Search Documents

By Francis O. Otuonye

A time series and system analysis modeling technique was applied to signals from strain egages mounted on a fully grouted resin roof bolt and signals from accelerometers mounted on the bolt head and roof rock to determine the roof bolt's response to repeated blast loading. The derived model gives a comprehensive quantitative description of the modes of vibration of the roof bolt response to each blast loading. The damping ratios and natural frequencies of the modes of vibration can reveal the alteration of the process dynamics due to the deterioration of the roof rock and can be used to identify the incipience of instability in the roof bolt system.

Jan 1, 1987

By C Yeung, G Fitz, R Heater, P D. Katsabanis

Explosives malfunction due to shock waves is a serious concern for successful blasting results. Malfunction can range from sympathetic detonation to desensitization and modification of firing times of conventional pyrotechnic detonators.

Jan 1, 1994

By Dale S. Preece, J Paul Tidman, Stephen H. Chung

A discrete element computer program named DMC_BLAST (Distinct Motion Code) has been under development since 1987 for modeling rock blasting (Preece & Taylor, 1989). This program employs explicit time integration and uses spherical or cylindrical elements that are represented as circles in 2-D. DMC_BLAST calculations compare favorably with data from actual bench blasts (Preece et al, 1993).

Jan 1, 1997

By Elaine Gorham-Bergeron

CAROM is a distinct element, dynamic code developed at Sandia National Laboratories to calculate the motion of rock fragments during blasting.[1] It has recently been improved to incorporate a mechanism for its elements to mimic non-circular rock fragments. With this option, elements stack and move in ways that are characteristic of irregular boulders of blasted rock. In bench geometry, CAROM has been used to examine the possibility of producing variations in muckpile shape due to variations in detonation-time delays between rows. Surprisingly, the shape of the muckpile was predicted to be insensitive to time delays between detonation of rows of explosive, except where the rock fracturing was affected by the time delays.

Jan 1, 1987

By Andre Pienaar, Larry Wilson, Clive Dawkins

The development of implementation of cost effective emulsion explosive and portable pumping system for the replacement of package explosives in the deep level gold mining environment. A number of versions of portable pumps will be presented, demonstrating continuous improvement on these systems. Data on reliability of units in the field will be presented.

Jan 1, 2009

By Carlos Agreda

"It is widely accepted that the rock blasting results are a function of several stochastic variables given by: -The natural geological structure of the rock mass (joint spacings, discontinuities length orientation and characteristics, physical-mechanical properties, such as: ultimate strengths and elastic properties, etc.).-The detonation and explosion parameters of the explosive mixture (V.O.D., P2, T2, Q3, etc.).-The drilling and blasting pattern dimensions.-In this paper the most important stochastic variables regarding with the rock mass and the blast design dimensions before mentioned are identified, described and discussed.A non linear programming method to calculate the optimum burden Bo) is proposed and discussed.The great impact of the stochastic variable called burden (B) on the rock blasting results is emphasized. A comparison between burden theoretical calculations and some field blast results is also shown."

Jan 1, 1996

By Charles R. Welch, Charles E. Joachim

Underwater blasting causes not only ground shock but water-shock. Underwater shock attenuates less with range from the explosive source than ground shock and has the potential for killing fish or marine mammals or for damaging marine structures. The collapse and subsequent oscillation of the gas cavity surrounding the detonation can sometimes produce a greater impulse than the initial shock wave from the detonation. The airblast from underwater detonations can range from nuisance levels to damaging levels.

Jan 1, 1997

By John Turner, James Lamb

The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) has an extensive project to improve driving conditions and reduce hazards to motorists on US Highway 61 between Duluth, MN, and Canada along the north shore of Lake Superior. In 1991, the Lafayette Bluff Tunnel was completed just north of Two Harbors, MN, through a joint venture of Johnson Brothers Corporation of Litchfield, MN, and Obayashi Corporation of San Francisco, CA.

Jan 1, 1994

By Mark S. Stagg, Stephen A. Rholl

The Bureau of Mines is studying blast delay timing influences on rock fragmentation in a series of tests that started in 3-ft concrete blocks, progressed to 45in-bench reduced-scale tests in massive dolomite, and has now included 22-ft-bench full-scale tests in a thin-to-thick horizontally bedded dolomite. This paper discusses the full-scale test results and how they compared to the concrete block and reduced-scale studies.

Jan 1, 1988

By David R. Holberg

In the Kansas City metropolitan area, mineable Bethany Falls Limestone occurs 80 ft below river level under the 700 acre Park College Campus on the north bank of the Missouri River at Parkville. For 20 years prior to this project various firms passed over this opportunity to mine this property for construction aggregate because of uncertain costs, financial risk, and the difficulty of constructing an entry tunnel. This paper describes the drill and blast construction, rock bolting, and shotcrete lining of a 750 ft. long, 15% declining grade, truck tunnel through several Pennsylvanian limestones and shales.

Jan 1, 1997

By Keith L. Bockelman

The Colowyo mine is a unique surface coal mining operation because it is a multiple seam pit. Using a combination of a shovel-truck and dragline operation, Colowyo mines 8 seams of coal to a depth of 400 ft. Over the past 3 years a number of operational changes have occurred, one of which is the implementation of blast casting. Through this implementation Colowyo has been able to eliminate over one million cubic yards a year, which would have had to be removed by the shovel-truck operation. This has also brought about a significant decrease in the stripping cost per ton within the dragline operation.

Jan 1, 1985

By Jack Elorenta

A recent forum of mine operators revealed a continuing strong interest in alternative methods of freeing rock. A Rand Corporation report lists a continuous mechanical machine that would replace drilling and blasting as a priority for mine operators. Meanwhile, mounting evidence documents a dramatic cost benefit in processing where increased blast energy is available. The reasons for this dichotomy may be due to a number of factors.

Jan 1, 2002

By J P. F Warkentin, A W. Bauer

Recently, significant improvements have been made in both blast design methods and blasting accessories. The introduction of extremely accurate blast delays now allows proper implementation of advanced blast designs. Thus the onus for future blasting improvements has moved from blast design to the need for ensuring that explosives quality is of the highest order. One measurement commonly used to assess explosive performance is the velocity of detonation (VOD).

Jan 1, 1991

By Richard Arsenault

The production of oil & gas from wells requires method of flow from the producing formation into the well bore. Once the well is drilled it will have casing pipe installed to protect the integrity of the well formations and means of delivery to the surface. Once casing pipe is installed it will be cemented in by pumping cement through the annulus of the casing pipe down to the bottom of the well and allowed to flow outside the casing pipe up into the formation.

Jan 1, 2007

By Lewis L. Oriard

Ground vibrations associated with blasting are generally in a higher frequency range and of shorter duration than those generated by earthquakes, and the intensity scales for earthquakes cannot be applied directly to blasting vibrations without modification. Further, the profession does not need an intensity scale merely to estimate vibration intensity. If the blasting in question was not monitored instrumentally, it is a simple matter to estimate the range of intensities based on published prediction formulae or data from various sources such as Oriard (1), Nicholls et al (2), Hendron and Oriard (3), Siskind et al (4), and others. However, the profession has a serious need, for purposes of evaluating damage claims, to understand the relationships between vibration intensities and the levels of observed effects. The criteria for threshold damage do not apply to typical cases which usually involve structural damage. If the damage in question would have required ground vibration with a particle velocity of, say, 20-120 ips, damage is not verified by showing that the vibration merely approached a suggested limit to avoid threshold damage. That is not the question. This paper provides some guidelines for comparing severity of damage to intensity of vibration which would be required to cause such damage, much as is done when determining earthquake intensities. In addition, this paper includes a discussion of strain amplitudes induced by environmental forces, the predominant causes of damage to structures. Also, certain popular myths regarding blasting damage are discussed in the paper. Due to space limitations, the paper will not include a discussion of airblast effects.

Jan 1, 1989

By Rolf Koenig

After the Dynatronic firing system was demonstrated for the first time at the SEE conference in Miami in 1987, it was officially approved in Germany at the beginning of 1993. Dynatronic has now been on the market for 5 years. At present, it is used in several European countries and successful test series have been running in Australia.

Jan 1, 1998

By C De La Cruz

The use of a thin-film piezoelectric stress gauge to determine the pressure profile in a detonating explosive has been demonstrated. These PVDF gauges have measured, in the borehole, the Chapman-Jouget pressure and the release adiabat of the detonation products for several explosives including ANFO and ANFO/emulsion mixtures. The technique can provide: (1) a direct measure of the blasting stimulus, (2) a sensitive QA tool for the blaster, and (3) a means to examine the magnitude and effects of preshock from adjacent bore holes. The PVDF pressure gauge is self powered, can measure pressure from a few bars to 400 kbars, has high time resolution (0.05 µsec), and is easy and economical to use.

Jan 1, 1997

By Young-Dong Cho, Han-uk Lim, Bok-Ki Park, Sang-Eun Lee

Many methods and techniques have been developed to reduce ground vibrations. Some of them are an adoption of electric millisecond detonators with a sequential blasting machine and an improvement of initiating system with an adequate number of delay intevals.

Jan 1, 1995

By Dale S. Preece

A carefully designed and controlled in-place destruction experiment was performed on a concrete bunker buried in 4.27 m (14 ft.) of soil. The objective was to determine if the explosive charges would collapse the structure in-place without requiring mechanical excavation. Collapse of the buried structure was fi rst attempted by drilling holes in the soil and placing four 13.38 Kg (29.5 lb) Comp B explosive charges at a depth of 2.13 m (6.7 ft.). The confi guration of the charges when detonated was 2.13 m (6.7 ft.) off the top of the concrete roof and 3.66 m (12 ft.) apart in a square pattern. Detonation of these charges created a crater ~4.88 m (16 ft.) in diameter and 2.13 m (6.7 ft.) deep, leaving ~2.13 m (6.7 ft.) of soil covering. Very limited spalling occurred on the ceiling of the concrete structure as a result of detonating these four charges. The second attempt to collapse the structure consisted of placing another single 13.38 Kg (29.5 lb) charge, identical to the fi rst four, near the geometrical center of the bunker roof. This charge was detonated in the soil cover 100 to 200 mm (4 to 8 in.) above the reinforced concrete roof, collapsing it. Due to the collapsed roof and remaining soil cover, the structure had been collapsed in place, requiring no further demolition. A computer simulation of the above explosive destruction scenario was completed using the computer hydrocode AUTODYN with a granular material model to treat the soil and the RHT brittle material model to represent the concrete. AUTODYN accurately recreated the scenario including the slightly damaged response of the concrete structure to the initial four charges and the collapse of the structure resulting from the second single charge close to the roof.

Jan 1, 2007

Introduce self – thanks for having me.Indiana program – spent first 15 years of program telling folks how smart we are and to trust us. “We are from the government and we are here to help you.” How well would that go over with you if the IRS invited you in for an audit and that was their openning? Our audience was the same way – not thrilled or inspired. We decided we were the problem – being nice guys just was not enough. We had to learn to communicate with people who did not know us. I am here to share a few things we have learned – and are still learning.

Jan 1, 2007