RI 8933 - Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal

- Organization:
- The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
- Pages:
- 36
- File Size:
- 2462 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1985
Abstract
This Bureau of Mines report describes and compares the procedures, capital investments, and operating costs of rotary and in-hole motor drilling techniques used to drain methane gas from the Pittsburgh Coal- bed in an underground mine located in southwestern Pennsylvania. A timestudy was conducted during the drilling of each of two boreholes, and the data were collated to serve as a base for comparing drilling procedures and operating costs. Findings indicate that drilling with an in-hole motor offers four advantages over rotary drilling; namely, an increase in drilling productivity, fewer worker-hours required, ease of maintaining vertical and horizontal bit trajectory, and less expensive drilling cost per foot of borehole.
Citation
APA:
(1985) RI 8933 - Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in CoalMLA: RI 8933 - Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1985.