Ferroalloying Metals - Electric Smelting of Cle Elum-Blewett Pass Nickeliferous Ores

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
S. F. Ravitz Virgil Miller F. B. Petermann
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
4
File Size:
164 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1944

Abstract

The Cle Elum nickeliferous iron deposit is in Kittitas County, Washington, in a rugged, mountainous region about 23 miles north of the town of Cle Elum. The Biewett Pass deposit, which is similar in character and occurrence, is in Chelan County, about 18 miles east of the Cle Elum deposit. A more or less continuous ore zone may extend between the two deposits, since iron ore is reported to have been discovered at Iron Mountain, which lies directly between them. The ore probably was formed by meta-morphism of laterite resulting from Ieach-ing of serpentine derived from peridotite. It consists largely of magnetite grains distributed through a matrix of limonitic material containing a small amount of hematite and chromite. Many of the chromite grains have shells and inclusions of magnetite. The magnetite grains range in size from 1200-mesh to 1/4-in., the average size being 48 to 65-mesh; the chromite grains range from 20 to 150-mesh. The gangue minerals are olivine and serpentine with a small, amount of chlorite, and appear both as very thin bands in the ore and 's minute fragments in the limonitic matrix. The nickel is present as minUte inclusions of a nickel silicate mineral within the magnetite and gangue par- ticles, varying in size from 1500 to about 280-mesh. Detailed analyses of 3000-lb. lots of Cle Elum and Blewett Pass ore are given in Table I. TABLE i.—Analyses of Ore Samples Per Cent Ore from Constituent cle Elum' Blewett Pass Cr....................... 2.23 2-12 Ni...................... 1.43 0.9s Fe...................... 52.9 41.4 SiOz.................... 5.6 13.4 CaO.................... 0.3 0.8 MgO................... 4-1 7-5 AI2O3................... 7.0 2.g P...................... 0.022 0.034 S....................... O.O1 o.oa Mn..................... I.I 0.4 Ba..................... nil co..................... o.oa 0.02 CU..................... 0.02 0.03 As...................... 0.03 Au..................... nil Ag°..................... O.58 Pt...................... ml Fe++.................... 8.9 5-9 Fe+++.................. 44-0 35-5 « Ounces per ton, 1 sr,cte,so,","&&$ally absent: B, W, M~, T~, V, ~i, Bi, Pb. Sb. Sn. Be, In, Hg. Zn, Zr. Cd. Preliminary Tests Attempts to beneficiate the ore by ore-dressing methods, including various 'cornbinations of sink and float, tabling, jigging, flotation, and magnetic separation, were consistently unsuccessful. A wide variety of roasting and leaching tests were made on both raw and reduced ore, but in most of the tests little or no nickel was extracted, and in none did the extraction exceed 50 Per cent. No nickel could be volatilized as the carbonyl. by treating reduced ore with carbon monoxide. Fairly good sepa-
Citation

APA: S. F. Ravitz Virgil Miller F. B. Petermann  (1944)  Ferroalloying Metals - Electric Smelting of Cle Elum-Blewett Pass Nickeliferous Ores

MLA: S. F. Ravitz Virgil Miller F. B. Petermann Ferroalloying Metals - Electric Smelting of Cle Elum-Blewett Pass Nickeliferous Ores. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1944.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account