Search Documents

Donald H, McLaughlin San Francisco, Calif PAST PRESIDENTS W E Wrather, Washington, D C L E Young, Pittsburgh, Pa VICE-PRESIDENTS C Harry Benedict, Lake Linden, Mich A B Kinzel, New York, N Y Philip Kraft, New York, N Y C V Millikan, Tulsa, Okla RoRobert W Thomas, Boy, Ariz VICE-PRESIDENT AND TREASURER Andrew Fletcher, New York, N Y

Jan 1, 1952

For the year ending February, 1919 PRESIDENT SIDNEY .J. JENNINGS NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS L. D. RICKETTS, NEW YORK, N. Y. PHILIP N. MOORE, ST.Louis, Mo. FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT C. W. GOODALE BUTTE, MONT. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE, : NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY' EMERITUS ROSSITER W. RAYMOND NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON, NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 10, 1918

PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL. D. W. BRUNTON DENVER, COLO. (Term expires February, 1910 ) VICE-PRESIDENTS OF THE COUNCIL. J. PARKE CHANNING NEW YORK, N. Y. FREDERICK W. DENTON PAINESDALE, MICH. JOHN B. FARISH NEW YORK, N. Y. (Term expires February, 1910 ) W. C. RALSTON SAN FRANCISCO, CAL. W. L. SAUNDERS NEW YORK, N. Y. H. V. WINCHELL MINNEAPOLIS, MINK. (Term expires February, 1911 )

Jan 1, 1910

President-Mrs Andrew E Beer, 25 Sutton Place at 58th Street, New York 22, N Y. First Vice-President-Mrs. Edward H Thaete, Schuyler House, Fort Hill Village, Scarsdale, N. Y. Second Vice-President-Mrs Michael L Haider, 3 East 84th Street, New York 28, N. Y. Third Vice-President-Mrs Stephen Krickovic, 2275 Country Club Drive, Bridgeville, Pa

Jan 1, 1960

For the year ending February, 1918 PRESIDENT SIDNEY J. JENNINGS, NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS L. D: RICKETTS, ; . , . NEW YORK, N. Y. PHILIP N. MOORE, , ST. Louis, Mo FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT C. W. GOODALE, . . . . BUTTE, MONT. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY EMERITUS ROSSITER W. RAYMOND,. NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 3, 1918

For. the year ending February, 1919 PRESIDENT SIDNEY J. JENNINGS NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS L. D. RICKETTS NEW YORK, N. Y. PHILIP N. MOORE, ST. LOUIS, M.O. FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT C. W. GOODALE, BUTTE, MONT. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE, NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY EMERITUS ROSSITER W. RAYMOND, NEW YORK, N.Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 8, 1918

E. O?C. Acker Jinzoc Adachi Truman H. Aldrich Walter H. Aldridge Anson W. Allen John H. Allen William R. Appleby W. Lawrence Austin W. S. Ayres David Baker John Henry Banks Henry C. Banon Alonzo F. Bardwell Wm de L. Benedict Robert Bentley Andrew A Blair Walter M. Brodie Elwin F. Brown Fredrick Burbidge H.H. Burden Charles Butters

Jan 1, 1941

PRESIDENT WILLIAM L. SAUNDERS,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS CHARLES F. RAND,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. BENJAMIN B. THAYER,3 NEW YORK, N. Y. FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT PHILIP N. MOORE,1 ST. Louis, Mo. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY EMERITUS ROSSITER W. RAYMOND NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 9, 1915

E. O?C. Acker Jinzoc Adachi Truman H. Aldrich Walter H. Aldridge Anson W. Allen John H. Allen William R. Appleby W. Lawrence Austin W. S. Ayres David Baker John Henry Banks Henry C. Banon Alonzo F. Bardwell Wm de L. Benedict Robert Bentley Andrew A Blair Walter M. Brodie Elwin F. Brown Fredrick Burbidge H.H. Burden Charles Butters

Jan 1, 1942

For the year ending February, 1919 PRESIDENT SIDNEY J. JENNINGS NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS L. D. RICKETTS NEW YORK, N. Y. PHILIP N. MOORE ST. Louis, Mo. FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT C. W. GOODALE BUTTE, MONT. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE, NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY EMERITUS ROSSITER W. RAYMOND, NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 9, 1918

PRESIDENT WILLIAM L. SAUNDERS,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS CHARLES F. RAND,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. BENJAMIN B. THAYER,2 NEW YORK, N. Y. FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT PHILIP N. MOORE,1 ..... ST. Louis, Mo. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE,' NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY EMERITUS , ROSSITER W. RAYMOND, NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 7, 1915

PRESIDENTS DAVID THOMAS 1871 R W RAYMOND 1872-1874 A L HOLLEY1875 ABRAM S HEWITT 1876 T STERRY HUNT 1877 ECKLEY B COXE 1878 - 1879 WILLIAM P SHINN 1880 WILLIAM METCALF 1881 RICHARD P ROTHWELL 1882 ROBERY W HUNT 1883 JAMES C, BAYLES 1884-1885 ROBERT H RICHARDS 1886 THOMAS EGLESTON 1887 WILLIAM B POTTER 1888 RICHARD PEARCE 1889

Jan 1, 1923

PRESIDENT WILLIAM L. SAUNDERS,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. PAST PRESIDENTS CHARLES F. RAND,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. BENJAMIN B. THAYER,3 NEW YORK, N. Y. FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT PHILIP N. MOORE,1 ST. Louis, Mo. TREASURER GEORGE C. STONE,1 NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY EMERITUS ROSSITER W. RAYMOND NEW YORK, N. Y. SECRETARY BRADLEY STOUGHTON NEW YORK, N. Y.

Jan 8, 1915

PRESIDENT L E Young', Pittsburgh, Pa PAST PRESIDENTS Clyde Williams, Columbus, Ohio W. E Wrather, Washington, D C VICE-PRESIDENTS Robert W Thomas', Ray, Ariz C Harry Benedict, Lake Linden, Mich D H McLaughlin, San Francisco, Calif A B Kinzel, New York, N Y Philip Kraft, New York, N Y VICE-PRESIDENT AND TREASURER Andrew Fletcher, New York, N Y

Jan 1, 1949

The following persons were appointed as representatives of this Institute on, the American Committee on Engineering Standards.: George C. Stone, J. W. Richards, Arthur L. Walker. The Secretary presented a request from the Engineering Council that the representatives of the Institute be arranged in the dicier of retirement so that one would retire in 1918, two in 1919, and two in 1920. The

Jan 9, 1917

C. H. MATHEWSON, Chairman SAM TOUR, Past-chairman W. A. SCHEUCH, Vice-chairman T. S. FULLER, Vice-chairman W. M. CORSE, Secretary-Treasurer 810 Eighteenth St., N. W. Washington, D. C. Executive Committee J. L. CHRISTIE ARTHUR PHILLIPS E. H. Dix, JR. GUY C. RIDDELL W. M. PRIRCE J. WALTER SCOTT' A. J. PHILLIPS' H. M. WILLIAMS EL M. WISE

Jan 1, 1932

COMMITTEES. Precious and Base Metals. Charles W. Goodale, Chairman.. L. D. Ricketts, Vice-Chairman Darsie C. Bard, Secretary, Montana State School of Mines, Butte, Mont. Leonard S. Austin, Thomas J. Grier, Willet G. Miller, David W. Brunton, Hennen Jennings, Albert F. Schneider, Theodore B. Comstock, Edmund B. Kirby, George C. Stone, Stanley A. Easton, Charles W. Merrill, Benjamin B. Thayer. Samuel S. Fowler,

Jan 11, 1913

By A. Weiss, W. A. Coster

The search for ore is characterized by a great variety of uncertainties, each of which can be resolved by obtaining information at a cost. Three exploration stages may be distinguished in which information can be obtained, based on inherently different cost structure: 1) the reconnaissance or scanning stage, 2) the examination or screening stage and 3) the project stage. This exploration sequence would roughly coincide with replies to questions as to: where, how, why and how much. As complete information in each stage is too costly to acquire, we must assess the probability that adequate information will be furnished by a limited amount of effort and attempt to maximize the expected value of ore to be found for a given exploration expenditure. Several problems are discussed relative to the mathematical formulation and possible computer procedures for determining the optimum allocation of a total exploration effort. Based on the available literature possible solutions to this problem are indicated. When scanning through published literature on mineral exploration, it seems at first that there is little room for substantial and systematic improvements in the efficiency with which the problem of discovery of new ore deposits is presently being handled by large organizations active in exploration. It appears equally difficult to offer something relevantly new which could generate a break-through in exploration thinking and cause a marked improvement in the ratio of successful undertakings to the total exploration projects started. On the other hand, a number of experts in recent years have urged that the problems in prospecting be analyzed in a more skillful and sophisticated manner than in the past. Their thesis is based mainly on the premise that the cost of finding mineral deposits will increase with increasing technical difficulties. In present large-scale exploration ventures, especially in those regions where outcrops and immediately visible geologic evidence are scarce, older methods of prospecting are increasingly being replaced by more indirect and systematic geophysical and geochemical methods with more emphasis on correct statistical design of exploration patterns. It is perhaps the oil industry which has made the greatest strides in developing statistically, well justified patterns in its search for oil; possibly because oil seepages, as indicators of the presence of oil, left off at an earlier point in time than did outcrops as indicators of base metals. Among the pioneers in the field of statistics and operations research, as applied to mineral exploration, the excellent works of Allais, Slichter, Koop-man, Mickey, de Guhnin, Krumbein, Griffith, Sichel, Krige, de Wijs, and Matheron may be mentioned. It should, however, be pointed out that three subjects of basic importance to the allocation of exploration efforts have so far received only scant attention in published literature, even by the aforementioned authors. In the first place, a more precise definition of the object of the search, i.e., a minimum-size orebody, seems to be outstanding. Secondly, a decision model is not a widely-discussed subject. Thirdly, no concentrated attempt so far seems to have been made to establish probabilities of the occurrence of economic deposits on a regional scale and to arrive at a slightly more accurate knowledge of the probability laws governing the deposition of ore. It is not the purpose of this paper to create new order in the complexity of uncertainties in which our decision processes in exploration necessarily have to be conducted. Rather, we intend to highlight some of the outstanding, hitherto unmapped territory, where diligent compilation and a utilization of present and historic data may statistically improve our chances of success. We hope that the contribution of this paper will lie in bringing allocation problems into better focus and in increasing the mineral industry's realization of the magnitude of the factors involved. THE MINIMUM-SIZE OREBODY The concept of target specifications for what constitute a minimum-size orebody in exploration is a rather variable one and depends to some extent on

Jan 1, 1963

By Theodore B. Comstock

The existing topographical features of the United States present many points of interest to the student of dynamical geology, but there is, perhaps, no subject which offers a more promising field for investigation than the relations between the geological structure and the mineralogical characteristics of the principal mining districts. There are seven prominent culminating points in the relief of North America, each one of which can be used as a type of the physical features of all the others. Again, if we divide these seven elevated districts into two sets, we shall discover a still more striking parallelism between the individual members of each group. But the most remarkable revelation is the fact that each one of these points is more or less closely the centre of an area of economically important mineral resources. It is interesting to note in this connection that six of these mineral tracts lie mainly within the borders of the United States, three of them being almost wholly in our territory. For

Jan 1, 1883

By C. F. Wang

Page I. Introduction............:.............. 395 Manchuria in General ....................... 395 Pen-hsi-hu............................ 397 Pen-hsi-hu Coal & Iron Co., Ltd................... 399 I1. organization........................... 400 III. Coal Deposit........................... 402 Location..............................402 Geology............................. 403 Coal Mining...........'.................. 404 Mining Methods........................407 Mining Cost.........................408 IV. Coal Washing Plant.......................408 V. Coking Plant..........................410 VI. Iron Deposit...........................413 Magnetite Belt.......................... 413 Origin of Deposit......................... 414 Iron Mining........................... 415 VII. Concentration Plant........................ 417 VIII. Briquetting Plant.......................... 418 IX. Blast-furnace Smelting...................... 418 iNTKODtrCTION Manchuria in General Manchuria. called the "Three Eastern Provinces" in Chinese. forms the northeastern corner of China and is bordered by Siberia on the north and northeast. and by Korea on the east. It is a land famous in Chinese annals as the place of origin of the Ching dynasty. and in more recent times it has bcen an arena for diplomatic maneuvering and commercial competition between the Russians. advancing from the north. and the Japanese from the southeast. It derives its name of "three eastern provinces" from the fact that it is divided into three provinces; Hei-

Jan 1, 1918