Search Documents

By Joe Strobbe, Kevin Joe

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation awarded PCL Civil Constructors the project to build a new visitor's center and parking lot structure at the Hoover Dam. The excavations for these structures present many blast design challenges. The visitor center, a 30 foot deep excavation was blasted in the Nevada side of the canyon wall, 600 feet above the existing power plant. This excavation also included a through-cut underneath the existing road that carries the traffic over the Dam between Nevada and Arizona.

Jan 1, 1993

By Robert B. Hopler

This paper reviews, from the historical standpoint, the development of the commonly-used terms such as "No. 6 and No. 8" with regard to detonator strengths. The origin of the strength terminology is reviewed, and the many methods developed to compare the strength of one detonator to another are described, with the good and bad points of each method outlined. The "miniature cartridge test," very highly regarded by both the U.S. Bureau of Mines and Institute of Makers of Explosives in the 1930's and early 1940's, is described in detail, as is a test developed and used by IRECO.

Jan 1, 1992

By D. K. Ingram, G. L. Mowrey, T. R. Rehak

This paper summarizes flyrock and blast area security fatalities from 1989 to 1999 and examines the causative factors. Coal and nonmetal mining used about 43 billion pounds of explosives and blasting agents between1989 to 1999. A majority of this consumption was used at surface mines. Accident data indicates that flyrock and lack of blast area security were the primary causes of blasting related injuries in surface mining. Fatal injuries due to lack of blast area security were attributed to: failure to clear blast area; failure to follow instructions; inadequate guarding; inadequate blasting shelter; and unsafe location.

Jan 1, 2002

By Bill Runner, James T. Ludwiczak

During the last few years, there has been a flood of local, state, and Federal government regulations concerning blasting. Many of the laws and regulations were written by individuals who know little about explosives, the purpose of blasting, or blasting vibration and damage. I feel that the special interest groups responsible for some of these regulations are not trying to regulate blasting, but to stop it completely by unreasonable, non-flexible, regulations. The most recent being the Office of Surface Mining regulations that are already spreading to the quarry industry and will, no doubt, spread to all blasting involving disturbance of the surface.

Jan 1, 1979

By R. K. Wharton

A European Directive requires that an explosive which is sold or transported within Europe must meet certain essential safety requirements from 1 January 2003. The assessment and certification of such an explosive is undertaken by an Explosives Notified Body and if the explosive meets the requirements a certificate is issued that allows the affixation of a CE mark. The presence of a CE mark ensures the product free access to European markets. The paper examines the requirements of the Directive, identifies those explosives that come within its scope, considers the role of an Explosives Notified Body, and explains the process of applying for certification.

Jan 1, 2002

By Gordon Revey

In construction and mining work, situations occasionally occur where hard rock or concrete must be excavated at locations near critical structures or utilities. Fearing damage from blasting, contractors and engineers often explore the viability of using mechanical methods or expansive concrete to facilitate the excavation work. However, for moderate to large excavations, the prolonged duration and high cost of using these methods is often impractical. In these situations, under the right conditions, controlled blasting and blast-management methods can be used to speed up the work and lessen costs. The process of determining whether or not blasting is practical is ofien complex, particularly when risks are high.

Jan 1, 2001

By Paul Worsey, Delbert Da, Eric Achelpohl

The University of Missouri-Rolla is currently researching the concept of using glass microspheres in explosives as taggants as part of a 3-year technical project funded by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. These taggants are intended to provide two functions, first explosive detection and second post explosive event identification. The key priority is being able to detect explosives used in terrorist acts prior to detonation. The research on the use of microspheres includes the development of indicator taggants for the purpose of revealing the presence of hidden explosives, by either emitting radiation when bombarded with neutrons or emitting selective vapors, such as DMNB which may be readily “sniffed”. Of secondary importance, after an illegal explosion, the tags serve to identify the lot number, etc of the explosive. This information is to aid in the tracking, arrest, conviction and imprisonment of the perpetrators.

Jan 1, 2001

By Mike McGill, Stephen Chung, Dale S. Preece

Cast blasting can be designed to utilize explosive energy effectively and economically for coal mining operations to remove overburden material. The more overburden removed by explosives, the less blasted material there is left to be transported with mechanical equipment, such as draglines and trucks. In order to optimize the percentage of rock that is cast, a higher powder factor than normal is required plus an initiation technique designed to produce a much greater degree of horizontal muck movement. This is a significant change from normal blasting practice where fine fragmentation and sufficient muck movement were the prime requirements to permit efficient excavation.

Jan 1, 1994

By Thomas R. Scotese, John L. Ackerman

The Hanging Lake Tunnel Project represents a major portion of the Glenwood Canyon Project, the last piece of Interstate 70 to be constructed. The project features twin bore, large span rock tunnels and six open cut portal excavations, all excavated by drilling and blasting. This paper presents descriptions of the methods used by the Owner and Engineer to control and monitor the drilling and blasting practices in the tunnels and in the portal areas.

Jan 1, 1992

In situ, most Taconite is heavily pre-fractured; because of the high cost of comminution of taconite, maximum fracture of pre-existing blocks is desirable. Sustained borehole pressure plays a significant role in fragmentation, especially by penetrating pre-existing fractures. The distribution of explosive-induced energy in the burden in three dimensions was calculated. Data on the comminution of single particles was used, with the distribution of energies and the distribution of pre-existing block sizes, to calculate fragmentation for a case study. The calculation agreed well with the measured fragmentation. Sequential comminution events are much more efficient than single ones, and enhanced fragmentation may be possible with alternative blasting practices. Some important factors in the dependence of comminution on energy input are discussed.

Jan 1, 1995

By Larry R. Fletcher, John W. Kopp

The safety record for explosives in U. S. mining is excellent considering that over 4 billion pounds of explosives are now being used each year. However, blasting accidents remain one of the most serious concerns based on the number of injuries, the injury severity rate and the disaster potential. The Bureau of Mines has been analyzing blasting accident data obtained from the Mine Health and Safety Administration (MSHA) to determine the most frequent causes of mine blasting accidents and to examine trends in blasting accidents. This accident analysis is an update of two previous blasting accident studies conducted by the Bureau and published in 1983 and 1987.

Jan 1, 1991

By A B. Andrews

The use of sequential blasting techniques that combine surface and in-thehole delays has provided blasters with increased flexibility in blast design to promote good rock fragmentation and displacement while minimizing offsite blast effects such as air blast, flyrock, and ground vibration.

Jan 1, 1981

By Terry L. Cook

RAG Coal West, Inc., Belle Ayr Mine is located in the heart of Wyoming’s rich Powder River Basin coalfield. Belle Ayr utilizes an open pit, truck/shovel operation to strip the overburden off the 70’seam of sub bituminous coal. Our excavation capacities consist of a 301 Marion with a bucket size of 52 cubic yards, and a 4100 XPB P&H with a capacity of 76 cubic yards. Production levels on these machines are closely monitored utilizing the Modular Mining Dispatch system. RAG Coal West, Inc. is a coal mining business that utilizes the effectiveness of teams as one of their strategies. Technicians have a certain amount of control over their own Team Process. The Drilling & Blasting Team is an assortment of blasters with varying experience levels. We have been able to think outside of the box when it comes to certain “proven” methods of blasting.

Jan 1, 2004

By J. Esterle, J. Kruttschnitt

Fragmentation modelling in soft rocks presents a challenge due to their propensity to further fragment after blasting during normal handling. Coal and some iron ore deposits are examples of materials that undergo significant degradation during the extraction, hauling and dumping process of the mining operation. The Kuz-Ram model is an empirically derived predictor of size distribution from blasting hard rock. Little breakage occurs during excavation and subsequent sizing of hard rock, so the measured Run of Mine (ROM) size distribution is essentially the same as the post-blast (before excavation) size distribution. However, for soft rocks, each step of the excavation and hauling operation imparts energy to the rock particles so the measured. ROM size distribution will be significantly different from the postblast size distribution. In order to calculate the ROM fragmentation at any stage of the extraction (or sizing) operation, the JKMRC has developed a model that combines both blast fragmentation and degradation through subsequent handling.

Jan 1, 2001

By Cathy Aimone-Martin

The City of Henderson, Nevada is experiencing extraordinary population growth. Some residential development requires blasting to be conducted at close proximities to high-value houses. Blastingrelated concerns voiced by the community residents include dust, noise, fears of damage to residences, and claims of insufficient controls exercised by the blasters. Residents perceive geological conditions are adverse to the protection of structures at the current vibration regulatory limit of 0.5 in/s. Airblast limits are 120 dB. Vibrations felt within structures leave home owners with the perception that damage is taking place. New cracks appearing in homes at distances far from the blasting are being blamed on blasting.

Jan 1, 2007

By Dale Preece, Stephen Chung

Development of DMCBLAST-3D is continuing and now includes the capability to simulate the detonation of multiple blastholes in multiple rows that make up a conventional bench blast, either in a rock quarry or a surface coal mine. DMCBLAST-3D is a three-dimensional extension of the proven twodimensional rock blast modeling code, DMCBLAST. DMCBLAST has been under development since 1987 and has successfully predicted the physics, mechanisms and results of a number of different types of rock blasting including, coal mine bench blasting, mineral mine choke blasting and underground stope blasting. Substantial effort has gone into the qualification and verification of DMCBLAST by comparing computer code predictions with real blasts in the field. Comparison with field data has also provided significant guidance to the development of the code.

Jan 1, 2002

By P Albert

A wedge-shaped underwater rock plug has to be blasted in order to tap the reservoir and furnish water to a new underground powerhouse at Manicouagan-5. The paper deals with the design and engineering aspects of drilling and blasting of this plug where the topographical configuration is extremely difficult. In this study small diameter vertical holes are considered with the OD-method and a fixed platform is recommended for drilling and loading operations.

Jan 1, 1984

By Jim Daly

The word “Enron” has taken on a totally different meaning since its leaders were caught juggling the books, President Clinton’s reputation was destroyed not by what he did but by how he tried to cover it up, Martha Stewart spent time in prison for not being honest. Our society is tolerant of mistakes we humans make but has become very critical about what we do following those mistakes. The blasting industry is in a similar position. We have all heard the stories of the tree stump that came down through someone’s roof, of the windows that were broken, of the casualties that occurred when a blast was not properly guarded. What was done following these incidents? In the mind of the public, not enough.

Jan 1, 2007

By G Dean Barrett

Just one year ago at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the Society of Explosives Engineers, Dr. Calvin J. Konya presented a paper entitled "Presplitting Granite Using Pyrodex, A Propellant.'' Since that time more evidence has been developed to support the concept that "...gas energy can be the principal splitting force and that the stress wave or shock wave is not necessary to cause the presplitting action to occur." Work done in Vermont and Georgia is presented, and the ability to split granite without causing radial cracking of the bore holes is demonstrated.

Jan 1, 1987

By Richard J. Mainiero, Michael S. Wieland, Harry C. Verakis

The Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, has been conducting research on delay blasting in underground coal mines in support of the efforts of Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), U.S. Department of Labor, to revise coal mine blasting regulations. Part of the research centered on developing an understanding of the factors that lead to misfires of permissible explosives. Research was conducted to determine whether frequency of misfires was related to borehole spacing. For a wide variety of permissible explosives, misfires were observed for about 50 X of the holes at 45-cm (18-in) spacing. Misfires were also observed for 60-cm (24-in) spacing, but the frequency of misfires was much lower than observed for the 45-cm (18-in) spacing. The Bureau has recommended that hole spacings of less than 60 cm (24 in) be prohibited.

Jan 1, 1986