Sources of Sampling Error and Implications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface and Underground Reverse Circulation Drilling

The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
J T. Carswell K Sutton
Organization:
The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Pages:
6
File Size:
274 KB
Publication Date:
Jul 29, 2014

Abstract

Quality control (QC) of reverse circulation drill sampling commonly involves regular duplicate subsampling to monitor the extent of imprecision or random error in the subsampling system. In gold mining in Australia, the subsampling tool is usually a cone splitter.Other sources of error, including delimitation error and bias (systematic error) in the subsampler are often assumed to be negligible or ignored for being too difficult to QC.This paper describes actual sampling errors and error mitigation based on quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of surface and underground reverse circulation drill sampling at a high-nugget gold mine at Sunrise Dam, Western Australia.CITATION:Carswell, J T and Sutton, K, 2014. Sources of sampling error and implications for quality assurance and quality control in surface and underground reverse circulation drilling, in Proceedings Sampling 2014 , pp 65–70 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Citation

APA: J T. Carswell K Sutton  (2014)  Sources of Sampling Error and Implications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface and Underground Reverse Circulation Drilling

MLA: J T. Carswell K Sutton Sources of Sampling Error and Implications for Quality Assurance and Quality Control in Surface and Underground Reverse Circulation Drilling. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account