RI 8933 - Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
S. J. Kravits A. Sainato G. L. Finfinger
Organization:
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Pages:
36
File Size:
2462 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1985

Abstract

This Bureau of Mines report describes and compares the procedures, capital investments, and operating costs of rotary and in-hole motor drilling techniques used to drain methane gas from the Pittsburgh Coal- bed in an underground mine located in southwestern Pennsylvania. A timestudy was conducted during the drilling of each of two boreholes, and the data were collated to serve as a base for comparing drilling procedures and operating costs. Findings indicate that drilling with an in-hole motor offers four advantages over rotary drilling; namely, an increase in drilling productivity, fewer worker-hours required, ease of maintaining vertical and horizontal bit trajectory, and less expensive drilling cost per foot of borehole.
Citation

APA: S. J. Kravits A. Sainato G. L. Finfinger  (1985)  RI 8933 - Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal

MLA: S. J. Kravits A. Sainato G. L. Finfinger RI 8933 - Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1985.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account