Elemental Solubility Tendency for the Phases of Uranium by Classical Models Used to Predict Alloy Behavior

The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society
Van S. Blackwood Travis W. Koenig Jason M. Porter David L. Olson Brajendra Mishra Robert D. Mariani Douglas L. Porter
Organization:
The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society
Pages:
12
File Size:
549 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2012

Abstract

"Traditional alloy theory models have been applied relative to the three solid phases of uranium: alpha (orthorhombic), beta (tetragonal), and mainly gamma (body centered cubic)[l]. The Darken-Gurry and Miedema models, with modifications based on concepts of Waber, Gschneidner, and Brewer have been used to predict the behavior of four types of solutes: 1) Transition associated with alloying in and containment of the uranium fuel 2) Transuranic elements in the uranium 3) Rare earth fragmentation elements (lanthanides) 4) Transition metals and other fragmentation elements. Using these solute map criteria, elemental behavior have been predicted as highly soluble, marginally soluble, or immiscible (intermetallic phase formers) and have been used to compare solute effects during uranium phase transformations. The overlapping of these solute maps are convenient first approximation tools for predicting alloy behavior.IntroductionAn investigation is in progress to determine the role of various solute elements on size and shape of the 'Y phase field range for uranium to optimize the burning and material processing of nuclear fuel is in progress. Traditional alloy theory models based on correlations to elemental electronic and crystal properties are used to predict solubility and micro structural formation. The effectiveness of this model is based on microstructure property correlations. Darken and Gurry, and Miedema models, with modifications based on concepts of Waber, Gschneidner, and Brewer, models have been used to describe solute solubility with respect to uranium based the on correlation between elemental electronic structure and uranium phases. The alpha (orthorhombic), beta (tetragonal), and gamma (body centered cubic) phases have different solubilities for specific alloy additions as a function of temperature. Using the method of Waber, ellipse diagrams classified those solutes that should have broad solubility in the allotropes of uranium[2]. The predictive diagrams are made from four different correlations:"
Citation

APA: Van S. Blackwood Travis W. Koenig Jason M. Porter David L. Olson Brajendra Mishra Robert D. Mariani Douglas L. Porter  (2012)  Elemental Solubility Tendency for the Phases of Uranium by Classical Models Used to Predict Alloy Behavior

MLA: Van S. Blackwood Travis W. Koenig Jason M. Porter David L. Olson Brajendra Mishra Robert D. Mariani Douglas L. Porter Elemental Solubility Tendency for the Phases of Uranium by Classical Models Used to Predict Alloy Behavior. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2012.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account