RI 9214 - Comparison of Aerial and Ground Surveying of Subsidence Over an Active Longwall

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
John C. LaScola
Organization:
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Pages:
17
File Size:
936 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1988

Abstract

The Bureau of Mines repeatedly surveyed a grid of monuments over an active longwall mine panel in southwestern Pennsylvania during a 1-year period. Both conventional ground surveying techniques and photogrammetry were used. The objective of this investigation was to compare elevation measurements of subsidence obtained from aerial and ground survey methods under dynamic ground conditions. The results of a statistical analysis of the survey data show that the mean of the differences between 372 matched pairs of elevation measurements was 0.20 ft (61 mm) with a 95-pct-confidence interval of 0.05 ft (15 mm). The mean of the absolute values of the differences was 0.38 ft (116 mm) with a 95-pct-con-fidence interval of 0.04 ft (12 mm). Ninety-five percent of the absolute values of the differences were less than 1.11 ft (338 mm).
Citation

APA: John C. LaScola  (1988)  RI 9214 - Comparison of Aerial and Ground Surveying of Subsidence Over an Active Longwall

MLA: John C. LaScola RI 9214 - Comparison of Aerial and Ground Surveying of Subsidence Over an Active Longwall. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1988.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account