Session 32 "Grout Mixtures and Materials 3"

- Organization:
- Deep Foundations Institute
- Pages:
- 28
- File Size:
- 2507 KB
- Publication Date:
- Feb 10, 2003
Abstract
I did a project (Sungai Piah) as a consultant to your firm in Malaysia, where we were faced with a similar situation as sketched out in your question. The following is what we did for the grouting of the primary holes, which were both located upstream of the plug as well as downstream: We used a hydrophobic MDI based semi-rigid polyurethane prepolymer in the first phase of the grouting operation when grouting under water flow conditions. Then in the second phase and also for the contact grouting we used a two component water compatible polyurethane elastomer. And then for deeper formation grouting, when all the water flow had been stemmed in the vicinity of the plug, we used a regular (balanced stable) cement based grout. So it may not exactly answer your question, but we first used hydrophobic grout because it is very efficient to grout a formation through which water flows. We didn't stop all the leaks day-lighting downstream of the plug or all water running through the formation near the plug, but the flow of water through the rock formation adjacent to the plug was reduced by 99.9%, after completing the urethane grouting. This facilitated the placement of cement based suspension grouts without wash-out.
Citation
APA:
(2003) Session 32 "Grout Mixtures and Materials 3"MLA: Session 32 "Grout Mixtures and Materials 3". Deep Foundations Institute, 2003.