Search Documents

By Michael E. Kovach

This discussion is an overview of an approach to drilling and blasting angle holes at Martin Marietta Aggregates. Method of determining burdens, hole depths, angle settings and explosive selection will be discussed in detail with an emphasis on safety and production. Such techniques and methods involve the use of hand-held surveying instruments such as the Abney level, pocket transit and inclinometer along with measuring tape and burden pole. An interesting method developed by Oscar Banfield a retired Martin Marietta and E. I. duPont engineer, for setting the proper angle on a drill will also be presented. This treatise is a discussion of the use of simple yet important tools and techniques a blaster should use to resolve both routine and complex problems encountered during quarry blasting operations.

Jan 1, 1992

By Edward J. Walter

A vibration record is a complex of motions resulting from a combination of direct, reflected and refracted seismic energy that originated at a blast source. Multiple hole blasting using delays further complicates the motion in that overlapping of seismic wave trains may occur when delays do not fire in the programed sequence. This can result in variations in amplitude, frequency and wave-1ength of the vibration. Amplitude may be doubled, frequency may oscillate between the highest and lowest frequencies present and wave-length may approach doubling of the longest wave-length present. These effects can present serious problems to conducting a safe blasting program since increased amplitudes and lower frequencies present higher damage potentials for structures. The development of these effects is described and illustrated graphically to show how these effects can occur.

Jan 1, 1989

By Douglas Lindsey, Glenn Hazen, Shad Sargand

"With the innovation of computational equipment, an exact analysis of structures as dynamic systems is more approachable. Accordingly, the dynamic system can be established, if the natural characteristics such as the natural frequency and the damping fraction of a system are known. Through dynamic analysis, the response of a structure can be predicted from ground vibration, and it becomes possible to forecast the damage potential to the structure with reasonable accuracy. Most vibration will appear as single harmonic or superposition of waves that consists of several harmonics with different frequencies. A vibration signal can be expressed, therefore, as the function of sine waves. If a signal is periodic, the particular harmonic with the smallest frequency will befundamental and frequency of the others will be multiples of the fundamental frequency."

Jan 1, 1993

By Dale Preece, Stephen Chung

Development of DMCBLAST-3D is continuing and now includes the capability to simulate the detonation of multiple blastholes in multiple rows that make up a conventional bench blast, either in a rock quarry or a surface coal mine. DMCBLAST-3D is a three-dimensional extension of the proven twodimensional rock blast modeling code, DMCBLAST. DMCBLAST has been under development since 1987 and has successfully predicted the physics, mechanisms and results of a number of different types of rock blasting including, coal mine bench blasting, mineral mine choke blasting and underground stope blasting. Substantial effort has gone into the qualification and verification of DMCBLAST by comparing computer code predictions with real blasts in the field. Comparison with field data has also provided significant guidance to the development of the code.

Jan 1, 2002

By John W. Kopp, David E. Siskind

Over 4 billion pounds of commercial explosives are used by the U.S. mining industry every year with an excellent and improving safety record. However, accidents involving explosives are seldom minor. They produce a disproportionate amount of fatalities compared to other mining activities, as reflected in the relatively high severity rates. The U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) has been analyzing blasting accident data obtained from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) to determine the most frequent causes of mine blasting accidents, examining trends in these accidents, and identifying areas of needed research. This paper is an update of three previous blasting accident studies conducted on 4-year intervals by the USBM and published in 1983, 1987, and 1991, and is based on a total of 869 blasting accidents.

Jan 1, 1995

By Sanjay Sengar, Nabiullah Pingua, Saurabh Sahay

In India, more than 80 percent of the total of 557 million metric ton coal production comes from open-cast mines involving large overburden removal with average 1:3.5 stripping ratio which is going to in-crease in future. This operation consumes nearly 0.5 million metric ton explosives consisting of 80-85 percent bulk explosives and remaining 15 to 20 percent non-permitted large diameter explosives. Quali-ties of bulk explosives play an important role in rock blasting. Post blast results like poor fragmentation, tight mucking, toe problems, improper muck profile and lower productivity of mine may require chang-es in explosive loading factor (amount of explosive used per unit of rock blasted ). The explosive load-ing factor is an extremely important index to assess the economy of blasting operation.

Jan 1, 2014

By B Mohanty

The current basis for rating of commercial explosives is examined, with particular emphasis on calculated bulk and weight strengths, detonation velocity and underwater energy measurement. The calculated strengths still form the basis for selecting explosives for most blasting applications, with the measured detonation parameters serving only as a measure of the quality of the explosive. The major drawbacks with this approach are discussed, in view of the non-ideal nature of commercial explosives and the field conditions prevalent during the blasting operation. A unified approach to rating explosives on the basis of blasting performance rather than calculated energy alone is presented for various types of explosives. This incorporates the relevant field parameters as well as the effect of non-ideal reactions, both of which affect explosive energy release and its transfer to target rock.

Jan 1, 1988

By W C. Burkle

A rather common observation over the last several decades at least has been that rock or ore properties influence blasting results more than does the explosive type that has been used in the blast. It we accept that premise than it is held here that the material to be blasted should receive even closer attention as to its properties. Several years ago, Dr. Richard Ash published papers that pointed out the rock properties that mostly influence blasting. These principles are given attention in this paper. We have gone somewhat further - or lets say expanded this subject in regard to the role of rock structure in open pit blasting. Though open pit work is given some prominence, we believe that much can be observed and applied to underground mining.

Jan 1, 1979

By Terry Nichols, Karl E: Warkwick Burgher, Charles J. Wideman

The application of Fourier spectral analysis to records of ground vibration generated by over 100 explosions from an open pit mine is used to develop empirical predictor equations that relate the response spectra to the blasting parameters used to generate the excitation motion. Time series representations of ground particle velocity are transformed into the frequency domain where the appropriate modifications are made such that the inverse Fourier transform yields the time series representation of particle displacement and acceleration. Compensations are made for the transform function of the recording system in the frequency domain. Spectral analysis of the three types of ground motion is correlated with the blasting parameters. The results show that the frequency content of ground vibrations generated from a mine blast can be quantified in terms of the predictor equations.

Jan 1, 1990

By W. J. Birch

The dedicated documenting of blast design and vibration monitoring results forms part of the best practice methodology for today’s blasting operators. This allows regression curves to be constantly updated and in turn compatible charge weight determinations are based upon the most current data. The point can arise however when so much data becomes agglomerated that variations in blast design, geology or monitoring location response and their effects can pass unobserved and start to have an adverse effect on the forecasting capability of the regression due to a deterioration of the standard error statistic. The simple solution would be to only compile like-for-like blasting returns, but this prospect can quickly become unworkable due to the number of potential variables. In addition it is very difficult to spot subtle variations by simply examining a standard scaled-distance curve mainly due to the intrinsic data scatter that is always present together with the logarithmic nature of the regression curve. If indeed a variation is thought to be apparent, how can the degree and magnitude of its influence to be quantified? The Likelihood Ratio Test when applied to regression data can diagnose subtle variations between data sub-sets and provides a comparative statistic as to the degree of variation. By analysing datasets in such a way, levels of compatibility are obtained, indicating which sets can be combined in order to increase prediction capability.

Jan 1, 2004

By C. Lownds, U. Steiner

In 2008 a paper from the same source describing four actual cases of exposure of electronic detonators to lightning strikes was presented. It was shown that electronic detonators, like other initiation systems, are vulnerable to very close or direct lightning strikes. At the time of submitting this abstract no further incidents with lightning have been experienced. As a result of those original incidents, and in order to understand how the safety devices inside electronic detonators break down, two series of tests have been done, each with 2 detonator designs. In the first series detonators were subjected to capacitor discharges up to 6kV and 1kJ in energy. In the second series the intensity was increased to 800kV and 24kJ in energy. In the second series, more electrical energy was delivered to the detonator assembly than the explosive energy of the detonator. In both series both detonators showed a spectacular ability to resist very high discharge energies. The tests are described in detail with supporting photographs. The data for both pin-to-pin and pin-to-case (more relevant to lightning) are presented and discussed. The mechanism of breakdown of safety devices is now understood better and the learning is being used to design more robust products. This high-voltage testing is relevant in understanding how electronic detonators might initiate as a result of a very close or direct lightning strike 1. Orica

Jan 1, 2009

By Paul Worsey, Braden Lusk, Seokbin Lim

This paper discusses the theory and experiment involved in the discovery of the mechanisms of Linear Shaped Charges, which are much different from those for Conical Shaped Charges. Linear Shaped Charges (LSC) have been assumed to function in the same manner as Conical Shaped Charges (CSC) in the published literature on the subject. Much work has been done on CSC for military purposes, but there is limited information about the mechanics of LSC. Previous theories have cited the formation of a Monroe Jet as the dominant process. The Monroe Effect describes what happens to a target below the charge following detonation of the charge, and prescribes a fluid jet process for penetration. The fluid jet comprised of the liner material is the cutting device in CSC and has been extensively studied. Recent work at the University of Missouri at Rolla (UMR) cutting concrete with LSC has surprisingly shown that there is not a fluid jet process in LSC. After completing several reinforced concrete penetration tests, minimally deformed copper blades were found in the debris. Initially, the blades were suspected to be misfires or malfunctioned charge remnants. However, results were good and blades were found after every single test. Upon closer inspection, the ribbons were found to be folded copper and they were suspected to be the bottom liner of the LSC. A test series was conducted to verify the new theory by experiment.

Jan 1, 2005

By Steven D. Sandbrook

A man by the name of Louis Binstock once said, “Too often the shortcut, the line of least resistance, is responsible for evanescent and unsatisfactory success.”

Jan 1, 2015

By Mark William Withey

Blasting safety in surface mining is a necessary industrial goal. Proper techniques and disciplines exercised during the blasting process enhance the probability of achieving that goal.

Jan 1, 1995

By Catherine Johnson, Barbara Rutter

The shock tunnel located at the Missouri University of Science and Technology Experimental Mine is 65 feet 9 inches (20.0406 m) in length. The tests performed inside of this tunnel are either arena tests or shock interaction and transfer (SIT) tests. Arena tests simulate a large open air blast, with lower explosive weights, by elongating the impulse of the blast wave. SIT tests are conducted to determine how the produced shock wave interacts and transfers its energy into a target object located at the end of the tunnel. The target used in this research is multilayered, with each layer being a different material. The targets are 2 ft. by 4 ft. (0.6096m by 1.2192m) pieces of Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF), DOW polystyrene foam insulation, and gypsum drywall. The order of these materials varies with each test. This shock tunnel is unique, because the geometry changes along its length. To fully understand how the shock waves are affected by these changes, a working model was needed. The second purpose of this model is to confirm the maximum charge size of 400 grams (14.11 oz.) of C4 that can be detonated inside the tunnel without causing damage to or failure of the tunnel, thus reducing the amount of time needed in downtime and repair. The model predicts pressures in various locations both within the tunnel and the attached target, thus assisting in determining where failures would likely occur. In the process of generating this model, several problems were encountered, including filling the tunnel with air, meshing the complex geometry, and creating the tunnel in a CAD system. This paper will discuss how these problems were solved. A working model was created by using ANSYS Explicit Dynamics and ANSYS Autodyn. The tunnel geometry file was created using SolidWorks and includes the complex geometry changes along with the target and its mount located at the end of the tunnel. The results produced by the model were compared to the field SIT tests. The comparison of the results from both the model and the experimental testing showed a similar trend in the pressure traces.

Jan 1, 2018

By Kurt Oakes, John Williams

Placer Dome, US operates the Bald Mountain Mine. The Bald Mountain Mine is a surface operation located in remote northwestern White Pine County in east-central Nevada, approximately midway between Elko and Ely. The mine is in the Newark Valley along the southwestern flank of Bald Mountain a part of the Ruby Mountain range, at an approximate elevation of 7,500 ft (2,286 m). The geology at the Bald Mountain Mine is highly altered, both mineralogically, and structurally. Highwall stability and control have long been an issue at the operation, due largely to the varying geologic conditions. In some blasts as many as seven distinct geologic unconformities exist. These unconformities affect both final high wall integrities, as well as blast fragmentation characteristics. A 60 million ton (54.5 million tonnes) layback expansion of the existing “Top Pit” as well as development of a new satellite pit, “Sage Flats”, is being undertaken. Design final highwall pit slopes have been steepened from the traditional 47º to 55º in order to reduce overall ore-to-waste ratios, thereby improving economic viability for the expansion over the 4.5 year life of the project. With the increased usage of electronic detonators throughout the mining industry, mine operations staff, as well as representatives from the mines explosive supplier felt that an evaluation program incorporating electronic detonators would be warranted. The areas of focus for this evaluation would be resultant highwall pre-split integrities, peak particle velocity measurements (both near field and far field), frequency measurements, loader productivity, and visual interpretation of the results. The mine incorporates 25 ft (7.6 m) benches and uses separate trim blasts in conjunction with production blasts in order to reduce blast effects along final highwalls. Hole diameters in production blasts are 7? ” (200 mm). Typical production blast patterns are 18 ft x 18 ft (5.5 m x 5.5 m), drilled in a square pattern configuration. Shot sizes vary greatly, ranging from 200 holes to as many as 800. Bulk low percentage ANFO/emulsion blends are utilized as the redominant blasting agent. Non-electric dual delay detonators (25 ms/500 ms), with non-electric surface delays are the initiation system utilized in production blasts. Typical production blast design

Jan 1, 2004

By Chad Ducey

The proper utilization of energy in an explosive column is of paramount importance to the success of any blast. Historically, Powder Factor (the weight of explosive per mass or volume of material to be blasted or its inverse), has dictated the blast design. The concept of Energy Factor is a more effective method to design a blast. In order to utilize explosives efficiently, the energy contained in any given product must be quantified. The Powder Factor method, although historically successful, assumes that a pound of cast pentolite affects the material to be blasted the same as a pound of ammonium nitrate / me1 oil (ANFO.) Years of experience and scientific testing have led the blaster in the field to believe otherwise. The next logical technological step is Energy Factor. The Energy Factor method that will be discussed in this paper takes into consideration not only the weight of the explosive, but also the weight strength (Cal/g) and the density (g/cc) to yield a constant relative Energy Factor. The result of such a method is a factor that can be used in the field exactly the same as Powder Factor, but that reflects the relative energy of any given product in terms that will reflect the relative cost benefit of that explosive selection. The Energy Factors associated with different available explosives make it possible to compare the difference in the amount of energy per loaded pound in each unit length of borehole. This paper will examine the concept of Energy Factor in an in depth manner and also compare this quantification method to that of Powder Factor. It will also demonstrate the value of using Energy Factor and how it can improve the efficiency of a blast design. The misconceptions that come along with using Powder Factor will be examined and comparisons will be made between boreholes loaded using Powder Factor and those that are loaded using Energy Factor. This paper will clearly define the differences between these blast design methods and allow the reader to realize the production, quality, and economic advantages of using the Energy Factor method.

Jan 1, 2000

By Robert Hopler

SECTION 9.---BORING AND BLASTING.*155. Blasting is the operation of bringing down and detaching from its bed or position masses of material by means of explosives.

Jan 1, 2011

By Les W. Armstrong, Stephen B. Richardson, Neville T. Moxon

A study was carried out to determine how different degrees of stemming confinement, that is the retention of the explosives gases, effects fragmentation and movement during blasting.

Jan 1, 1993

By Richard Dooley

The purpose of this paper is to give a description of a controlled blasting program and why Georgia Power now has one; mainly because of the Spillway Project.

Jan 1, 1981