Exercise caution in foreign lands

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Robert B. Parsons
Organization:
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Pages:
2
File Size:
215 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1994

Abstract

"The Canadian tax treatment of mining operations outside Canada is not as attractive as the treatment of Canadian operations. Further, the Canadian company that invests abroad a host of complex rules. This month, Tax Notes examines some of the major Canadian tax considerations confronting the Canadian company that wants to invest abroad. IntroductionCanadian-based mining companies are investing abroad more than ever before. These foreign investments trigger a complex set of tax rules that are distinct from the rules that apply to Canadian investments. In most cases, careful tax planning is mandatory if the company's tax liabilities are to be minimized. This article summarizes the main tax considerations that need to be taken into account with respect to a mining investment outside Canada.Branch Versus SubsidiaryOne of the first questions that arises in connection with a prospective foreign investment is ""Should we invest directly (that is, in a branch operation), or should we invest through a foreign subsidiary?"". In the case of a branch operation, the Canadian company owns and operates the business directly - that is, the foreign business assets are part of the Canadian legal entity. In the case of a foreign subsidiary, the foreign business operation is owned and managed by that subsidiary. The tax treatment of a branch and a subsidiary can be quite different."
Citation

APA: Robert B. Parsons  (1994)  Exercise caution in foreign lands

MLA: Robert B. Parsons Exercise caution in foreign lands. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 1994.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account