Search Documents

By R. J. Cefalo

Blast and mining spillover between phases or critical areas of the pit is a continuing problem in the mining industry and a safety concern for operating mines. The challenge for many mines is to produce the highest value in the shortest amount of time for any project. For any project, the top priority of any mine is producing ore as fast as possible. The next challenge is to keep that ore feed continuous. To achieve continuous ore feed, pits are designed with multiple phases that are connected and are mined at different elevations. This difference in elevation causes dangers with spillover between the phases during mining, drilling, and blasting. This paper covers an incident that occurred at an active mine and the work completed in creating a spillover control program over an active mining phase. The drill and blast technical group was responsible for creating blast patterns to reduce spillover between these phases. Unrealistic goals and expectations were initially set for the area of the pit. The drill and blast technical group needed to figure blast objectives and work with the geotechnical team to align with these goals. This paper will go over the executed example of setting up spillover targets and expectations for multiple sections of an operating mine. Different sections of the pit had different control measures and blast objectives due to narrow laybacks and double benching. The use and value of blast objectives and goals were beneficial in setting expectations and measuring design success. Having unrealistic blast goals can set up the operations to fail or get frustrated in trying to work on an impossible task. The problems and risks of phase interactions for many open pit operations need to be considered in the design process, along with designed controls that minimize the probability of any safety incident. Mine designs are being created in the industry and do not consider phase-to-phase mining interaction and the impact it would have on safety or production. The best future for safer mines is blast patterns that reduce spillover between phases of mining and pit designs that might account for spillover interaction.

Jan 1, 2024

By Eduardo Gonzalez Fernandez, Jaime Rios Vazquez

This report substantiates the connection that always exists between explosives and vibrations and draws attention to low frequency vibrations, which are the moat dangerous for the structures affected.

Jan 1, 1986

By C Yeung, G Fitz, R Heater, P D. Katsabanis

Explosives malfunction due to shock waves is a serious concern for successful blasting results. Malfunction can range from sympathetic detonation to desensitization and modification of firing times of conventional pyrotechnic detonators.

Jan 1, 1994

By Larry R. Fletcher

Excessive flyrock, which is blasted rock that travels beyond the secured blast area, is responsible for 25 pct of the blasting injuries that occur in surface mining. Excessive flyrock is also a frequent cause of damage to mine equipment and facilities.

Jan 1, 1986

By P D. Katsabanis

Explosives malfunction due to shock waves is a serious concern for successful blasting results. Malfunction includes sympathetic detonation and desensitization of explosive charges as well as the modification of firing times of conventional pyrotechnic detonators.

Jan 1, 1995

By Rob Farnfield

The control of vibration from surface mine blasting by the application of detonator (cap) delay techniques has been universally accepted for many years. For almost as long it has been known that, for delay techniques to be effective, a minimum of 8 milliseconds delay must exist between blast holes.

Jan 1, 1999

By Jay P. Tobin

This paper will address the legal standards applicable to construction blasting lawsuits and offer best practices suggestions for pre-blast inspections, documenting the construction blasting work, recordkeeping, and effectively participating and partnering in the defense of a construction blasting lawsuit.

Jan 1, 2015

By Rodney C. Espley-Jones, John C. B Wilson

South Africa is well known for its shaft sinking exploits, and many of the world's biggest and deepest shafts are to be found there. Blasting practice differs in a number of respects from that followed elsewhere.

Jan 1, 1979

By William C. Geitz, Dan Fitzgibbon

Lightning has always posed a serious threat to blasting operations, especially within the mining and construction industries. In recent years, technological advancements in communications systems and microprocessors have significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of lightning detection and warning instrumentation. These advancements have increased the availability of highly reliable, accurate and affordable systems for use within the explosives arena.

Jan 1, 1991

By Carl Hendricks

AQUILA Mining Systems Ltd. is the world leader in drill monitoring, control and GPS based drill navigation systems for the mining industry. This paper will review the general design and application of AQUILA.s drill systems currently in use throughout the world and the key benefits that derive through their use.

Jan 1, 2002

By Dale S. Preece, J Paul Tidman, Stephen H. Chung

A discrete element computer program named DMC_BLAST (Distinct Motion Code) has been under development since 1987 for modeling rock blasting (Preece & Taylor, 1989). This program employs explicit time integration and uses spherical or cylindrical elements that are represented as circles in 2-D. DMC_BLAST calculations compare favorably with data from actual bench blasts (Preece et al, 1993).

Jan 1, 1997

By Cathy McGinley, John Mullay, Clark Stancavage

The use of crater studies to evaluate explosive performance is a well-established practice in the Blasting Industry. Normally, this work utilizes larger charge sizes (>75mm) in order to minimize the influence of geological factors adjacent to the borehole. This can impose unwanted restrictions in the experimental factors accessible to investigation. Thus, for example, systematic studies of non-ideal performance in a somewhat practical setting is rendered quite difficult.

Jan 1, 1995

By Qingshou Chen, Paul N. Worsey

It has been recently argued that rock strength has little effect on the final results of pre-split blasting and is of only minor importance when blasting rock in general. However, it can be shown that the maximum borehole separation for optimal perimeter blasting results with constant borehole and loading configuration is strongly dependent on the tensile strength of the rock.

Jan 1, 1986

By Conny Postupack, Jim Petrunyak, John Loope

The authors discuss the concepts, engineering considerations, and cost relationships involved in the use of drilling and blasting to accomplish backfilling and reclamation with minimum use of mechanical equipment. The four methods of reclamation now in use are reviewed, and their advantages and disadvantages are noted. Guidelines for selecting a particular method are offered in terms of applicability under varying geologic, economic, and technological conditions.

Jan 1, 1987

By S A. Steyn, I P. Douglas

Duvha Opencast is a large South African dragline operation supplying coal to the Duvha Power Station which is operated by Eskom, the state power utility. For Duvha to remain competitive with other collieries, it has proved necessary to continuously examine and investigate methods of reducing costs. With explosives representing a major portion of the total working costs, blasting is an obvious area of investigation.

Jan 1, 1991

By Cameron McKenzie, John Heilig, Patrick Andrieux, Andree Drolet

It is widely accepted that both underground and surface blasting operations can de-stabilise excavations to the point where it can threaten the feasibility of mining through personnel safety or OK dilution. Research has been undertaken to outline a practical method in which the impact of blasting will be accounted for during the early excavation design stage by modelling, and during the following production stages by monitoring rock response to blasting operations.

Jan 1, 1994

By Conny Postupack, Jim Petrunyak, John Hope

The authors discuss the concepts, engineering considerations, and cost relationships involved in the use of drilling and blasting to accomplish backfilling and reclamation with minimum use of mechanical equipment. The four xchods o f reclsnacisn now in use are reviewed, and their advantages and disadvanrages a r e nocea. Guidelines for seleccrng a particular method are offered in terms of applicability under varying geologic, economic, and technological condirions.

Jan 1, 1989

By Karl Kure, Anders M. Heltzen

Mixtures of prilled ANFO and 0,5 - 3 mm polystyrene balls are interesting substitutes to the tube charges or other types of reduced explosives or detonation fuses. Experiments have shown detonation ability even of a mixture of 95% bolt polystyrene balls and 5% ANFO. The gas and shock energy in the mixtures decrease proportional with the content of polystyrene. The detonation velocity shows higher values than expected for mixtures with more than 50% (vol.) ANFO.

Jan 1, 1980

By J Mensah, G C. Sen

Often large boulders of rock have to be fragmented in civil or mining engineering operations. These oversize boulders are encountered after primary blasts in both surface and underground excavations of minerals. Various methods are employed to break large boulders into a manageable size for loading and crushing. These methods range from mechanical breaking (such as drop-ball and hydraulic impactor) to the use of explosives. Apart from these, static agents (such as expanding chemicals) are used in special circumstances.

Jan 1, 1989

By Lars Osen

Both fragmentation and safety can be improved by following proper procedures in loading boreholes. Proper loading procedures such as primer location, borehole sealing, decking, and stemming along with the hazards of dropping on primers are presented. Discussions follow on the reason for the use of each procedure along with the possible consequences such as hazards, misfires, or poor fragmentation.

Jan 1, 1985