Search Documents

By Gour Sen, Peter Bellairs

Blasting conducted in rock temperatures greater than or equal to 55°C (13 1 “F) and / or in rock containing sulphide minerals and their oxidation products can result in unplanned detonations. Blasting practices involving the identification of the affected areas together with the use of speciality explosive products and rigorous attention to quality control are required to safely blast in these types of environments. Sulphide dust explosions occur in some underground mines where the primary blast results in a secondary explosion of the sulphide rock dust which propagates some distance from the primary blast area. This phenomena results in considerable damage and the generation of significant volumes of toxic gasses delaying re-entry to the affected area of the mine thereby increasing both costs and safety concerns. The exothermic reaction between ammonium nitrate based explosives and rock types containing partially oxidised sulphides have resulted in numerous high risk blasting incidents. These reactions can occur at ambient temperatures and often result in premature detonations / deflagrations causing a great deal of consternation at the affected minesite resulting in lost production and considerable expenditure to solve the problem. Rock masses at elevated temperatures can also result in unplanned detonations unless appropriate precautions are taken. This paper discusses each of these hazards, cites some case studies and details appropriate generic safe and efficient blasting techniques for each of the above applications using appropriately formulated explosive products.

Jan 1, 2000

By James Ludwiczak

This paper consists of the conduct of a forensic criminal investigation of the components, construction, use, and functioning of two suicide bombs. As the title states, the task was to form professional opinions as to whether the bombs would work, would cause property damage, and would injure or kill. The bombs were created and installed by a defendant in a Federal death penalty case where the defendant’s daughter was killed in a shootout with the West Virginia State Police. The two black powder bombs were placed under the front seats of the defendant’s automobile and were designed to function by the use of a toggle switch connected to the automobile’s cigarette lighter. The forensic work first consisted of an inspection of the remains of the wiring system and bombs at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Laboratory, in Ammendale, MD. This was necessary to determine and detail the wire diameter and lengths, the lengths and size of the wire used, the type of toggle switch used, the type of containers, the type of rocket motors used to initiate the black powder, the manufacturer and amount of black powder used in each bomb, and the type, wraps, and amount of duct tape used for the construction of each bomb. Using this data, tests were conducted by duplicating the wiring system and the two bombs to insure that the system functioned properly. Each bomb was duplicated and initiated to observe the violence produced when initiated in the open air. Duplicate bombs were placed under the seats of a similar type of automobile and initiated. The purposes of the tests were to duplicate the bombs, to observe the violence of the initiation, and to observe the damages to the automobile produced by the initiation.

Jan 1, 2007

By Jack Eloranta

To improve control of blasting, tests were performed to assess non-electric cap accuracy. Simultaneous testing using a Velocity of Detonation Recorder (VODR), Red Lake LoCam and an Instantel DS-677 blast monitor was done. Favorable comparisons were found in the three records. This testing confirmed the accuracy of an inexpensive and expedient cap testing procedure.

Jan 1, 1992

By Jim Simpson, John Waller, Scott Stewart

The authors review the evolution of drilling and blasting procedures at this West Virginia surface coal mine where management seeks continually to improve and update the drilling and blasting programs. Today's operations require efficient programs which include quality control to maximize production and minimize the public's sensitivity to the blasting events.

Jan 1, 1992

By Dale Preece, Stephen Chung, Richard Jensen

DMCBLAST_3D is a three-dimensional extension of the proven two-dimensional rock blast modeling code, DMCBLAST. DMCBLAST has been under development since 1987 and has successfully predicted the physics, mechanisms and results of a number of different types of rock blasting including, coal mine bench blasting, mineral mine choke blasting and underground stope blasting. Substantial effort has gone into the qualification and verification of DMCBLAST by comparing computer code predictions with real blasts in the field. Comparison with field data has also provided significant guidance to the development of the code.

Jan 1, 2001

By J Lyall Workman, Peter N. Calder

The Manassas Quarry is a large industrial stone quarry in Northern Virginia owned and operated by Vulcan Materials Company. The quarry experienced instability in a portion of the north wall, which included toppling failure in a metasediment and movement on a major fault zone. It was necessary to take remedial measures to stabilize the wall and create good quality final pit walls.

Jan 1, 1992

By Michael S. Wieland

This report discusses the U.S. Bureau of Mines research regarding the desensitization and malfunction of cap-sensitive explosives deployed in underground coal mines. Delay blasting in underground coal generates severe shock waves and rifting forces that fracture and heave coal. These dynamic interactions can damage other charges still remaining in the delay pattern. The debilitating impacts precipitate degrees of reduced charge performance ranging from misfires to weak detonations or out-of-sequence firings. Damaged charges react poorly, perform less useful work, and/or generate atypical fumes with higher toxicity.

Jan 1, 1993

By Robert Hopler

Accidents associated with the storage of explosives prompted regulating the locations of such storage at least as early as 1719, when an act was passed in Great Britain. During the following years various refinements to the regulations were made, but a major explosion in 1864 in which there was destruction and loss of life as far away as 10 miles, led to the landmark Explosives Act of 1875. This act certainly had influence on regulators in the United States: when Massachusetts established an explosives distance/weight table in 1904 they referred to the prior British work. Later, Colonel Dunn of The American Railway Association convened a conference of explosives manufacturers to discuss safe storage. From this conference the American Table of Distances was established in December, 1910.

Jan 1, 2007

By Christopher Smith

The critical nature of detonator function in blast design and its effects upon performance and safety of a blasting operation are well documented. Numerous laboratory and field studies have shown dynamic shock waves, generated by the detonating explosives in a shot, to be detrimental to the performance of the explosive columns in the adjacent boreholes. Laboratory tests conducted in Japan have explored the possible effects of dynamic precompression upon cartridges of emulsion explosives, which had been sensitized with different hotspot void producing methods. These tests uncovered significant differences in the magnitude of the dynamic shock wave pressures measured inside the different emulsion explosive cartridges, and demonstrated these pressure differences by crushing detonator shells inserted inside the emulsion cartridge. Basically, the results of these tests clearly showed the magnitude of the compressive force applied to the detonator inside the primed explosive cartridge to be a function of the mechanism that had been used to sensitize the emulsion (i.e., glass microspheres, plastic spheres, chemical gassing). The current study was designed to further explore the actual detonator failure mechanism in these dynamic precompression tests using live detonators inside the emulsion cartridge as opposed to empty detonator shells. The testing involved inserting commercial delay detonators inside emulsion charges, which had been sensitized with common hotspot void producing agents, and subjecting the primed explosive cartridge to the dynamic pressure wave generated by an underwater donor explosive charge. The effects of variations in the emulsion’s sensitization method upon the damage inflicted to the detonator were studied. Depending upon the degree of detonator damage, detonator crushing can lead to varying degrees of detonator malfunctions, ranging from sympathetic initiation of the detonator, to a reduction in delay time accuracy, to reduced detonator output, to complete detonator failure. Each of these malfunctions can have serious detrimental effects upon the performance and safety of a blasting operation.

Jan 1, 2006

By Chad Ducey

The proper utilization of energy in an explosive column is of paramount importance to the success of any blast. Historically, Powder Factor (the weight of explosive per mass or volume of material to be blasted or its inverse), has dictated the blast design. The concept of Energy Factor is a more effective method to design a blast. In order to utilize explosives efficiently, the energy contained in any given product must be quantified. The Powder Factor method, although historically successful, assumes that a pound of cast pentolite affects the material to be blasted the same as a pound of ammonium nitrate / me1 oil (ANFO.) Years of experience and scientific testing have led the blaster in the field to believe otherwise. The next logical technological step is Energy Factor. The Energy Factor method that will be discussed in this paper takes into consideration not only the weight of the explosive, but also the weight strength (Cal/g) and the density (g/cc) to yield a constant relative Energy Factor. The result of such a method is a factor that can be used in the field exactly the same as Powder Factor, but that reflects the relative energy of any given product in terms that will reflect the relative cost benefit of that explosive selection. The Energy Factors associated with different available explosives make it possible to compare the difference in the amount of energy per loaded pound in each unit length of borehole. This paper will examine the concept of Energy Factor in an in depth manner and also compare this quantification method to that of Powder Factor. It will also demonstrate the value of using Energy Factor and how it can improve the efficiency of a blast design. The misconceptions that come along with using Powder Factor will be examined and comparisons will be made between boreholes loaded using Powder Factor and those that are loaded using Energy Factor. This paper will clearly define the differences between these blast design methods and allow the reader to realize the production, quality, and economic advantages of using the Energy Factor method.

Jan 1, 2000

By Carlyle F. Bunn

The source of the standards adopted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration are outlined. Preplanning to eliminate violation of the standards and improve overall job efficiency are discussed.

Jan 1, 1975

By Heins Walter Wild

Detailed investigations on various configuration kinds of cut with respect to drilling-technological and blasting-technological properties as well as with respect to cost effectiveness have been carried out in Germany.

Jan 1, 1995

By Melvin A. Sannes

The explosives industry is recognized as one of the most dangerous occupations in the world, yet it is rare to see actual training procedures. As our industry becomes increasingly technical, it is imperative that we train the personnel in OUI industry properly.

Jan 1, 1999

By Thomas L. Barkley, Steve Salli

In the past, blasters have attempted to evaluate the results of their blast designs and make corrective adjustments to improve the blasts' productivity and value to the mining operation. The methods employed have nearly always been "eyeball" evaluations and "trial and error" corrections.

Jan 1, 1997

By David F. Street

In order to achieve an efficient operation in an open pit mine it is very important to develop and maintain good coordination and communication between various departments within the operation. This paper will address this subject using methods and procedures developed at an open pit gold mine in northern Nevada.

Jan 1, 1994

By Robert C. Friend

On-the-job and "hands-on" training programs which attempt to train newcomers to blasting with instructors whose only qualification is their experience can easily miss the boat. Organized training programs which utilize competent instructors and a well developed format are necessary if we wish to provide a meaningful program of instruction, But, let's not go overboard and attempt to provide a level of training which goes far beyond the scope of the worker's duties and responsibilities, and "need to know",

Jan 1, 1980

By AN Gupta, N V. Srinivasa Rao

Initiating devices like detonators use sensitive primary explosives. Successful detonation of secondary explosive is achieved by suitable source of energy from primaries. The most widely used primaries contain toxic lead azide and lead styphnate, dinitrodiphenol or tetracine. All these primaries are very sensitive to friction, impact and heat. The handling of these chemicals is very hazardous and many accidents reported in detonator manufacturing were from these primaries only. In addition to this high sensitivity, lead azide and lead styphnate contain lead which is toxic.

Jan 1, 2014

By Jin Jingzhi, Wang Xuguang, Guan Li, Li Jianjin

Emulsion explosives are gaining a wider and wider commercial market and are displacing other composite slurry technologies. However, the grease-like state and essential thermodynamic instability of emulsion explosives cause inconvenience in production, transportation, storage and use and lead to gradual changes in performance. Emulsion powder explosives are designed to avoid these disadvantages. The formulation, process and properties of emulsion powder explosives made through a spin flash technology are described in this paper.

Jan 1, 1997

By Jerry Bennett

A recant Bureau of Mines analysis has shown that failure of blast area security systems is the mayor cause of mine blasting accidents. Accidents occur during scheduled blasting because of failure to clear the blast zone, inadequate guarding, and failure of personnel to follow instructions, retreat to a safe location and/or take adequate cover. The high incidence of blastslte security-related accidents could be considerably reduced by increased attention to improving minesite blast-guarding practices.

Jan 1, 1984

By Ronald L. Sanders

The prevailing view of the coal mining industry by government officials is: "Tell everyone you're coming - Don't let anyone know you're there - And remove all evidence you have ever been there". Now the irony is that the government inspectors are just enforcing the law. The coal mine operators seem more interested in genuine reclamation than the inspectors.

Jan 1, 1979