Search Documents

By Minoru Kawamura, Yukio Kato, Yoshikazu Hirosaki, Satoru Suzuki

A wireless blasting system for tunnel construction which consists of a loop antenna, oscillator and blaster, has been developed. The basic technology of this method had been studied in the 1970s to develop a wireless initiation system for undersea blasting and has been successfully used as a Remote Controlled (RCB) system in the Honshu/ Shikoku Bridge construction project in Japan.

Jan 1, 1998

By Natalie Zeleznik, Brian Hawkins, David Bradley, Rachel Gooding, Patrick Wilson, Brian Somes, Kevin Wegman

"To perform a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), a method of quantifying the risks associated withinfrequent high consequence events, consequence models that generate representative estimates of human health consequences for a wide variety of representative scenarios are commonly used. Criteria that suitable models must possess include: (1) input requirements necessary to generate large volumes ofprobabilistic simulations; (2) the capability to output injuries with the necessary details and resolution;(3) the ability to capture the variety of different scenarios inherent in an assessment; (4) acceptable cost and computational requirements; and (5) sufficient stakeholder buy-in for community acceptance."

Jan 1, 2017

By Rolf Koenig

After the Dynatronic firing system was demonstrated for the first time at the SEE conference in Miami in 1987, it was officially approved in Germany at the beginning of 1993. Dynatronic has now been on the market for 5 years. At present, it is used in several European countries and successful test series have been running in Australia.

Jan 1, 1998

By William Yutmeyer, Meredith Hardwick

Since 1996 there have been at least two teams formed within the U.S. Government to develop a consistent set of risk-based standards to be used to govern safety. The first of these was the Risk and Lethality Commonality Team which developed risk criteria associated with protecting personnel during launches at the national test ranges. The second team titled the Risk-Based Explosives Safety Criteria Team (RBESCT) is the subject of this paper.

Jan 1, 2007

By Joseph L. Uraco, Harry C. Verakis

The use of explosives in underground coal mines presents a potential risk for serious injuries and death to miners. Widespread disasters have occurred from the explosion of methane and/or coal dust initiated by blasting with explosives. Many of these disasters took place in the early 1900's when the use of black powder for blasting was prevalent. Historically, the investigations in the U.S.A. to develop and test safer explosives for blasting coal began in 1908 when a testing station was established in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Since that time, great strides have been taken in the development of safer explosives. The use of safer explosives has significantly reduced blasting accidents in coal mines. Enactment of legislation, such as the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 and enforcement of regulations has also improved blasting safety. More recently, MSHA began a major revision of its regulations for blasting in coal mines. In 1988, MSHA published final rules for the approval and use of permissible explosives in coal mines. The approval requirements for explosives address testing and evaluation. The requirements include tests for sheathed explosives which represent a new technology. The use regulations provide increased safety protection for miners by including standards to address identified hazards. Major aspects of these standards, such as qualifications for blasters, multiple-shot blasting and the use of sheathed explosives are discussed.

Jan 1, 1992

By Dale S. Preece

A carefully designed and controlled in-place destruction experiment was performed on a concrete bunker buried in 4.27 m (14 ft.) of soil. The objective was to determine if the explosive charges would collapse the structure in-place without requiring mechanical excavation. Collapse of the buried structure was fi rst attempted by drilling holes in the soil and placing four 13.38 Kg (29.5 lb) Comp B explosive charges at a depth of 2.13 m (6.7 ft.). The confi guration of the charges when detonated was 2.13 m (6.7 ft.) off the top of the concrete roof and 3.66 m (12 ft.) apart in a square pattern. Detonation of these charges created a crater ~4.88 m (16 ft.) in diameter and 2.13 m (6.7 ft.) deep, leaving ~2.13 m (6.7 ft.) of soil covering. Very limited spalling occurred on the ceiling of the concrete structure as a result of detonating these four charges. The second attempt to collapse the structure consisted of placing another single 13.38 Kg (29.5 lb) charge, identical to the fi rst four, near the geometrical center of the bunker roof. This charge was detonated in the soil cover 100 to 200 mm (4 to 8 in.) above the reinforced concrete roof, collapsing it. Due to the collapsed roof and remaining soil cover, the structure had been collapsed in place, requiring no further demolition. A computer simulation of the above explosive destruction scenario was completed using the computer hydrocode AUTODYN with a granular material model to treat the soil and the RHT brittle material model to represent the concrete. AUTODYN accurately recreated the scenario including the slightly damaged response of the concrete structure to the initial four charges and the collapse of the structure resulting from the second single charge close to the roof.

Jan 1, 2007

By Larry Schneider

In the construction field and to a lesser degree in mining, flagman are often necessary to move traffic and or pedestrians through work zones. Everyone readily recognizes that they are essential for the safety of the general public and the employees on the job. What is not often considered is the safety of the flagmen themselves. Actually, let’s call these employees “flaggers” recognizing the fact that there are as many women as men doing this job. The first problem we need to overcome is the misperception that flagging is a low skill function that can be done by any untrained employee. The reality is that the flagger works in a very hazardous position with serious responsibility for the safety of his fellow employees and the public at large. And to do this job properly re q u i re s that the flagger receive sufficient training before being sent out to the highway. It is also necessary to convince the flagger of the value and importance of their job in order to motivate them to do a professional job.testing, documentation of both, and accurate re c o rdkeeping are key aspects of HM126F. Of course, training and documentation requirements will vary depending on the type of operation involved, and there may be some differences in the application of requirements depending on your jursdiction. Nonetheless, failure to train and properly document such training can result in heavy fines and/or penalties.

Jan 1, 2004

By Jon Andrews

Purpose: To show how in managing risk in avalanche control blasting has changed throughout the years, and try to define the term “Acceptable Risk”. History: The history and the way we manage risk in avalanche control blasting to the avalanche control crews and public has change over the years dramatically. From the mid 1800s to about 1920 was the Risk vs. Rewards era, the Industrial Revolution. Now it is a Risk vs. Liability, the age of Liability.

Jan 1, 2009

By G. A. Walsh, M. Timm, S. M. Geerts

This paper will discuss the effectiveness and the general use of improvised shaped charges. Testing was conducted by the New Mexico Tech Student Chapter of ISEE and held at EMRTC. The first series of tests conducted was to illustrate the performance of different features of the shaped charge. A PVC pipe filled with C4 with no cavity, PVC with an unlined conical cavity, PVC with a copper lined conical cavity and no standoff, and lastly a PVC pipe with a copper lined cavity and a 1.5 cone diameter standoff.

Jan 1, 2010

By Italo Onederra, Jason Furtney, Ewan Sellers

The Hybrid Stress Blasting Model (HSBM) is a high level blast modelling research tool which provides results that can still be used implicitly for practical blast design. The code is being developed through an international collaborative research project funded by a consortium of companies which is comprised of explosive, equipment suppliers and major mining houses. A key component of the HSBM is the numerical code and user interface designated as Blo-Up 2.5. To date validation work has focussed on breakage, fragmentation and damage outcomes in controlled laboratory experiments and using large concrete cubes

Jan 1, 2012

By H. C. Verakis

This paper summarizes blasting accident data for over a quarter of a century (1978-2004) for all types of surface and underground mining operations in the United States. Although many billions of pounds of explosives and blasting agent have been used by the mining industry, the accident safety record has improved significantly in the past 25 years. Over the past decade, approximately 5 billion pounds of explosives and blasting agents were used annually in the United States. Coal mining has been and continues to be the dominant user of blasting agents.

Jan 1, 2006

By John M. Bolger, Keith E. McMaster

Excessive salt fines are undesirable in underground salt mining as they are considered a costly waste byproduct. This paper describes an extensive explosive application program conducted at The Canadian Salt Company Ltd, located in Pugwash, Nova Scotia, Canada. The prime objective of the program was to reduce the quantity of fines generated from this company’s underground production blasts. The program was known as the “The Fines Reduction Program”.

Jan 1, 1996

By Sung Su, Jui-Lin Chang

A new technique of dimensional stones blasting for achieving directional rock cutting by conical shaped charges is proposed in this study. This technique has many advantages like precisely controlling numbers and propagation directions of cracks under blasting, having a complete rock excavation face, and maintaining surrounding rock and slope’s stability. So it can be applied to quarrying, underground excavation, tunneling, rock slope blasting, bench blasting and dimensional stone blasting.

Jan 1, 2006

By R E. Otterness, M S. Stagg

The U. S. Bureau of Mines conducted 22 full-scale blasts to determine the effects of delay and explosive type on fragmentation. The shots were conducted over a period of 7 years in three limestone quarries and one granite quarry. Hole diameters, bench heights, and number of holes varied from 6.4- to 14-cm, 6.7- to 14-m, and 4- to 24-holes, respectively. Explosive performance and actual firing times were measured and screening was used to assess the fragmentation.

Jan 1, 1995

By Stafan Rose, Art Madsen

Four years ago, Peabody’s North Antelope Rochelle Mine (NARM) site started experimenting withANFO and Liners in its Cast Blasting operations. The motivation to use ANFO was based on the following:1. ANFO generates more gas thereby resulting in greater heave/movement. 2. ANFO is a more consistent product because there are less components/ingredients. 3. ANFO when protected from water contamination does not produce NOx smoke.

Jan 1, 2007

By Gimtong Teowee

SDI has launched the Electronic Detonator Blasting System containing a set of robust serial protocol and hardware exhibiting great ease in field usability and deployment. Programmable delay time with increments of 1 ms up to 10s is possible with excellent timing accuracy. Bus length of up to 2 km containing 1600 EIMs can be employed. A key feature of the SDI Electronic Blasting System has been its high tolerance towards current leakage in the bus line.

Jan 1, 2007

By Richard D. Love

Competition in the aggregate industry of the 90's will be an over increasing really. With this in mind a quarry manager should always be comparing new and innovative concepts to increase productivity and reduce operating costs. In this paper, the author will present a comprehensive history of a drilling and blasting program that achieves these results. By employing proven methods and implementing new concepts, this program was proven to be a success over a ten year period.

Jan 1, 1991

By David E. Siskind

In the period 1989 to 1994, the U.S. Bureau of Mines assisted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) in studying a high-complaint situation near an active surface coal mine. As part of a review for its project report, the Bureau had to address issues on the adequacy of the safe blasting criteria and analysis procedures in its 1980 report RI 8507, Structure Response and Damage Produced by Ground Vibration From Surface Mine Blasting.

Jan 1, 1996

By Kamal Wadhwa

Liquid oxygen explosives have been used in India for well over 5 decades now. These are being extensively used both for shallow and deep hole blasting in the various opencast mines and quarries for mining of coal, limestone, ironore, bauxite, magnesite etc. IOL Ltd., are the pioneers in the introduction of these explosives in India and are marketing these under the brand name 'LOXITE'.

Jan 1, 1991

By Denise Clarke

Homeland Security Qualifications (HSQ) personnel were instrumental in developing the UK’s suite of Explosive Substances and Articles (ESA) National Occupational Standards (NOS) (also known as "competences") on behalf of the Standards Setting Body for Explosives, Munitions and Search Occupations (SSB for EMSO).

Jan 1, 2013