Passive Magnetic Bearing Prototype Testing Results - Collaboration between Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Arnold Magnetic Technologies takes Passive Magnetic Bearings from Theory to Hardware

- Organization:
- Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
- Pages:
- 7
- File Size:
- 534 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2012
Abstract
"This paper describes the theory, design, building, and testing of the passive magnetic bearing stabilizing system which is the core of the passive magnetic bearing system. The stabilizing system is made up of two large magnetic disks opposing themselves with a stabilizing disk in the center which allows the system to self-locate in a null position without the need for external power sources or sensors. When outside forces act upon the stabilizer, the magnetic fields interact with the stabilizing plate to return the system to its null position. Collaboration between two industry leaders has allowed an actual prototype to be built and tested providing real data to prove out the theory.INTRODUCTIONMagnetic bearing/stabilizer systems have many advantages over conventional mechanical bearing systems. These include near-zero drag losses and no need for lubrication since the rotating elements make no mechanical contact with the stationary elements of the bearing system. However all magnetic bearing systems must contend with a constraint known as Earnshaw’s Theorem in the early 1800’s, this theorem asserts the impossibility of constructing a stable, non-contacting, electrostatic or magnetostatic levitation system using only fixed charges or fixed magnetic poles, such as those produced by permanent magnets. Because of the constraint imposed by Earnshaw’s Theorem virtually all present-day commercial magnetic bearing systems are of the “active” type. That is, they employ electromagnets that are powered by amplifiers the inputs to which come from sensors embedded in the bearing system. These sensors are a part of a feedback loop that operates to keep the levitated rotating parts of the bearing stable and centered. The resulting complexity means that active magnetic bearings are expensive, require periodic maintenance, and continuously consume electrical power to energize their amplifiers and their electromagnets.Passive magnetic bearings are, of course, also subject to the constraints imposed by Earnshaw’s Theorem but they solve this problem in a straightforward and simple way, with only “passive” elements that take advantage of a loophole implicit in the derivation of Earnshaw’s Theorem. This loophole is that Earnshaw’s Theorem as derived applies only to static systems, i.e. an assembly of stationary permanent magnets arranged so as to levitate an object containing other permanent magnets. The theorem can be overcome if dynamic effects are taken into account. In active magnetic bearings the “dynamic effects” involve the afore-mentioned sensors, amplifiers, and electromagnets."
Citation
APA:
(2012) Passive Magnetic Bearing Prototype Testing Results - Collaboration between Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Arnold Magnetic Technologies takes Passive Magnetic Bearings from Theory to HardwareMLA: Passive Magnetic Bearing Prototype Testing Results - Collaboration between Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Arnold Magnetic Technologies takes Passive Magnetic Bearings from Theory to Hardware. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 2012.