Electron Spin Resonance Detection of Reactive Free Radicals in Fresh Coal Dust and Quartz Dust and Its Implications to Pneumoconiosis and Silicosis

"It is well known that prevalence and severity of coal worker's pneumoconiosis (CWP) differ markedly in different regions and mines despite comparable exposures. These variations in the pathogenicity of different coal mine dusts can only partially be explained by the mineral composition of the coal mine dust and the rank of coal. Laboratory studies also do not correlate with the human experience. One major difference between human exposure and laboratory studies is that the coal miner breathes dust from freshly broken coal, while the animals or cells are exposed to stale dust. In an effort to find biochemical clues for resolving this apparent paradox, we have carried experiments to detect differences in chemical reactivities of fresh versus stale coal dust from several U.S. coal mines. Electron spin resonance (ESR) was used as a technique for the direct detection of the concentration and reactivity of free radicals. ESR measurements of freshly ground coal dusts of different ranks and composition showed significant differences in the amount and reactivities of the organic free radicals produced. The half-lives and reactivity patterns of these newly formed species of free radicals seem to correlate with the expected toxicity and pathogenicity of the dust, thereby, providing new clues to the biochemical mechanisms and pathogenesis of CWP. Similar detection of free radicals in freshly crushed quartz suggest that free radicals might play a significant role in the pathogenicity of quartz in causing fibrosis and eventually silicosis.IntroductionThe pathogenesis of coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP) has been an important topic of concern for decades, but the mechanism of CWP is still not understood. It is well known, for example, that the prevalence and severity of CWP differ markedly in different regions and mines despite com¬parable exposure'(1,2) but these observations can only par¬tially be explained by differences in mineral composition and rank of coal (3-5) Specifically, while epidemiological studies of coal miners indicate (1,2) that the effectiveness of coal in producing CWP correlates roughly with the rank (i.e. %,carbon content) of coal, such correlation has not been established via biological studies.(4-6)"