Microscale Characterisation of Pristine and Processed Ore - Implications for Leaching Calcrete-Hosted Uranium Ore

- Organization:
- The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 13
- File Size:
- 9941 KB
- Publication Date:
- Sep 29, 2013
Abstract
To extract uranium from low-grade, calcrete-hosted uranium (CHU) ore is challenging owing to the presence of carbonate and swelling clay gangue minerals that require an alkaline lixiviant to be used. Western Australia possesses ~75 000 U3O8 t in CHU resources. Improvements to alkaline leach extraction practices would improve the economic potential of these deposits.A column leach study of CHU ore was run for 105 days using an alkaline carbonate-bicarbonate lixiviant. The uranium content of the liquor plateaued after 75 days at ~275 mg U/L; the calculated maximum solution capacity was 800 mg U/L. Spiked peaks and troughs were seen in the data set beyond the 60th day, where concentrations ranged from 220 - 290 mg U/L, indicating possible cyclic uptake and loss of uranium from the solution.Pristine and leached ore samples were geochemically analysed and mineralogically characterised at high resolution using a field emission gun-electron probe micro-analyser (FEG-EPMA). Results showed that leached ore samples from the top of the column contained less carnotite than pristine ore. In contrast, leached ore samples from the column base contained regions with more carnotite than pristine ore, indicating precipitation. Three carnotite grain micro-structures were identified in the leached ore; fan-spherulite, granular and core-shell cubes, with evidence for multiple growth phases.Evidence of carnotite precipitation was seen at the edge of and in pore spaces within montmorillonite and dolomite grains. The point of zero charge of both minerals is lower than the pH of the lixiviant (pH 10.8), thus the mineral surfaces are negatively charged and would not attract UO2(CO3)34- ions out of solution. Similarly, the decrease in the uranium content of the lixiviant is not attributed to super-saturation, as this was unlikely to have been achieved. Work is ongoing to understand the reason for carnotite precipitation and the fluctuations in the lixiviant uranium concentration that are seen.CITATION:Johnson, C, Pownceby, M I, Wilson, N C and Torpy, A, 2013. Microscale characterisation of pristine and processed ore - implications for leaching calcrete-hosted uranium ore, in Proceedings The Second AusIMM International Geometallurgy Conference (GeoMet) 2013 , pp 303-316 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Citation
APA:
(2013) Microscale Characterisation of Pristine and Processed Ore - Implications for Leaching Calcrete-Hosted Uranium OreMLA: Microscale Characterisation of Pristine and Processed Ore - Implications for Leaching Calcrete-Hosted Uranium Ore. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2013.