Sources of Sampling Error and Implications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface and Underground Reverse Circulation Drilling

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 6
- File Size:
- 274 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jul 29, 2014
Abstract
Quality control (QC) of reverse circulation drill sampling commonly involves regular duplicate subsampling to monitor the extent of imprecision or random error in the subsampling system. In gold mining in Australia, the subsampling tool is usually a cone splitter.Other sources of error, including delimitation error and bias (systematic error) in the subsampler are often assumed to be negligible or ignored for being too difficult to QC.This paper describes actual sampling errors and error mitigation based on quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of surface and underground reverse circulation drill sampling at a high-nugget gold mine at Sunrise Dam, Western Australia.CITATION:Carswell, J T and Sutton, K, 2014. Sources of sampling error and implications for quality assurance and quality control in surface and underground reverse circulation drilling, in Proceedings Sampling 2014 , pp 65–70 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Citation
APA:
(2014) Sources of Sampling Error and Implications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface and Underground Reverse Circulation DrillingMLA: Sources of Sampling Error and Implications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface and Underground Reverse Circulation Drilling. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014.