Search Documents

Members whose deaths were reported from Mar. 5, 1919, to Apr. 5, 1920. Elected Died 1895 ANDERSON, ROBERT HAY 1920 1916 ATWATER, M. W 1919 1905 BARD, D. C 1920 1893 BECKER, GEORGE F 1919 1914 BIGELOW, BRAXTON 1917 1917 BLACK, HERBERT F 1919 1911 BOWLER, ROBERT P 1919 1902 BROWN, ARTHUR H 1919 1913 BURNHAM, WILLIAM 1918 1905 Carnegie, Andrew 1919 1900 CARPENTER ROLLA C 1919 1908 CONNER H. MCKEAN 1919 1883 COOK, ROBERT A 1919 1903 COOPER, JOHN 1919 1875 CROXTON, SAMUEL W 1919 1889 DICKMAN, R. N 1919 1893 DUFOURCQ, EDWARD L 1919 1917 FAY, CHARLES H 1918 1875 FOHR, FRANZ 1919 1879 FRICK, H. C 1919 1880 GAYLEY, JAMES 1920 1917 GARVIN, JOHN C 1920 1915 GIBBS, CHARLES H 1919 1917 GODBE, RALPH T - 1918 GREGORY, A. E 1919 1917 HAMILTON, A. McL 1918 1914 HEISE, HENRY C - 1913 HINCKLEY, E. R 1918 1884 JENNINGS, HENNEN 1920 1895 JOHNSON, J. E., JR 1919 1895 KANN, MEYER M 1919 1895 KAYSER, H. W. F 1919 1918 KENNEDY, DANIEL J 1903 KING, PAUL S 1919 1901 LANGTON, JOHN 1920

Jan 1, 1923

By H. H. Rachford, W. P. Schultz

The use of computing machines to solve physical problems has made it imperative to represent physical data in a form computing machines can use. Although curve-fitting is an old and well-practiced art, there still seems to be some interest in questions regarding what methods can be used and why. Even though there are many good references on this subject, it may be of some value to discuss a particular method which has been found to be useful, and to make available the associated tables for its use in the hope that there can be saved a few of the tedious hours necessary to reduce many of the suggested methods to practice. Although a very brief discussion of the mathematical background of the tables is included immediately below, those interested only in their use can skip directly to the section on Use of the Tables. Direct Fit of a Set of Points A frequently encountered problem is: Given data which can be represented by a smooth curve +(x), to find an easy-to-evaluate function F(x), with only a few coefficients, which is a good approximation of +(x) on the interval 0 5 x 5 x,,. Consider F(x) as a linear combination of m + 1 arbitrary, single-valued, continuous, linearly independent functions, f,(x), Ff.r) = a,f,,(x) + a,f,(x) + . . . -+ aifi(x) + If the value of Q(x) is known or can be read from the curve at the points xj: +(x,), +(x,), . . . +(xj) . . . +(x.), and if n = m, then all the coefficients of F(x) can be determined, and F(x,) — +(x,) = 0 for j =. 0, 1, . . . n. This follows from the solution of the set of linear simultaneous equations. +(x<.) = aofu(x,) + aJI(x0) + . . . + a,,f,,(x,) =a, = f,,(x,) + a,f,(x,) + . . . + a,f,,(x,) +(x,,) = a,,f,(x,,) + a,f,(x,) + ... + a,,f.,(x,,) ...........(2) for the coefficients ai. Although the set a, from the solutions of the set of Equations 2 yields an fix) which gives an exact value of $(x,) for the n + 1 points, there is no restraint on ~(xj in the interval xi < x < xj+,. Indeed, if the points +(x,) are not sufficiently smooth, very serious differences may arise between F(x) in the interval and the smooth curve +(x). Least-Squares Fit It has been suggested&apos; that if n is made to exceed m, and the set a, is found to minimize the function the function F(x) is much less sensitive to small errors in +(xi), and usually provides a much better fit to the smooth function +(x). This is known as the best fit in the sense of the least-squares error. To minimize $, set £ = 0,i = 0,1,... iTi,.....(3) The m + 1 equations from Equation 3 are k—n k=n a.^p /,,(a) f,(xt) + a, X A: = 0 k=O k = n k = n k=0 k=0 +(x.) f,(x,),............(4) one equation being obtained for each i = 0, 1, . . . m. Inasmuch as the arbitrary functions f(x) may be evaluated for x,, k = 0, 1, . . . n, and the +(x,) are known values of the curve to be fitted, the simultaneous Equations 4 may be solved for the set a,. Particular Functions Given the functions fi(x) and the set +(xj), the solutions for require evaluating a number of sums of products as well as the solution of an m + 1 order set

Jan 1, 1956

By T. M. Morris

R. T. Hukki (Finland Institute of Technology, Helsinki, Finland)—Two schools of thought are developing concerning the order of the rate of flotation. The paper by Morris is intended to show experimental evidence in favor of the first order rate. Arbiter, on the other hand, has presented an earlier paper" to demonstrate the validity of the second order rate equation. Unfortunately his method of plotting is open to criticism, as pointed out by Morris." A more sensitive method of plotting has been described by the writer,= whereby the data presented by Arbiter demonstrate the superiority of the second order plot. The general rate equation may be written in the following forms for the integrated first and second order equations: (A) t = -1/k In Co-R/Co (first order) [4] 1 (B) 1/t = - kCo + kCo2 1/R (second order) As a first approximation the value of Co may be taken as a unity, 100 pct or 1. Whether or not this is the case in all tests performed by Morris is impossible to judge, owing to the fact that the flotation times are extremely short, e.g. 150 sec in tests A. It would, indeed, be very interesting to know what the total recovery R would be after 1 hr of flotation, for example, instead of after 150 sec. Certainly there are circumstances when C, approaches unity within a very small margin of error. Morris has used the same approximation in his example D "since the feed to this cleaner

Jan 1, 1954

By W. C. Lacy

This article is a progress report of a program designed to quantitatively evaluate geological parameters to predict stable slope angles. The author feels that, although there does not appear to be any one technique or characteristics that will suffice as an index to the determination of stable slope angles, a combination of seismic methods as outlined here, detailed geological mapping and logging of core, and a better understanding of the angle of internal friction in rock types will permit accurate estimation. A mining engineer friend once remarked, "If we don&apos;t have pit slope failures, the slopes are too flat." Since economic justification of an open pit project is based upon ultimate pit slopes, we cannot wait until the pit is developed and slopes established by trial and error. Some combination of geological and/or geophysical techniques must be developed to permit accurate prediction of stable slope angles and to suggest modification of pit outlines to result in slopes enabling maximum economic yield. This presentation is a progress report of a program designed to quantitatively evaluate geological parameters to predict stable slope angles. The principle of the weakest link applies to any slope stability evaluation and necessitates detailed geological examination and recording of observations. Physical failure will occur along any surface where shearing stress exceeds shearing resistance. Rock conditions are seldom uniform even within a single cut or pit face, so stability conditions will vary. Consequently, both plan outline and ultimate slope limits must be tailored to the specific situation. Economic advantages to be gained by slight increases in slope angles in deep pits are well recognized and stimulate efforts to obtain maximum permissible slope angles. MECHANICS OF SLOPE FAILURE Excellent reviews on the nature of slope failure have been presented+2,6,8,11 For the purpose of this study, the writer considers failure to take place by one or more of three processes: 1) ravelling, 2) translation or slope failure, and 3) rotation or base failure (Fig. 1). The effects of increased pore water pressure in soils were recognized in 1923 by Terzaghi in his development of the concept of effective stress, and he has applied the same principle to jointed rocks designating water pressure as cleft-water pressure.8 Cleft-water pressure in a rock slope reduces normal pressure on the plane of failure, thus reducing shearing resistance and resulting in slope failure. In the following discussion it is assumed that adequate drainage is supplied to prevent any build-up of water pressure. This is the first step in any program to establish maximum slopes. Ravelling: Ravelling occurs in rocks with low cohesion and entails the free movement of individual fragments ranging from single rock falls to running ground. Removal of lateral support wherever slope angle exceeds the angle of repose of the rock parti-

Jan 1, 1963

The following is an incomplete list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period Jan. 10, 1918 to Feb. 10, 1918: K. Baumgarten, San Diego, Cal. J. A. Meyerovitch, Petrograd, Russia. F. J. Brine, Toronto, Ont., Canada. C. Naramore, Washington, D. C. W. A. Castleton, Salt Lake City, Utah. Orrin P. Peterson, Wausau, Wis. J. Ross Corbin, Boyerton, Pa. William H. Rea, Pittsburgh, Pa. W. M. Corse, Buffalo, N. Y. W. Murray Sanders, Tucson, Ariz. W. A. Deane, Summitville, N. Y. Edmund F. Saxton, Philadelphia, Pa. S. E. Doak, Philadelphia, Pa. William C. Schmidt, Humboldt, Ariz. F. G. Downs, Jersey City, N. J. G. J. Sielaff, Oakland, Cal. Albert H. Fay, Washington, D. C. A. D. Sproat, Bound Brook, N. J. F. Julius Fohs, Tulsa, Okla. J. A. Stader, Joplin, Mo. A. L. Gholz, Minneapolis, Minn. A. K. Stewart, Mine La Motte, Mo. Ruger W. Hay, Easton, Pa. Geo. W. Tower, Jr., New Rochelle, N. Y. Stanley C. Herold, Pittsburgh, Pa. Henry Traphagen, Toledo, Ohio. A. A. Holland, Montreal, Canada. H. E. Treichler, Chuquicamata, Chile. T. Z. Humphrey, Anaconda, Mont. Paul M. Tyler, Fairlee, Vt. H. M. LaFollette, LaFollette, Tenn. F. R. Van Campen; Seattle, Wash. J. B. Lain, Goldfield, Nev. Thor Warner, Phoenix, Ariz. J. R. Lashbrooke, Los Angeles, Cal. Clarence Woods, Narrows, Va. W. F. Lewis, Ewen, Mich. E. N. Zern, Pittsburgh, Pa. C. E. McQuigg, New Haven, Conn. Robert J. Anderson has resigned his position as chief chemist and metallurgist of the Cleveland Metal Products Co., Cleveland, Ohio.

Jan 3, 1918

Jan 1, 1880

THE opening session was held on Tuesday evening, February 17th, in the house of the American Society of Civil Engineers. The President of the Institute, Mr. E. B. Coxe, after a few introductory remarks, congratulating the members on the general prosperity in all the branches of the professions and manufactures represented by the Institute, called on Mr. E. F. Loiseau, of Philadelphia, for the first paper, On the Successful Manufacture of Compressed Fuel at Port Richmond, Philadelphia. Professor Prime called attention to the fact that the work of the United States Testing Board had been left unfinished at a point when valuable results had just been reached, and offered the following resolutions: WHEREAS, The American Institute of Mining Engineers has seen with regret that the work of the United States Testing Board has been suspended through the lack of an appropriation by Congress, which appropriation dues not seem likely to be renewed, and WHEREAS, It seems most important to the vital interests of our iron and steel manufactures that the experiments commenced by the United States Testing Board should be carried to successful completion ; Resolved, That a committee of three be appointed, to act with a like, committee to he appointed by the American Society of Civil Engineers, to carry out to completion the work commenced by the United States Testing Board. Resolved, That the American Society of Civil Engineers be requested to cooperate with this society by the appointment of a like committee. Resolved, That the committee have authority to request, in the name of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, contributions to a fund to be devoted to the completion of the experiments aforesaid. Resolved, That the Council of this Institute be authorized, whenever requested by the committee so appointed, to petition Congress for the free use of the testing machine at the United States Arsenal at Watertown. Resolved, That a committee be appointed by the President, to select the afore-said committee of experts. Resolved, That the President of the Institute have authority to fill any vacancies which may occur in the committee. The resolutions were unanimously adopted, and President Coxe appointed the following committee in accordance with the resolutions : Messrs. A. L. Holley, James Park, Jr., and J. F. Holloway. The President also appointed Messrs. Heinrich, Mickley, and Spils-

Jan 1, 1880

The following is an incomplete list of members and guests who called at Institute headquarters during the period June 10, 1918 to July 10, 1918. F. C. Alsdorf, Tucson, Ariz. Emory M. Marshall, Camp Raritan, N. J. Juan F. Brandes, Santa Barbara, Cal. Jacques S. Negru, Camp Niagara, Ont. .H. Smith Clark, Kansas City, Mo. Arvid E. Nissen, High Bridge, N. J. J. S. Cunningham, Charleston, W. Va. Richard G. Place, So. Strafford, Vt. W. G. Eberhardt, Tucson, Ariz. Frank H. Probert, Berkeley, Cal. M. Eldredge, Bombay,. India. Martin A. Roudabush, Osterburg, Pa. A. D. R. Galloway, Accra, W. Africa;. P. H. Royster, Minneapolis, Minn. F. Hanst, Harrisburg, Pa. J. L. Schueler, Peoria, Ill. B. B. Hood, Chrome, N.. J. Henry B. Smith, New Britain, Conn. Paul S. King, Wilmington, Del. W. G. Sommer, Peoria, Ill. E. D. Kinney, Anaconda, Mont. A. L. Toenges, Roanoke, Va. E. W. Kohl, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. G. D. B. Turner, Butte, Mont. James W. Love, Knoxville, Tenn. A. T. Ward, Bellefonte, Pa. Edwin A. Austin, formerly with the Yukon Gold Co., is superintendent of the Elkoro mine at Jarbidge, Nev. John W. Beard is now with the Cia Minera de Penoles, Ojuela, Dgo., Mexico, via Mapimi. R. S. Bonsib has accepted a position with the United States Emergency Fleet Corporation as District Safety Engineer, San Francisco, Cal. Albert Burch has been appointed by the Bureau of Mines to encourage the mining of chrome. F. B. Caldwell is working for the U. S. Bureau of Mines, under Albert Burch, in the investigation of chromite deposits. W. A. Carlyle has taken over the duties (in addition to his own) formerly assigned to E. P. Mathewson with the British America Nickel Corporation, at Sudbury, Canada. R. M. Catlin received the honorary degree of Doctor of Science at the recent commencement of Rutgers College, New Brunswick, N. J. S. K. Dahl is giving up his position as mill superintendent with the Messina Mines, which have been suspended, and is returning to this country. Algernon Del Mar has become manager of the Techatticup mines, El Dorado Canyon, Nev. Robert Dye has succeeded D. L. Forbes as manager of the Teck-Hughes at Kirkland Lake, Ont., Canada. J. O. Elton, superintendent of the Anaconda company&apos;s electrolytic zinc plant at Great Falls, Mont., is doing special work with the U. S. Bureau of Mines. R. B. Caples takes charge of the plant in his absence. George H. Gibbs has resigned his position as engineer at Messrs. T. & 1. Bradley & Sons, Ltd., Darlaston blast furnaces, Darlaston, and is now located at "Belmont." Litchfield Road, Rushall, Walsall, England. William D. Gordon, for the past 7 years manager of The Mine & Smelter Supply Co. at El Paso, has been elected president of Camphuis, Rives & Gordon,. Inc., and has opened American headquarters for the company at 81 New Street, New York, N. Y. E. Harms, for the past 16 years inn charge of metallurgical operations of the Torreon, Mexico; lead and copper smelter, has resigned and is now located at El Paso, Tex.

Jan 8, 1918

By AIME AIME

FEATURES of the second fall meeting of the Petroleum Division for 1941, held at the Ambassador Hotel, Los Angeles, Oct. 29-30, were the forum on the Paloma Plan on Thursday after- noon, the large attendance from east of the Rockies, and the dinner on Wednesday evening sponsored by the Southern California Section and at which President Suman spoke on the strategic minerals and metals situation. The attendance was large and the technical fare uniformly good ; the presiding officers had the proceedings well in hand at all times and kept things humming. Some- times it was necessary to taper off the discussion because of pressure on time. All this was due to careful groundwork before the respective sessions. These presiding officers deserve citation: L. W. Huebel, Howard Pyle, E. K. Parks, Carlton Beal, E. G. Trostel. R. W. French, Jr., John Dodge, and H. N. Marsh. The Los Angeles local commit- tees and the Southern California Section deserve much credit for the arrangements, which were recognized by suitable resolutions at the end of the meeting.

Jan 1, 1941

Trans No. Place Date Vol. 1. Wilkes-Barre, Pa&apos; May, &apos;71 1 2. Bethlehem, Pa Aug., &apos;71 1 3. Troy, N. Y Nov., &apos;71.. 1 4. Philadelphia, Pa Feb., &apos;72.. 1 5. New York, N. Y.&apos; May, &apos;72.. 1 8. Pittsburgh, Pa Oct., &apos;72.. 1 7. Boston, Maas Feb., &apos;73.. 1 8. Philadelphia, Pa." May, &apos;73.. 2 9. Easton, Pa Oct., &apos;73.. 2 10. New York, N. Y Feb.. &apos;74.. 2 11. St. Louis, Mo.* May, &apos;74.. 3 12. Hazleton, Pa Oct., &apos;74.. 3 13. New Haven, Conn Feb., &apos;75.. 3 14. Dover, N. J. ? May, &apos;75.. 4 15. Cleveland, 0 Oct., &apos;75.. 4 16. Washington, D. C Feb., &apos;76.. 4 17. Philadelphia, Pa.} June, &apos;76.. 5 18. Philadelphia, Pa Oct., &apos;76.. 5 19. New York, N. Y Feb., &apos;77.. 5 20. Wilkes-Barre, Pa. ? May, &apos;77.. 8 21. Amenia, N. Y Oct., &apos;77, . 6 22. Philadelphia, Pa Feb., &apos;78:. 6 23. Chattanooga, Tenn.*...May, &apos;78&apos;.. 7 24. Lake George, N. Y Oct., &apos;78.. 7 25. Baltimore, Md.* Feb., &apos;79.. 7 26. Pittsburgh, Pa Mayo &apos;79.. 8 27. Montreal, Canada Sept., &apos;79., 8 28, New York, N. Y.? Feb., &apos;SO.. 8 29. Lake Superior, Mich. ..Aug., &apos;80.. 9 30. Philadelphia, Pa.&apos; Feb., &apos;81.. 9 31. Staunton, Va May, &apos;81..10 32. Harrisburg, Pa Oct., &apos;81..10 33. Washington, D. C.? ....Feb., &apos;82..10 34. Denver, Colo Aug., &apos;82..11

Jan 1, 1928

By Jasper L. Stuckey

PYROPHYLLITE, first identified as soapstone,1 later as agalmatolite,2 and finally as pyrophyllite,3 has been known to occur in North Carolina for more than 130 years and has been produced intermittently in commercial amounts for the past 100 years. Pyrophyllite mining, however, has become a major industry in North Carolina only during the past 25 years. North Carolina and California are the chief producing states. Current annual production averages 125,000 tons, of which slightly more than 90 pct comes from North Carolina. Distribution and Geologic Setting: All known pyrophyllite deposits in North Carolina are associated with rocks of the Carolina Slate Belt,4 which is composed of a vast series of metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary materials, occurring as two zones extending in a northeast-southwest direction across the state. The larger of these zones, lying in the central Piedmont region, varies from 8 to 50 miles wide. The smaller zone lies along the eastern edge of the Piedmont region and is partly covered by coastal plain sediments.

Jan 1, 1958

By Charles R. Keyes

I. Introductory,.......... 185 II. Hypotheses oF the Origin of OzaRk Ores..... 186 1. General Considerations........ 186 2. Schmidt-Leonhard and Gage View...... 187 3. Jenney Opinion.......... 187 4. Posepny Idea,.......... 188 5. Winslow-Robertson Hypothesis....... 188 6. Branner Proposition......... 189 7. Keyes Statement.......... 189 8. Van Hise-Bain Theory........ 190 III. Requirements of an Adequate WoRking-Hypothesis,... 190 IV. GeneRal Geotectonics of the OzaRk Region.... 192 1. Salient Aspects.......... 192 2. Geologic Formations......... 192 3. Character of Faulting...192 4. Extent of Flexing......... 193 5. Unconformity Inequalities....195 6. Warping of Strata...195 V. Classes of Ore-Deposits... 196 VI. Vadose ORe-ConcentRation,........ 197 VII. GeogRaphic DistRibution of the Ore-Bodies,... 199 VIII. Relation of ORe-Deposit to Geologic Structure... 201 1. General Occurrence of Ore-Bodies in Basins.... 201 2. Deposits of the Central Missouri District..... 203 3. Deposits of the Southwestern Missouri District.... 203 4. Deposits of the Northern Arkansas District... 305 5. Deposits of the Southeastern Missouri District.... 206 6. Synclinal Ore-Deposits of Other Districts.....207 7. Significance of Ore-Troughs in Prospecting... 209 8. Origin of the so-called Synclines,...210 9. Significance of the Cross-Bars of Joplin..... 213 10. Relation of Ore-Run to Ancient Relief-Features,... 215 IX. Direction of GRound-Water Circulation..... 216 X. VeRtical Range of Workable Ore-Bodies,... 218 XI. Oscillation of Ground-WateR Level...... 219 XII. Relations of Ore-Bodies to Lithoclasic Features,.. 220 XIII. PRimaRy Source of Ore-Materials,...... 220 XIV. Zone of Ore-Enrichment,......... 222

Jan 1, 1910

United Engineering Trustees, Inc. WILLIAM H. BASSETT H. G. MOULTON R. M. ROOSEVELT The Engineering Foundation GEORGE D. BARRON E. DEGOLYER R. M. ROOSEVELT Engineering Societies Library Board ROBERT PEELE H. K MASTERS A. B. PARSONS, Ex-officio F. F. SHARPLESS R. H. SWEETEST

Jan 1, 1934

OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES OF LOCAL SECTIONS AIME Committee on Local Section Affairs Roger Pierce, Chairman Carleton C Long Thomas C Frick AIME Committee on Student Chapter Affairs John P Nielson, Chairman John C Calhoun, Jr J R Van Pelt, Jr Council of Section Delegates A A Burr, Chairman (Hudson-Mohawk) Ralph A Watson, Vice-Chairman (North Pacific) L G Neely, Secretary (West Central Texas) INTERIM COMMITTEE M O Langham (East Texas), Fulton J Olivier (Delta), L W Smith (Niagara Frontier), G R Spindler (Central Appalachian) LOCAL SECTIONS (There are 78 Local Sections in the United States, 9 Foreign) ADIRONDACK Established June 18, 1952 Official year begins in April Meets fourth Saturday monthly, April through October Seven meetings annually Local Section Dues AIME Members $2, Nonmembers $3 Charles F Dievendorf, Chairman Severn P Brown, Vice-Chairman George E Erdman, Secretary-Treasurer Gouverneur Talc Co , Inc Gouverneur, N Y Malcolm V Lowry, &apos;60, Section Delegate Committees Membership David J Crawford, Chairman Program Brower Dellinger, Chairman Student Affairs Eugene A Eastman, Chairman

Jan 1, 1959

By C. J. Guntner, R. P. Reed

A commercial 18Cr-8Ni iron alloy (AISI 304L) was examined in tension at 300°, 76°, 20°, and 4°K. Continuous stress-strain recordings were made, X-ray analyses at periodic stress (strain) intervals were obtained, and the magnetic measurements were taken. From this data the percentage of martensitic products [bcc(a) and hcp (E)] was computed as a function of stress (strain). It was found thatup to 15 pct E phase forms at low temperntures. The amount of E formed increases to a maximum at about 5 pct strain, then decreases. This decrease indicates the additional transformation of E to a&apos;. The total amount of E and a&apos; was suppressed at constant stress (strain) at 4°K as compared to 76°K. It is proposed that the suppression of E and a&apos; is associated with the decreased mobility of extended dislocations at very low temperatures. The yield strength decreased as the temperature was depressed below room temperature and then increased rapidly near 4°K. SOME ferrous alloys which are austenitic (fcc ?) at room temperature appear to be unique in that two martensitic products (hcp e and bcc a&apos;) may form on cooling to lower temperatures or on application of mechanical stress. The most common room-temperature austenitic ferrous alloys are 18Cr, 8Ni stainless steels. Most aspects of the spontaneous transformations have been previously described for these steels.&apos; Several previous papers have described special aspects of the stress-induced transformations at low temperatures for the stainless steels, such as the existence of the hcp phase (c) after straining at 76oK,2-7 the morphology after straining using electron microscopy,7 and the decrease in E at higher strains at 76oK.4 However, for a complete representation, one must know the stress-strain characteristics and the dependence of both martensitic products on applied stress and temperature. It is the intention of this paper to provide that documentation. To accomplish this, continuous stress vs strain recordings were made at four temperatures: 300°, 76", 20°, and 4°K for annealed AISI 304L (a commercial 18Cr-8Ni alloy). At periodic stress intervals at each temperature the integrated X-ray line intensity of a selected peak for each phase (y, E, and a&apos;) was measured. In addition, photomicrographs of the strained surfaces were taken and magnetic measurements were made. The magnetic readings can be directly converted into percent a&apos;.&apos;,e With these measurements the percentage of each phase may be plotted as a function of stress (or strain) and test temperature. It was found that up to 15 pct E phase forms upon stressing the AISI 304L alloy at low temperatures. The E percentage increases abruptly after the alloy yields, but then decreases gradually at higher stresses. The rapid increase in e at 76°K is associated with an "easy-glide" portion of the stress-strain curve. The total amount of a&apos; + .G is suppressed below 76°K at a constant stress or strain. The yield strength decreases down to 76°K but increases rapidly below 20°K. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Tensile test specimens were cut parallel to the rolling direction from 0.1-in.-thick sheet. Continuous stress vs strain recordings were obtained at each test temperature (300°, 76o, 20°, and 4°K) using equipment and methods described elsewhere.&apos; The specimens which were used in the X-ray analysis were stressed to successive increments of strain at each temperature, analyzed at room temperature, then restressed at the test temperature. This procedure was repeated until approximately ten X-ray analyses had been performed with approximately 1.0 pct strain increments. The specimens had a reduced section 1 in. long, 1.2 in. wide, and 0.1 in. thick. They were electro polished prior to testing and after each strain increment. Table I lists the chemical composition, grain size, and hardness for the alloy which was used. This is the same alloy for which extensive mechanical-property tests3 and morphological studies of the spontaneous transformations&apos; have previously been made. For the low-temperature tests (76o and 4°K) below the Ms temperature the specimens were initially cooled to the test temperature, held for 1/2 hr, then warmed and X-rayed at room temperature. The results are listed in Table 11. From earlier work8 it was known that additional transformation on the second cycle would be considerably less (-0.1 pct

Jan 1, 1964

Jan 1, 1920

Large deposits of manganiferous iron ores, representing several million tons of metallic manganese, occur in the United States. The Minnesota deposits of such ore are of outstanding importance because of their size, state of development, ease of mining and proximity to the Great Lakes, which permits water transportation to steel centers. In view of the fact that our steel industry requires large quantities of manganese, for which no satisfactory substitute has been found, and because our reserves of ferro-grade ore are comparatively small, the development of methods that will make our large deposits of manganiferous iron ores available as a source of ferromanganese is an important problem. Realizing the importance of this problem, some years ago the North Central Station of the U. S. Bureau of Mines and the Minnesota School of Mines Experiment Station undertook jointly the development of methods for recovering the .manganese content of manganiferous iron ores in a form suitable for the production of ferromanganese, the 80 per cent. alloy indispensable in producing steel. Two types of manganiferous iron ores have been described in previous reports.&apos; The brown ores are higher in iron and lower in manganese than the black ores; the black ores are more siliceous but contain less phosphorus. The utilization of the iron content of the brown ores in the production of steel appears to furnish the best basis for their treatment. The method of attack has been to work out modifications in iron and steel practice so as to recover manganese in the form of slag comparable to ferro-grade ores. The greater part of the experimental work has been conducted with a 6-ton blast furnace and a 1/2-ton basic open hearth. This paper is devoted mainly to open-hearth tests in which high-phosphorus spiegel

Jan 1, 1930

By George E. Roberts

THE gains of society from the state of primitive conditions in the past to the standard of living which prevails in the advanced countries today have been accomplished mainly by the increasing productive capacity of the population under the leadership and services of the engineer. Without improvements in the arts and industries the growth of population tends to place succeeding generations always at a disadvantage. In this country we have been exploiting with reckless prodigality a wealth of soil and minerals and timber that has been in preparation for thousands of years. We know that the prices of all national products have been advancing, and were on a rising scale even before the phenomenal increases resulting from the war. Over against this depletion of natural wealth we have the influence of improvements made in the methods of production and distribution-and the accumulation of wealth in the form of productive equipment. The net result of these opposing influences determines whether society moves forward or backward.

Jan 1, 1926

In 1962, minerals beneficiation showed definite signs of coming out of the doldrums into which it has drifted after the uranium boom. Demand by steelmakers for high-grade iron pellets has created the need for concentrating plants to upgrade specular hematite by spiral concentration or flotation and magnetites by magnetic means and flotation. According to a paper given at the AMC annual meeting by C. S. Arms of Pickands Mather, "the shipment of pellets, started in the mid-1950&apos;s, has increased to 17.6 million tons in 1961 from North American operations. Many plants already underway will raise this production to about 42 million tons by 1965. This will be a very sizeable percentage of the total iron ore production contemplated by that date." Iron ore concentration methods are gradually raising the assay of pellets into the 65 to 69% Fe range and lowering silica to the 4 to 7% range. Quebec Cartier&apos;s Lac Jeannine concentrator went into operation in late 1961 and all grinding units were running by 1962. The Iron Ore Co. of Canada&apos;s new Carol Lake plant was started in mid-1962.

Jan 2, 1963