karl Kure, Anders M. Heltzen

Mixtures of prilled ANFO and 0,5 - 3 mm polystyrene balls are interesting substitutes to the tube charges or other types of reduced explosives or detonation fuses. Experiments have shown detonation ability even of a mixture of 95% bolt polystyrene balls and 5% ANFO. The gas and shock energy in the mixtures decrease proportional with the content of polystyrene. The detonation velocity shows higher values than expected for mixtures with more than 50% (vol.) ANFO.

Jan 1, 1980

By J Mensah, G C. Sen

Often large boulders of rock have to be fragmented in civil or mining engineering operations. These oversize boulders are encountered after primary blasts in both surface and underground excavations of minerals. Various methods are employed to break large boulders into a manageable size for loading and crushing. These methods range from mechanical breaking (such as drop-ball and hydraulic impactor) to the use of explosives. Apart from these, static agents (such as expanding chemicals) are used in special circumstances.

Jan 1, 1989

By Minoru Kawamora, Koichi Kurokawa, Kenji Hashimoto

We developed concentrated remote control blasting system to blasting simultaneously at a large number of sites in a mine of large scale. This system is consisted of three parts, the first part is a control station with high voltage power source units, the second part is a relay terminal with relaying and branching units, and the third part is a blasting machine with charging and discharging units. The control station is connected with the blasting machine by mean of control bus wire. The blasting machine adopts MBS(electromagnetic induction blasting system) for the reason of safety and good handling.

Jan 1, 1990

By John Brennan

The Avalauncher has been an integral tool for avalanche mitigation work for close to 50 years. With their ability to place a kilogram of high explosives up to two thousand meters away, they routinely serve as a short range alternative to military artillery. The Avalauncher’s roots can be traced to a pneumatic baseball pitching machine used by Major League Baseball teams in the United States in the late 1950s. Throughout the decades, many modifications have been made to both the launcher and its projectiles. Current technology has allowed the Avalauncher to attain greater accuracies and operational range. In this paper I plan to cover not only the history of the Avalauncher but also explore its potential future.

Jan 1, 2009

By Claude Cunningham, Szendrei

The partitioning of blasting energy into “Shock” and “Heave” components is a popular concept for attempting to match explosives to particular ground conditions and blasting results. The issue is complex, as it affects both the detonation process and the immediate response of the rock skin. However, the fundamental process of energy transfer from the explosive to the rock through the blasthole wall is not well defined. Clues to the “Shock” phase of blasthole expansion are given by cratering behaviour of materials subject to high velocity penetrators. The final cavity volume defines both the energy used to achieve this and the resistance of the confining material. Attention is being given to the link between penetration of a solid target and expansion of a readymade hole, both producing the same outcome. The benefit of this work is that it leads to clearer understanding of how explosives will impact upon the blasting results and helps to explain the energy consumption in blasting.

Jan 1, 2004

By Thomas J. Snyder

Modern quarry management should be alert to every opportunity to improve productivity and reduce operating costs. In this paper, the author outlines areas in which explosives suppliers should be encouraged to propose changes. He also supplies guidelines for evaluating these proposals, suggests yardsticks for measurement, and stresses the need to be open-minded when dealing with imaginative, innovative concepts.

Jan 1, 1988

By H Y. Fang, H Sutherland, R M. Koerner

Due to the increased number of complaints by property owners to blasting related industries an apparent need for a clearer understanding of blasting-related damage is needed. We feel that direct structural crack monitoring during such blasts is the appropriate measurement technique. Instrumentation and interpretation of results for taking such measurements are described in this paper. Typical results from blasting and other environmental effects are also described which can eventually be related to Fracture Mechanics principles in the hope of clarifying such disputes in an equitable manner.

Jan 1, 1976

By Charles A. Nork

Licensing of surface blasters as a regulatory requirement has been in effect in Pennsylvania for more than twenty years. Training of license applicants was begun in 1971 on a random basis. Formalization of training of applicants for surface blaster licenses was begun in 1980. Training is conducted on a regularly scheduled basis in specific locations throughout Pennsylvania. Training is conducted by Charles A. Nork with the assistance of one of five Department explosives field inspectors.

Jan 1, 1985

By K Lombardo

Numerous small- and intermediate-size cratering experiments have been conducted in Piceance Creek Basin oil shale at the Colony and Anvil Points oil shale mines near Rifle, Colorado. The purpose of these experiments was to evaluate scaling as a tool to infer the behavior of large-scale tests from small-scale experiments, to calibrate the hydrodynamic computer codes used to model explosive fragmentation of oil shale, and to investigate the influence of bedding plane orientation, natural joints, fractures, and the grade of oil shale on rock fragmentation.

Jan 1, 1983

By Edward Fitch

The DOE is evaluating Yucca Mountain, Nevada as a potential site for disposal of high level nuclear waste. Yucca Mountain is located approximately 160 km northwest of Las Vegas on the western edge of the Nevada Test Site and the Nellis Air Force Range. An exploratory tunnel has been constructed through Yucca Mountain for site characterization. A controlled drilling and blasting technique, smooth wall blasting, was used to excavate the TBM starter tunnel and alcoves off the main tunnel to provide areas for scientific investigation. Fundamental to the blasting program has been the use of two blast design equations used in concert to minimize blast damage to the surrounding rock mass. The first of these equations was developed by Roger Holmberg and estimates near-field peak particle velocity that is the basis for minimizing blast damage to the host rock. The second of these equations was developed by B. H. Sanden and provides bore hole pressure estimation which allows controls to minimize crushing of the rock mass along the perimeter yet allowing enough force to create tensile failure between perimeter bore holes. This is key to the smooth wall blasting technique. To date, essentially the same controlled drilling and blasting program has been in place for all excavation requiring controlled drilling and blasting at the ESF. The controlled drilling and blasting program uses an iterative process to achieve continuous improvement in the blast rounds. This involves interaction between Architect and Engineer (A/E), Constructor, and Testing Coordination O&e (TCO) to ensure each blast round successfully meets the expectations of affected participants. The A/E requested that the TCO provide validation of the near-field peak particle velocity estimation under the Construction Monitoring Program. Data gathered under this program were reduced by statistical analysis and used to verify blast design parameters and provide a site specific blast damage relationship.

Jan 1, 2000

By Chuck Kliche, Bill Clements

This paper relates some of the experiences, good and bad, of blasting adjacent to residences of the primary author during his 15+ years of field blasting in the Northern Great Plains region. During this highly-rewarding blasting career, the author has become aware of two major issues in residential blasting: 1) What we call “Risk/Reward Ratio.”Some questions that must be asked by the blaster prior to taking on any blasting job include: - Can we eliminate or minimize the risk? - Is the reward worth the risk? - Do I have a measure of “nervous confidence” about the shot? 2) Public Relations. Two key elements to public relations are: - Notification - Education All the education in the world to the adjacent populous of what’s happening, of blasting in general, or of what to expect from the blasting does little good without notification. Good public relations is a key to controlling the cost of liability in a litigious society.

Jan 1, 2009

By Lewis L. Oriard

Ground vibrations associated with blasting are generally in a higher frequency range and of shorter duration than those generated by earthquakes, and the intensity scales for earthquakes cannot be applied directly to blasting vibrations without modification. Further, the profession does not need an intensity scale merely to estimate vibration intensity. If the blasting in question was not monitored instrumentally, it is a simple matter to estimate the range of intensities based on published prediction formulae or data from various sources such as Oriard (1), Nicholls et al (2), Hendron and Oriard (3), Siskind et al (4), and others. However, the profession has a serious need, for purposes of evaluating damage claims, to understand the relationships between vibration intensities and the levels of observed effects. The criteria for threshold damage do not apply to typical cases which usually involve structural damage. If the damage in question would have required ground vibration with a particle velocity of, say, 20-120 ips, damage is not verified by showing that the vibration merely approached a suggested limit to avoid threshold damage. That is not the question. This paper provides some guidelines for comparing severity of damage to intensity of vibration which would be required to cause such damage, much as is done when determining earthquake intensities. In addition, this paper includes a discussion of strain amplitudes induced by environmental forces, the predominant causes of damage to structures. Also, certain popular myths regarding blasting damage are discussed in the paper. Due to space limitations, the paper will not include a discussion of airblast effects.

Jan 1, 1989

By Dwayne Tannant, Jeffrey Loeb

Blasting techniques and protective measures exist that can mitigate risks associated with flyrock and the nuisance of vibration, and overpressure. However, these are often misused or not used because there are no prescriptive regulatory requirements and typically urban blasting guidelines do not exist. The relationship between the increasingly negative publicity that the urban blasting industry receives and the existing state of regulatory control on blasting in urban environments is presented.

Jan 1, 2012

By R A. Farnfield

Measurement of the environmental impact of ground vibration from blasting operations is based almost exclusively on the peak vibration level generated. This measurement is known as the Peak Particle Velocity or PPV. The recorded PPV is used to assess the impact of the vibration both in terms of structural damage and human response. Limits for vibration are almost universally quoted in terms of PPV levels and, as a consequence, blast design for vibration control is centred around techniques for the control of this peak value.

Jan 1, 1996

By Richard Mainiero, James H. Rowland III

For many years there have been small scale tests available for evaluating the toxic fumes production by capsensitive explosives (DOT Class 1. l), but these could not be used with blasting agents due to the large charge sizes and heavy confinement required for proper detonation. Considering the extensive use of blasting agents in construction and mining, there is a need to determine the quantities of toxic ti,tmes generated by blasting agents. At the International Society of Explosive Engineers Twenty Third Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique in 1997, the authors reported on a facility for detonating large (4.54 kg), confined blasting agent charges in a controlled volume that had been constructed at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s Pittsburgh Research Lab’s Experimental Mine. Since 1997, this facility has been used to collect data on toxic fumes produced by the detonation of various ammonium nitrate/fuel oil (ANFO) mixtures and several cap-sensitive explosives. ANFO composition ranging from 1 to 10 percent (pet) tieI oil have been studied. As expected from previous studies, with an increase in fuel oil content the carbon monoxide production increases, while nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide production decrease. The detonation velocity varies from 3,000 to 4,000 m/set for the 1 to 10 pet range of fuel oil content, suggesting that ANFO mixes with improper fuel oil content may appear to detonate properly, while their fume production differs significantly from optimum. The study also considers such factors as degree of confinement, water contamination, and aluminum content on blasting agent fume production. Results indicate that water contamination of the ANFO has little effect on carbon monoxide production, but causes significant increase in nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide production. Decreasing confinement from Schedule 80 steel pipe to 0.4~mm thick sheet metal also has little effect on carbon monoxide production, but significantly increases nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide production. Adding 5 and 10 pet aluminum to the ANFO had no clear effect on carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, or nitrogen dioxide production.

Jan 1, 2000

By Glenn Ludwig, Stephen H. Chung

Fragmentation has a direct impact on mine costs and productivity. Computer programs have been developed to calculate fragmentation using data on the properties of the explosive, the characteristics of the rock, the rock mass and the blast pattern. While computer models can yield good data, conclusions must be verified. Fragmentation assessment, muckpile surveys or high speed film analysis of rock mass movement are some of the techniques that have been used to confirm blast results. Digitizing photos of the muckpile is now the most common method to assess fragmentation. But it has some drawbacks. Although automatic electronic imaging equipment speeds up the process, the results depend on the photographs. Shadows will distort results. High resolution, black-and-white prints are essential.

Jan 1, 1992

By George E. Jackson

ANFO, as a blasting agent, is used in large quantities in coal surface mines. It can be purchased on the open market or through reliable suppliers. The blaster in the field must assume that his ANFO is homogeneous, consistent, and nearly identical on a daily basis. A quality control program will enable him to be assured of the correct product. Therefore, the material cost and operational efficiency can be better controlled.

Jan 1, 1978

By D O. Doehring, W A. Charlie, W A. Lewis

The detonation of explosive charges releases large quantities of energy that can produce rock and soil deformations far from the detonation point Extensive data are available on blasting in general and on the performance of certain structures subjected to blast vibrations. However, only limited information is available on the performance of earthfill dams and other hydraulic structures subjected to blasting. The limited data indicate that, whatever the cause, one or several cycles of repeated strains in earthfill dams may cause residual porewater pressure increases. Limiting the peak particle velocity to less than 2.5 cm/s for operating dams constructed of or having foundations consisting of saturated, loose sands or silts and to less than 5 cm/s for other earthfill dams, should keep strains below the threshold strains required for residual porewater pressure increases to occur. Porewater pressures should be monitored throughout a blasting operation, and they should be allowed to dissipate, if necessary, before subsequent charges are detonated.

Jan 1, 1987