Practical Ground Control As It Relates to Productivity, Safety, and Costs

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 16
- File Size:
- 620 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1983
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rock mechanics theory needs to be applied to solve ground control problems, but in the final analysis the mining method and equipment which is used will be those which solve problems in a practical manner. Equipment and its inherent productivity and safety as supplied as "off the shelf" items by manufacturers often dictate the size of mine openings. Operators may tolerate falls of ground and associated hazards if productivity and safety problems are not too severe. In this whole process the costs of mining finally dictates just what system will be employed and what equipment will be used. True solutions to ground control problems sometimes require that the mine operator step back and totally rethink his problems. The true cost of accidents are often missed and hidden in overhead costs. Losses in production and accompanying profit are not fully considered, false economics, such as using inappropriate roof support devices, are undertaken at times when using the most expensive devices to totally eliminate accidents may be the best overall solution. Automation to remove the worker from the hazard area is often over- looked as the initial capitol expense to apply it may be high. Cooperation between mine engineers, mine operators, safety personnel, equipment suppliers, and government inspectors, both state and federal, is required to reach workable solutions that best meet the goals of all parties.
Citation
APA:
(1983) Practical Ground Control As It Relates to Productivity, Safety, and CostsMLA: Practical Ground Control As It Relates to Productivity, Safety, and Costs. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1983.