Field Comparisons Of Some Magnetic Instruments, With Analysis Of Superdip Performance

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
H. L. James
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
11
File Size:
360 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1947

Abstract

THIS paper presents the results and analysis of field trials of various magnetic instruments over anomalies ranging from 20 to 5000 gammas of vertical intensity. The following instruments were used: Askania vertical magnetometer, Wolfson vertical magnetometer (model M-I), Hotchkiss Superdips (used both parallel to and normal to the magnetic meridian, with several settings of the "sigma" angle), Lake Superior dip needle, and the dipping circle for measurements of inclination. The change in inclination over the measured anomalies ranged up to 4°; this caused pronounced changes in sensitivity of the Hotchkiss Superdip oriented parallel to the magnetic meridian. The variable sensitivity not only gives apparent displacement of crests of anomalies, particularly at high sensitivities, but also makes the data difficult or impossible to use in preparation of iso-anomaly maps. This weakness in field performance of the Superdip is shown to be eliminated by orienting the instrument normal to the magnetic meridian and measuring vertical intensity only, which in the latitude of upper Michigan is equal to 97 pct of the total intensity. The dip needle is seen to be relatively ineffectual for location of anomalies of less than 400 gammas.
Citation

APA: H. L. James  (1947)  Field Comparisons Of Some Magnetic Instruments, With Analysis Of Superdip Performance

MLA: H. L. James Field Comparisons Of Some Magnetic Instruments, With Analysis Of Superdip Performance. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1947.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account