Mathematics of Mine Sampling IV - An Analysis of Geostatistical Doctrine

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
R. F. Shurtz
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
10
File Size:
886 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1983

Abstract

This paper relates geostatistical doctrine to classical statistical and mathematical concepts. It is not a contribution to geostatistics; it is a contribution about geostatistics. It uses descriptive and pictorial arguments to assist interested readers in forming an intuitive grasp of the recondite and difficult mathematical issues involved. The method chosen is to cite authoritative literature references from the two fields and trace connections between them. Four broad conclusions appear: first, geostatistics comprises a relabelled subset of concepts detached from classical statistics and mathematics; second, this relabelling artificially isolates geostatistics from the classical fields and restricts its scope; third, the classical fields still have much to offer to the mining industry but will remain fallow unless artifcial communication barriers are removed; and fourth, the unique advantages asserted for geostatistics are neither unique nor necessarily real. These findings should not be regarded as iconoclastic but rather as Pointing the way to a wider and more productive scope for those who evaluate mineral deposits.
Citation

APA: R. F. Shurtz  (1983)  Mathematics of Mine Sampling IV - An Analysis of Geostatistical Doctrine

MLA: R. F. Shurtz Mathematics of Mine Sampling IV - An Analysis of Geostatistical Doctrine. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1983.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account