Search Documents

Search Again

Search Again

Refine Search

Publication Date
Clear

Refine Search

Publication Date
Clear
Organization
Organization

Sort by

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) of Mr. Potter's paper on American blast-furnace practice (see vol. xxiii., pp. 370 and 577)

    James Gayley, Braddock, Pa. (communication to the Secretary) : Mr. Potter has made reference to our practice at the Edgar Thomson works in the direction of increasing the life of the lining, and menti

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) of Mr. Douglas's paper on American improvements in ore-crushing, concentration, etc. (see vol. xxii, pp. 321 and 647)

    C. E. Dewey, Georgetown, Colo. (communication to the Secretary) : In his remarks on crushing-machinery, Mr. Douglas says (Twins., xxii., p. 322): "To insure a smaller and more uniform size of parti

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion : Coal-Dust in Mine-explosions (see Mr. Glenn's paper, p. 195)

    E. E. Russell Tratman, New York City (communication to the Secretary): Mr. Glenn's paper brings up again the question of the part played by coal-dust in colliery-explosions. In the discussion of

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Becker's paper on the torsional theory of joints (see p. 130)

    President Howe: It is, of course, not easy to discuss off-hand the paper which Mr. Becker has presented with so much lucidity. I will only make one remark, which is outside of the line of his argument

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Lychenheim's paper on phosphorus in coal and coke (seep. 66)

    Since this paper was written, some changes have taken place, materially reducing the cost of iron-making as estimated in the text. These are chiefly reductions in the prices of ore and fuel. The charc

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Sheafer's paper on the re-working of anthracite culm-banks (see p. 364)

    In answer to inquiries from members, Mr. Sheafer said that the culm-banks of which his paper gave the shipments were of about the average quality of the banks in the Mahanoy region of the Schuylkill f

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion (continued) of Prof. Pošepný's paper on the genesis of ore-deposits (see vol. xxiii., pp. 197 and 587)

    Discussion, at the Virginia Beach Meeting, February, 1894, of the Paper of Prof. Posepny. (Trans., xxiii., 197, 587.) Including communications subsequently received. a T. A. Rickard, Denver, Colora

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Postscript to Mr. Kennedy's paper on iron-ores of East Texas (see p. 258)

    Since this paper was written, some changes have taken place, materially reducing the cost of iron-making as estimated in the text. These are chiefly reductions in the prices of ore and fuel. The charc

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Mr. Leggett's paper on transmission of electrical power (see p. 315)

    FREderick H. Davis, Electrical Engineer of the Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co., in charge of the plant at Bodie, Cal. (communication to the Secretary): I beg to offer, to complete the info

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
    Virginia Beach Paper - Discussion of Dr. Waldo's paper on aluminum-bronze (see p. 525)

    President Howe : It is not so clear to me that the facts which Dr. Waldo brings forward really argue that the nature of the combination between copper and aluminum differs from that of the combination

    Jan 1, 1895

  • AIME
  • AIME
    Chicago Discussions - Discussion of paper of Mr. Rickard (See p . 289)

    RichaRd PeaRce, Argo, Colo.: This contribution upon the very interesting subject of the origin of the gold of certain lode-formations offers many subjects for thonghtful consideration. The explanation

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
    List of Meetings

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
  • AIME
    Chicago Paper -The Micro-structure of Ingot-Iron in Cast Ingot (See Discussion, "Physics of Steel," p. 608)

    By A. Martens

    When I was honored with an invitation from the American Institute of Mining Engineers to present a paper at the Chicago meeting on the microstructure of iron, I hesitated about accepting, as the short

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
    Chicago Discussions -Discussion of papers of Prof. Chesneau (See p. 120) and of Prof. Clowes (See p. 606).

    C. Le Neve FosteR, Llandudno, Wales: I regret that Prof. Clowes is not here, and also that I cannot produce one of his lamps for inspection. The lamp has but just passed the experimental stage, and is

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
    Chicago Paper - Mining and Mineral Statistics

    By C. Le Neve Foster

    The object of this paper is to offer a few suggestions for improving the mining and mineral statistics presented by the governments of various nations on both sides of the Atlantic. At the present tim

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
    Chicago Paper - The Open-Hearth Process (See Discussion, p. 679)

    By H. H. Campbell

    The following paper deals almost exclusively with the results of practice at the works of the Pennsylvania Steel Company at Steelton, Pa. From the records of the furnaces at this plant, both acid and

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
    Chicago Paper -Discussion : The Physics of Steel

    [The following discussion, comprising both remarks made at the Chicago meeting and contributions since forwarded to the Secretary, is based upon the following papers, presented at that meeting : "S

    Jan 1, 1894

  • AIME
    Chicago Discussions -Discussion of paper of Prof. Blake (See p. 569)

    C. Q. Payne, New York City: Prof. Blake's inference that magnetic separation may be successfully employed upon smithsonite and iron oxide, after a preliminary roasting, is confirmed by the fact t

    Jan 1, 1894