Things We'd Have Done Differently at Chimney Creek (1989)

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 6
- File Size:
- 320 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1998
Abstract
DOUG HALBE: We're not quite to the end of our session, but we're close. We've had a lot of fun with some of these spill ideas. But these are serious problems, and I think we might be able to benefit by continuing to compile these. Several years ago, the metallurgists at the various operations of Gold Fields Mining Company had a newsletter that came out every two months for several years. This publication consisted of short articles by the staff at the various operations, plus a few others, on problems they'd had and how they solved them. One very useful article, "Things We'd Have Done Differently at Chimney Creek," was written shortly after start-up. John Marsden was the editor and John Mansanti contributed to it, as did Jim Arnold (our distinguished co-chair) and Mike Gleason. I would be interested, with the permission of the audience, in editing that article to make it a little bit less abrasive and putting it into the record here. I think it's a useful SME function to maintain a list of things we've done wrong in plant design, things we don't want to do again. If we have another open session in the future, would others be willing, even anonymously, to contribute, bring slides, and say "Hey, look at the goofs we made?" [laughter, followed by support from the audience] Okay, we'll plan on that. And we'll try to include the Chimney Creek list in the transcript of this session-perhaps edited a bit.
Citation
APA:
(1998) Things We'd Have Done Differently at Chimney Creek (1989)MLA: Things We'd Have Done Differently at Chimney Creek (1989). Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1998.