Minerals Beneficiation - Comparative Results with Galena and Ferrosilicon at Mascot - Discussion

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 2
- File Size:
- 202 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1952
Abstract
P. L. Jones (Sink and Float Corp., New York)—The comparisons between galena and ferrosilicon medium should be applied only to the specific sink-float process used at Mascot since no evidence is presented that allows the comparison to be extended generally to galena medium as now used in other forms of sink-float. It is stated that flotation recovery of galena medium was tried but was unsuccessful and therefore the elaborate gravity system of medium recovery was applied. The expense of the gravity system at Mascot was one of the reasons for changing to ferrosilicon. However two important sink-float plants treating a combined total of over 13,000 tons of ore per day are using flotation to clean galena medium most successfully and are obtaining medium recoveries comparable with those reported in the paper for ferrosilicon. Slightly increased zinc recovery is claimed due to the change-over but it is to be noted that at the time of the change a decreased density differential was obtained in the separator. With galena a differential
Citation
APA:
(1952) Minerals Beneficiation - Comparative Results with Galena and Ferrosilicon at Mascot - DiscussionMLA: Minerals Beneficiation - Comparative Results with Galena and Ferrosilicon at Mascot - Discussion. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1952.