Evaluating the Tradeoffs Between Microtunnelling and Tunnel Boring Machines for Small Diameter Tunnels—A Case Study of the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project - RETC2023

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Dani Delaloye Kas Zurek
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
11
File Size:
111 KB
Publication Date:
Jun 13, 2023

Abstract

Evaluating and selecting the appropriate excavation method is a key to the success of any tunnelling project. The benefits and risks of different methods should be well understood by the designer and communicated to the project owner to enable selection of a preferred method from a technical, social and environmental impact, cost and constructability perspective. For tunnels that have an internal diameter around 3 m, depending on the tunnel purpose and ground conditions, both microtunnelling with pipe jacking and tunnel boring machine excavation with a one- or two-pass lining may be feasible construction methods. Using the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project located in Winnipeg, MB as a case study, this paper will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of each method, including technical design, social, environmental, cost, schedule, and risk considerations.
Citation

APA: Dani Delaloye Kas Zurek  (2023)  Evaluating the Tradeoffs Between Microtunnelling and Tunnel Boring Machines for Small Diameter Tunnels—A Case Study of the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project - RETC2023

MLA: Dani Delaloye Kas Zurek Evaluating the Tradeoffs Between Microtunnelling and Tunnel Boring Machines for Small Diameter Tunnels—A Case Study of the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project - RETC2023 . Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2023.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account