Search Documents

By David Hoadley, Kenneth R. Maser, Ashok B. Boghani, James E. Billar, D. Randolph Berry, Mackenzie Burnett, Robert H. Trent

The computer program has been developed in conjunction with the rest of the project to evaluate evacuation capabilities of the mines and develop guidelines for the escape systems. There are several problems associated with predicting evacuation performance of a mine. First, the mine has many interconnected passages, shafts, hoists and a number of miners in varying positions. To be able to predict evacuation time requires processing a hugh amount of data. A simplistic approach of determining the miner farthest from the exit and calculating evacuation time for him knowing his walking speeds and hoisting times is not realistic, since the waiting time for the hoist is neglected. The second problem is being able to repeat the calculations for a number of configurations. It may be possible to spend enough time to hand calculate the evacuation parameters for a single mine for a single configuration, but to evaluate capabilities of the evacuation

Jan 1, 1976

By C. B. Manula, R. L. Sanford, R. A. Rivell

PART I. FLOW CHARTS

Jan 1, 1974

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX A - PNEUMATIC TRANSPORT OF FLY ASH 1. Introduction Two types of pneumatic transport of fly ash are critical to the success of (1) Transport of fly ash from the fly ash truck to the entrance to the borehole. Depending on the surface topography, this may be horizontal, decential and ascential. (2) Vertical downflow of fly ash through the borehole. All fly ash trucks have limited pressure with which they can pump the fly ash. Thus, the pressure drop in the fly ash hose will define the maximum length for pumping and consequently the maximum distance that the fly ash truck can be parked from the auxiliary blower. The same relationships describe the flow of the dilute fly ash-air mixture produced by mixing with the auxiliary air from the blower and thus define the selection of the pipe diameter. These are im¬portant considerations in the proper selection of the location of the passages to be sealed and the type of surface preparation required. The flow characteristics of fly ash down the borehole determine the selection of the minimum borehole diameter and the blower pressure. This appendix presents theoretical analyses of these flow regimes and summarizes the limited experimental data obtained during the field tests at Grant Town, described in Section 8.4. The analysis for the borehole flow is presented first as it is of greater interest to the program. This is followed by a discussion of the horizontal flow.

Jan 1, 1973

By Rudolf E. Greuer, Linneas W. Laage, Xinton Chang

UNIT OF MEASURE ABBREVIATIONS USED IN MFIRE FT foot FT3/MIN cubic foot per minute LBM•MIN2/FT4 pound mass times minutes squared over feet to the fourth FT2/HR square feet per hour BTU/HR*FT*F British thermal unit divided by hours times fimes feet times degree Fahrenheit IN W G inches water gage FT3/MIN cubic feet per minute FT2 square feet FT3 cubic feet LBM, pound mass F Fahrenheit IN W G /CFM2 inches water gage per cubic foot per minute squared PERCENTAGE percent BTU/MIN British thermal unit per minute MFIRE BAT PROGRAM cls echo off echo MFIRE activated mfire0 echo Wait a moment for loading the program if EXIST zheng chg mfirel if EXIST zheng chg mfire2 if EXIST zheng chg mfire1 if EXIST zheng chg erase zheng chg if EXIST hang chg erase hang chg if EXIST yunzhi fan copy yaodong.ion+yunzhi fan yaodong ion if EXIST yunzhi fan erase yunzhi fan if EXIST xintan chg copy yaodong xin+xintan chg yaodong ion if EXIST xintan chg erase xintan chg if EXIST yaodong xin copy yaodong.xin mfire out if EXIST yaodong.xin erase yaodong.xin if EXIST net erase net echo Your output is saved in file MFIRE OUT MFIRE0 FOR PROGRAM CHARACTER•50 A OPEN (10,FILE='NET',STATUS='UNKNOWN',FORM='UNFORMATTED') NETWW=0 WRITE (10) NETWW OPEN (21,FILE='ZHENG CHG',STATUS='UNKNOWN',FORM='UNFORMATTED') A=) ' B=0.0 WRITE (21) A WRITE (21) A,B

Jan 1, 1990

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

CALCULATION OF MINE HEAD LOSSES FROM ALTIMETER SURVEY DATA USBM PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - MINERAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT USBM USBM USBM THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES PRESSURE LOSSES USING THE USBM METHOD GIVEN USBM IN USBH IC 7809 BY MCELROY AND KINGERY.1957. THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE USBM BETWEEN THIS PROGRAM AND THE CITED REFERENCE IS THE TREATMENT OF AIR USBM

Jan 1, 1977

By R. V. Ramani, R. Stefanko, G. W. Luxbacher

C THRM 1 C CALCULATION OF MINE HEAD LOSSES FROM ALTIMETER SURVEY DATA TURN 2 C PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - MINERAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THRM 3 C THRM 4 C THRM 5 C THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES PRESSURE LOSSES USING THERMODYNAMIC RELATION- THRM 6 C SHIPS BASED ON POLYTROPIC FLOW BETWEEN STATIONS. FOR REFERENCE SEE THRM 7 C "A NEW TREATMENT OF MINE BAROMETER SURVEYS" BY M. J. MCPHERSON IN THRM 8 C 'THE MINING ENGINEER' NO. 109, VOL. 129, P 23. THRM 9 C THRM 10 C THRM 11 C THRM 12 C IDENTIFICATION OF ARRAYS THRM 13 C NOTE THE PROGRAM HAS BEEN DIMENTIONED FOR FOURTY (40) DATA POINTS THRM 14 C BASEC(6;2) BASE INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE CORRECTIONS THRM 15 C TRAVC(6,2) TRAVERSE INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE CORRECTIONS THRM 16 C BASER(I) BASE INSTRUMENT READING THRM 17 C TRAVR(I) TRAVERSE INSTRUMENT READING THRM 18 C TDRY(I) DRY BULB TEMPERATURE AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 19 C TWET(I) WET BULB TEMPERATURE AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 20 C ELEV(I) ELEVATION AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 21 C VEL(I) AIR VELOCITY AT TRAVERSE STATION THRM 22 C TBDRY(I) DRY BULD TEMPERATURE AT BASE STATION THRM 23 C BASC(I) BASE READING CORRECTED FOR INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE THRM 24 C TRAV(I) TRAVERSE READING CORRECTED FOR INSTRUMENT TEMPERATURE THRM 25 C BBASE(I) TEMPERATURE CORRECTED BASE READING IN BAROMETRIC THRM 26 C PRESSURE THRM 27 C BTRAV(I) TEMPERATURE CORRECTED TRAVERSE READING IN BAROMETRIC THRM 28 C PRESSURE THRM 29 C BTRAVS(I) BAROMETRIC TRAVERSE READING CORRECTED FOR ATMOSPHERIC THRM 30 C CHANGES THRM 31 C RELHUM(I) RELATIVE HUMIDITY THRM 32 C ASW(I) AIR SPECIFIC WEIGHT TURN 33 C R(I) GAS CONSTANT FOR MOIST AIR THRM 34 C STPRES(I) STATIC PRESSURE CHANCE BETWEEN STATIONS (I) AND (1-1) THRM 35 C TOPRES(I) TOTAL PRESSURE CHANCE BETWEEN STATIONS (I) AND (I-1) TURN 36

Jan 1, 1977

By Thomas V. Falkie, R. Venkataramani

Table

Jan 1, 1972

By R. V. Ramani, A. S. C. Owili-eger

? THIS PROGRAM SIMULATES METHANE FLOWRATES THROUGH THE GOAL ? SEAM BY THE GAUSS-SEIDEL ITERATIVE TECHNIQUE. THE MODEL IS A TWO ? DIMENSIONAL SYSTEM. THE ITERATIVE FORM OF THE GAUSS-SEIDEL IS ? OBTAINED FROM A PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION OF FLOW BY CENTRAL ? FINITE-DIFFERENCING APPROXIMATION SCHEME ? NPRESS IS THE NUMBER OF SPECIFIED PRESSURES EXCLUDING ? RESERVOIR AND FACE PRESSURES ? NQUAN IS THE NUMBER OF SPECIFIED FLOW QUANTITY.... EXCEPT FLOW ? OUT OF THE FACE. THIS- QUANTITY CAN BE POSITIVE(INJECTION) OR ? NEGATIVE ( PRODUCTION) ? XPERM(I,J) I S THE DIRECTIONAL PERMEABILITY IN THE X-DIRECTION AT THE POINT (I,J) ? YPERM(I,J) IS THE DIRECTIONAL PERMEABILITY IN THE Y-DIRECTION ? AT THE POINT (I,J) ? RESEP' IS THE RESERVOIR PRESSURE ? FACEP IS THE FACE PRESSURE. THIS PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE ? APPROXIMATELY ATMOSPHERIC ? LENGTH, WIDTH, AND THICK ARE THE ZONE OR MEDIUM DIMENSIONS * PUHL I S A DUMMY NAME FOR VISCOSITY ? DMAXI IS VARIABLE NAME FOR INITIAL MAXIMUM ERROR OF ITERATION ? DMAXF IS A VARIABLE NAME FOR FINAL MAXIMUM ERROR OF ITERATION ? NITER IS A VARIABLE NAME FOR STORAGE OF NUMBER OF ITERATIONS ? RAD IS A VARIABLE NAME FOR THE SPECTRAL RADIUS OF THE GAUSS¬ ? SEIDEL MATRI-X. THIS PARAMETER ALSO MEASURES THE RATE OF ? CONVERGENCE OF THE ITERATION ? KOUNT IS AN ITERATION COUNTER ? MAXIT IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATION SPECIFIED BY THE USER # EPS IS THE MAXIMUM RESIDUAL ALLOWABLE ERROR-FOR CONVERGENCE

Jan 1, 1974

Table B-1. Summary of respirable coal mine dust samples collected under 30 CFR 90 by MSHA inspectors for underground occupations, 1988-92* [ ]

Jan 1, 1997

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX B - DEVELOPMENT OF FOAM-CONCRETE SLURRY MINE SEALANT 1. Introduction This appendix describes the results of an experimental development and laboratory evaluation of foam-concrete as a rapid setting, lightweight, self-supporting mine sealant material. Foam concrete, otherwise known as Aerated Concrete, is a form of lightweight concrete whose structure consists of air bubbles held together by a hardened cement mortar. Its principal applications are found in roofing, insulation, shock absorbing, and backfill. The air bubbles in foam concrete are formed either by chemical reaction in the wet, placed mortar, or by introducing a stable foam into the mortar during mixing. The mortar is usually a cement slurry with fine sand or fly ash as filler. Our attention focused on preformed foam concrete, since this is most adaptable to field applications. Equipment is available,* which simultaneously mixes and pumps a slurry of foam concrete. Such a slurry can be produced at a rate of up to 50 yards/hr and has been pumped in a 2-inch-diameter hose 1000-feet horizontally and 250 feet vertically up without significant bubble deterioration. One very attractive feature associated with the use of foam concrete concerns site logistics. Foam concrete can be generated with densities as low as 20 lbs/ft3, and hence the total number of

Jan 1, 1973

By David Hoadley, Kenneth R. Maser, Ashok B. Boghani, James E. Billar, D. Randolph Berry, Mackenzie Burnett, Robert H. Trent

Appendix B - Mine Evacuation Simulation Program - User's Manual B 1 Introduction Appendix B documents information necessary to use the emergency escape simulation program and to make modifications if necessary. For a user interested in using the program as it exists, Sections B 2, B 5 and B 6 are particularly useful. The program listing (B.6) can be used to prepare a card deck and the data cards can be punched from the directions given in Section B. 2. Typical input data and output printout summarized in B 5 provides guidelines for the program use. Sections B 3 (Program Nomenclature) and B 4 (Subroutine Description) describe, in detail, the inner workings of the program and are particularly useful for a user interested in modifying the program.

Jan 1, 1976

By C. B. Manula, R. L. Sanford, R. A. Rivell

PART I. DATA INPUT FOR THE OPERATING PROTOTYPE [To run the Rail Haulage Model independent of the Production Sub-system, remove the production data from card type four through the blank card following END DATA on page B18 and change the fourth data element under ADDITIONAL DATA from 1 To 0.]

Jan 1, 1974

By Kenneth P. Klouse

The current rulemaking on mine illumination makes it necessary for mine personnel to have an understanding of the behavior of light. They must be able to understand many terms that are new to the industry and must be familiar with the use of various types of photometers. With this knowledge, the enforcement criteria for mines can be understood and compliance can be maintained.

Jan 1, 1976

By Rudolf E. Greuer, Linneas W. Laage, Xinton Chang

INPUT FORMAT INSTRUCTION FILE FOR PROGRAM MFIRE GENERAL RULES FOR DATA INPUT: $THERE IS NO NEED TO DISTINGUISH INTERGER AND REAL NUMBERS. $ $ SYMBOLS FOR NUMERICAL INPUT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING $ $ 1234567890 -+BLANK $ $ * FREE FORMAT IS ALLOWED. COMMA AND BLANK SPACE CAN BOTH BE $ $ DELIMITERS. SEQUENTIALLY DISTRIBUTED BLANK SPACES ACT AS ONE $ $ DELIMITER. BLANKS ADJACENT TO A COMMA HAVE NO DELIMITING EFFECT $ $ * A ZERO INPUT CAN BE OMITTED BUT NOT THE DELIMITERS EXCEPT WHEN $ $ THE ZERO INPUTS ARE THE LAST ONES ON A LINE. $ $ * A LINE WHOSE FIRST NON-BLANK SYMBOL IS "$ IS AN INSTRUCTION $ $ LINE WHICH WILL BE IGNORED IN A PROGRAM RUN. $ $ * A LINE WHOSE FIRST NON-BLANK SYMBOL IS NEITHER ONE USED IN THE $ $ ABOVE LIST FOR NUMERICAL INPUT NOR "$, OR WHICH CONTAINS MORE $ $ THAN 3 SYMBOLS OUTSIDE OF THE LIST, IS A COMMENT LINE WHICH WILL $ $ BE SHOWN IN THE OUTPUT FILE. $

Jan 1, 1990

By Thomas V. Falkie, R. Venkataramani

Table 15. Summary of Physical Characteristics of Coal and Shale from Channel Samples. Table

Jan 1, 1972

By David Hoadley, Kenneth R. Maser, Ashok B. Boghani, James E. Billar, D. Randolph Berry, Mackenzie Burnett, Robert H. Trent

APPENDIX C - HOISTING SYSTEMS - AVAILABLE EQUIPMENT C 1 - Introduction A survey has been made of available hoisting equipment which has applications for use in metal and non-metal mine emergency escape hoist systems. The information was gathered from a number of sources, including representatives in the USBM and MESA, mine operators, personal visits and telephone interviews with manufacturers, field visits to inspect equipment, advertisements, catalogues and indices of manufacturers. Wherever possible, technical specifications and prices were checked out with the manufacturer, or supplier. The sections on individual sub-systems and components, such as automatic control systems, winches and controls, are not intended to be all encompassing surveys. Rather a reasonable number of representative units in each category are discussed. The sample is large enough to provide a general picture of the kind of equipment available, including the abilities and limitations and a reasonable price range. The survey has been divided into six categories 1. Complete Hoisting Systems A Above ground installations B Below ground installations 2. Hoist Assemblies ^(Man-rated) 3. Hoists (not Man-rated)

Jan 1, 1976

By C. B. Manula, R. L. Sanford, R. A. Rivell

Part I. DATA INPUT ALTERNATIVE 1

Jan 1, 1974

By R. V. Ramani, A. S. C. Owili-eger

System Size N,NX Number of blocks in x-direction M,NY Number of blocks in y-direction NTIMES Number of systems to be simulated LENGTH Length of medium WIDTH Width of medium THICK Thickness of medium NZONE Number of material zones Medium Properties XPERM(I,J) Permeability in x-direction at the point (i,j) YPERM(I,J) Permeability in y-direction at the point (i,j) PHI Medium porosity T Medium temperature Gas Properties PURL, VISCOG Gas viscosity Z Gas deviation factor BETAG Gas compressibility coefficient Initial and Boundary Conditions IBC Initial and boundary conditions NPRESS Number of specified pressures NQUAN Number of specified quantities FACEP Face pressure RESEP Reservoir pressure

Jan 1, 1974

By David A. Monaghan, Kenneth R. Maser, Adi R. Gurdar, D. Randolph Berry

APPENDIX C SCALING RELATIONSHIPS 1. Scaling Law for Fly Ash Crater Formation The scaling law derived for predicting crater diameters at different scales is developed below by considering the equation of motion of individual fly ash particles. It is assumed that the air drag on each particle is characterized by Stokes flow, and at the borehole - passage intersection the air velocity and the fly ash particle velocity are the same. The equations of motion for a fly ash particle are the following, (see Figure C-1).

Jan 1, 1973

By Cecil E. Lester

Since the advent of coal mining, the minimal lighting in the under¬ground working place has been an obstacle to the safe and efficient performance of the miner's many tasks. Compounding this problem is the fact that the machines being operated in the working place are so large that the vertical and horizontal clearances around the machinery are severely limited. Consequently, in these poorly lighted and congested working places, the machine operator is unable to utilize his peripheral vision. He cannot see hazards as they develop and, too often, cannot react in time to avoid serious injury or death to himself or his fellow miners. The greatest hazard to miners inby the last open crosscut is from falls of roof which are often preceded by warning signs such as falling rock fragments, roof supports taking weight, or a sudden reduction in the height of the working place. These warning signs often go undectected because the machine operator's attention is focused on the small circle of light emitted from his cap lamp. Congress recognized the illumination deficiencies, and, in the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, charged the Secretary of the Interior with the authority and responsibility for development and promulgation of minimum standards for illuminating working places in coal mines. These standards have been developed and, as stated in the April 1, 1976 Notice, Federal Register, Volume 41, No. 64, will be promulgated on October 1, 1976, as mandatory regulations under Section 75.1719, Title 30, Code of Federal Regulations. The regulations require that the designated surfaces within the miner's normal field of vision be illuminated to 0.06 foot-lamberts while self¬propelled mining equipment is being operated in the working places. The term "working place" is defined in the Act as "the area of a coal mine inby the last open crosscut".

Jan 1, 1976