Search Documents

By W. A. Haley

The use of diesel engines in underground hard-rock mines dates back to the late 1940s. For the first several years, they were used only occasionally, being limited to a few metal mines that experimented with crawler¬mounted front-end loaders, tractor-trailer hauling units, a few tractors for drill-compressor mounts, and utility cleanup machines. By the mid-1950s, track loaders had become commonplace in limestone mines and uranium mines on the Colorado Plateau in the United States, as well as in Canada. Use of crawler-mounted tractors as drill and compressor mounts also increased. By the end of the 1950s, rubber-tired loaders and some haulers began to replace the track-type machines and rail-mounted cars that had been in use. About 1960, the rubber-tired machines brought about a new era of underground mining mobility and flexibility, centered on a method commonly known as "trackless mining." Ultimately, many of the underground rail-type systems for loading and hauling were replaced by the trackless mining technique. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS The size and nature of mineral deposits, plus ground control techniques, historically had dictated small open¬ings to the surface from many underground mines. The small mine openings led to the development of special rubber-tired loaders and haulers designed specifically for access through the small openings. However, some mines, particularly those in massive mineral deposits, are able to excavate and maintain very large openings, and some use modified room-and-pillar systems. With the large mine openings, the use of larger, more produc¬tive equipment such as that commonly found in surface mining becomes economical. In fact, productivity gen¬erally increases at a more pronounced rate than machine size increases because many of the larger machines were designed for heavy-duty shot-rock applications in surface mines and construction sites where the handling of blasted rock is common. Table 1 can be used as a very Table 1. General Productivity Comparison for Conventional Machines In Underground Use (Shot-Rock Conditions) 2.3 m3 (3 cu yd) 4.6 m3 (6 cu yd) Loader Loader Expected Surface 230 t/h 540 t/h Production (250 stph) (600 stph) Expected Underground 90 t/h 270 t/h Production (100 stph) (300 stph) Expected Total Efficiency: Surface 40%-60% 50%75% Underground 25%.-40% 30%50% Expected Useful Machine 8000 hr 12,000 hr Life Before Replacement general comparison of the production and efficiency between small and large machines. Combining greater productivity often inherent in larger machines, with reduced downtime resulting from using fully developed machines with fast parts and service backup, some mine operators have been able to reduce material handling costs appreciably while reduc¬ing manpower requirements for operators and main¬tenance men. Large mine openings increase the amount of rock that must be handled in the development work, and they sometimes increase the dilution in stopes or rooms, de¬pending upon the dimensions of the ore zone. Providing adequate space for the unrestricted operation of large surface mining machines could, therefore, lead to more waste segregation and handling costs. It could also cause greater ore dilution that would result in a lower grade of ore being delivered to the processing plant. The tradeoffs between opposing cost factors must be reconciled and balanced to achieve the best overall cost of the crude ore, concentrates, or product. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS Loaders and haulers designed for surface mining are seldom used underground in their standard con¬figurations without some modifications. If done, the modifications generally are made by the equipment dealer and/or the user, and the modifications usually include one or more of the following items: 1) The exhaust stack is lowered, and its direction is changed. Usually, it is repositioned horizontally to the rear, or it is fed into the engine fan to diffuse the exhaust gases. 2) The operator's position is lowered by either lowering the seat or changing the seat to a side mount. 3) The operator controls are adjusted to fit the new operator position. 4) Other components, such as the radiator and loader tower, are lowered. 5) Special bumper guards are mounted at the base of the radiator area. 6) An exhaust conditioner is mounted and con¬nected, using either a catalytic or a water-type condi¬tioner, or both. This usually is controlled by the safety and health regulatory authority having jurisdiction. 7) The positions of other components are rearranged

Jan 1, 1982

By Ivor Hawkes

INTRODUCTION High energy breaking is an alternative to using ex¬plosives in underground secondary breaking operations. It also is a means of upgrading conventional hand-held breakers, manual sledge-hammer breaking, and scaling bar operations. Major areas of application are in sec¬ondary breaking over grizzlies and at drawpoints. Other applications include breaking down ripping lips in longwall seam mining, scaling in stopes and rooms, general demolition work, and roadway maintenance. There is considerable interest in high-energy impact breakers for use in primary ore breaking, but, as of 1977, all such applications have been only experimental (duToit, 1973; Joughin, 1976; Wayment and Grantmyre, 1976). EQUIPMENT Essentially, a high-energy impact hammer is a boom¬mounted pneumatically or hydraulically actuated breaker. The machine basically consists of a piston that oscillates in a housing and impacts the end of a tool or moil thrust against the rock. The force applied to the rock primarily depends upon the impact energy of the piston-the higher the impact or blow energy, the greater the force and, thus, the greater the rock break¬age. Among drill and breaker designers, a common expression for blow energy is "force of blow." Hand-held breakers are limited to blow energies of about 140 J (100 ft-lb), because the operator is unable to handle heavier machines efficiently or to absorb the recoil energy resulting from higher blow energies. How¬ever, these restrictions do not apply to boom mounted breakers; machines with blow energies on the order of 4000 J (3000 ft-lb) and higher are available commer¬cially for underground use. There is considerable evi¬dence to show that increasing the blow energy also in¬creases the efficiency of the breaking operation; i.e., more rock is broken per unit of energy expended (Grantmyre and Hawkes, 1975). Thus, there is a trend to higher blow-energy machines, particularly where high¬strength rocks are to be broken. In relation to rock breaking, the blow rate of boom¬mounted impact breakers is not as important as it is for rock drills. This is because the breaker must be moved over the work surface between blows. The blow rate is governed eventually by the power supply, and typical blow rates range between 200 and 600 blows per minute. As a general rule, light blow-energy machines have higher blow rates than heavier machines. Table 1 lists most of the boom-mounted impact breakers that were available commercially during 1977, and it gives details of the blow energies and machine weights. Restrictions are placed on the blow energy by the machine weight and size, and by the strength of the boom. Typically, boom-mounted impact hammers have a blow-energy to mass ratio of about 1.5, with lower values for lighter machines and higher values for heavier machines. In addition to supporting the hammer weight, the boom also has to absorb the recoil energy of the blow, which can be on the order of 1400 J (1000 ft-lb) for large hammers operating in a horizontal mode. Interesting exceptions to the general run of impactors are the Joy HEFTI hydraulic hammers. In these machines, the piston impacts onto a fluid cushion that is positioned between the piston and the impact tool. This approach allows very high piston velocities, over 30 m/s (100 fps), to be used without the risk of break¬ing the piston or impact tool. Steel on steel impacts must be limited to impact velocities of about 10 m/s (35 fps) due to the high impact stresses generated; thus, increased blow energies can be achieved only by increas¬ing the piston size. The Joy 514 HEFTI®, listed in Table 1, has a blow energy of 27 100 J (20,000 ft-lb), but, as of 1977, the machine has been used underground only on an experimental basis. Using a fluid cushion between the piston and the impact tool allows the use of light pistons, reducing the overall machine weight. The recoil energy, which must be absorbed by the boom for a given blow energy, is directly proportional to the piston to machine mass ratio, and operating with light pistons provides an addi¬tional benefit in reducing the requisite boom size. Both pneumatic and hydraulic hammers are avail¬able commercially. Although hydraulic hammers are a relatively recent development, they already outnumber the pneumatic machines in use. There are many reasons

Jan 1, 1982

By J. G. Lang

"This paper gives an outline of the principles used in E.M. wire rope testing, showing the practical application of the device and its value in industry and in mining operations.It presents: case histories involving deterioration, such as corrosion, peening and broken wires; anomalies indicating conditions peculiar to drum hoists and friction hoists; tests of locked coil ropes; low-frequency testing; and experiments and development."

Jan 1, 1969

By W. H. Blackburn

This paper describing the milling practice at the Tybo concentrator is one of a series of similar papers being prepared by the United States Bureau of Mines on milling methods and costs at the various mills in the United States. ACKNOWLEDGMENT A large part of this paper way prepared by H. M. Lewers, mill superintendent of the Tybo plant of the Treadwell Yukon Co., Ltd.

Jan 1, 1931

By D. M. Urich

This paper is a follow-up on a previous paper presented at the A.I.M.E. Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on February 17, 1965, by Mr. D. Kelly Campbell. Mr. Campbell's paper was presented prior to the operation of the Eveleth Taconite-Company's Plant, and this paper outlines and reports on the operation and performance of the Plant after the first nineteen months of operation.

Jan 1, 1967

ALABAMA Altoona -Cain, J Anniston -Cowie, L K Heimrod, A A White, H E Bessemer-Abbott, C C Ball, E M Mitchell, F R Thompson, N E Birmingham -Adler, T E Aldrich T H Aldrich, T H, Jr Blackburn, A R Bush, 117 W Clark, G H Cowin, P G Crane, W R Crawford, G G Crockard, F H Darnelspn, G E Davis, C B

Jan 1, 1923

By Michael G. Zabetakis, Aldo L. Furno, George H. Martindill

Hydrazine vapor is flammable in the absence of air at elevated temperatures and atmospheric pressure . The minimum concentrations of benzene , toluene , m- xylene , cumene , and n- heptane needed to inhibit flame propagation through vapor mixtures of hydrazine and hydrocarbon were determined at 125 ° C and atmospheric pressure . These concentrations can be correlated with either the heat of formation or the heat capacity of the hydrocarbon .

Jan 1, 1964

The Ok Tedi open pit mine will have final wall heights in excess of 750m. The behaviour of these excavated slopes will be influenced by the presence of numerous defects. This paper discusses the identification of possible failure mechanisms within the pit walls based on mapped fault and joint data. Results from analyses using these data have formed the basis for the ultimate pit design.

Jan 1, 1994

DISCUSSION, M. Cohen presiding A. H. Geisler and D. L. Martin (GeneTal Electric Research Laboratory, Schenectady, N. Y.)—We were rather interested to note the author's conclusion that the cubic to tetragonal transformation may be of the second order, for we have been able to show that the order-disorder transformation in an analogous alloy system is a first-order transformation with a discon-

Jan 1, 1952

By David Yanez

The hydroelectric project "El Cajón" is currently under construction in the state of Nayarit, on the Santiago River, in western Mexico. This project is comprised of a Concrete Face Rockfill Dam (CFRD) with a rockfill necessity of 10,5 million cubic meters and it reaches a height of 188 m. The generation equipment includes two turbines with a total installed capacity of 750 MW.

Jan 1, 2006

The paper describes the geotechnical as- pects of design and construction of two 12 m diameter concrete lined tunnels from the start of design to completion of construction. Prob- lems occurred due to delay in supply of essen- tial rock support materials from overseas and alternative methods using locally available materials were developed. Several major rock- falls and rock movements occurred and remedial measures are outlined.

Jan 1, 1981

By NONE NA

[Allen -Sherman -Hoff. Pump Co Third Cover Dee Carlton Brown, Advertising Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co 733, 750 Compton Advertising, Inc. American Cyanamid Co James J. McMahon. Inc. American Manganese Steel Div., American Brake Shoe Co 746 Fuller & Smith & Ross, Inc. Anaconda Copper Mining Co Kenyon & Eckhardt Inc. Carlon Products Corp 748 Penn and Hamaker, Inc. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co 744, 745 G. M. Basjord Co.]

Jan 1, 1952

Mining Methods JAY A. CARPENTER, Chairman CLYDE E. WEED, Vice-Chairman ROY A. HARDY, Secretary Alluvial Mining CLINTON BERNARD O. B. PERRY NORMAN CLEAVELAND C. M. ROMANOWITZ R. B. EARLING J. B. STAPLER BENERE H. GRANT CHARLES THURMAN Open-Cut Mining Iron G. E. DIEHL EARL E. HUNNER P. G. HARRISON G. E. LEVEQUE Copper LOUIS BUCHMAN W. H. GOODRICH J. H. DAVIS WALTER S. LARSH

Jan 1, 1941

By J. Temporal

An introduction to the conference material in this issue is given together with the issue contents list, closing remarks by its chairman Dr. J. Temporal, the list of contributors and their companies, and the information that the 26th Sir Julius Wernher memorial lecture had had to be presented by the lecturer's wife, M. Biggart, in his absence due to site problems on the Storebaelt project

Jun 16, 1905

By Paul Miller, Rene Laprade

Does a 76 mm Ø hole drilled over 45 m deep remain straight? This is the question asked by the Engineering department at Placer Dome's Dome Mine in Timmins, Ontario before they could lay out the initiation sequence in a long-hole production stope. Everyone realized that the holes would wander over such great depths, but it was important to know where they went.

Jan 1, 1998

By M. H. Kirchner

Trackless mining at Thabazimbi Mine by M. H. KIRCHNER. Pr. Eng.. B.Sc.. B.Sc. (Elec. Eng.)(Stellenbosch). Dip. Mining (Pta.) Certain aspects of the' methods used in the exploitation, by sub-level caving, of a wide, tabular, steeply dipping orebody are described, reference being made to the use of modern mechanized equipment. Statistics relating to production and labour, as well as some geological details, are given.

By Roy C. Kirkman

It is with great pleasure that I read Mr. Howard M. Wells article in the December 1978 issue of MINING ENGINEERING entitled: "Optimization of Mining Engineering Design in Mineral Valuation." Mr. Wells very adequately presents the case and point that there are a great number of variables which must be analyzed during an economic evaluation of an FUND RESOURCE, such as copper or uranium.

Jan 4, 1979

[Allen-Sherman-Hoff Pump Co Third Cover Dee Carlton Brown, Advertising Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co 625,654 Compton Advertising, Inc. American Cyanamid Co 638,639 James J. McMahon, Inc. American Manganese Steel Div., American Brake Shoe Co 642 Fuller & Smith & Ross, Inc. Anaconda Copper Mining Co * Kenyon & Eckhardt Inc. Carlon Products Corp * Penn and Hamaker, Inc. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co 627 G. M. Basford Co.]

Jan 1, 1952

By G. F. Comstock

H. M. BOYLSTON, Cambridge, Mass.-It might be asked, since this test is so simple, why it was not discovered before. It seems to me the explanation is that when we have used the sodium picrate solution, it has .generally been on a very, high-carbon or hypereutectoid steel; to detect . the presence of free cementite, and when we have looked for sulphides, it

Jan 4, 1917

The Committee on Nominations begs to submit the following names as its nominees for the respective offices indicated: For President, SIDNEY J. JENNINGS, New York. For Vice-Presidents, WALTER H. ALDRIDGE, New York; MARK L. REQUA, San Francisco. For Directors, J. E. JOHNSON, JR., New York; ALLEN H. ROGERS, Boston; HOWARD N. EAVENSON, West Virginia; ROBERT M. RAYMOND New York; WILLET G. MILLER, Canada.

Jan 12, 1916