Secondary Recovery and Pressure Maintenance - Further Discussion of Technical Papers

I would like to congratulate the authors on an interesting paper and, in particular, on their justification of the use of superposition in treating gas wells. They state, however, that no theory has previously been developed lor treating the variable rate drawdown case. In a paper published a few years ago by my colleagues and myself, a method is described which allows a constant rate drawdown curve to be derived for any well. regardless of real rate variations. This method has the great advantage that it is not necessary to make any assumptions regarding the form or uniformity of the reservoir, and the derivation suggested by the present authors is simply an idealized case of our more general treatment. In the light of several years' experience in the derivation of constant rate drawdown curves: I would like to point out that the method proposed by Odeh and Jones may lead to confusing answers, particularly if applied over an appreciable time interval. The reason is that, if pressures are measured when a well is flowing, non-linearities in plots like Figs. 1 and 2 can arise due to either (1) changes in the skin factor with time and/or flow rate, or (2) an inhomogeneous reservoir. Separation of these two effects is only possible if some of the pressures used in the analysis are measured when the well flow rate is 0 or, in other words. during brief shut-in periods. REFERENCES 1. Arthur, K. B.. Metunomski, Z. G. and Ruche, Ms "Intetet ct methode d'utilisa tion des mesures de pression [)our Petude des gisemonts" Revue de T'I.F.P. (Nov., 1962) XVII, 1299. 2. Thomere, R. and Arthur, K. R.: "Analysis of the Pressure Bet~avior of a Production Well Subject to Interterence and Its Application to Reservoir Models", Paper SPE 1189 presented at SPE :Amund Fall Mecting Ireld in Denwer, Colo. (Oct. 3-6, 1965).