Restoration And Reclamation In Two Utah Mining Districts: Park City And Bingham Canyon (Kennecott) - SME Annual Meeting 2022

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 15
- File Size:
- 5935 KB
- Publication Date:
- Mar 2, 2022
Abstract
Mining activities at Kennecott and Park City are similar in that both districts began operation in the last half of the 18th century, and both operated on a large scale for many years. However, they are different for two important reasons. First, the mines in the Park City district were always underground. The city of Park City was above many of those mine workings. It remained in place after mining activity stopped, and as the town became an up-scale ski resort, property values increased and the tailings dumps became desirable building sites. In contrast, Kennecott eventually became an open pit mine, and the growing pit effectively consumed many of the small towns that had grown up around the underground workings. Even towns on the periphery of the open pit were razed to allow for the disposal of mine overburden. Second, almost all mining activity stopped in Park City in the early 1970s, just as the first rigorous environmental legislation in the United States was enacted. (The Ontario mine operated sporadically until 1982.) Many mine structures, waste dumps, tailings ponds and piles, and tunnels were simply abandoned as the mining companies ceased business or were bought out. Kennecott, on the other hand, has been in continuous operation for more than 120 years, so a closure plan hasn’t been finalized. Nonetheless, environmental and social problems have arisen, and the company has had to address them.
Citation
APA:
(2022) Restoration And Reclamation In Two Utah Mining Districts: Park City And Bingham Canyon (Kennecott) - SME Annual Meeting 2022MLA: Restoration And Reclamation In Two Utah Mining Districts: Park City And Bingham Canyon (Kennecott) - SME Annual Meeting 2022. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2022.