Search Documents

Jan 1, 1966

By P. S. Bagga, P. T. Luckie

Liberation (the process of destroying the interlock between unwanted materials, such as mineral matter and pyrite, and coal) is one of the most important precursors to the benefication of raw coal in order to produce high grade marketable coals at economical recovery levels. Liberation is achieved usually by comminuting the raw coal. However, because of the significant interaction between the production of fine particles to achieve liberation and the cost of separating fine particles, the coal industry needs a method projecting the change in washability with size reduction. Such a projection can be combined with size reduction and separation simulators in order to examine completely beneficiation circuitry to produce coals of stringent specification. This paper presents the development of an appropriate liberation model for coal and its solution by Monte Carlo simulation to predict the expected washability of the raw coal as a function of comminution. It includes model validation with a known binary mixture as well as with a known teritary mixture.

Jan 1, 1983

Jan 1, 1969

Jan 1, 1967

Official Program

Jan 8, 1950

Jan 1, 1943

Jan 1, 1943

By J. J. Jakosky

THE method of electrical mapping of oil structures to be described possesses certain limitations, as well as certain definite advantages. It, in common with other geophysical methods, is not a panacea for the solution of all subsurface geological problems. It operates on differences in electrical conductivity of the geological strata, whereas the other most-used methods operate on (1) differences in magnetic properties, (2) differences in gravimetric properties, or (3) differences in seismic properties. This modification of the resistivity method is therefore able to obtain subsurface information under conditions not favorable to the other methods mentioned. Where the other methods have been employed with ambiguous results it may act as a complementary method.

Jan 1, 1936

By J. Spotts McDowell

Ackowledgments........................... 5 Introduction............................. 5 The Silica Minerals. Stability Relations......................... 6 Optical Properties........................ 9 Density.............................. 10 Melting Points....;..................... 10 Thermal Expansion..................,..... 10 Solubilities............................ 12 Identification of Cristobalite and Tridymite.............. 12. The Silica Refractories. Raw Materia1........................... 13 American Deposits....................... 13 Properties Determining Usability................ 15 Expansion on Heating..................... 16 Texture........................... 17 Silica Brick............................ 17 Manufacture........................... 18 Properties of Silica Brick .................... 19 Analysis ......................... 19 Density......................... 19 Porosity......................... 20 Strength....................... 21 Melting Point....................... 22 Specific Heat....................... 22 Thermal Conductivity................... 23 Expansion........................ 24 Effect of Rapid Temperature Change.........:... 26 Constitution......................... 26

Jan 1, 1918

Jan 1, 1968

By AIME AIME

THE American Engineering Council, which is the working body of The Federated American Engineering Societies, held its first meeting in Washington, Nov. 18 and 19, 1920. The Federated American Engineering Societies was formed in Washington in June and is composed of engineering and technical societies, national, state, local and regional. These Member Societies elect delegates to the American Engineering Council, which is the administrative body of the Federated. The meeting was called to order by Richard L. Humphrey, Chairman of the Joint Conference Com¬mittee, and the program (which is printed below) was carried out without substantial change by E. S. Carman, who was elected temporary chairman. Under the Constitution, the Council appoints an Executive Board, the members of which are chosen according to the proportional membership of the vari¬ous Member Societies in their respective districts. Under this plan, with the present membership, 'the national societies will have 14 members and the local societies 6 members on the Executive Board.

Jan 1, 1920

Jan 1, 1955

Jan 1, 1970

By Edward J. Felten

THE oxidation resistance of chromium and Fe-Cr alloys is increased by small additions of yttrium or other rare earth metals.1,2 In addition, the presence of the additives increases the resistance of these alloys to spalling of the external oxide above 1000°C. This ability to prevent spalling appears to be related to the formation of an internal oxide in alloys containing yttrium or the other rare earth metals. The internal oxide is found in the form of a filamentary growth concentrated in the grain boundaries of the unoxidized metal. In alloys containing yttrium this internal oxide was found to be either Y2O3 Or YCrO3.' In an earlier report,' the growth of the external oxide was found to be controlled by diffusion through the oxide layer. Thermal balance studies were used to establish the kinetics of external oxide formation. In this related study the rate of growth of the internal filamentary oxide has also been studied. The results obtained indicate that the growth of the internal oxide is also diffusion controlled. Internal oxidation appears to occur in at least two ways. Using copper alloys containing small amounts of silicon, Rhines 3 found that between 600" and 1000oC a subscale was formed which consisted of particles of silica dispersed in the metallic matrix. The conditions requisite to internal oxidation as suggested by Rhines are: 1) a solubility of oxygen in the alloy, 2) the ability of oxygen to diffuse at an appreciable rate into the alloy, 3) the possibility of the formation by the alloying element of an oxide more stable than the oxide of the host metal, and 4) a relatively low solubility of this oxide in the metal. These conditions are fulfilled for a number of other copper alloys.3-5 Furthermore, the relationship between the depth to which the internal oxide is formed and the oxidation time follows the simple parabolic law.6 The activation energy for copper containing small amounts of silicon, germanium, iron, or manganese as calculated from Rhines data6 is about 48 kcal per mole. In some cases the internal oxide is found segregated at the grain boundaries, especially near the the surface. Observations of this type of oxide formation have been reported by stead,7 Rhines,* and Lustman. Evans" cites these cases as examples of the simultaneous movement of anions and cations during oxidation. Furthermore, Evans states that the presence of a minor constituent with a high

Jan 1, 1962

Discussion of "The Ordering Transformation in Titanium-Aluminum Alloys Containing up to 25 at. pct Aluminum" by F. A. Crossley, Trans, TMS-AIME, 1968, vol. 242, pp. 726-30. Dr. Blackburn, in his response, pointed out that the c/a ratio of the Ti-26 at. pct A1 alloy quenched from 900°C is 1.6006 and not 1.5965 as plotted in Fig. 19. An error in transcription was made in preparing Table V of Ref. 1 (F. A. Crossley, Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 1174). The corrected Fig. 19 strengthens rather than weakens the argument that a martensitic transformation occurs in alloys containing from 15 to 18 at. pct Al. A Study of the Factors Which Influence the Rate Minimum Phenomenon During Magnetite Reduction, by P. K. Strangway and H. U. Ross, Trans. TMS-AIME, 1968, vol. 242, pp. 1981-88. Page 1883 Reverse Figs. 5 and 6. Sigma—Its Occurrence, Effect, and Control in Nickel-Base Superalloys, by J. R. Mihalisin, C. G. Bieber, and R. T. Grant, Trans. TMS-AIME, 1968, vol. 242, pp. 2399-2414. Pages 2403, 2407, and 2414 Arrows should appear on Figs. 4 and 9; a sigma is missing from Table IV; line 2, page 2414, change "case" to "cast". These are published correctly in the bound volume. Index, December Issue There were a few omissions in the Author Index. These have been corrected and published properly in the bound volume.

Jan 1, 1970

Jan 1, 1969

Jan 1, 1969

Jan 1, 1948