Whole-body vibration exposure comparison of seat designs for low- and mid-seam shuttle cars in underground coal mines - SME Transactions 2009

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 11
- File Size:
- 9717 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2009
Abstract
In a systematic study, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
evaluated seat designs in low- and mid-seam shuttle cars during production operations at two underground
coal mines in southern West Virginia. The purpose was to support, with additional data, earlier
findings that NIOSH ergonomic seat designs (featuring viscoelastic foam padding and lower-back
support) may help reduce health risks to operators of coal mine shuttle cars. Eight shuttle car operators
evaluated seven seat designs (one already in use in each vehicle and five NIOSH designs) relative
to perceived and measured whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure (including vehicle jarring/jolting)
and discomfort. Operators’ perceptions using a visual analog scale (VAS) and questionnaire ratings
were compared with International Standards Organization (ISO) 2631-1:1985 fatigue-decreased
proficiency (FDP) limits and measured WBV levels on low- and mid-seam shuttle cars. Objective
and subjective data results indicated that NIOSH seat designs (with added adjustability, lower-back
support and improved seat padding) performed better to reduce vehicle jarring/jolting levels and that
shuttle car operators favored them over existing seat designs. The NIOSH low- and mid-seam shuttle
car seats showed 45 to 77 percent better performance in FDP and 9 to 60 percent better performance
overall in operators’ ratings. Considering the VAS results for low- and mid-seam shuttle cars under
no-load conditions, operators rated the level of jarring/jolting 18 to 89 percent lower with the NIOSH
seats. Reductions in measured vehicle jarring/jolting were 19 to 46 percent for the three-directional
vector sum accelerations relative to the existing seats on the low- and mid-seam shuttle cars. Questionnaire
responses indicated that operators for both shuttle car models rated NIOSH seat designs as
more comfortable overall. Vehicle operators most frequently suggested adding armrests to improve
the seats on the mid-seam shuttle car. A suggested improvement for the low-seam shuttle car was to
make the seat a better fit for the operator compartment, which would enhance clearance between the
operator and vehicle controls and allow for better seat adjustment and operator visibility.
Citation
APA:
(2009) Whole-body vibration exposure comparison of seat designs for low- and mid-seam shuttle cars in underground coal mines - SME Transactions 2009MLA: Whole-body vibration exposure comparison of seat designs for low- and mid-seam shuttle cars in underground coal mines - SME Transactions 2009. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2009.