Search Documents

September 28, 1915. The Nominating Committee of the American Institute of Mining Engineers has the honor to present the following nominations for officers of the Institute to be voted for at the 1915 Annual Meeting: For President: L. D. Ricketts District 0 For Vice-Presidents: Karl Eilers District 0 James MacNaughton District 4 For Directors: Thomas B. Stearns District 7 Charles F. Rand District 0 Charles W. Goodale District 5 Edwin Ludlow District 2 George D. Barron District 0 F. W. BRADLEY, Chairman.

Jan 11, 1915

Organization Place Date International Mining Convention (Auspices, Van- 1919 couver Chamber of Mines) Vancouver, B. C. Jan. 8-10 American Institute of Consulting Engineers, Inc... New York, N. Y. Jan. 13 American Society of Civil Engineers New York, N. Y. Jan. 15-16 Institute of Chemical Engineers Chicago, 111. Jan. 15-18 American Wood Preservers Association St. Louis, Mo. Jan. 28-30 American Society of Heating and Ventilating Engineers New York, N. Y. Jan. 28-30 Automotive Engineers New York, N. Y. Feb. 4-6

Jan 1, 1919

Abbott, Franklin E. Adgate, Frank Aertsen, G. Aid, Kenneth Albert, H. I. Alexander, D. B. W. Allan, Wm. G. Allen, R. 0. Allen, Roy H. Aller, Mr. and Mrs. F. D. Altmayer, Maurice Ambler, Harry A. Ambrose, A. WV. Ammon, Mark A. Ammon, Mr. and Mrs. Robt. Anderson, George H. Anderson, Mr. and Mrs. L. D. Andros, S. 0. Appleby, W. R. Archer, R. S. Armitage, Paul Arobb, Alden D. Arthur, Walter Ashman, A. 0. Atkinson, R. H. Aupperle, J. A. Austin, D. F. Avery, G. E.

Jan 11, 1919

Elected Died 1895 *ABBOTT, AI ATTHUR 1908 1882 *ABBOTT, ARTHUR V 1906 1903 * ADAMS, CHARLES C. 1905 1905 * ADAMS, WILLAMS 1909 1884 *ADDY, MATTHEW 1896 1889 * AKERS, WILLIAMS 1906 1894 *ALLEN R B 1896 1905 * ALLEN, R. SCOTT 1906 1874 *AMIOT, H 1892 1886 *AMSLER, CARL 1894 1895 *ÅNGSTROM, CARL 1901 1900 * ARLETT, GEORGE H 1906 1895 *ARMSTRONG, JOHN F 1898 1882 *ARNOLDS, HUGO 1886 1875 *ASHBURNER, CHARLES A 1889 1872 *ASIIBURNER, WILLIAM 1887 1883 *ATKINS, C M , JR 1885 1905 * AUSTEN, PETER T 1907

Jan 1, 1910

By F. Galasso, A. Paton

ThE recent emphasis on producing boron fibers by reacting boron trichloride and hydrogen on a hot tungsten wire has brought about a renewed interest in the tungsten boride phase diagram. The reaction of the boron with the tungsten core results in the formation of 6 WB, W2B5, and another tungsten boride phase, which was suspected of being the WB4 phase reported by Chrbtien and Helgorsky.1 While the powder-diffraction data for the boride in the fiber and those reported

Jan 1, 1967

By AIME AIME

CHARLES ALLEN GIBBONS has been in the anthracite industry now since 1931, following his earlier experience in the bituminous fields, which dated from boyhood. In fact he was born in a coal-mining district-at Morgantown, W. Va.-starting at an early age working in the neighboring mines-going to the secondary schools there and then to West Virginia University. After graduating in 1923 with a B.S. in mining engineering he was made assistant superintendent of bituminous mines in southern West Virginia. Less than a

Jan 1, 1939

Page Fundamental Principles Involved in Segregation in Alloy Castings. By R. M. Brick. (With discussion)............................* Review of Factors Underlying Segregation in Steel Ingots. By B. M. LarseX.. (With discussion)............................. 4x4 Introduction to the Session on Segregation in Steel. By Earle C. Smith......436 Relation of Open-hearth Practice to Segregation in Rimmed Steel. By J. W. HaLley and G. L. Plimpton, Jr. (With discussion)................438 Segregation in a Large Alloy-steel Ingot. By S. W. Poole and J. .4. Rosa. (With discussion) .............................459

Jan 1, 1945

Oscar Rohn was born in Jackson, Wis., June 27, 1870. He attended the University of Wisconsin and there gained from Professor Van Hise his inspiration for scientific effort and useful attainment. While a student at Wisconsin he was interested in athletics and was a member of the first eight-oared crew that Wisconsin sent to compete with Eastern crews at Poughkeepsie. He was an instructor in the gymnasium for several years. He received his B. S. in 1895 at Wisconsin, specializing in engineering and geology. 1229

Jan 1, 1924

By Earl Oliver

SEVERAL notable papers, and free discussion on many controversial subjects, marked the various sessions of the Petroleum Division at the annual meeting. The Division first convened on Tuesday afternoon, Feb. 16, and wound up with a dinner and technical meeting on Thursday night. H. C. Fowler presided at the opening session, which was devoted to problems of engineering research and production engineering. Joseph Chalmers abstracted his paper on the flow of air and gas through porous media, in the preparation of which E. L Rawlins and D. B. Talia-ferro contributed. G. H. Fancher told how much he and his associates at Pennsylvania State College were interested in this field, and described the problems they had met in conducting test work. He made a plea for standardization of testing methods. Mr. Fowler then read an abstract of written discussion by Professor Barb, which was followed by discussion by Dr. Fancher and Mr. Chalmers of technical points in connection with the Chalmers' paper. H. H. Hill abstracted written discussion from Messrs. Wilde and Moore, of the Humble company. The second paper, by K. B. Nowels, on computing pressure drop in the pipe of flowing oil wells, was abstracted by the author. Messrs. Blair Smith, G. W. Coggeshall, and I. I. Gardescu participated in the discussion, and the chairman abstracted written discussion prepared by Mr. Rawlins. Most of this had to do with the viscosity of gas¬oil mixtures, on which subject Mr. Nowels said there was great need of accurate technical information.

Jan 1, 1932

The following list comprises the names of those persons who became. members during the period Oct. 10, 1919, to Nov. 10, 1919. ABELL, 0. J., Pres. & Treas., Abell-Howe Co., 332 South Michigan Ave.; Chicago, Ill. ADAMI, ARTHUR E., Asst. Prof. of Min. Engrg., Montana State School of Mines,Butte, Mont. BASSETT, R. H Chief Engr., Hanna Ore Min. Co., Hibbing, Minn. BOZA, HECTOR J., Cons. Engr., Boza Aizcorbe Hermanos, Box 106, Lima, Peru. BROWN, HAROLD P., Cons. Concrete Engr 120 Liberty St., New York, N. Y. BUCHANAN, W. A Mgr., Meteor Mine, Slocan City, B. C., Canada. CAMERON, JAMES A Supt., Ellsworth Collieries Co., Ellsworth Pa. CARPENTER, CRANSTON HOWE, Electro-Met. Engr., General Engrg. Division, Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co., East Pittsburgh, Pa. CASTLETON, GEORGE T Assayer, Custom Office, Box 122, Eureka, Utah. CHAFFIN, C. E., Eastern Mgr., General Engineering Co., 120 Broadway, New York-, N. Y. CLARK, WALTER R., Wks. Mgr., Bridgeport Brass Co., 1875 Park Ave., Bridgeport, Conn. CLARKE, ERNEST E., Min. Engr., Vinegar Hill Zinc Co., 419 S. Court St., Platteville, Wis. COOLIDGE, E. B., Mgr., Spotted Horse Mine, St. Paul Montana Min. Co., Maiden, Mont. CORTELYOU, ARTHUR P., Resident Mgr., Potrero Min Co. Mocorito, Sinaloa, Mexico. COTTINGHAM, KENNETH, Pet. Engr., Halter & Robitaille Delmonico Bldg.,Fifth Ave. & 44th St., New York, N. Y. CREW, J. A Mgr., Research Dept., Pittsburgh Steel Co., Monessen, Pa. CUMMINGS, LISTER M., Efficiency Engr., Copper Queen Branch, Phelps-Dodge Corpn., Box 1539, Bisbee, Ariz. DANFORTH, GEORGE L., JR., Asst. Gen'l Supt., Illinois Steel Co., South Works, South Chicago, Ill.

Jan 12, 1919

By H. S. Bell

IT SEEMS unnecessary to dwell upon the advantages of the modern pipe still as compared with the older type of distillation equipment used by oil refiners. The relatively low installation cost, coupled with remarkable operating efficiencies of pipe stills, precludes the consideration of other types except in rare instances where some peculiarity of product or plant may have an influence. The question of the actual heat required to distil petroleum is quite involved. We have extensive data on the latent heats of the various hydrocarbons under different conditions of pressure. We also have information regarding the specific heats of various oils and the effect of temperature thereon. Because of the complexity of petroleum and of each fraction, it seems impossible to theoretically analyze the partial-pressure effect of the great number of hydrocarbons upon one another during distillation. If a distillation curve and percentage analysis of any crude or product are available, it is possible to construct a curve with ordinates representing per cent. distilled and B. t. u. per pound or per gallon, or other desired unit. To do so the crude is split into fractions, of 5 or 10 per cent. The boiling point and gravity of each fraction being determined, it is possible to evaluate the heat required. As each fraction is removed, the residue must be raised to a higher temperature and latent heat supplied for the successive fraction. As the calculations progress, the latent heats decrease while the specific heats increase. Such a curve is illustrated by Fig. 1 for a typical 39.9 B° North Texas crude.

Jan 1, 1928

IT will be recalled that the first professor of metallurgy in the United States, appointed in 1855, never really gave any instruction in metallurgy and gradually turned into a professor of mineralogy. Metallurgy was included with mining in the early curricula, two students who took the B.S. in mining engineering from the Polytechnic College of Pennsylvania in 1863 wrote their graduation theses on the metallurgy of copper and zinc, respectively. Even after Columbia School of Mines established, in 1868, a separate curriculum leading to the Ph.B. degree in metallurgy, very few students elected it,* preferring to take the mining degree, since they received in its curriculum nearly all the metallurgical instruction they would have in the metallurgical curriculum. For many years a large proportion of the men who attained prominence in metallurgical enterprises had taken mining rather than metallurgical degrees. METALLURGY Clifton Sorby's study of thin sections of rocks under the micro- scope, beginning in 1850, and its subsequent development by Zirkel and others, had made microscopic petrography a recognized department of, geological research as early as 1873. It was inevitable that the idea of studying polished metal surfaces under the microscope by reflected instead of transmitted light would occur to investigators. Sorby himself did it in 1864, and Adolph Martens and Floris Osmond may be especially named ', among the many European workers who, by the late eighties, had so developed the necessary techniques that they were able to photograph polished metal surfaces at magnifications as high

Jan 1, 1941

By J. G. Koenigsberger

The electrical specific resistance of rocks in the field is measured by sending a current through a medium of great volume, compared to the electrodes, whose resistivity should be measured. The whole resistance can be determined by the Wheatstone bridge and the specific resistance calculated by a well-known formula. The resistivity of some rocks in place in Germany and in Switzerland is given; first, of a rock near the surface, and especially near electrodes. Practical applications are made in the determination: (1) of the continuity of a conducting orebody; (2) of the surface ares of an orebody; (3) in the detection of a water-bearing fault in a salt mine. Preliminary 'observations are described: (1) on the influence of the depth of ground-water table; (2) on the detection of gas under high pressure in coal seams. The observations in this paper of the electrical resistivity of rocks and soil in place are along the lines of the very interesting method and results of the Messrs. Gish, Rooney, Hotchkiss and Fisher. 1,2 All the work described has been done since 1920. Method Used The very simple method consists in the application to the rock of two plane circular electrodes of iron or brass of a suitable diameter, with the aid of a contact substance, and in measuring the resistivity in a Wheatstone bridge with alternating current of 100 to 400 Hertz frequency per sec.). The general formula is known to be R= R0 +d/4(1/a+1/b-1.7/l+0.8(a+b)/l2) (1)

Jan 1, 1929

By R. M. Rose, D. P. Ferriss, J. Wulff

The effect of orientation on the stresses, nctivation energies, and activation volumes for yielding and plastic flow of tungsten single crystals was investigated. Tensile tests showed the proportional limit to be a function of orientation: crystals whose tensile axes were near the [I10} direction were roughly three times as strong as [loo] crystals. The [ 1101 crystals showed low strain hardening and displayed yield phenomena, whereas the other orientations yielded smoothly and showed considerable strain hardening. The fracture mode was cleavage, except for crystals near the [1101 , many of which gave "chisel" fractures at 300°and 373°K. The activation energy for yielding was approximately one- half an electron; volt at all orientations, and the volume of activation was (12 to 14)b3, except near the [1101, where it was 7b3. Activation volumes generally increased after yielding. The most common theoretical models for yielding and strain hardening of bcc metals were. found to be insufficient to the intepretation of the observations here in. An explanation is proposed, based on the dislocation reaction dislocation networks and jogs, md jogs formed during plus tic flow. PRECLSE knowledge of the Drocesses involved in the yielding and plastic flow of the refractory metals is essential to the formulation of models for their flow and fracture. Despite this need, the single -crystal investigations, especially of tungsten, have been sparse. Slip occurs at low temperature, according to schadler,i in <111> directions on {110) planes; as the temperature rises to room tempera-

Jan 1, 1962

By Oscar Lachmund

DURING the driving of the main haulage level at the Copper Mountain mines of the Canada Copper Corpn., Ltd., near Princeton, B. C., some very rapid driving was clone, though no claim for a world&apos;s record is made. Conditions, however, were unfavorable for economical operations. The cost of power was high, for the fuel was of poor grade; besides, during the time the work was in progress, very little other power was needed so that most of the power cost was charged against the footage. The FIG. 1.-DRIFT ROUND USED IN MAIN HAULAGE LEVEL, COPPER MOUNTAIN, B. C. transmission line consisted of No. 4 galvanized iron wire with the result that the line loss was considerable. The voltage transmitted was about 30,000. The plant was operated under a lease, which was due to expire about the same time this work was supposed to be completed; an extension was refused, therefore speed was most important. The plans called for a straight adit 2900 ft. (884 m.) in length. At a point 2800 ft. (853 m.) from the portal, two raises were to be put up to the next nearest workings, a difference in elevation of about 800 ft. (243 m.). One of these was to be a two-compartment hoistway and the other a zigzag ore pass, or muck run. A location for these raises had been determined by a number of diamond-drill holes, but the material to be penetrated by the alit was not known. It seemed imperative to get the tunnel work completed as rapidly as possible, in

Jan 3, 1919

The following is a &apos;partial list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period Oct. 10, 1917, to Nov. 10, 1917. Edwin T. Blake, Berkeley, Cal. Alfred C. Lane, Tufts College, Mass. H. M. Boylston, Cambridge, Mass. W. G. Matteson, Houston, Texas. W. B. Cogswell, Syracuse, N. Y. E. Francis M&apos;Crossin, Birmingham, Ala. Paul R. Cook, Zaruma, Ecuador. R. E. Murray, Butte, Mont. F. W. DeWolf, Washington, D. C. Edmund Newton, Minneapolis, Minn. A. Faison Dixon, Venezuela. J. J. Ormsbee, El Paso, Texas. W. H. Dufur,, Oil City, Pa. Pablo Ortega, Havana, Cuba. Maxwell E. Erdofy, Lieut. Engr. Officers&apos;. W. E. Pomeroy, El Paso, Texas Reserve Corps, New York. J. C. Ralston, Spokane, Wash. Evan Fraser-Campbell, Scotland. W. L. Remick, Chrome, N. J. David B. Gemmill, Crown King, Ariz. Howard D. Smith, San Francisco, Cal. F. Lynwood Garrison, Philadelphia, Pa. Harold C. E. Spence, Steeple Rock, N. M. C. J. Hall, Spassky, Siberia. R. K. Stockwell, Salt Lake City, Utah. H. Hamada, Tokyo, Japan. Maurice W. Summerhayes, Timmins, Rush M. Hess, Bouse, Ariz. Ont., Canada. A. Howard Higgin, London, England Malcolm M. Thompson, Morsemere; N. J. A. O. Ihlseng, Joplin, Mo. Nicholas Truschkoff, Petrograd, Russia. T. Ishikawa, Japan. H. J. Wendler, Los Angeles, Cal. C. H. James, Tucson, Ariz. Ira T. Wright, Hurley, N. M. R. R. Landon, Philippine Islands. C. Yabe, Japan. Robert W. Bissell has now become associated with Gunn, Richards & Co., of New York, N. Y. Major Reginald W. Brock is giving a course in a school for commanding officers in England.

Jan 12, 1917

(Members are urged to send in for this column any notes of interest concerning themselves or their fellow-members) The following is a partial list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period May 10,1917, to June 10, 1917. F. J. Anderson, Cali, Colombia. W. F. Jahn, Kirkland Lake, Ont., Canada. George J. Bancroft, Denver, Colo. W. McA. Johnson, Hartford, Conn. W. F. B. Berger, Denver, Colo. J. E. Jopling, Marquette, Mich. F. J. Brulé, Toronto, Ont., Canada. William Kelley, Vulcan, Mich. J. Murray Clark, Toronto, Ont., Canada. H. M. LaFollette, La Follette, Tenn. Will L. Clark, Jerome, Ariz.. Dorsey A. Lyon, Washington, D. C. G. H. Clevenger, Palo Alto, Cal. James F. Magee, Lancaster, Pa. Paul S. Couldrey, Sound Beach, Conn. M. Ortin, Nijni-Novgorod, Russia. C. W. Crispell, Kingston, N. Y. - C. H. Palmer, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal. George A. Easley, La Paz, Bolivia. Edison S. Pettis, ?Mill Valley, Cal. Bancroft Gore, Butte, Mont. Mortimer A. Sears, Paintsville, Ky. John B. Guernsey, Roanoke, Va. W. J. Uren, Houghton, Mich. Rush M. Hess, St. Louis, Mo. C. E. Visel, New Haven, Conn. E. Hibbert, Nickelton, Ont., Canada. Percy E. Barbour, has resigned his position as managing editor of the Engineering & Mining Journal, to accept the appointment of Deputy Superintendent of the New York State Troopers, with headquarters at Albany, N. Y., with the rank of captain.. He has also been commissioned as captain in the 22nd Regiment, N: Y. N. G., having been formerly 1st Lieutenant.

Jan 7, 1917

By J. H. Anderson, G. A. Parks, B. K. Jindal

Both temperature and humidity are important variables in electrical separations. By independent control of temperature and water vapor pressure, it is shown that charge depends primarily upon relative humidity, not on temperature or water pressure alone. All the effects of temperature changes other than modification of humidity are apparently small. However, humidity control can be achieved through manipulation of the more tractable variable, temperature. Both temperature and humidity are important variables in electrical separations. Some of their effects have been described in general by Fraas1,2 and by Ralston.3 The influence of temperature and humidity may be considered a problem in industrial separations because humidity, especially, is not normally controlled, hence leads to unpredicted quality control problems. The problem is significant whether the separation is based on conductivity differences or on contact electrification. There is no doubt that water adsorbs from humid atmospheres onto mineral surfaces resulting in conductivity changes.&apos;-8 An empirical relationship between conductivity and humidity is1.4-6,8 where a and b are constants peculiar to the substrate, and s and h are the conductivity and relative humidity respectively. Some authors have taken advantage of differences in a and b among minerals to make or propose electrodynamic separations in which h is the key control variable. Fraasl,2 reported that the charge developed on quartz and feldspar through contact with aluminum is sensitive to humidity, as illustrated schematically in Fig. 1. Lawver9 found that the charge developed by quartz on contact with several materials was tem-

Jan 1, 1967

By Alden B. Greninger

That metallographic structures analogous to the martensite of steel may be found in certain copper-aluminum and copper-tin alloys has been known for many years; similar structures recently were found in certain copper-zinc a1loys.l In all three of these alloy systems the martensite structures result from transformation of the metastable fi phase when the speed of cooling from the B range is sufficiently high to suppress decomposition into equilibrium phases. In the normal decomposition of solid solutions into equilibrium phases, diffusion is needed to bring about the necessary changes in concentration, and the rate of reaction falls almost to zero at temperatures slightly above room temperature. The rates of reaction for martensite processes, however, are not dependent upon temperature; the transformation does not require rendjustments of concentration. For example, the martensite transformation in 60:40 (B) copper-zinc does not begin until the temperature has dropped to about minus 30" C., and then continues down to minus 130" C. and probably even at lower temperatures.&apos; Furthermore, martensite processes apparently proceed only while the tempcrature is falling, within the proper range, and cease completely while the temperature is held constant ;$ and they cannot be suppressed by extremely rapid cooling although the rate of cooling for some alloys may be increased to over 10,000 times the critical cooling velocity. Isaitschew, Kaminsky and Kurdjumow2 account for these observed behaviors of rnartensite processes by postulating that the mechanism 6I... consists in a regular rearrangement of the lattice in such a way

Jan 1, 1939

By Alden B. Greninger

That metallographic structures analogous to the martensite of steel may be found in certain copper-aluminum and copper-tin alloys has been known for many years; similar structures recently were found in certain copper-zinc a1loys.l In all three of these alloy systems the martensite structures result from transformation of the metastable fi phase when the speed of cooling from the B range is sufficiently high to suppress decomposition into equilibrium phases. In the normal decomposition of solid solutions into equilibrium phases, diffusion is needed to bring about the necessary changes in concentration, and the rate of reaction falls almost to zero at temperatures slightly above room temperature. The rates of reaction for martensite processes, however, are not dependent upon temperature; the transformation does not require rendjustments of concentration. For example, the martensite transformation in 60:40 (B) copper-zinc does not begin until the temperature has dropped to about minus 30" C., and then continues down to minus 130" C. and probably even at lower temperatures.&apos; Furthermore, martensite processes apparently proceed only while the tempcrature is falling, within the proper range, and cease completely while the temperature is held constant ;$ and they cannot be suppressed by extremely rapid cooling although the rate of cooling for some alloys may be increased to over 10,000 times the critical cooling velocity. Isaitschew, Kaminsky and Kurdjumow2 account for these observed behaviors of rnartensite processes by postulating that the mechanism 6I... consists in a regular rearrangement of the lattice in such a way

Jan 1, 1939