Search Documents

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX E EQUIPMENT USED FOR FIELD TESTING OF MINE SEALING SYSTEM I. Drilling Operation - Equipment supplied by local drilling contractor 1. Mobile drill rig. 2. Flat bed truck, containing 20 lengths of drill pipe. 3. Auxiliary compressor. 4. Pickup truck for small parts and supply of diesel fuel. 5. Bulldozer. 6. Water supply, in this case the nearby stream. 7. Supply of casing, positioned next to the drill rig. 8. Ready mixed cement grout. 9. Drill bits, stabilizer units, cutting and welding equipment, other miscellaneous tools and supplies. II. Sonar Probing Operation 1. 25 foot tower with pulley mounted atop. - FMA 2. Electric winch with 100 feet of 1/4-inch cable, Model No. 100A, City Engineering Co. , Indianapolis, Indiana. 3. 400 feet of 1-1/2-inch-diameter aluminum pipe with alignment holes and coupling grooves. - FMA*

Jan 1, 1973

By David Hoadley, Kenneth R. Maser, Ashok B. Boghani, James E. Billar, D. Randolph Berry, Mackenzie Burnett, Robert H. Trent

APPENDIX E REFUGE CHAMBER LEAKAGE ANALYSIS Variables p 0 = pressure outside of chamber (psi) p = pressure inside of chamber (psi) i q = leakage flow rate (cfm) Q= total leakage (cu ft. ) V = chamber volume (cu. ft. ) t= time (minutes) p= nominal atmospheric reference pressure (14.7 psi) A= chamber leakage coefficient (cfm/psi)

Jan 1, 1976

[ ]

Jan 1, 1997

By Dale R. Ralston, Roy E. Williams, Gerry V. Winter, George L. Bloomsburg

Jan 1, 1986

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

1 9 THIS IS A DIGITAL COMPUTER SIMULATION OF THE VENTILATION SYSTEM OF A MINE LOCATED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY; PENNSYLVANIA. THE VENTILATION SURVEY ON WHICH THIS SIMULATION IS BASED WAS RUN FROM OCT. 27-30 AND ON NOV. 2;1976 IN THE ACTIVE PORTION OF THE MINE INBY COMBS SHAFT AND THE INACTIVE PORTION AROUND AND INBY DONAHOO SHAFT. FOLLOW-UP SURVEYS WERE THEN RUN ON FEB. 18 AND FROM MARCH 7-11;1977 TO INCLUDE THE MAIN HAULAGE SYSTEM OUTBY THE ACTIVE AREAS 0F THE MINE. ALL SURVEY DATA WAS NORMALIZED TO A STANDARD DENSITY OF 0.075 POUNDS/CU.FT. PRIOR TO THE CALCULATION OF INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THIS SIMULATION.

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

MINE VENTILATION NETWORK ANALYSIS

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, V. T. Burgos, J. A. McClay

Introduction The Cost program was developed to provide the planning engineer with a tool to evaluate the cost implications of the technical mine design decisions. Direct costing methods are employed, where feasible, to provide greater detail and accuracy in the primary cost centers. Options have been provided in the cost computation, economic analysis, and output data subsystems to increase the flexibility of the system. Computer Program The program is written in Fortran IV for use in the IBM System 360/370 computers. i. Main - The main routine reads and stores input data from three sources, user input, Cost Data Library, and data transfer from the Master Design Simulator. Data is trans¬ferred to the appropriate subroutines, as they are called, by means of labeled common blocks. ii. Subroutine CSTCOM - is a data modification routine which computes the peripheral charges related to labor and supervisory costs. iii. Subroutine MANPWR - interrogates section data to determine the total labor and supervisory costs for each cost center. iv. Subroutine CAPCST - computes the total capital investment for each cost center, including the economic life and salvage value of each element. Capital costs are determined by user selection of quantities and models of equipment. Equipment costs are stored in the Cost Data Library for retriev-

Jan 1, 1975

By Craig Haase

A. Introduction

Jan 1, 2003

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

1 11 THIS IS A DIGITAL COMPUTER SIMULATION OF THE VENTILATION SYSTEM OF A MINE LOCATED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. THE VENTILATION SURVEY ON WHICH THIS SIMULATION IS BASED WAS RUN FROM OCT. 27-30 AND ON NOV. 2, 1976 IN THE ACTIVE PORTION OF THE MINE INBY COMBS SHAFT AND THE INACTIVE PORTION AFCUND AND INBY DONAHOO SHAFT. FOLLOW-UP SURVEYS WERE THEN RUN ON FEB. 18 AND FROM MARCH 7-11, 1977 TO INCLUDE THE MAIN HAULAGE SYSTEM OUTBY THE ACTIVE AREAS OF THE MINE. ALL SURVEY DATA WAS NORMALIZED TO A STANDARD DENSITY OF 0.075 POUNDS/CU.FT. PRIOR TO THE CALCULATION OF INPUT PARAMETERS FOR THIS SIMULATION. IN THIS RUN, THE ORIGINAL VENTILATION NETWORK HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO INCLUDE NEW INTAKE AND RETURN AIRSHAFTS AT THE WEST MAINS.

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

• MINE VENTILATION NETWORK PROBLEM (NATURAL SPLITTING; FIXED • QUANTITY BRANCHES; METHANE SIMULATION; NETWORK TOPOLOGY REVISION; • ABSOLUTE PRESSURE) • NFIXB = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES • DD(I) = AIR QUANTITY ASSIGNED TO FIXED QUANTITY BRANCH I, IN KCFP • NFBPF = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES PLUS FAN • NFBPFG = NO. OF FIXED QUANTITY BRANCHES PLUS FAN PLUS METHANE • EMISSION BRANCHES • NBWNVP = NO. OF BRANCHES WITH NATURAL.VENTILATION PRESSURE • NVP(I) = NATURAL VENTILATION PRESSURE ASSOCIATED WITH • THE I-TH BRANCH • NF = NUMBER OF FANS • NB = NUMBER OF BRANCHES • MAXIT = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS • MAXJ = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF JUNCTIONS • NJ = NUMBER OF JUNCTIONS INVOLVED IN THE SOLUTION * NM = NUMBER OF MESHES • NP = NO. OF POINTS TO DESIGNATE FAN CHARACTERISTIC * Q = QUANTITY OF AIR FLOW IN KCFM • R = RESISTANCE OF AN AIRWAY • WIDTH = AIRWAY DIMENSION • LENGTH = AIRWAY DIMENSION • HEIGHT = AIRWAY DIMENSION • SUMNVP = SUMMATION OF NATURAL VENTILATION PRESSURE FOR ANY MESH • X (I) = QUANTITY OF AIR, IN KCFM, ASSOCIATED WITH THE I-TB POINT • ON A FAN CHARACTERISTIC • E = ERROR FOR CONVERGENCE • FF = FRICTION FACTOR • FX(I) = FAN PRESSURE, INS INCHES OF WATER GAGE, CORRESPONDING • • TO A QUANTITY X(I) • H = HEAD LOSS IN INCHES OF WATER GAGE • I = BRANCH NUMBER • J, J1, J2 = JUNCTION, J1 AND J2 ARE TWO NODES WHICH DEFINE A • BRANCH • KEY = NO. WHICH SIGNALS THE TYPE OF FAN CHARACTERISTIC TO BE • EXPECTED

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, V. T. Burgos, J. A. McClay

The data for Test I describes an underground bituminous coal mine operation in a 48 inch seam, with an estimated production rate of 1,056,000 tons per year. The system includes four continuous mining sections, conveyor belt haulage, and a rail network for supply and personnel transportation. This section illustrates the input data sequence and the various report formats which may be selected for the printing of results. As explained earlier, at the present time, the elements of the Cost Data Library must be read in with the regular data input. Thus, in the input data listing, immediately following the required user input, are cards which contain the inputs of the cost library. Examination of the cost reports indicate the absence of cost values for some categories for which the system would normally be expected to incur costs. This situation has arisen due to the format of the cost data provided in the U. S. Bureau of Mines reports. An example of this is the charge of $20/ton for brattice cloth while no charge is indicated for stoppings. The test report data provided a single figure for ventilation cost without a supplemental breakdown. Thus the cost indicated for brattice cloth is actually the total ventilation cost. These explanations hold true for the data input and output for Test II, Appendix III.

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

PART 1 THE INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA AND THE MINE SCHEMATIC SHOWING THE FLOWS FROM COMPUTER SOLUTIONS FOR APPLICATION I

Jan 1, 1975

By Karl J. C. Harries

"The following is an outline or check sheet of some things that might be looked at when considering the concept of a royalty or royalty provisions. It is not intended as a guide to what is right or wrong (that is for the parties to decide). It does not replace the discussions in this work and is not intended to be a complete or exhaustive compilation of matters to be considered. It presumes that you are familiar with the basic concepts of royalties and has been included as an aide memoire only. Use it as such, with caution and common sense, and amend it to suit your needs. Remember also that brevity can result in inaccuracy or imprecision. This is a danger in many points below.The section references are for the sections where the matter is the main subject of the section – see the index for other sections.Royalty TypesNet Proceeds [§§ 5.8.; 11.4.]• No accepted or understood meaning within industry.• Literal meaning, if not defined, would imply “net operating profit”.• Often defined as net profit with revenue base of proceeds from sale of product.• Should not be used without detailed and clear definition. Net Operating Profit [§§ 5.8.; 11.4. – referred to only]• Net profit without recoupment of pre-production expenditures.• Revenue base: usually proceeds from sale of product.• Operating costs deductible.• Some reserves may be permitted.• Recoupment of some post-production capital expenditures may be permitted.• Not often seen as basis for royalties in Canada."

Jan 1, 2003

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

ANALYTICAL PRESSURE - VOLUME COMPUTATIONS FOR THE MINE PROTOTYPE A new coal mine is projected, with entrance by slope 1,500 feet long. Nine main entries will be standard for development, five as intake and four as return. One return shaft is planned near the slope bottom, and an intake shaft and portal are planned 5,000 feet north of the slope bottom. The slope will have an area of 150 square feet and a perimeter of 55 feet. A belt and supply track will be within the slope. The return shaft will be circular with a diameter of 18 feet and will be 500 feet deep with an escapeway. Two hundred feet of the shaft and 500 feet of the slope will be concrete lined. Select the fan to operate five units per shift and drive the 5,000 feet to a proposed new portal, using the slope for an intake. Two main splits are planned with the maximum of three units on any split. The amount of air desired at each unit is 25,000 c.f.m; a shop at the slope bottom will require 10,000 c.f.m. In the solution of this or any similar problem, the first step is to determine the resistance factors. CALCULATION OF R FACTORS Slope area = 150 sq. ft.; Perimeter = 55 feet; Length = 1,500 feet. The friction factor K must be established. Five hundred feet of the slope is smooth lined, moderately obstructed by belt; K = 35. The remaining 1000 feet is in sedimentary rock and moderately obstructed; K = 85.

Jan 1, 1975

By Karl J. C. Harries

"The Table of Contents that follows is only an example and is the Table of Contents from an actual negotiated agreement. It is merely intended to show how an agreement might be set out and the nature of possible provisions. As a negotiated agreement the format was dictated by the negotiations. It is not offered as a precedent of what should be contained in a joint venture agreement (“JVA”), the “proper” sequence of Articles, or a complete listing of the contents of joint venture agreements generally. The set-up used for an agreement should be decided by the parties and be one they consider flows in a logical and workable sequence. This example sets out the “deal” first, followed by the provisions relating to how work is to be carried out and then by administrative provisions necessary to make the agreement work. If you are more comfortable with, say, having the Committee provisions at the beginning, by all means have it drafted that way -- you are going to have to live with the agreement and work under it.Notes:1. The Table of Contents provisions appear in bold print. The italicized sections are annotations, which have been provided in some cases where the heading may not clearly describe the contents. They are not intended to be comprehensive, but refer to some specific matters that are considered to be of interest or to need some clarification.2. The subject matter of many of the articles and paragraphs is discussed or commented upon in the text of the book. Some of section cross-references have been provided. Such references are only to sections where the topic is a principal subject and no attempt has been made to provide a comprehensive indexing.3. Although this particular agreement is a three-party agreement, *B* and *C*, the Owners, are required to act as a unit (see para. 1.09. – § 8.44.), making the agreement effectively a two-party agreement. The parties insisted upon having a decision-making Committee and structuring the agreement accordingly. As is explained in § 8.11., such an arrangement is not recommended and can result in problems.5. See also §§ 8.24., 8.41. and 14.13. for discussions on tables of contents, summaries, and headings."

Jan 1, 2003

By R. V. Ramani, V. T. Burgos, J. A. McClay

The data for Test I1 describes an underground bituminous coal mine operating in a 72 inch seam, with an estimated production rate of 4,257,000 tons per year. The system includes 15 continuous mining sections, conveyor belt haulage, and a rail network for supply and personnel transportation. The following section includes the input data sequence, annual cost report, and cash flow analysis "report for this data set.

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, V. T. Burgos, J. A. McClay

Cost Data Library The data retained in the Cost Data Library is of a semi¬permanent nature in that it is held in storage for immediate use with the program although its contents may require periodic evaluation to maintain it in a current status. The library is composed of six arrays containing both technical and cost data. The following description of the library input system provides the information necessary to maintain an active storage file. Array POWERA: FORMAT (8F10.0) - contains the step groupings of the power rate schedule for power cost computations. Four input data cards are required to fill this storage area. Card Column 1 1 - 10 Demand in Kilowatts for the First Step of the Demand Rate Schedule 11 - 20 Demand in Kilowatts for the Second Step of the Demand Rate Schedule y 41 - 50 Demand in Kilowatts for Fifth Step of the Demand Rate Schedule 51 - 60 Maximum Demand Level for this Rate Schedule 61 - 70 Percent Power Factor for this Rate Schedule 71 - 80 Unassigned 2 1 - 10 First Step Demand Charge, $/Kw 11 - 20 Second Step Demand Charge, $/Kw 4¬ 41 - 50 Fifth Step Demand Charge, $/Kw

Jan 1, 1975

By R. V. Ramani, C. B. Manula, A. Owili-Eger

All the input data required to operate the ventilation simulator except the title, are entered with I10 or F1O.O formats. The title is entered with (18A4) format. The floating points are designated by (FP) and the integers by (INT)

Jan 1, 1975

The current procedure for measuring the concentration of respirable coal mine dust is as follows. Each filter is preweighed by the filter manufacturer to ±0.1 mg. Following sampling with the Coal Mine Dust Personal Sample Unit (CPSU) at 2.0 L/min, the filter with coal mine dust is sent to MSHA for weighing. The current MSHA procedure for weighing respirable dust samples uses a Mettler Model AE163 analytical balance in conjunction with an automatic weighing system with a precision of ±0.02 mg [Tomb 19901. Each balance is calibrated twice per day. Quality control for the automatic weighing system includes the systematic weighing of one in eight filters on a second Mettler AE163 balance. Tolerance is set at ±0.1 mg between the two weighings of the same sample. Weights are truncated at the 0.1 mg level (e.g., 3.457 mg is truncated to 3.4 mg) [Bowman et al. 19851. The difference of the two truncated weights is then recorded as the weight of coal dust deposited. The respirable concentration (mg/m3) is computed by multiplying by a correction equal to 1.38 and dividing by the volume of air sampled (2.0 L/min x sampling time [min]).

Jan 1, 1997

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

MINE VENTILATION NETWORK ANALYSIS

Jan 1, 1977