Search Documents

By John C. Didlinger

How do you measure the highwall? Why do you even need to know the highwall measurement? Why is it important? The importance of this measurement is to help keep a level floor and to help control vibration. Nevertheless, since most of us are not mountain climbers, there must be a safe and easy way to make an accurate highwall measurement. So with these factors in mind, how do you make your measurement?

Jan 1, 1997

By Shijie Qu, Paul N. Worsey

Pre-splitting has become widely adopted for the formation and protection of final surface rock excavation profiles in both large scale civil construction and highway rock cuts. Jointing has been shown to affect the success of pre-splitting and the smoothness of the resulting profile, however, only closed joints have been investigated. Frequently jointing that is closed at depth is open at and near the surface due to weathering, reduced stresses and ground water percolation. In many instances, problems are associated with surface rock layers whereas at depth these problems are either reduced or do not exist.

Jan 1, 1987

By K. Ram Chandar, Vedala Rama Sastry

Fragmentation and muck pile profile together play an important role in optimizing the excavation costs for given geo-mining conditions. Initiation system is one of the vital parameters influencing the fragmentation and muck pile throw (profile). An attempt is made through this paper to study the characteristics of muck pile produced in addition to fragmentation. Two new parameters namely “throwburden ratio” and “muck pile ratio” are proposed for assessing fragmentation and movement of material. Field investigations were carried out in a limestone mine in southern India with shock tube and detonating cord initiation, using four initiation patterns, keeping other parameters like burden, spacing,delay timing etc. same.

Jan 1, 2008

By Dave Proudfoot, Mike van Wyk

"There has akvays been plenty of discussion around the ‘accuracy of pyrotechnic detonators withmost recognised manufacturers claiming a variability of arourid 1% or less for their ‘superaccurate’ pyrotechnic based detonators. It is only now being understood that this 1% variabilitycan have serious adverse effects on blast performance. For example a 1% accurate 500millisecond shock tube detonator can fire anywhere between 485ms and 515ms. When wecouple these rather inaccurate ‘accurate’ detonators with short delays on surface, such as a 17millisecond connector, the probability of delay crowding and even out of sequence firing is quitehigh."

Jan 1, 1998

By C De La Cruz

The use of a thin-film piezoelectric stress gauge to determine the pressure profile in a detonating explosive has been demonstrated. These PVDF gauges have measured, in the borehole, the Chapman-Jouget pressure and the release adiabat of the detonation products for several explosives including ANFO and ANFO/emulsion mixtures. The technique can provide: (1) a direct measure of the blasting stimulus, (2) a sensitive QA tool for the blaster, and (3) a means to examine the magnitude and effects of preshock from adjacent bore holes. The PVDF pressure gauge is self powered, can measure pressure from a few bars to 400 kbars, has high time resolution (0.05 µsec), and is easy and economical to use.

Jan 1, 1997

By J T. Patterson

The mining, quarrying and construction industries are often blamed for causing damage to residential-type structures when explosives are used. The claim experience for blasting vibration damage has been poor. This coverage is excluded from the Comprehensive General Liability (CGL) policy. To obtain this coverage, the policyholder must meet additional criteria and an additional premium must be paid. The risk management process offers the explosives user a technique for minimizing the risk of complaints and vibration damage claims on his insurance program and his cash flow. Case histories indicate that the vibration damage claims expense may be a lower risk than the risk of interference with production and cash flow. An annotated bibliography on risk management and defense of vibration damage claims is provided.

Jan 1, 1978

By John W. Kopp, David E. Siskind

Over 4 billion pounds of commercial explosives are used by the U.S. mining industry every year with an excellent and improving safety record. However, accidents involving explosives are seldom minor. They produce a disproportionate amount of fatalities compared to other mining activities, as reflected in the relatively high severity rates. The U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) has been analyzing blasting accident data obtained from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) to determine the most frequent causes of mine blasting accidents, examining trends in these accidents, and identifying areas of needed research. This paper is an update of three previous blasting accident studies conducted on 4-year intervals by the USBM and published in 1983, 1987, and 1991, and is based on a total of 869 blasting accidents.

Jan 1, 1995

By B Mohanty

The current basis for rating of commercial explosives is examined, with particular emphasis on calculated bulk and weight strengths, detonation velocity and underwater energy measurement. The calculated strengths still form the basis for selecting explosives for most blasting applications, with the measured detonation parameters serving only as a measure of the quality of the explosive. The major drawbacks with this approach are discussed, in view of the non-ideal nature of commercial explosives and the field conditions prevalent during the blasting operation. A unified approach to rating explosives on the basis of blasting performance rather than calculated energy alone is presented for various types of explosives. This incorporates the relevant field parameters as well as the effect of non-ideal reactions, both of which affect explosive energy release and its transfer to target rock.

Jan 1, 1988

Blasting in a development heading or breasting operations starts from a cut. The void created by the cut provides a free face for the remainder of the round. It is the most critical part of the round because the later firing charges cannot pull to the desired depth unless the cut comes out as planned. The Burn cut is most commonly used in Canadian mines.

Jan 1, 1995

By Daniel Roy, Chris J. Preston, Ron J. Elliott

This paper discusses the use of pressure transducers in water filled boreholes in conjunction with surface mounted geophones to gather field data for in-situ dynamic rock properties determinations. A high speed collector is used to capture the data in the field. The calculated P and S wave velocities and rock density measurements are used as input into the Blastcalc program where the values of Young`s Modulus and Poissons Ratio are calculated. The rock properties information is used along with geological structural data and explosives properties in a 3-D blast modelling program to calculate predicted fragmentation distribution and other blast performance criteria based on the proposed blast design.

Jan 1, 1996

By Tom Hale

Developers and blasters are faced with increasing public demand and regulatory restrictions to maintain the lowest possible levels of noise and vibration from blasting operations in populated urban areas. Pyrotechnic products have proven to be a low noise, low vibration alternative to conventional blasting for close-in rock excavation and concrete demolition applications. Pyrotechnic breaking charges often yield 1/10th the vibration and noise compared to traditional explosives, and have been demonstrated to increase public confidence and decreased damage potential where they have replaced explosives, thus allowing new opportunities for work and greater job profitability. This paper presents a practical approach to utilizing pyrotechnic products in various applications including trenching, mass excavation, demolition, and dimension stone production, providing methodology for pattern design, vibration probability and loading calculations. Field research data is reviewed and compared to conventional explosives.

Jan 1, 2008

By John S. Manka

Of the various methods used to reduce the density of emulsion explosives prior to detonation; ammonium nitrate prill addition, glass micro-balloon addition and chemical gassing, chemical gassing is the method most often selected by emulsion explosive end users. Chemically gassing emulsions costs less than adding micro-balloons and chemically gassed emulsions have better water resistance than emulsions that add ammonium nitrate prills to reduce the bulk density. Unfortunately, the chemical gassing of emulsion explosives can be intricate and is often more art than a science. To gain a better understanding of chemical gassing, we investigated the factors that may affect the chemical gassing of emulsion explosives. Variables investigated as having an effect on gassing were the pH of the oxidizer phase, the amount and type of nitrogen in the emulsifier, the composition of the oxidizer phase, the use of pH buffers in the oxidizer phase, and how the gassing reagents are added to the emulsion.

Jan 1, 2004

By Brian W. Stump

The cessation of testing of any nuclear explosive devices in all environments is the goal of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. In order to assure compliance with such a treaty, an international monitoring system has been proposed. This system will include seismic, infrasound, hydroacoustic and radionucleide monitors located throughout the world. The goal of this system is the detection of any nuclear test. In preparation for this treaty, a series of monitoring system tests, focusing primarily on seismic observations, have been undertaken. The most recent of these tests, Group of Scientific Experts Technical Test Three (GSETT-3), provides valuable data for assessing future monitoring systems. During the course of this experiment, seismic events associated with earthquakes, nuclear explosions and mining explosions have been recorded. This presentation will discuss the numbers and types of mining explosions triggering the system, in a particular area. Possible implications for the mining industry will be explored.

Jan 1, 1997

By R L. Keller

Hong Kong has some of the most restrictive practices regarding blasting than any place in the world. Regulations regarding vibration limitations are 1 in/sec for structures and 0.5 in/sec (or even less) for most utilities; with no recognition of frequency response or adjustment. The Hong Kong Geotechnical Engineering Office has one of the most conservative approaches and protective guidelines for pre-blast assessment of slopes subjected to blast vibration (SEE paper '96). The protective measures to control flyrock generally required by the Mines Division are additionally very stringent. It is not uncommon for the costs associated with protective measures or methods which must be employed to exceed the cost of the drilling and blasting itself - or to waiver blasting application unfeasible altogether. From these restrictions it can easily be imagined how blasting in this urban environment would be most challenging.

Jan 1, 1997

By Chuck Kliche, Bill Clements

This paper relates some of the experiences, good and bad, of blasting adjacent to residences of the primary author during his 15+ years of field blasting in the Northern Great Plains region. During this highly-rewarding blasting career, the author has become aware of two major issues in residential blasting: 1) What we call “Risk/Reward Ratio.”Some questions that must be asked by the blaster prior to taking on any blasting job include: - Can we eliminate or minimize the risk? - Is the reward worth the risk? - Do I have a measure of “nervous confidence” about the shot? 2) Public Relations. Two key elements to public relations are: - Notification - Education All the education in the world to the adjacent populous of what’s happening, of blasting in general, or of what to expect from the blasting does little good without notification. Good public relations is a key to controlling the cost of liability in a litigious society.

Jan 1, 2009

By Paul Worsey, Randall Franklin

This paper is based on an undergraduate research project undertaken for the explosives emphasis in the UMR mining engineering degree program by the first author. The purpose of the selected research topic was to investigate the impact sensitivity of commercial detonators to determine their relative safety for handling and how much abuse they can take without accidentally firing. A modified BAM tester was used for the investigation. Both electric and non electric detonators were impacted at incremental positions along their length to determine the relative effect of their various components. Repeat impact tests were also conducted to see how a damaged cap would react to repeated abuse. The results indicate that it takes a significant amount of impact energy to initiate commercial detonators. They also indicate that repeated abuse can increase sensitivity. Modern commercial detonators appear to be relatively insensitive to impact (an order of magnitude above RDX in the standard BAM test) and this is mainly due to their construction. This explains why damaged caps with exposed powder are more sensitive. Their measured insensitivity correlates with rough handling not being a major cause of blasting accidents.

Jan 1, 2004

By Lee Wehner, Daryl Kin, John Bolger

The Maumee Quarry, located in the city of Maumee, Ohio, has large in-situ cavities, ranging in size from 3 ft (.91 m) in diameter to over 15 ft (4.5 m). The drill/blast team challenge is to drill, load and shoot the geologically disturbed rock in a safe, cost efficient manner, while in close proximity to a commercial area. A continuous improvement process, managed by a Blast Optimization Team (BOT), was implemented to quantify the innovative explosive loading techniques that have been implemented. Borehole camera monitoring, modified loading practices, the need for accurate drill hole logging and open communications between the drill and blast crew proves critical to the success of the operation. Safe Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs) have been developed and are strictly enforced for the drill/blast cycle. All blasts are monitored with seismographs and recorded on video to provide detailed information as part of the Blast Management Plan. Despite the geological challenges, the measurement of rock fragmentation index versus loader dig rates has provided near optimal crusher throughput.

Jan 1, 2007

By D Anonby

The Fox Pit at EKATI Diamond Mine is designed with 11 m wide benches excavated using a double benching technique leaving 30 m high faces. Blasting tests were conducted to increase the percentage of benches that meet an 11 m catch width. The subdrill depth for the lower bench trim blasts and the blasthole diameter for the upper bench trim blasts were reduced to maintain the bench crests. Raising the lower trim blastholes by 0.5 m decreases the depth of broken rock below the final bench elevation, and consequently reduces damage to rock that forms the bench crest below. The use of smaller diameter (165 mm vs. 270 mm) blastholes in the A and B rows for the upper trim blast reduces the charge per delay during detonation, reduces the powder factor slightly, and reduces the energy affecting the final pit wall and crest.

Jan 1, 2007

By Jikai Rong Changai Liu

The dig instrument by blasting is a,new product we developed(See Fig. 1) It is an apparatus to dig hole at the ground. It is composed of combustor A, combustor B, charge pipe and shock head. Work characteristics of Combustor A are that combustion time is 1. 5 seconds, driving force is 725kg. Work characteristics of combustor B are that the combustion time is 1. 3 seconds, driving force is 460kg. After the combustor is ignited, the charge pipe is drived into ground immediately. Then, whole dig instrument is threw out automatically, but explosive in charge pipe is left in ground and blast in the twinkling. The diameter of vertical hole formed by blasting is 3cm to 60cm which is controlled according to engineering requirement. The maximum depth of the hole diged by using the dig instrument is 2M. It applies to blindage of single solidier in military affairs, and hole planting pole as well as sewer in civil use and so on. The two shots are charged in combustors to dig a hole. The maximum weight of shot is 490g, minimum is 130g. The whole process diging hole is completed automatically in about ten seconds.

Jan 1, 1998

By Andrew Ritter, Victor I. Montenyohl, Stephen R. Winzer

Thirty-seven open pit production blasting operations have been monitored using high-speed cameras running between 500 and 7000 frames per second. Analysis of the resulting films reveals irregularities in timing including sequencing errors and crowding (holes firing less than 8 ms apart), confirming results of laboratory testing of ms delay blasting caps (Winzer, 1978). Where blasting parameters are otherwise constant and within recommended guidelines (stemming, spacing, burden, etc.), timing problems dominate the overall performance of the blasting operation. Model tests in layered Homalite 100, designed to simulate joint or bedding planes in rock, indicate the importance of the stress waves generated by the explosive in developing the crack network which is ultimately responsible for the fragmentation seen in the resulting muckpile. These mechanisms are strongly supported by high-speed film studies at Pinesburg, Maryland. Experiments in controlling relief in deep shots (where depth approaches the lateral extent of the bench blasted) using borehole geometry and hybrid initiation systems (electronic timer and pyrotechnic delays) were carried out. The results suggest that the 1 me/ft. of burden guideline developed by Bergmann et aI., 1974 is too short, and that much longer times are necessary to optimize fragmentation and muck digability. Longer times are found to reduce noise, vibration, and flyrock.

Jan 1, 1979