Search Documents

THOSE NOT MARKED ARE MEMBERS; MARKED THUS ?ARE ASSOCIATES. HEAVY-FACED TYPE SIGNIFIES HONORARY MEMBERSHIP JUNIOR MEMBERS ARE MARKED ' . THE FIGURES AT THE END OF THE ADDRESS INDICATE THE YEAR OF ELECTION. AARONS, J. BOYD See Honor Roll. '05 ? AARONSON, ALFRED E Pres., Tuloma Oil Co., Unity Bldg., Tulsa, Okla. '18 ABADIE, EMILE R., Min. En r Box 291, Porterville, Tulare Co., Cal. '76 ABBOTT, CLARENCE E., Gen'l Supt., Iron Mines Div., Tenn. Coal, Iron & R. R. Co., 1405 Minnesota Ave., Bessemer, Ala. '04 ABBOTT, Louis BENJAMIN, Chief Engr., Consolidation Coal Co., Elkhorn Div., Jenkins, Ky. '15 ABBOTT, ROBERT R Met. Engr., Peerless Motor Car Co., Cleveland, Ohio. '12 ABE, ASAKA Fujitagumi Taiwan Office, Taipeh, Formosa, Japan. '14 ABBY, HIROSHI Min. & Met. Engr., Mitsubishi Co., Tokyo, Japan. '17 ||ABOUCHAR, S. S., Cia. de Minerales y Metales, S. A., Minas Viejas, Villaldama, N. L., Mexico. '17 ABRAHAMS, A. I 1391 Madison Ave., New York, N. Y. '14 ?ACKER, E. O'C., Met.,128 East Washington Lane, Germantown, Philadelphia, Pa. '86 ? ACKERMAN, ERNEST R., Pres., Lawrence Portland Cement Co., Plainfield, Union Co., N. J. '15 ACOSTA, J. N., Min. Engr., Cons. Engr Hotel Brewster, San Diego, Cal. '15 ADACHI, JINZOO 11 Shiba Park, Shiba-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. '88 ADAMI, CHARLES J., Min. Engr., Gen'l Supt., St. Joseph and Doe Run Lead Companies, Bonne Terre, Mo. '12 ADAMS, ARTHUR K., Min. Geol., Andes Copper Min. Co., Casilla 230, Antofagasta, Chile. '06

Jan 1, 1923

By Samuel B. Christy

As is well known, the ore at New Almaden is cinnabar. Native quicksilver occurs also; but, as a rule, in small quantities only. Pyrite occasionally accompanies the ore. Bitumen is quite common,

Jan 1, 1885

THE Institute assembled in the metallurgical lecture-room of Pardee Hall, Lafayette College, at 7 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday evening, October 21st. The session was opened by the President, R. W. Raymond, with an address on Mining Industry as illustrated at the Vienna Exposition. The second session was held on Wednesday morning. The Council reported the following names for election as members and associates. They were unanimously elected. †Ayres, W. S., - Easton, Pa. *Baker, Prof. A. L., - Easton, Pa. †Browne, Thomas Nicholl, - Hamilton, Nev. *Carter, Frank, - Pottsville, Pa. *Davis, E. F. C., - Pottsville, Pa. *Fox, Prof. J. G., - Easton, Pa. *Haight, Ogden, - Etna, Pa. †Hall, Norman, - Sharon, Pa. *Knap, Joseph, - Fountain Mill, Pa. †Miller William McKeen, - Easton, Pa. †Pardee, I. P., - Easton, Pa. *Plater, John E., - Eureka, Nev. *Platt, Joseph L., Jr., - Franklin Furnace, N. J. *Plumb, W. H., - Mauch Chunk, Pa. *Reis, George L., - New Castle, Pa. *Samuel, Edward, - Philadelphia, Pa. *Smith, William Allen, - Trenton, N. J. *Smock, Prof. John C., - New Brunswick, N. J. *Weberling, Charles, - Salt Lake City, Utah. Also the following as foreign members Beaulieu, Ad. le Hardy de, - Brussels, Belgium.. Beaumont, Major Fred., - London, England. Beck, Alexander, - Mons, Belgium. Bodmer, J. J., - London, England. Brassert, Berghauptmann, Dr., - Bonn, Prussia. Brogden, James, - London, England * Members. † Associates.

Jan 1, 1874

The Institute assembled in the metallurgical lecture-room of Pardee Hall, Lafayette College, at 7 o'clock P.M. on Tuesday evening, October 21st. The session was opened by the President, R. W. Raymond, with an address on Mining Industry as illustrated at the Vienna Exposition. The second session was held on Wednesday morning. The Council reported the following names for election as members and associates. They were unanimously elected. Ayres, W. S.,.......Easton, Pa. *Baker, Prof. A. L.,.. Easton, PR. Browne, Thomas Nicholl,.... Hamilton, Nev. *Carter, Frank,......Pottsville, Pa. *Davis, E. F. C.,... Pottsville, Pa. *Fox, Prof. J. G.,...,..Easton, Pa. *Haight, Ogden,...Etna, Pa. Hall, Norman,...Sharon, Pa. *Knap, Joseph,......Fountain Mill, Pa. Miller William McKeen,.... Easton, Pa. Pardee, I. P.,....Easton, Pa. *Plater, John E.,......Eureka, Nev. *Platt, Joseph L., Jr.,.....Franklin Furnace, N. J. *Plumb, W. H.,......Mauch Chunk, Pa. *Reis, George L.,......New Castle, Pa. *Samuel, Edward,. ..Philadelphia, Pa. *Smith, William Allen,.....Trenton, N. J. *Smock, Prof. John C.,..... New Brunswick, N. J. *Weberling, Charles,.....Salt Lake City, Utah. Also the following as foreign members: Beaulieu, Ad. le Hardy de,. . Brussels, Belgium. Beaumont, Major Fred.,..London, England. Beck, Alexander,.Mons, Belgium. Bodmer, J. J.,..London, England. Brassert, Berghauptmann, Dr.,. .. Bonn, Prussia. Brogden, James,.London, England.

By David R. Mitchell, Ernest M. Spokes

There is evidence that study of minerals now considered to have susceptibilities too low for magnetic separation should be continued. Present concepts may be false. INFORMATION on magnetic properties of minerals other than magnetite is scanty and sometimes erroneous. Often there is no information at all. W. R. Crane's table of tractive forces published in 1901 is still the best guide in the field, but Crane's data can be used as a guide only, since he ignored such important factors as impurities in the minerals, size, and packing effect. During the 1930's work by the U. S. Bureau of Mines added greatly to knowledge of the behavior of certain minerals in a magnetic field. The USBM bulletin gave for the first time complete magnetic characteristics for magnetite and fragmentary data for a few other minerals. The work reported here covers a study of the magnetic-susceptibility relationships of the wolframite series of minerals and sphalerites as related to their chemical compositions. Theories are proposed to explain divergences found from commonly accepted beliefs. Gouy Method for Determining Magnetic Susceptibility: The Gouy principle has been adequately described in the literature1-3 and applied in various ways.'- It may be summarized by stating that a body of material (gas, liquid, solid, or powder mixed with gas or liquid) of cylindrical shape changes in apparent weight if suspended with one end in a zone of higher magnetic field strength than is found in that portion of the field surrounding the other end of the cylinder. This may be expressed as K2 - K1 A (H2 - H2) - mg. [1] In determining the susceptibility of mineral specimens by the Gouy method, the mineral is reduced to a fine powder and packed in a glass weighing tube. Precise measurement of the bore and depth of the tube is made unnecessary by a calibration procedure. Using the basic expression of Eq. 1, Hoare"

Jan 1, 1959

D. K. CRAMPTON, Chairman EDMUND M. WISE, Past-Chairman CYRIL S. SMITH, Vice-Chairman CARL E. SWARTZ, Vice-Chairman H. A. MALONEY, Treasurer Executive Committee 1942 1943 FRANCES H. CLARK ERIC R. JETTE W. L. FINK LOUIS W. KEMPF J. T. NORTON GEORGE SACHS 1944 WILLIAM C. ELLIS ALAN MORRIS KENT R. VAN HORN Finance JOHN L. CHRISTIE, Chairman J. R. FREEMAN, JR. H. M. ST. JOHN W. M. PEIRCE JEROME STRAUSS

Jan 1, 1941

By C. R. Kuzell

STAFF: Editor, Gerhard Derge Carnegie lnstitute of Technology Schenley Pork Pittsburgh 13, Pa. Editorial Assistant, M. A. Redmerski Production Editor, Otto T. Johnson THE METALLURGICAL SOCIETY: C. C. Long, President; John Chipman, Past-President; J. S. Smart, Jr., Vice-President, T. D. Jones, Treasurer; R. W. Shearman, Secretary. PUBLICATIONS COMMiTTEE OF THE METALLURGICAL SOCIETY: D. J. Carney, Chairman; Robert Maddin, Past-Chairman; J. H. Hollomon, J. H. Jackson, H. H. Kellogg, T. B. King, F. C. Langen-berg, D. L. McBride, W. O. Philbrook, J. S. Smart, Jr., R. L. Smith, J. D. Sullivan, and F. L. Vogel Review and selection of manuscripts is under the supervision of the following Publications Committees: Extractive Metallurgy Division: H. H. Kellogg, Chairman; T. 8. King, Post-Chairmon; R. P. Hermsdorf, W. A. Krivsky, R. E. Lund, C. L. McCobe, Poul Queneou, A. 5. Russell, M. E. Wadsworth, and W. D. Wilkinson. Institute of Metals Division: R. L. Smith, Choirman; P. A. Beck, I. I. Bessen, J. O. Betterton, Jr., R. S. Davis, J. J. Gilmon, R. 8. Gordon, C. D. Graham, Jr., R. W. Guard, J. C. Gurlond, J. J. Heger, M. Hermon, J. N. Hobstetter, H. H. Johnson, Jr., I. R. Krarner, W. C. Leslie, R. A. Meussner, R. R. Nosh, G. E. Pellissier, T. N. Rhodin, A. U. Seybolt, L. L. Seigle, I. S. Servi, P. G. Shewmon, L. Slifkin, J. K. Stanley, C. D. Starr, and J. Washburn. Iron and Steel Division: F. C. Longenberg, Chairmon; H. L. Bishop, C. W. Sherman, J. 8. Wagstaff, and E. Whittenberger. Published bimonthly by the American lnstitute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., 29 West 39th Street, New York 18, N. Y. Telephone: PEnnsylvania 6-9220. Subscription $20 per year for nan-AIME members in United States and North, South, and Central America; $25, foreign; $5 far AlME members. Single copies, $4.00, single copies foreign, $5.00. The AlME is not responsible for any statement mode or opinion expressed in its publications . . . Copyright 1960 by the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc. . . . Registered cable address, AlME New York ...Indexed in Engineering Index, Industrial Arts Index, and Chemical Abstracts ... Second class postage paid at New York, N. Y., and Ann Arbor, Mich. Volume 218, Number 4

Jan 1, 1961

[I-Institute of Metals Division PAUL D. MERICA, Chairman ZAY JEFFRIES, Vice-chairman W. M. CORSE, Secretary General Committee ROBERT J. ANDERSON H. C. JENNISON L. W. SPRING WILLIAN K. FRANK DAVID LEVINGER R. L. SUHL J. R. FREEMAN, JR. PAUL McKINNEY R. F. WOOD]

Jan 1, 1928

No. Place Date Vol. 1. Wilkes-Barre, Pa May, '71 1 2. Bethlehem. Pa Aug., '71 1 3. Troy, N. Y Nov.,'71 1 4. Philadelphia, Pa Feb., '72 5. New York, N. Y.* May, '72 8. Pittsburgh, Pa Oct., '72 7. Boston, Mass Feb., '73 8. Philadelphia, Pa.* May, '73 9. Easton, Pa Oct.. '73 10. New York, N. Y.Feb., '74 11. St. Louis, Mo.* May, '74 12. Hazleton. Pa Oct., '74 13. New Haven, Conn Feb., '75 14. Dover, N. J.* May, '75 15. Cleveland, O Oct., '75

Jan 1, 1929

New York Meets first Wednesday after first Tuesday of each month. J. E. JOHNSON, Jr., Chairman EDGAR RICKARD, Vice-Chairman D. M. LIDDELL, Secretary, 7 Wall St., New York, N. Y. C. A. BOHN, Treasurer JOHN V. N. DORR. LEWIS W. FRANCIS Boston Meets first Monday of each winter month. R. L. AGASSIZ, Chairman JAMES G. CARLETON, Vice-Chairman E. E. BUGBEE Secretary-Treasurer, Mass. Inst. of Technology, Cambridge,Mass. W. E. C. EUSTIS G. A. PACKARD Columbia Holds four sessions during year. Annual meeting in September or October. W. H. LINNEY. Chairman OSCAR LACHMUND, Vice-Chairman LYNDON K. ARMSTRONG, Secretary-Treasurer, P. 0. Drawer 2154, Spokane, Wash. STANLY A. EASTON S. SHEDD Puget Sound Meets second Saturday of each month SIMON H. ASH, Chairman I. F. LAUCKS, Vice-Chairman CHARLES SIMENSTAD, Secretary-Treasurer, 425 Lyon Bldg., Seattle, Wash. GLENVILLE A. COLLINS JOHN N. POTT

Jan 10, 1917

By Gregory M. Dexter

Recent litigation in Pennsylvania between three coal-mining companies and a private water company resulted in the payment by the coal companies of the equivalent of about $500,000 to buy a new water supply to replace that which had been damaged by acid drainage from strip mining. An investigation of the relevant facts indicates that the water could have been treated by spending about $40,000 on equipment and $15,000 yearly for chemicals, labor, and power until the contamination could be reduced about 80 pct. The water company's supply, furthermore, had deteriorated largely by reason of dry weather before stripping was begun by the coal companies. Payment to the water company should not have exceeded $300,000 and could have been as low as $100,000. Strip mining of coal is common in Pennsylvania. The most important objection to it in Pennsylvania is generally acid pollution of runoff water. An outline of the methods, therefore, that could be used to reduce such pollution, to compare acid-contaminated waters, and to treat such waters to make them satisfactory for public and industrial use is worth-while. The watershed of the West P~M Water Co. covers about 4.5 square miles, 20 miles west of Pittsburgh, and has two 90,000,000 gal reservoirs sup- plying about 1,300,000 gal daily for public and industrial use of which 450,000 gal daily are for two railroads. The pollution arises from weathered derivatives of typical "Coal Measures"

Jan 1, 1949

CONTENTS PAGE ANDERSON, ARVID E., and CAMERON, FRANK K.-Recovery of Copper by Leaching, Ohio Copper Co. of Utah. Discussed by Thomas B. Brighton, H. C. Goodrich, Arvid E. Anderson, Thos. P. Billings, Frank K. Cameron 2 BEESON, J. J.-Mining Districts and Their Relation to Structural Geology. Discussed by Charles Keyes, Chas. A. Porter 4 DOBBEL, CHAS. A.-Deep-hole Prospecting at the Chief Consolidated Mines. Discussed by G. W. Crane 10 CRANE, G. W.-Notes on the Geology of East Tintic. Discussed by G. W. Crane, H. E. Havernor, N. O. Lawton 11 SACKETT, B. L., BARDWELL, CARLOS, JACOBSON, SIMON, and JENSEN, N. H. Lead Smelting in Utah. Discussed by D. W. Jessup, B. L. Sackett, E. H. Laws 13 BARDWELL, E. S., and MILLER, Roy H.-Pulverized Coal as Fuel for Copper Refining Furnaces. Discussed by L. D. Anderson, E. S. Bardwell, C. P. Crawford 15 WIGTON, G. H.-The Chief Consolidated Volatilization Process and Mill. Discussed by Thomas Varley, S. G. Olmstead, V. O. Lawton, O. C. Ralston.... 16 JESSUP, D. W.-Evolution in the Preparation of Ores for Lead Blast Furnaces. Discussed by W. Spencer Reid, D. W. Jessup, Carlos Bardwell 19 ALLEN, H. P., and MADGE, WM. C.-Chloridizing Mill of the Standard Reduction Co. Discussed by Thomas Varley, H. R. Hanley, H. P. Allen, George H. Dern 20 TUCKER, E. L., and HEAD, R. E.-Effect of Cyanogen Compounds on Floatability of Pure Sulfide Minerals. Discussed by Blarney Stevens 24 Mix, B. E., and BARKER, L. M.-Method of Unloading Ores and Coarse-crushing Practice at Magna Plant of Utah Copper Co. Discussed by W. C. Madge,B. E. Mix 25 KEIGLEY, C. T.-The New Byproduct Coke Plant of the Columbia Steel Corporation. Discussed by W. M. Grant, C. T. Keigley, A. C. Feilder 25 JACKSON, P. W.-Blast Furnace Plant of the Columbia Steel Corporation. Discussed by W. R. Phibbs, H. M. Henton 26 OLDRIGHT, G. L., KEYES, H. E., and WARTMAN, F. S.-Production of Ferric Sulfate and Sulfuric Acid from Roaster Gas. Discussed by G. D. Van Arsdale William E. Greenawalt, G. L. Oldright 27 MAZANY, M. S.-Braden Copper Company Caletones Smelter. Discussed by A. B. Young, G. L. Oldright 36 HARRINGTON, D.-Safety Methods in Utah Coal Mines. Discussed by Edward K. Judd, Otto Herres, Benedict Shubart, A. C. Watts, D. Harrington 36

Jan 12, 1925

By W. D. Ludemann, J. E. Dor, L. A. Shepard

Recovery of the creep resistance of 99.99 pct pure Al was studied at temperatures 540°, 573°, 600°, and 611°K. Poly-crystalline specimens crept under a stress of 950 psi to a strain of 5.5 pct were allowed to recover for periods of from 1 min to 16 days under a residual stress of 4.4 psi. Increased creep rates upon reapplication of the 950 psi stress evidenced softening of the material. The activation energy for the recovery process was found to be 64,000 cal-per mol. THREE major observations have clearly revealed that the creep of polycrystalline aluminum above about 510°K is controlled by the rate of climb of jogged edge components of dislocations past the barriers impeding their motion: 1) Extensive polygonization, characteristic of climb, takes place during creep.'9' 2) The activation energy for creep equals the estimated activation for self-diffusion. 3) The stress law for creep coincides with theoretical predictions based on the climb mechanism.4,5 The decreasing rate during the primary stage of creep must be ascribed to the introduction of additional barriers to the glide of dislocations. During secondary creep the density of barriers must remain constant, the rate at which new barriers are formed being equal to the rate at which they recover. For this reason the nature of the barriers, and their rates of formation and recovery, are significant to a complete understanding of creep. It is proposed here to study the kinetics of the recovery of barriers to creep of high-purity polycrystalline aluminum in the climb range. The technique will consist of creeping a series of tensile specimens under a prescribed stress to given state following which the specimens will be recovered for various times and temperatures under approximately zero stress. The amount of recovery will be determined by comparing creep curves following the recovery. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE The material used for this investigation was a 99.99 pct pure Al supplied by the Aluminum Co. of America in sheets of 0.001-in. thickness having an H-18 temper. The spectroscopic analysis of impurities gave Cu-0.004 wt pct, Fe-0.002 pct, Si-0.001 pct, others-0.000 pct. Creep specimens were machined with their tensile axes in the rolling direction of the sheets. Annealing in a molten potassium nitrate-potassium nitrite bath for 1 hr at 686K, followed by air-cooling, resulted in a grain diameter of from 0.22 to 0.27 mm. Creep machines were equipped with constant stress lever arms of the type suggested by Fullman, Carreker, and Fishher,' which maintained the applied stress to within 0.04 pct of the reported value of 950 psi. Creep strains were calculated from extensions over a 6-in. gage section to the nearest 3 X 10"5. The temperatures of testing, 540°, 573", 600°, and 611°K, were obtained by immersing the specimen and extensometer assembly in a molten KNO2-KNO3 bath. Temperatures during the periods of creeping could be maintained constant to within better than ± 1°K. Correlation of creep data at different temperatures of testing demanded the use of an appropriate temperature-compensated time 8. Previous investigations have shown that the creep of pure metals at temperatures above about 0.55 of their melting temperatures can be correlated by the functional relationship3" e=f(0), s= const. [1] where e = total plastic strain during creep f = a function that depends on stress a = stress 6 = te-Q/RT = a temperature-compensated time t = time under test Q = 35,500 cal per mol = activation energy for creep R = gas constant, and T = absolute temperature In the present series of tests all of the creep was conducted under the same stress of 950 psi. To provide identical initial conditions for the recovery all specimens were first crept to a temperature-compensated time of = 47 X 10-14 min which resulted in a creep strain of 0.055 + 0.005 regardless of the creep temperature. During recovery, a small stress (4.4 psi) was permitted to remain upon the specimens to maintain tautness in the pulling assembly and to prevent mechanical damage to the soft specimen. After each recovery period, the full stress was reapplied and

Jan 1, 1961

By W. B. Finkeldey, C. H. Mathewson, C. S. Trewin

This paper was prepared upon request as a contribution to a symposium covering the manufacture, properties, and uses of the important non-ferraus metals. In approaching a subject as broad as this, there is a natural desire to build up a comprehensive and finished production which shall constitute a dependable source of information on all questions properly belonging to this branch of metal technology. There are, however, a number of circumstances, apart from the mere routine of labor and thought involved, which operate rather effectively against the possibility of completing such .an ambitious program at the present time. First of all, as far as any public record of results is concerned, the commercial rolling, drawing, and forming of zinc with relation to changes of structure and properties—and this we consider to constitute the clement~ of metal technology—might as well be an unpractised art. We have never seen a published photomicrograph showing the structural characteristics of either hard or soft sheet or strip, although the structure of castings has been frequently described, and other coarse-grained structures resulting from hard-hammering and annealing have been reproduced. Thus, an author in this field must proceed to his task without much assistance from the literature, and the outcome can represent only a personal estimate of principles, facts, or findings, and not a summary or survey of progress in the entire field as determined by varied experience, practice, and settled opinion.

Jan 1, 1921

By E. F. Koppe

The Upper Freeport coal in the Freeport and New Kensington quadrangles, Pennsylvania, varies from a bony streak to a thick coal deposit often exceeding ninety inches, the "Double" or "Thick Freeport". Distinctive basal partings, a central bone layer, and a canneloid top bench may be present. The appearance of a sandstone roof, sandstone rolls, and bony coal at the top of the main coal bench can be anticipated in thin Freeport areas when basal partings are absent. When the two basal partings are present, a shale roof is normal. These effects are correlated with the original topography upon which the coal was deposited. The original depositional high areas tend to coincide with present structural highs. Preliminary data indicate that coal quality, in part, is affected by the deposi-tional setting. In "high" areas, a tendency exists for the main coal bench to contain higher percentages of fusain and mineral matter. Within limits, some-what higher ash fusion temperatures appear to correlate with paleotopographic highs. As a result of these findings, critical examination of the paleotopography and related sediments is indicated in other areas and other coals. The Upper Freeport coal is quite variable both in thickness and composition in the Freeport and New Kensington quadrangles of Pennsylvania (Figure 1). The coal horizon in these quadrangles is marked either by a thin carbonaceous shale bed or by a single bed containing a variable number of partings (binders). The complex coal zone known locally as the "Double" or "Thick Freeport" contains the Upper Freeport Coal Bed at the base; but in addition, it has an overlying bone layer and an upper coal bed occasionally capped with a canneloid layer. The "Thick Freeport" often exceeds 90 inches in thickness, whereas the normal Upper Freeport coal usually varies between 34 and 50 inches.

Jan 1, 1961

By Maynard H. Jameson

Earlier investigations of the potential-drop-ratio method of electrical prospecting have indicated that under suitable conditions this method is well adapted to the location of formation boundaries in stratified ground. A description of this development was given several years ago by H. Lundberg and Th. Zuschlag.l The curves published by these authors for the potential-drop-ratio variation above a horizontal contact indicated a definite relation of the position of the curve peak to the depth of the interface. The theory underlying this relation was subsequently studied by Z. Mitera in greater detail,' and the theoretical deductions were compared with the results of tank experiments. The investigations available at this writing were confined to studies of horizontal formation boundaries. It is the purpose of this paper to extend the scope of the previous work to the problem of dipping layers. Theory Consider the case of three media of different resistivities, whose interfaces are not parallel. If a point-source is located in one of these interfaces, its images do not lie in a straight line, but on the circumference of a circle whose center is at the hypothetical junction of the interfaces. R. F. Aldredgea determined the relation that exists between the degrees of dip of the two interfaces and the distances between the various images and the point for which the potential is to be found. As seen in Fig. I, three media of resistivities PO, p1, and p2 are involved, and the source I is located at the interface of the media Coo) and (p1). The perpendicular depth of the lower interface is h, 0 is the dip, R is the distance between source I and potential point P, and r is the distance between the images and that point. To distinguish between images lying above the ground interface and those below, the notation "odd" and "even" images will be employed; images below the ground interface will be termed "odd" and those above "even." The following relations govern the distances between either kind of images and the potential point: EvEn Odd Ta — R r1 - [rl] - [RS + 4h(h + R sin 01½ r, = [r] =. [R1 + 4h cos 0)2(h + -R sin 0)1½ ri - [r3] ={r3} [R* + 4h(4 cos2 0 - i)1 (h + R sin 0)l½ r4 = [r4] = [R2 + 4h(4 cos $ cos 30)1 (h + R sin 0)]½ r, — [r4] - [R2 + 4h(4 cos9 R cos 20 + cos 48)2 (h + R sin 01½ I RI + 4h[2 cos 30(4 cos2 0 - I)12 (h + R sin 8)1 ½ rn - [r4] - [R2 + 4hlf(cOs 0)18(h + R sin R)l½ As previously pointed out, the images of the source are on the circumference of a circle. If the angle of dip is 0, the angle measured from the horizontal to the first image is 28; to the second image it is 48, and so on. Since the limit of the reflecting interface is at its outcrop, the last possible

Jan 1, 1946

By Maynard H. Jameson

Earlier investigations of the potential-drop-ratio method of electrical prospecting have indicated that under suitable conditions this method is well adapted to the location of formation boundaries in stratified ground. A description of this development was given several years ago by H. Lundberg and Th. Zuschlag.l The curves published by these authors for the potential-drop-ratio variation above a horizontal contact indicated a definite relation of the position of the curve peak to the depth of the interface. The theory underlying this relation was subsequently studied by Z. Mitera in greater detail,' and the theoretical deductions were compared with the results of tank experiments. The investigations available at this writing were confined to studies of horizontal formation boundaries. It is the purpose of this paper to extend the scope of the previous work to the problem of dipping layers. Theory Consider the case of three media of different resistivities, whose interfaces are not parallel. If a point-source is located in one of these interfaces, its images do not lie in a straight line, but on the circumference of a circle whose center is at the hypothetical junction of the interfaces. R. F. Aldredgea determined the relation that exists between the degrees of dip of the two interfaces and the distances between the various images and the point for which the potential is to be found. As seen in Fig. I, three media of resistivities PO, p1, and p2 are involved, and the source I is located at the interface of the media Coo) and (p1). The perpendicular depth of the lower interface is h, 0 is the dip, R is the distance between source I and potential point P, and r is the distance between the images and that point. To distinguish between images lying above the ground interface and those below, the notation "odd" and "even" images will be employed; images below the ground interface will be termed "odd" and those above "even." The following relations govern the distances between either kind of images and the potential point: EvEn Odd Ta — R r1 - [rl] - [RS + 4h(h + R sin 01½ r, = [r] =. [R1 + 4h cos 0)2(h + -R sin 0)1½ ri - [r3] ={r3} [R* + 4h(4 cos2 0 - i)1 (h + R sin 0)l½ r4 = [r4] = [R2 + 4h(4 cos $ cos 30)1 (h + R sin 0)]½ r, — [r4] - [R2 + 4h(4 cos9 R cos 20 + cos 48)2 (h + R sin 01½ I RI + 4h[2 cos 30(4 cos2 0 - I)12 (h + R sin 8)1 ½ rn - [r4] - [R2 + 4hlf(cOs 0)18(h + R sin R)l½ As previously pointed out, the images of the source are on the circumference of a circle. If the angle of dip is 0, the angle measured from the horizontal to the first image is 28; to the second image it is 48, and so on. Since the limit of the reflecting interface is at its outcrop, the last possible

Jan 1, 1946

By Steve H. Carpenter, Henry E. Otto

The explosive welding of metals is dependent upon the production of a jetting action caused by the collapsing of one metal plate against another. Successful welds are generally accomplished if the yield strength of the metals is in the range of 10,000 to 90,000 psi and the sonic velocity of the metal is greater than the detonation velocity of the explosive if direct contact explosive is being used.' Should the detonation velocity exceed the velocity of sound in the metal it may still be possible to obtain the jetting action and a good weld. However, in most cases where a high detonation velocity is used complications arise because of reflected shock waves which tear the bond apart as fast as it is put together.' Explosive welding of lead presents several problems since its yield strength and sound velocity are very low. Various values have been published3-5 for the velocity of sound in lead ranging from 2000~ to 23004 m per sec. Most of the high-order explosives have detonation velocities on the order of 6000 to 8000 m per sec, which precludes their use. The dynamites have a lower detonation velocity of around 2800 m per sec which is still somewhat too high. Lower-order explosives such as ammonium nitrate (1070 m per sec) must be used to weld lead in the as-received condition if the explosives are used in direct contact. Rather than use low-order explo'sives it was decided to alter the sonic velocity of the lead. The sonic velocity is directly related to the modulus of the material according to the following expression: Fig 1—Interface of explosive weld of lead to steel. Lead is on top As-polished Magnification 75 times as well as the yield strength. Bolling et al. 6 show that the shear modulus of lead single crystals increases from about 0.72 X1011 dynes per sq cm at 300°K to about 0.98 X1011 dynes per sq cm at 0°K, an increase of approximately 3 5 pct. This gives an increase in the sonic velocity of around 700 m per sec. Hence, the sonic velocity of lead at cryogenic temperatures is approximately equivalent to the detonation velocity of the low-order dynamites. We have obtained high-quality lead to steel explosive welds using a 40 pct dynamite in direct contact with the lead. Prior to detonation the lead was chilled with liquid nitrogen (78°K) to increase the strength and sonic velocity. Welds were made while the lead was cold. Specimen sizes were 3 by 6 in. A preset angle of 5 deg with a 0.10-in. standoff at the base was the geometrical setup used. The amount of explosive used for optimum welding of an 1/8 -in. -thick lead sheet to a steel plate was found to be 7 g per sq in. A PETN sheet explosive line wave generator was used to insure a linear detonation front through the dynamite. A photomicrograph of a lead-steel weld is shown in Fig. 1. The typical wave effect that constitutes a good explosive weld is present. When tested in shear, the weld failed in the lead, indicating that the bond is stronger than the lead base metal. Higher-order explosives were also tried without success. We believe this indicates the importance of matching the detonation velocity and the sonic velocity for successful explosive welding. Note Added in Proof. High quality explosive welds of lead to steel have recently been obtained at ambient temperature using a low velocity (1000 M per sec) free running dynamite. The weld interface obtained is comparable to Fig. 1. 'S. H. Carpenter, R. H. Wittman, and R. J. Carlson: Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Center for High Energy Forming, Syracuse University Press, syracu.se, N. Y., in press. 'A. HI Holtzman and G. R. Cowan: Welding Risearch. Council Bull., No. 104, April, 1965. 'Metals Handbook, 8 ed., p. 1062, Metals Park, Ohlo. 'J. M. Walsh, M. H. Rice, R. G. McQueen, and F. L. Yarger: Phys. Rev., 1957, vol. 108, pp. 196-216; 'L. V. Al'tshuler, K. K. Krupnikov, B. N. Ledener, V. I. Zuchikhin,

Jan 1, 1968

Institute of Metals Division PAUL D MERICA, Chairman ZAY JEFFRIES, Vice-chairman W M CORSE. Secretary General Committee ROBERT J ANDERSON H C JENNISON L W SPRING WILLIAM K FRANK DAVID LEVINGER R L SUHL J R FREEMAN, JR. PAUL McKINNEY R F WOOD STANISLAUS SKOWRONSKI

Jan 1, 1923

By B. E. Eakin, A. L. Lee, M. H. Gonzalez

Expeximental viscosity and density data of lour natural gases are presented for temperatures from WO to 340F and pressures from 100 to 8.000 psia. A correlation is also discussed and results reported. INTRODUCTION This investigation is one of several efforts by the authors to provide viscosity data for pure hydrocarbons and mixtures. Results of some pure hydrocarbons and their mix tures have been presented." Several predictive methods and correlations have also been reported.'," This paper presents the experimental viscosity and density data of four natural gases and confirms a correlation in a previous study. APPARATUS The viscometer was described previously. 2,6 A bank of stainless steel pycnometers was included to determine density in conjunction with the viscosity measurements (Fig. I). DATA AND MATERIALS The natural gases were furnished by the Atlantic Richfield Co. (Samples 1 and 21, the Continental Oil Co. (Sample 3) and the Pan American Petroleum Corp. (Sample 4). Table 1 shows the composition of these gases obtained by mass spectrometer analysis. The pure component viscosity data used in the correlation have been published."".'"', '" Experimental and calculated viscosity data for the natural gases are presented in Tables 2 through 5. CORRELATION Starling and Ellington"' have reported several semi-empirical expressions based to a certain extent on the theory of viscosity advanced by Born and Green.' The final expression presented by Starling and Ellingto'n is: i'. (micropoise) -- /t,, exp rX(7') p ..... (I) Eq. 1 was modified by Lee et 01." to represent mixture and pure component data simultaneously. This equation has the form: F = K exp [XpY] :.........(2) where K=- (7.77 i 0.0063M)Ti 122.4 + 12.9M +T .................(3) ' ' ' X= 2.57 + ---1914.5+ 0.0095M .... (4) Y = 1.11 -r 0.04 X ........(5) Over the pressure and temperature range studied in this investigation, this equation represents the data on methane, ethane, propane, n-butane and four methane-n-butane mixtures with a standard deviation* of ? 1.89 per cent. Density data by Sage and Lacey" were used to fit the equations. Eq. 2 gives reliable values of the viscosity of light hydrocarbons without prior knowledge of experimental viscosity values, but accurate density data must be available. Eq. 2 was used to predict viscosity values for the natural gases studied in this paper. The particular set of parameters contained in Eqs. 3 through 5 gave values that reproduced experimental data within 25 per cent. Needless to say, in using Eq. 2 better density values will give better viscosity results. However, those engineers who do not have accurate density values at hand or the time, or such facilities as a library, computer, etc. readily available, may feel uneasy in using Eq. 2. Therefore, the authors sought the easiest but by no means best density prediction method, which was reported by Kaf 30 years ago. A set of density values, which were calculated based on Kay's method, and a generalized compressibility factor chart were used to fit Eq. 2. The results are:

Jan 1, 1967