Library vs. Laboratory Research

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Arthur Connolly
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
2
File Size:
205 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1942

Abstract

WHEN scientific literature was lacking or meager, research necessarily meant laboratory investigation above all else. Today, scientific literature has attained tremendous proportions, and the volume increases at a much faster rate than it is digested and efficiently utilized. For that reason the present-day research worker should spend much more time in the library, and correspondingly less in the laboratory, than is the general custom. Library research would overcome two serious errors often made by scientists: duplication of work described completely and failure to appreciate inventions described almost verbatim in the literature. To emphasize these failings that often occur in present-day research, consider a hypothetical scientist as he conducts his search from inception to the stage where it is made available to the public by patent or other publication.
Citation

APA: Arthur Connolly  (1942)  Library vs. Laboratory Research

MLA: Arthur Connolly Library vs. Laboratory Research. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1942.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account