Search Documents

AIME 1953 DIRECTORY SUPPLEMENT COMMITTEES NOMINATING E. H. Rose, Chairman R. E. Byler J. F. Myers Grover Molt S. W. Engelmann S. J. Swainson EDUCATION A. C. Dorenfeld, Chairman G. P. Lutjen A. E. McHugh H. Rush Spedden T. G. Chapman T. M. Morris T. Barker S. R. B. Cooke W. O. McClintock

Jan 1, 1953

[Executive HERBERT G. MOULTON, Chairman WILLIAM WRAITH, Vice-Chairman ,PAUL D. MERICA W. M. PEIRCE H. Y. WALKER Finance H. T. HAMILTON, Chairman ERLE V. DAVELER HENRY KRUMB Admissions FELIX E. WORMSER, Chairman GEORGE D. BARRON, Vice-Chairman CHESTER A. FULTON PHILIP KRAFT EDWARD MEAGHER Alternates P. B. BUCKY LLOYD C. GIBSON F. T. SISCO]

Jan 1, 1940

By AIME AIME

THREE of the addresses presented at this interesting and important session are printed in full else- where in this issue. The fourth, Mr. Hewett's paper, on "Cycles In Metal Production" has been issued as Technical Publication 183, and an abstract of it was published on page 162 of last month's issue. The general discussion that followed these four important papers is given in full below. S. A. TAYLOR: I would like to ask Mr. Veasey whether the control of oil in pools includes royalties, and, if so, in case of a new pool how are you going to control, or rather how are you going to describe the limits of that pool?

Jan 1, 1929

Jan 1, 1970

By R. F. Ashton, D. S. Thompson

In reporting results of precipitation hardening experiments, it is customary to include such conditions as solution heat-treatment temperature, specimen size, and quench medium as well as the aging time and temperature. One portion of thermal history that is often overlooked is the effect of the heating rate employed to achieve the aging temperature. It is the intent of this note to demonstrate the importance of the rate of heating to aging temperatures. This work was carried out on the aluminum alloy 7075 aged at 162oC, a temperature commonly used to obtain stress corrosion resistant tempers. A 2 in. thick plate of 7075 was quenched into 24°C water after solution heat-treatment for 2 hr at 470°C. Approximately 13 in. around the periphery of the plate was discarded to minimize quench rate variations, and the remainder was divided into 0.5 by 1.8 by 2.0 in. blocks which were held at room temperature, 24oC, for 4 days. This aging, or incubation period, at room temperature allowed a copious supply of GP-zones to form. Blocks were then heated at various rates to 162oC using the practices shown in Table I. Both single- and two-step aging practices were employed for each heating rate. The single step consisted of heating directly to temperature at the indicated rate while the two-stage practice included an interruption of heating for 7 hr at 107°C. In the case of the two-stage 100°C per min heating rate experiment, the specimens were returned to room temperature after 7 hr at 107°C where they were held for 16 hr be-fore finally heating at this rate to 162°C. This devia-tion in practice is not considered to be significant. Blocks were removed after various times at 162oC, and aging curves were determined from duplicate R. F. ASHTON and D. S. THOMPSON,Member AIME, are Senior Scientists, Metallurgical Research Division, Reynolds Metals Company, Richmond. Va. Manuscript submitted December 2. 1968. IMD Table I. Aging Practices Two-step Single-Step Heating Rate* Aging Aging Heating Method oC per Min A B Programmed Air Oven 0.23 * 0.01 C D Programmed Air Oven 0.93 ? 0.03 E F Air Oven at Temp -10 G H Oil Bath at Temp ˜100 *Heating rate was measured with a thermocouple at the center of a specimen. An average value between the starting temperature and 3°C below the aging temperature is reported for practices E-H. PRACTICES 70 — A B C E and G 50 - 2 4 6 810 20 40 60 HRS.AT 162°C Fig. 1—The influence of processing variables on 7075 aging curves. Fig. 2—7075 aged according to practice H (single-step aged, fast heating rate) for 3 hr. Magnification 100,000 times.

Jan 1, 1970

?ADAIR, ARTHUR C., Corp 4th Co., 1st. Training Bat., 154th Depot Brigade. ADAMS, HENRY, Major: Chemical Warfare Service. ARLUCK, A. A Headquarters, 1st Corps of Artillery. ASKIN, THOMAS B. H Ensign. BANKS, H. R., 2d Lieut Canadian Engineers. BAYLESS, G. E. S Supply Dept. U. S. Submarine Base. BELL, L. R Co. C, 302d Engineers. BELLIS, ARTHUR E., Capt Ordnance Reserve Corps. I BIRRETT, HOWARD, Lieut., Aviation Section, U. S. Signal Corps, Ellington Field. BOISE, PAUL T 2d Regiment, 24th Squadron. ?BRADLEY, CLARENCE I Convois Automobile Section 585. BROWN, GEORGE M Co. G lot Engineer Replacement Regiment. BUCKINGHAM, ALBERT U. S. S. " Coronet," S. P. 194, Section Base No. 7. BURNS J. J Co. 1-B, E. R. O. T. C. BURT, Co. B, let Engineers Replacement Regiment. ||BYERS, WHEATON B., 2d Lieut Ordnance Dept. CANTON, WILLIAM R., Sgt Headquarters Co., 80th F. A. CARSON, JOSEPH A., Capt A.S. S. R. C.' CHAPMAN, LEWIS C. Corp 29th engineers. CHETNEY, P. C., 2d Lieut 15th Bat. Headquarters Co. CHEVRILLON Louis French Red Cross. CHIDESTER, W. B., 1st Lieut 24th Machine Gun Bat. CHURCH, JOHN L., Capt 308th Engineers. CLAGHORN, D. MONTGOMERY, 1st Lieut 45th Engineers. CLAQHORN, JAMES L., Lieut Aviation Section, Signal Corps. CLARKE, ALEXANDER F U. S. Naval Aviation Service. COMINS, WALDO H. Ca t 41st Co., 164th Depot Brigade. COOK, FREDERICK A., Capt., Engineer Reserve Corps, Asst. to Div. Engr. 79th Division. COOPER, CLAUDE H. Capt C. A. R. C., 50th Artillery. COPELAND, N. R., Lieut. ||CORBY H.. G., 1st Lieut Co. D, 109th Supply Train. CORSA, BEAN, Capt Co. D, 612th Engineers. CORTESE, EMILIO Italian Army. COULDREY PAUL S., Corp British Expeditionary Forces. || CRAGIN, RODNEY S Co. E, 115th Engineers. CURRIE, JOHN M., Ca t Royal Engineers. || CUTTING, G. W., 2d Lieut U. S. Reserves, Field Artillery. V DARRINGTON, PAUL N., 1st Lieut U. S. Infantry. DAVIS, ANGUS W., Lieut-Col British Expeditionary Forces. || DAVIS, THORNTON, 1st Lieut 13th Field Artillery. ELAND, FREDERICK A., Major Engineer Reserve Corps. DOUGLAS, JAMES $ American Red Cross. DOVE, D. R., Candidate 21st Training Battery, F. A. C. O. T. C. Dover JAMES J 6th Co. C. B. DOWS, DAVID,Capt Coast Artillery, Officers Reserve Corps. || DRAKE, M. 6., 2d Lieut Headquarters Co., 325th Infantry. I || EMMERSON, E. Roy British Navy. EVERIT, RICHARD STURTEVANT Heavy Artillery Officers' Training Camp.

Jan 1, 1923

By Lawrence Adler

MINE hoist ropes have hitherto been selected by successive approximation, a process both tedious and inexact. The proposed expression is a readily solved synthesis of existing data and the following standard equation:' [ W + Wr + (W + Wr) -a 9 (W + W)f + b] n=T [1] For convenience, a glossary of all terms appears on page 564. Since rope weight (W,) and bending load (B) are functions of unit rope weight (Wv), which in turn is a function of rope strength (T), W, and B can be expressed in terms of T. W, as a Function of T: A study of the curve in Fig. 1, unit rope weight vs strength, yields Eq. 2: W. = -f- [2] Therefore Wr = WvL = T. [3] iv B as a Function of T: From Fig. 2, unit rope weight vs diameter, Eq. 4 is obtained: W, = 1.6d2 [4] B is related2 to d and D, and d has been expressed in terms of W, by Eq. 4, so the curve B vs W, (Fig. 3) gives Eq. 5: 177,000 177,000 This may readily be checked from the expression3 for a 6x19 rope, i.e., d3 B = 288,000D Since d2 = 0.625 W, and N = substituting d into the above expression gives Ea. 6: 180,000 180,000 B T, which will be used. [6] Into Eq. 1 substitute Eq. 3 and Eq. 6, noting that f=0.02: W + T 1.02+=T. [7]

Jan 1, 1958

By Hugh P. Nicholson

IN view of the many articles that have been written on the proper classification of mining systems without so far having produced any particular tangible results it might seem that the subject is hopeless of solution. I do not believe that is so, and my intention in contributing the following outline is to present a slightly different viewpoint. Too much attention is often focused on unnecessary details and not enough on general principles. Too much attention and emphasis is often given to the system employed at one particular mine or in one particular district. In addition, names that are entirely misleading are applied to mining systems, and their adoption by the coming generation perpetuates a condition that needs clarification badly. The following classification is the result of several years of practical experience in mining and also several years' practice in teaching the same subject. It therefore represents a broad picture of the entire field of mining systems from the viewpoint of the miner as well as the teacher. It seems that the difficulty in the past has been in reconciling these two viewpoints. The need of such a reconciliation requires no explanation.

Jan 1, 1934

By Ravitz, S. F

76-B Unpublished manuscript. Not available in printed form. An experimental and Theoretical investigation of Quantitative Microscopic Mineralogical Analysis. By S.F.Ravitz and H.A.Steane. Manuscript in Engineering Societies Library.

Jan 1, 1935

By AIME AIME

Annual net production of crude oil from the Anglo-Iranian, Oil Company's fields in Iran for the years 1940 through 1945 amounted to: YEAR TOTAL PRODUCTION (Long Tons) 1940 8,626,639 1941 6,605,320 1942 9,399,231 1943 9,705,769 1944 13,274,243 1945 16,835,000 (preliminary figure) All developed fields were on almost continuous production throughout the war, though their operation naturally was hampered by war conditions, which affected particularly supplies of equipment.

Jan 1, 1946

By J. S., Douglas

IN 1880, the late James Douglas, LL.D., was superintendent of the Chemical Copper Co., operating the Hunt & Douglas process for the treatment of the siliceous copper ores of the Jones mine at Phoenixville, Pa. In conjunction with this a refining furnace was operated. After correspondence with Ben Williams, of Bisbee Ariz., who was commencing the mining and smelting of the Copper Queen ore. Dr. Douglas decided-to make his first journey to Arizona. While making plans for the trip lie visited a friend in Philadelphia, a .Mr. Logan, a prominent lawyer. He, through Professor Treadwell, brother of the discoverer of the great Treadwell gold mine of Douglas Island, Alaska, had an option with his min¬ing partner, Mr. Lenig, on the Eureka and Wade Hampton claims near the headwaters of the Verde River in Yavapai County, Arizona. These two claims, later the source of practically all of the wealth of the Jerome district, were then owned by C. P. Head and Co. Prescott merchants. Hugo Richards, banker, and formerly sutler at Camp Apache; Rod and John McKinnon prospectors and Nova Scotians; and perhaps one or two 'other owners of minor interests. Mr. Logan, hearing of Dr. Douglas intended trip to Bisbee, asked him to go first to see the two mining prospects, and this, Douglas, in need of the $500 fee, agreed to do as the time on the option on the claims was running short.

Jan 1, 1935

New York Meets first Wednesday after first Tuesday of each month. DAVID H. BROWNE, Chairman. JOHN H. JANEWAY, Vice-Chairman. F. E. PIERCE, Secretary, 35 Nassau St., New York, N. Y. P. A. MOSMAN, Treasurer. LEWIS W. FRANCIS. BENJAMIN B. LAWRENCE. Boston Meets first Monday of each winter month. HENRY L. SMYTH, Chairman. ALFRED C. LANE, Vice-Chairman. HENRY A. WENT WORTH,. Secretary-Treasurer, 60 India St., Boston, Mass. A. H. EUSTIS. F. G. STANTIAL. Columbia Holds four sessions during year. Annual meeting in September or October. FRANK A. ROSS, Chairman. RUSH J. WHITE, Vice-Chairman. LYNDON K. ARMSTRONG, Secretary-Treasurer, P. O. Drawer 2154, Spokane, Wash. FREDERIC KEFFER. - FRANCIS A. THOMSON.

Jan 12, 1915

By Kenneth K. Humphreys

INTRODUCTION What is automation? Why automate? Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines automation as "the automatically controlled operation of an apparatus, process, or system by mechanical or electronic devices that take the place of human organs of observation, effort, and decision." This definition gives an implied answer to the second question, "Why automate?" Automation, automatic control devices, and process control equipment receive their justification in supplementing or replacing manpower, which results in decreased operating costs. In the past, processes were operated with the minimum amount of instruments needed merely to guide operators. Processes were manually con- trolled by the operator on the basis of simple temperature, pressure, flow, and level indications on a panel. Today the tendency is to design a new plant to operate in a fully automatic manner according to a preset pro- gram utilizing a minimum of manpower. In addition to this direct cost reduction in manual labor, increased equipment capacity results from uniformity of flow and uniform control of process variables. This control eliminates or minimizes surges and permits equipment to be operated at or near its ultimate capacity and, for a given material throughput, permits the use of smaller process equipment. Automatic control, therefore, be it in the field of coal processing or in any industrial field, is simply a problem of economics. Control equipment is justified in terms of its contribution toward increasing productivity, increasing profit margins, or producing a new and salable product at a profit. Instruments and control devices can be divided into two general groups: (1) units which measure and (2) units which both measure and control a process variable.

Jan 1, 1979

By W. C. PAGE

ALL mine ore here must be concentrated before shipment, which involves selective flotation. Three products are made: lead, zinc, and pyrite concentrates. The equipment and practice are so well outlined in the accompanying flow sheet that only a few amplifying remarks are necessary. After crushing at the mine to approximately 4 in., the ore is carried by aerial tram about 4 1/2, mi. to the mill. From 1800 to 2000 metric tons per day, excluding Sundays, is thus transported. At the mill, the buckets are hand-tipped into the bins. After crushing to pass a ¼ -in. square opening, the ore may be stored in reserve crushed-ore bins or ball-mill feed bins as desired. Total bin capacity at the mill is about 4000 metric tons. The concentrator is arranged in three independent grinding sections, each fed from its own storage bin. Grinding operations follow standard practice, with ball mills in single-stage closed circuit with classifiers, the overflow from which is delivered to the lead circuit rougher flotation machines,

Jan 1, 1936

By AIME

WE got our chance to talk with Arthur J. Blair at the Annual Meeting at the Pennsylvania Hotel. By two o'clock Wednesday afternoon things had quieted down enough so we had our interview in the foyer to the Ball Room. There were the usual questions. Where were you born? In La Salle County, Ill., on March 26, 1885. Where did you go to school? Northwestern University, B.S. degree in 1906. Where did you start work? For E. J. Longyear right after leaving school. One's ability as a geologist was measured by one's ability to wield a brush hook and ax. He stayed on the job as geologist for three years and then got to thinking about the advantages of a warmer climate. The advantages stacked up favorably, so off he went to Birmingham, Ala., just about the time U.S. Steel took over the Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Co.

Jan 1, 1948

September 28, 1915. The Nominating Committee of the American Institute of Mining Engineers has the honor to present the following nominations for officers of the Institute to be voted for at the 1915 Annual Meeting: For President: L. D. Ricketts District 0 For Vice-Presidents: Karl Eilers District 0 James MacNaughton District 4 For Directors: Thomas B. Stearns District 7 Charles F. Rand District 0 Charles W. Goodale District 5 Edwin Ludlow District 2 George D. Barron District 0 F. W. BRADLEY, Chairman.

Jan 11, 1915

Bailey, Lewis Newton, Master Engineer, Senior Grade, 4th Regiment, U. S. Engineers, Headquarters Company, died of pneumonia at Camp Merritt, N. J., on April 30, 1918. Baird, Louis, Lieut., Royal Field Artillery, British Army, died on the battlefield in 1915. Ballamy, John H., Capt., 103c1 Engineers, killed in action near Fismes, Aug. 9, 1918. Bowles, Martin F., 2d Lieut., Co. B, 355th Infantry, killed in action, Sept. 3, 1918. Burt, Andrew, died in active service, 1916. Cobeldick, William Morley, Royal Engineers, died from gas poisoning on Oct. 7, 1915. Dougall, Ralph,. 4th University Co., Princess Patricia Regiment, killed in action early in the war. Evans, Alfred Winter, Lieut.-Col., New Zealand Rifle Brigade, D. S. 0., D. C. M., killed in action on Oct. 12, 1917. Gordy, Sheppard B., died in service, Oct. 9, 1918. Gorman, Thomas C., Lieut., Canadian Engineers, killed in France, Mar. 18, 1918. Hague, William, 1st Lieut., Engineer Officers' Reserve Corps, died in active service, Jan. 1, 1918.

Jan 1, 1919

By Howard N. Eavenson

AN analysis of the bituminous coal situation by an authority who traces the production, mining, safety, markets and labor trends in comparison with other fuels. BEFORE 1918 the production of coal experienced a steady growth, with slight recessions in ouput in only twelve years (1837, 1841, 1852, 1855, 1861, 1874, 1876, 1889, 1894, 1905, 1909, 1914), and in each of these cases the loss was recovered in the following year and the increase continued. In each decade the output was doubled. Prices, while not high, allowed some profit. In 1918 during World War I, an output of 580 million tons was reached and with the exception of 1923 this total was not again reached until 1942, in World War 11. Losses of output in this period were much greater than ever before; in 1932 the total was 270 million tons less than in 1918 or 1923, and the loss after 1923 was not recovered until 1942. The greatest output was 631 million tons in 1947.

Jan 1, 1950

The following is an incomplete list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period Oct. 10, 1919, to Nov. 10,1919. Carl A. Allen, Salt Lake City, Utah. W. G. Mitchell, Montreal, Canada. M. M. Altmayer, Paris. Henry S. Munroe, Litchfield, Conn. A. E. Bellis, Major Ord., Springfield J. S. Negru, New York, N. Y. Armory, Springfield, Mass. Edmund Newton, New York, N. Y. R. S. Botsford, New York, N. Y. A. W. Newberry, Cleveland, Ohio. Henry S. Burnholz, Monterrey, Mexico. C. C. O'Harra, Rapid City, S. D. D. E. A. Charlton, New York, N. Y. Fred S. Porter, Philadelphia, Pa. C. C. Colburn, Denver, Colo. Donald A. Powell, Columbus, Ohio. C. V. Corless, Coniston, Ontario. Thomas T. Read, Washington, D. C. I. N. Daily, Seattle, Wash., W. L. Remick, Chrome, N. J. E. V. Daveler, Butte, Mont: Hallet R. Robbins, San Francisco, Calif. John Davis, Fairbanks, Alaska.' Milnor Roberts, University Station, E. W. Engelmann, Salt Lake City, Utah. Seattle, Wash. M. E. Erdofy, New York N. Y. Thos. S. Roberts, Lakehurst Proving W. F. Ferrier, Toronto, Canada. Grounds, N. J. H. A. Fisher, Pittsburgh, Pa. George B. Rodgers, Dobbs Ferry, N. Y. Walter Fitch, Sr., Eureka, Utah. John C. Rogers, Copper Cliff, Ontario. C. D. Grier, New York, N. Y. Joseph L. Rosenmiller, Bethlehem, Pa. A. Hibbert, London. . C. J. Saville, Portland, New South Wales. John E. Hodge, Minneapolis, Minn. W. A. Scheuch, New Jersey. W. E. Hopper, Newark, N. J. S. B. Shutts, Lynchburg, Va. M. R. Hull, McGill, Nev. E. W. Smith, U. S. Army. A. W. Ibbett, Trinidad, B. W. I. S. J. Speak, London. A. O. Ihlseng, Joplin, Mo. John. B. Stewart, Santiago de Cuba, Sherwin F. Kelly, Lawrence, Kans. Cuba. R. G. Knickerbocker, Logansport, Ind. S. A. Taylor, Pittsburgh, Pa. .M. H. Kuryla, Eureka Colo. Karl Thomas,' New York, N. Y. F. G. Lasier, Detroit, Mich. F. L. Torres, Eureka, Nev. David Lasuer, Elizabeth, N. J. Henry Traphagen, Toledo, .Ohio: H. H. Lauer, Allentown, Pa. W. D. Van Doren, Ottawa, Canada. J. Whitney Lewis, Care First Nat'l Bank, J. A. Vernon, Newport, R. I. Tulsa Okla James Wilding, San Francisco, Calif. James W. Love, Knoxville, Tenn. D. J. Williams, Butte, Mont. Dorsey A. Lyon, Washington, D. C. Harry J. Wolf, New York, N. Y. M. E. Martiner, Boston, Mass.. Dwight E. Woodbridge, Duluth, Minn. Benj. L. Miller, Bethlehem, Pa. Percy E. Wrighn, Seattle, Wash. W. G. Miller, Toronto, Canada. F. Yamada, Tokyo, Japan.

Jan 12, 1919

By M. H. Richman, W. D. Sproul

THE indexing of a field-ion micrograph is in many cases similar to the indexing of the poles of a stereo-graphic projection.* If one has a standard projection as a guide, the task of indexing is relatively simple. In this way, field-ion micrographs of bcc and fcc wires have been oriented from projections available in most any text on X-ray diffraction. These books always illustrate the projections for the bcc and fcc structures and even for a particular hcp structure. There is no "standard" hcp projection because the angles between planes depend on the c/o ratio of the unit cell. In order to index field-ion micrographs of hcp metals, one must compute the angles between various planes—a rather laborious task. In recent work,, we have had to identify the structure and index the orientation of field-ion micrographs of the compounds WC and W,C. To overcome the problem of computing angles by hand or calculator, a program was written in Fortran lV for use on the IBM 360, Model 50 which will compute all angles between planeswith indices (hlklll) and (17,k,l2) in the range from (447) to (444) for any given c/o ratio. The program, which is more specific than that of Camp and clum, was so written as to take advantage of the multiplicity of the hexagonal system, and, for the limits defined above, only 26,649 values out of a possible 265,721 values had to be computed. This is a 90 pct saving in time (and cost) and was accomplished in the following way. Because the lattice parameters of the hexagonal crystal system are defined such that: a = b * c [1] the I index does not enter into the multiplicity (i.e., it cannot be transposed with the h or k indices), and all possible values of h and I, from 4 to 4 must be used—a total of eighty-one combinations. The index h2 varies the most—it must assume values from - Ill,: to 3Ihl. The indices kl and k2 are always equal and vary

Jan 1, 1969