Search Documents

Prof. HEnRy Louis, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Eng. (communication to the Secretary*):—I welcome Mr. Hammond's paper as an attempt to give definiteness to the best modern professional practice. Such a codification of our professiollal ethics is urgently needed, seeing how widely the views of nlining engineers direr on some of the points raised; for example, I have no hesitation in performing a class of work, as to which Mr. Hammond seems to entertain some doubts, and, on the other hand, I strongly condemn a practice which he appears to recommend. I have not the least hesitation in making reports for vendors of mining-properties, and am constantly doing so; the best justification for this practice may be found in the fact that such reports have been repeatedly accepted by buyers as giving a correct representation of the facts of the case, which is all that should be demanded from any report. On the other hand, Mr. Hammond advocates that mining engineers should take payment for their reports in shares of a company to be floated upon the basis of such reports. I hold that this is ethically wrong, as even themost honest of men is liable to be unconsciously biased under these conditions. Indeed, I go much further, and maintain that a mining engineer who reports or advises upon mining-properties should never hold any mining-shares at all, or be himself interested in any mine, and this has been my consistent practice for many years. A man who hold shares in a mine, and is called upon to report upon a neighboring property or a similar mine, can never be wholly unbiased; and even if he could be, he would always lay himself open to the suspicion that he was giving a favorable report 80 as to enhance the value of the property in which he himself is interested, or an unfavorable report so as to stifle competition. It is quite as bad for the manager of a mine or the consulting manager to be interested, because he will have access

Jan 1, 1910

By Lewis T. Wright

It is commonly believed by metallurgists that in copper-smelting, the copper in the slags, which is irreducible by continued " settling," is retained in the form of " prills " of matte. I have frequently held well-settled slag in a molten condition for a long period without being able thereby to reduce the copper-content. The slag acted as though it contained a minimum of dissolved or combined copper that could not be settled out by gravity. I have used reagents, but without satisfying myself in what form this copper existed. The same slags, by fine grinding and elutriation, could not be separated into portions containing more or less copper than the average content. By treating copper-slags in an electric furnace a button of metallic iron and copper was produced, but the high temperature and the strong reducing-action of the furnace mere influences that suggest an explanation of a result not obtainable with ordinary smelting-temperatures. If all the copper in the slag were in the form of copper-matte, and not existing as a dissolved compound with some of the elements of the slag, then the other metals in the matte, such as gold and silver, should occur in the slag in the same ratio to the copper as to the copper in the accompanying matte. This reasoning led me to study the ratio of metals in the products of smelting, and, apart from the issues discussed in this paper, the research has proved both interesting and illuminative. On the assumption of a similar ratio of metals in matte and slag, if the percentage of copper in the slag accompanying a matte containing 50 oz. of silver and 1 oz. of gold per ton of copper was 0.3 per cent., or 96 oz. per toll of slag, there should be found 0.15 oz. of silver and 0.003 oz. of gold per ton of slag; but, in my experience, there is less silver and much

Jan 1, 1910

Elected Died 1882 *ABBOTT, ARTHUR V 1906 1903 * ADAMS, CHARLES C. 1905 1884 *ADDY, MATTHEW 1896 1894 *ALLFN R B 1896 1874 *AMIOT, H 1892 1886 *AMSLER, CARL 1894 1895 *ÅNGSTROM, CARL 1901 1895 *ARMSTRONG, JOHN F 1898 1882 *ARNOLDS, HUGO 1886 1875 *ASHBURNER, CHARLES A 1889 1872 *ASIIBURNER, WILLIAM 1887 1883 *ATKINS, C M , JR 1885 1897 *AYERS, WILLIAM 1898 1885 *BABCOCK, GEO H 1893 1884 *BAILEY, EDWARD 1889 1880 *BAILEY, JACKSON 1887 1900 *BALLOU, FRANKLIN 1903 1886 *BARNES, F W 1892

Jan 1, 1910

By Mark R. Lamb

The various methods of treating pulp in air-agitation tanks offer problems for experiment and study which are fascinating as well as practical. The usual method heretofore has been to fill each tank in turn, agitate the mixture the required period and then discharge the treated pulp into a storage-tank, from which it is drawn to the filter as required. A later method is to run the pulp from the tube-mill, classifier, thickener, or settler into the first of a set of tanks, and thence continuously or in series through the remaining tanks, finally drawing off the pulp to a continuous filter, or to a pulp-storage tank if the filter is of the intermittent type. It is this method which I propose to discuss here in a preliminary way, with the idea of going exhaustively into the examination of the results of a series of experiments in a later paper. It may be of interest to note that the design of a cyanide-plant has recently been completed in which the estimated cost of the agitation-tanks, storage-tanks, and pumps was 30 per cent. higher for the charge-agitation arrangement than for the series plan. The first question in studying the series method is, " What is the actual period of treatment undergone by the pulp ?" One first supposes that by chance some of the pulp may get through with little or no treatment, while other portions may stay in the tanks a needlessly long period. The former is not probable or even possible, and the latter is, practically, true

Jan 1, 1910

LIST OF MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATES ARRANGED ACCORDING TO STATES AND TOWNS ALABAMA Aldrich, Aldrich, W F Anniston, Noble, A E, Smith, N B Aibacoche, Bradley, D II Bessemer, Fergusson, V Birmingham, Aldrich, T H, Aldrich, T H, Jr, Bowron, J, Bowron, C E, Davis, F H, Dimmick, F D, Hillman, McCarthy, M E , McCormack, McCrery, Ramsay, E, Shook, A M Bridge¬port, Wheeler, S K Ensley, McDonald, S, Shook, J W Fanbanks, Hamil¬ton, A L Helena, Squire, J Huntsville, Moss Lehigh, Toulmin Oxmoor, Green¬amyer, A G Plasma, Gage Rock Run, Garvin Sheffileld, Miller, D I Tuscaloesa, Lodge, J University, McCalley Woodward, Bukofzer, Woodward, A H ALASKA Dawson, Buck Douglas Island, Corbus, J P , Macdonald, J Hames, Le Wald, E A Jualin, Hoggatt, W B Juneau, Denby, Gaifield, Garside, Hamp¬ton, W H Rodman Bay, Phillpots Snettisham, Tisdale Sumdum, Thane Tel¬ler, Hirshberg, M R Treadwell City, Batcheller, J H , Kinzie Valdez, Esterly, G M Yukon, Dawson, Elmer, J M ARIZONA Bisbee, Clark, G C, Coombs, H L , Douglas, W, Hoatson, Parnall, S A, Pelton, R T, Ricketts, L D, Sherman, G F G, Smith, F W, Smith, H A Black Diamond, Bagge Blanchard, Cummins, Murray, J J Casa Grande, Rich¬mond, A B Clifton, Colquhoun, Grabill, Murray, H T , Plater, Smith, J D A, Veitch, Watson, W S Congress, Goodloe Crown King, Alexander, G E Douglas, Cornell, Kraemer, E L, Lee, G B, Rutherford, F Globe, Berray, Hoar, Snell Harrisburg, Smith, F C Jerome, Clark, W A, Thomas, C A Kingman, Treadwell, Wallace, J P Kirkland, Bretherton, G K Kofa, Lamp¬shire, J O , Pomeroy, H G Mayer, Haggott, E A Metca j, Blumenkranz, M , Forbes, D L H Morenca, Clark, C D, Fleming, J B, Honey man, Mills, C E, Wallace, L R Morristown, Stevens, H W Nogales, Glove, H G, Sandoval, A , Sandoval, P Octave, Rose, G W Phoenix, Armstrong, T , Butler, C E, Defty, Lindsay, L Prescott, Blauvelt, H , Bunker, C E, Claypool, W M , Drescher, F M , Fairbank, Nissen Tombstone, Gage, Poindexter, C L , Staunton, Walker, E W Troy, Cutting Tucson, Blake, W P, Burgess, De Lashmutt, I, McCleary, Mann, Prout, J W , Jr ARKANSAS Fayetteville, Purdue Fort Smith, Bache, F , Denman, H Little Rock, Fordyce, Scholz CALIFORNIA Alameda, Arents, King, L Arnador City, Downs, Tregloan Angeles Camp, Dig¬gles, R N , Kenney, C E Antioch, Belshaw Auburn, Coe, I J Ballarat, Thorns Berkeley, Abadie,, Christy, Dozier, Hall, F F , Hersam, Landfield, Lind¬say, L , Mansfield, N T, Morley, W S , Sharwood, W J Bag Oak Flat, Dron Bodae, Hamilton, W R, Hoover, T, Hoover, T J, Jackson, B L , Nutter , E, H Bullion, Power, H T Callahan, Scott, E H Campo Seco, Baird Cartero,

Jan 1, 1910

Jan 1, 1910

PROF RICHARD ÅKERMAN Stockholm, Sweden ANDREW CARNEGIR New York, N.Y. PROF HANS HOEFER Leoben, Austria PROF HATON DE LA GOUPILLIERE Paris, France PROF HENRI LOUIS LE CHATELIER New York, N.Y. M FLORIS OSMOND Paris, France PROF DIMITRY CONSTANTIN TSCHERNOFF St Petersburg, Russia PROF DR HERMANN WEDDING Berlin, Germany

Jan 1, 1910

By Charles R. Keyes

PAGE. I Introduction,........674 11. Occurrence............ 676 III. Geology of Death Valley BoRate-Region,....677 1. Surface.Relief ......677 2. Geologic Formations,....680 3. Geotectonics,..684 IV. FURnace Canyon Deposits..686 1. General Features..686 2. Geologic Structure..688 3. Ores.....690 4. Typical Section ...691 V. Lost Valley Deposits...693 VI. Mojave Desert Deposits..693 1. Distribution....693 2. Geologic Structure ........694 3. Ores............ 696 VII. Santa Clara Valley Deposits .699 1. Distribution....699 2. Geologic Structure..700 3. Ores.....700 VIII. Ventura County Deposits..701 IX. Geologic Occurrence of Borax .701 1. Original Sources...701 2. Solfataric Borax...702 3. Lacustrine Borax...703 4. Marsh Borax....703 5. Terranal Borax...704 X. Chemistry of Natural Borates.... 705 1. General Considerations.....705 2. Composition of Saline Waters...706 3. Solubility of Components....707 4. Time-Element in Water.Concentrations . 707 5. Effect of Temperature.....708 6. Effect of Pressure......709 XI. Occurrence of Other Commercial Salines,.... 709 I. Introduction. A complete transforrnation has taken place in the borax industry during the year 1908. A most remarkable factor in

Jan 1, 1910

By Edward W. Parker

If one is to place any credence at all in the reports published in the daily press, the subject of conservation has been a very lively topic of conversation during the past 60 days, and it does not appear that the temperature of the summer months has been in any way moderated by the discussion. It is a subject in which we are all vitally interested and to which, so far as our mineral resources are concerned, both the Institute and the Geological Survey have liberally contributed. The report of the National Conservation Commission, appointed by President Roosevelt, contains a series of papers on the conservation of mineral resources, all of which were prepared by members of the Geological Survey and were compiled largely from information previously collected by that Federal bureau in the performance of its regular duties. It is not the purpose of this paper to reiterate in extenso any of the material already published. The contributions of the Survey offcials to the Corn-

Jan 1, 1910

By A. A. Steel

DUring the summer of 1905 I was employed by the U. S. Geological Survey to investigate the geology, mining, and preparation of barite in most of the fields of the United States. The Eastern districts have been more or less completely described; the Virginia field in detail by Thomas L. Watson, in his paper, Geology of the Virginia Barite-Deposits,' and other fields in abstract, including statistics of production and references to current literature, by various authors.2 There have also been published a few details of the occurrence of barite in the lead-mines of Washington county, Mo.³ The other accounts of this district are erroneous and meager, and since this field is the most important one in the United States at the present time, a detailed description of the local geology seems doubly desirable. Barite-deposits are scattered over nearly the whole of Washington and adjoining counties, but the product is all mined from the areas indicated upon the sketch-map, Fig. 1, and is shipped from the stations of the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern railway, between Blackwell and Potosi, from 45 to 60 miles SW. of St. Louis. The topography is for the most part gently rolling, with slightly graded streams, usually less than 200 ft. below the higher hill-tops. Along Mineral fork and Indian creek are some steep bluffs and cliffs, affording good exposures of the

Jan 1, 1910

By D. H. Newland

During the year 1907 an investigation of the Clinton formation in New York has been carried out under the direction of the State Geologist, and a full account of the results has been prepared for publication.' The more important economic features of the report are summarized in the present paper. Previous knowledge of this, the type, section of the Clinton has been contributed mostly by Hall and Vanuxem in their reports for the Natural History Survey of New York, which were issued in their final form in 1842-43. Brief accounts of the ore-occurrences have been given by 13. T. Putnam? J. C. Smock: A. H. Chester: and E. C. Eckel.5 Prof. C. H. Smyth, Jr.,6 has discussed the origin of the Clinton ores in two papers, which, so far as the local occurrences are concerned, have removed all doubt that may have existed on that subject. Distribution of the Clinton Formation. The Clinton strata in New York State are restricted to a single belt, which extends from the eastern central part to the Niagara river, which it crosses, and thence continues for some distance into the province of Ontario. The New York

Jan 1, 1910

By Milnor Roberts

The Nicola Valley coal-field is small, but it seems likely to become important because of its commanding position in a rich region that is developing rapidly. Bituminous coking-coal in workable quantity has not been found at any other point between the Crow's Nest Pass region, about 400 miles to the east, and Vancouver island, 250 miles westward. The Canadian Pacific railway reached the Nicola valley two years ago ; two other lines, the Canadian Northern and the Great Northern, are building towards the valley. The vast region between the Rocky mountains and the Pacific coast, extending northward for several hundred miles from the international boundary, which has been the scene of extensive mining- and smelting-operations for many years, is filling up with settlers, who are attracted by the wealth of minerals and timber, the rich soil of the valleys, and the fine climate. The Nicola river, flowing westward through the valley of that name in the Yale district, discharges into the Thompson river, which is the eastern branch of the Fraser. The transcontinental line of the Canadian Pacific railway crosses the mouth of the Nicola river at Spence's bridge, 178 miles from Vancouver. From Spence's bridge the Nicola branch line ascends the valley for 40 miles to Merritt, the coal-center, and continues 7 miles farther to the town of Nicola. Thus the haul from the mines at an elevatioiz of 2,000 ft. to salt water is 218 miles down river-grades. The Nicola branch will be continued about 150 miles farther eastward to Penticton, where it will connect with an extension of the line through the rich Kootenay and Boundary districts. The Canadian government has granted a subsidy of $6,000 per mile, to which the provincial government is planning to add $5,000 per mile, to assist in the construction of the Nicola extension. Upon the

Jan 1, 1910

By Frank Firmstone

In the summer of 1842 my father, William Firmstone, was engaged by Charles Jackson, Jr., of Boston, to examine the conditions in the Lehigh valley as a site for blast-furnaces using anthracite for fuel. In consequence of his report, he was further engaged by Mr. Jackson to build a furnace for him and his partners on the Lehigh canal, 2 miles above the mouth of the river at Easton. Work was begun in the fall of 1842, and the first furnace blown-in in 1844. The history of the works, therefore, from 1844 to 1887, when my own connection with them ceased, covers only four years less than the whole period of the rise, culmination, and commencement of the decline in the smelting of iron with anthracite in America, the beginning of which, in a commercial sense, may be put in 1839.' Although this paper, as the title indicates, is concerned almost exclusively with the furnaces at Glendon, still what was done there was more or less influenced by current opinion in the district, and even reflects, to some extent, the changes in opinion and practice with mineral fuel the world over. No. 1 Furnace was built of red brick, on four piers, had three tuyeres and fore-hearth and tymp, as was universal with furnaces using mineral fuel until the introduction of Lurmann's cinder-tuyere. The dimensions and profile are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The first hearth (Fig. 1) was of sandstone; all after were of fire-brick (Fig. 2). The profile was no doubt derived directly from Gibbons's furnace,2 for it appears from W. Firmstone's note-books that in October, 1840, he visited " Gibbons' new furnaces building at Corbyn Hall," and I have an old drawing,

Jan 1, 1910

LIST OF MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATES ARRANGED ACCORDING TO STATES AND TOWNS. ALABAMA. Aldrich, Aldrich, W. F. Anniston, Noble, A. E Bessemer, Fergusson, V. Bir¬mingham, Aldrich, T. H., Jr, Bowron, C. E, Bowron, J., Davis, F H, Dimmick, F. D., Hillman, Ludwig, C. P., McCarthy, M. E, McCormack, G B., McCrery, Ramsay, E, Shook, A. M. Ensley, McDonald, S., Shook, J. W. Gadsden, Lee, R. H., Jr. Gannts Quarry, Hiller, E Helena, Squire, J. Huntsvalle, Moss Le¬high, Toulmin. Ozmoor, Greenamyer, A. G. Rock Run, Garvin, J M. Selma, Saylor, B. F. A. Sheffield, Miller, D, I. Tuscaloosa, Lodge, J. Woodward, Wood¬ward, A. H. ALASKA Coppermount, Wiswell, H. J. Douglas Island, Macdonald, J Ellamar, Stevens, B. Fairbanks, Hamilton, A L Haines, Le Wald, E A. Jualin, Hoggatt, W. B. Juneau, Denby, Hampton, W. H , Thane, B L , Whipple, J. R. Ketchikan, Bar¬ber, J C , Parker, J. L., Reid, G D Nome, Garfield, C D. Snettwham, Tisdale. Teller, Hirshberg, M. R. Treadwell Caty, Kinzie, Stow, H. P. Valdez, Esterly, G. M, Hazelet.

Jan 1, 1910

The volumes of Transactions, which are published annually, contain the list of officers, rules, etc., the Proceedings, and the papers revised for final publication. (In this revision, after the preliminary publication, authors are permitted to use the largest liberty; and the changes and additions made in papers are sometimes important. It should be borne in mind by those who study or quote a paper in the preliminary edition, that they may not have in that form the ultimate and deliberate expression of the author's views. It should be added, however, that in the majority of cases there are no important changes.) These volumes are for sale as follows, in paper covers:

Jan 1, 1910

THOSE MARKED THUS * ARE MEMBERS, MARKED THUS ?ARE ASSOCIATES. THESE SIGNS DOUBLED INDICATE LIFE MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATES RESPECTIVELY. THE FIGURES AT THE END OF THE ADDRESS INDICATE THE YEAR OF ELECTION. HEAVY-FACED TYPE SIGNIFIES HONORARY MEMBERSHIP. *AARONS, J. BOYD, Vivian Gold Mining Co., Ltd., Harris, West. Australia. '05 *ABADIE, EMILE R., Cons. and Min. Engr., 214 Union Savings Bank Bldg., Oakland, Cal. '76 ?ABBÉ, MAX F., Prest., Abbé Engineering Co, 220 Broadway, New York, N.Y. '07 ? ABBÉ, PAULO., Secy.,Abbé Engineering Co., 220 Broadway, New York, N.Y. '07 *ABBOTT, AI ARTHUR Morococlia, Peru, So. America. '95 *ABBOTT, CLARENCE Chief EDgr., Iron Mines, Dic Tennessee Caol, Iron & R. R. Co., Bessemer, Ala. '04 *ABBOTT, JAMES W., Min. Engr: Ploche, Lincoln Co., Nev. '94 *ABE, MASAYOSHI, Prof. of Mining, Imperial University Kyoto, Japan. '05 ? ACKER, E. O'C., Supt., Treatment Dept., Bethlehem Steel Co., So. Bethlehem, Pa. '86

Jan 1, 1910

By Albert F. J. Bordeaux

This paper briefly describes the general outline of cyaniding silver-ores in Mexico, with special reference to personal experiments made in the Temascaltepec district. The most important papers on the subject deal with cyaniding gold-silver ores, the gold predominating in value, so that the treatment is nearly the same as for gold-ores, the losses of silver being considered of little importance. I describe here the treatment of silver-gold ores containing very little gold, which is more general in Mexico than elsewhere. The cyanide treatment, which was so successfully applied to gold-ores, did not succeed immediately with silver-ores on account of their varying composition. Gold occurs in nature usually in the native state, while silver occurs generally in combination with sulphur (argentite), and various combinations of sulphur, antimony, and arsenic. In former times there mas a complete difference in the treatment of gold-ores and silver-ores. Amalgamation, which was successful with gold-ores, was generally inadequate with silver-ores. The usual treatment in Mexico for silver was the patio process, the theory of which was satisfactorily explained only quite recently by Mr. Ortega and others. General Outline of the Cyanide Treatment. The general tendency of the present practice is to slime the silver-ore as much as possible, and in order to obtain a higher efficiency, with less loss of cyanide, and greater speed, the following lines are observed: 1. Crushing by stamps with 30- or 40-mesh screens, then crushing by Huntington or Chilean mills, through 60- or 80-mesh screens. 2. Concentration upon vanners.

Jan 1, 1910

By Charles R. Keyes

I. Introductory,.......... 185 II. Hypotheses oF the Origin of OzaRk Ores..... 186 1. General Considerations........ 186 2. Schmidt-Leonhard and Gage View...... 187 3. Jenney Opinion.......... 187 4. Posepny Idea,.......... 188 5. Winslow-Robertson Hypothesis....... 188 6. Branner Proposition......... 189 7. Keyes Statement.......... 189 8. Van Hise-Bain Theory........ 190 III. Requirements of an Adequate WoRking-Hypothesis,... 190 IV. GeneRal Geotectonics of the OzaRk Region.... 192 1. Salient Aspects.......... 192 2. Geologic Formations......... 192 3. Character of Faulting...192 4. Extent of Flexing......... 193 5. Unconformity Inequalities....195 6. Warping of Strata...195 V. Classes of Ore-Deposits... 196 VI. Vadose ORe-ConcentRation,........ 197 VII. GeogRaphic DistRibution of the Ore-Bodies,... 199 VIII. Relation of ORe-Deposit to Geologic Structure... 201 1. General Occurrence of Ore-Bodies in Basins.... 201 2. Deposits of the Central Missouri District..... 203 3. Deposits of the Southwestern Missouri District.... 203 4. Deposits of the Northern Arkansas District... 305 5. Deposits of the Southeastern Missouri District.... 206 6. Synclinal Ore-Deposits of Other Districts.....207 7. Significance of Ore-Troughs in Prospecting... 209 8. Origin of the so-called Synclines,...210 9. Significance of the Cross-Bars of Joplin..... 213 10. Relation of Ore-Run to Ancient Relief-Features,... 215 IX. Direction of GRound-Water Circulation..... 216 X. VeRtical Range of Workable Ore-Bodies,... 218 XI. Oscillation of Ground-WateR Level...... 219 XII. Relations of Ore-Bodies to Lithoclasic Features,.. 220 XIII. PRimaRy Source of Ore-Materials,...... 220 XIV. Zone of Ore-Enrichment,......... 222

Jan 1, 1910

PRESIDENTS DAVID THOMAS 1871 R W RAYMOND 1872-1874 A L HOLLEY1875 ABRAM S HEWITT 1876 T STERRY HUNT 1877 ECKLEY B COXE 1878 - 1879 WILLIAM P SHINN 1880 WILLIAM METCALF 1881 RICHARD P ROTHWELL 1882 RICHARD W HUNT 1883

Jan 1, 1910

By Frederic P. Dewey

The Bureau of the Mint of the United States Treasury maintains 13 ofEces for the purchase of gold-bullion, and this paper describes an investigation to establish the reasonable differences in the assay-results at the various institutions which may be commercially allowable in the settlements between them. Beginning with the comparative assay of proof-gold at the Philadelphia mint and the Utrecht mint, which shows 0.00002 as the closest agreement now possible, nine tables of comparative results, taken from the regular work of the service, are given..These tables begin with very fine gold, produced in an electrolytic refinery, showing close agreement in the assay-results, and follow through decreasing gold fineness and increasing amounts and complexity of base metals to very impure and complex bars produced at cyanide-mills, some of which give widely-varying results. Next is given a series of results on samples, prepared and sent out to various laboratories in the service, to test the influence of different metals and various combinations upon the agreement of the assay-results ; 11 samples were sent out and each one was assayed from 44 to 71 times, making a total of 623 assays. To these ire added 107 assays of identical samples of coin-gold. On a previous occasion,' I have endeavored to show the degree of accuracy that may be expected in the ordinary everyday analysis of various materials, and on another occasion,2

Jan 1, 1910