Extraction Ratio In Thin Seams Assuring No Surface Subsidence

International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Kot F. v. Unrug
Organization:
International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Pages:
9
File Size:
2167 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2001

Abstract

The depletion of thicker coal reserves has resulted in the thinner seams being economically attractive. Surface protection against subsidence limits the extraction ratio to 50% for the room and pillar method as a "no subsidence condition". That rule was developed for pillars with smaller width/height ratio because seams mined at the time were commonly 6 feet thick. Over time pillar ribs deteriorate around the pillar perimeter and thus decrease the area of the pillar. Using 50% extraction as the no subsidence condition in the squat pillar category (below 42 in with w/h > 7) causes unnecessary losses of reserves because squat pillars are stronger. In this paper a method is presented for design of long-term pillars. Based on the analysis of pillar deterioration and field observations, an increase of the "no subsidence" extraction rate to 60% for squat pillars is proposed.
Citation

APA: Kot F. v. Unrug  (2001)  Extraction Ratio In Thin Seams Assuring No Surface Subsidence

MLA: Kot F. v. Unrug Extraction Ratio In Thin Seams Assuring No Surface Subsidence. International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, 2001.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account