Reverse Flotation of Carbonate from Sulfide Minerals

Background For refractory gold ores with high carbonate contents ! Acid pressure oxidation ! High acid consumption (if low sulfur content) ! Low oxidation efficiency due to CO2 in autoclave ! Problems with slimy precipitates (gypsum, etc.) ! Alkaline pressure oxidation ! Difficulty in fixing arsenic ! Low gold dissolution due to iron hydroxides/oxides coating ! High reagent costs Summary ! Carbonate and sulfide minerals had similar floatability across the pH range tested (5 - 12) using sodium oleate as a collector; ! Thioglycollic acid or citric acid depressed the flotation of pyrite but could not depress chalcopyrite when used alone; ! Combination of thioglycollic acid and citric acid had a much stronger depressive effect, and the mixture depressed chalcopyrite as well as pyrite between pH 8 and 11 without affecting the flotation of calcite and dolomite; ! Calcite could be separated from chalcopyrite and pyrite; dolomite could be separated from pyrite but not from chalcopyrite under the tested conditions.