Search Documents

By Mick Fritz, Gregory Poole

Construction blasting is always challenging when in close proximity to existing structures, but when you are next to a landmark like Sanford Stadium at the University of Georgia it can get intense. Blasting on this project was performed less than 100 feet from students studying in their dorms at Reed Hall. Some shots are only a few feet from the columns on the stadium that hold up the sky boxes where meetings were being held while blasting was being performed. If a shot goes vertical the rocks would go through the floor of the sky boxes.

Jan 1, 2011

By Stuart Pether, Cedric Goode

The Mt Morgans Minesite is located 800km North East of Perth, the Capital City of Western Australia. The surrounding region has been a significant producer of gold since the turn of the century. The mine was previously host to a township of approx 40 - 50,000 people.

Jan 1, 1996

By Braden Schmidt

The following full paper will go into the products, techniques and people who work in the avalanche control industry giving insight to the other members of the ISEE an overview of the niche blasting that is Avalanche Control.

Feb 1, 2020

By Alan R. Cameron, William W. Forsyth, Tom H. Kleine

In the production environment, the current limits of blasting are most often defined by the ability of the operator to drill blastholes from a planned collar location to the required toe location. Many problems which are initially described as deficiencies in blasting or support are directly related to drilling. The assessment of support performance and blasting efficiency must begin with a detailed examination of drilling practices.

Jan 1, 1995

By Michael S. Wieland, Thomas C. Ruhe

Delay blasting in underground coal results in shock waves traveling through the coal that can damage delay charges remaining in the blast pattern. Undetonated explosives which are dynamically desensitized or react sympathetically from shock wave impact ruin blast results. Such malfunctions, sometimes manifest as misfires, more frequently are covert weak detonations, and result in poor coal breakage and fumes with above normal toxicity. To reduce these mining hazards and resolve charge performance problems, the Bureau of Mines has developed and tested forty prototype rugged explosives in the laboratory. Rugged explosives work properly under difficult circumstances because they not only retain their shock initiation sensitivity but also are resistant to shock damage. This research investigation resulted in one candidate emulsion explosive, formulation #37, which passed all the permissibility tests required by MSHA approval regulations. However, approval was not granted because it reached shelf-life (would not shoot properly) seven months into testing. For research purposes, the remaining tests were conducted with a second batch of formulation #37. This paper discusses the prototype rugged explosive composition and permissibility test results. Where possible, for reference purposes, comparisons are made to a commercial product that has been approved. Further research work is required to overcome the noted deficiency of short shelf-life.

Jan 1, 1992

By Dave I. McGregor

The Multiple Raise Round Blasting Technique (MRRBT) is a safe, efficient, cost effective method of blasting thee will use existing mine personnel. The MRRBT, developed from the conventional 'drop raise method' style of blasting, can be used for most raise mining applications. Current results using MRRBT indicate no upper limit for the maximum length that a raise can be blasted.

Jan 1, 1994

By Jerry Bennett

A recant Bureau of Mines analysis has shown that failure of blast area security systems is the mayor cause of mine blasting accidents. Accidents occur during scheduled blasting because of failure to clear the blast zone, inadequate guarding, and failure of personnel to follow instructions, retreat to a safe location and/or take adequate cover. The high incidence of blastslte security-related accidents could be considerably reduced by increased attention to improving minesite blast-guarding practices.

Jan 1, 1984

By Paul V. Sterk

"As vital as arteries are to sustaining life in the human body so are free flowing raises to thelife of an underground multiple level mine such as the Homestake Gold Mine. These raisesor boreholes are the artery system thru which the ore must pass to a point where it can behoisted from the mine. Through the history of underground mining miners have usedvertical or inclined raises to gravity transfer ore from level to level. Invariably, these raisesor boreholes will hangup and stop the flow of ore. These hangups are costly in terms of lostproduction, lost efficiency, and the inherent exposure danger to personnel who mustdislodge these hangups while being exposed to unsupported ground."

Jan 1, 1993

By Gary B. Hemphill

Each year the demand for precision blasting increases due to the reduction in the amount of prime land. More site preparation and hone building requires blasting than they did a decade ago, Because of this increased need for blasting in more populated areas, the need for blasters and engineers knowledgeable in work involving blasting nets has increased.

Jan 1, 1978

By Roberto Folchi, Hans Wallin, Mara Battocchio

An understanding of explosives science and technology, and the competence to harness it is central to maintaining Explosives capability, national security, and in sustaining a competitive industry. A consequence of eroding this competence is the increased likelihood of explosives accidents. These are often catastrophic as demonstrated by accidents in Nigeria, Russia, Toulouse and Enschede. In addition to the serious loss of life there was the very significant damage to houses, domestic and industrial infrastructure and to the environment at a cost of many millions of Euros.

Jan 1, 2013

By Robert B. Hopler

This paper reviews, from the historical standpoint, the development of the commonly-used terms such as "No. 6 and No. 8" with regard to detonator strengths. The origin of the strength terminology is reviewed, and the many methods developed to compare the strength of one detonator to another are described, with the good and bad points of each method outlined. The "miniature cartridge test," very highly regarded by both the U.S. Bureau of Mines and Institute of Makers of Explosives in the 1930's and early 1940's, is described in detail, as is a test developed and used by IRECO.

Jan 1, 1992

By Stephen Hamilton

This case history details the issues surrounding the rock drilling industry’s growing demand for straight holes, the importance of straight holes and the introduction of a new production drilling systems that can effectively and economically drill a true bore hole. Since the introduction of the hydraulic rock drill, the rock drilling industry has asked for a drilling system that would provide the fast penetration and low operating costs of Top Hammer drilling systems combined, with the directional control of Tube or DTH drilling techniques.

Jan 1, 1999

By Chad Ducey

The proper utilization of energy in an explosive column is of paramount importance to the success of any blast. Historically, Powder Factor (the weight of explosive per mass or volume of material to be blasted or its inverse), has dictated the blast design. The concept of Energy Factor is a more effective method to design a blast. In order to utilize explosives efficiently, the energy contained in any given product must be quantified. The Powder Factor method, although historically successful, assumes that a pound of cast pentolite affects the material to be blasted the same as a pound of ammonium nitrate / me1 oil (ANFO.) Years of experience and scientific testing have led the blaster in the field to believe otherwise. The next logical technological step is Energy Factor. The Energy Factor method that will be discussed in this paper takes into consideration not only the weight of the explosive, but also the weight strength (Cal/g) and the density (g/cc) to yield a constant relative Energy Factor. The result of such a method is a factor that can be used in the field exactly the same as Powder Factor, but that reflects the relative energy of any given product in terms that will reflect the relative cost benefit of that explosive selection. The Energy Factors associated with different available explosives make it possible to compare the difference in the amount of energy per loaded pound in each unit length of borehole. This paper will examine the concept of Energy Factor in an in depth manner and also compare this quantification method to that of Powder Factor. It will also demonstrate the value of using Energy Factor and how it can improve the efficiency of a blast design. The misconceptions that come along with using Powder Factor will be examined and comparisons will be made between boreholes loaded using Powder Factor and those that are loaded using Energy Factor. This paper will clearly define the differences between these blast design methods and allow the reader to realize the production, quality, and economic advantages of using the Energy Factor method.

Jan 1, 2000

By S. Nakamura, H. Taniguchi, K. Noguchi, H. Sugihara, T. Matsuzawa

It has been reported that expanded poIystyrene and ANFO prills ‘were mixed on a blasting site for controlled blasting (ISANOL). Although there seems to be few possibility of their segregation because mixing on a blasting site is done, there is a great possibility of segregation in packing, transportation and loading of the product due to the different densities of the two ingredients in Japan where mixing on a blasting site still remains inoperative. The fiee-flowing property of ANFO prills was lost with the passage of time because the Abel oil infiltrated into the expanded polystyrene and that gave the product high viscosity.

Jan 1, 2001

By I E. "Chip" Harris, G Alan Foster

Whilst a great deal of published data exists as to safe ground vibration and air blast levels which result from blasting little documented research has been carried out to determine how and why human beings complain about blasting operations. This paper gives the authors thoughts and experiences of why complaints arise and practical steps to minimize such complaints.

Jan 1, 1977

By David E. Siskind

"This report describes recommended vibration monitoring and assessment practices at blasting sites.Intended is regular monitoring, tracking of trends, responding to complaints of alleged damage, and the technical and data aspects of addressing lawsuits."

Jan 1, 1999

By Guang-Xin Li, Rui-Ping Guo

Based on the analysis of factors affecting the cracking performance of Silently Cracking Agent (SCA), a new SCA structural model is built and a study on the swelling mechanism of SCA and a method to increase swelling thrust by adding the swelling agent are presented. The reason for blow-out and the theory for avoiding blow-out are put forward. The new model improves the SCA theory and provides new method for developing effective SCA. Based on experiments made in laboratory, two types of SCA are developed. A Temperature Control Meter (TCM) has been developed to solve the alltemperature- crack problem after studying the suitable temperature scope of SCA.

Jan 1, 2000

By Anne Charline Sauvage

Blast designers and blasters need to know the rock mass influence on blast to increase explosive effi-ciency and to optimize costs, but also to succeed in limiting blast emissions (vibration, overpressure, flyrock) This paper presents an applied approach which makes it possible to structure the information con-cerning the rock mass and the blasting.

Jan 1, 2013

By D Wilson, R R. Vandebeek, R A. Bowes

"As business opportunities are sought around the world, the explosives industry must oftengrapple with the United Nations Transport of Dangerous Goods Recommendations.Canadians have problems in this area that are similar to those of other countries. Thispresentation outlines, through a case study, how a container for shipping ""explosives"" wasdesigned, tested and approved for use by the Chief Inspector of Explosives, the""Competent Authority"" for Canada."

Jan 1, 1993

By Thomas M. Keevin, Gregory L. Hempen

Accurate assessment of blasting near an object (organism or structure) requires recording of the damage parameter for low-valued scaled distances. Seismograph recordings of particle velocity are a well established, common procedure for land-based blasting. Similarly, pressure recording of the absolute waveform needs to be a more common procedure for sensitive, underwater resources.

Jan 1, 1997