Effect of Axial Compression on Lateral Pile Response: Laterally Loaded Test Pile Comparison

Deep Foundations Institute
David S. Graham Paul J. Axtell Michael K. Muchard Joseph D. Bailey
Organization:
Deep Foundations Institute
Pages:
10
File Size:
1031 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2017

Abstract

"Two instrumented test piles were simultaneously subjected to a static lateral load test by jacking the piles apart. One of the piles was loaded in axial compression via kentledge during the lateral load test. Both piles were constructed in an identical manner. These piles were constructed and tested as part of a construction-phase load test program for a floodwall improvement project along the Missouri River in Kansas City, Kansas. Details of the subsurface conditions, drilled pile construction, instrumentation, and load testing procedures are described. Data collected during testing of the piles are presented and compared. Potential effects of the axial compressive load related to observed differences in pile lateral response are discussed.INTRODUCTIONTwo instrumented test piles were simultaneously subjected to a static lateral load with one of the piles also subject to a combined axial load during testing. The load test program was part of a floodwall improvement project in Kansas City, Kansas. Known as the BPU floodwall, the floodwall runs along the south bank of the Missouri River at a Kansas City Board of Public Utilities power generation and water treatment facility. The project location is shown in Fig. 1.Drilled, 2-ft (610-mm) diameter piles were designated by the designer, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), as the foundation type for supporting extended floodwall footings. The drilled piles are fully cased, cast-in-place concrete, reinforced with a steel 12x74 (310x110) H-pile. In order to test soil lateral response and pile structural response under combined loading, the COE required that both a lateral test and combined lateral and axial test pile be constructed and tested. In order to most efficiently test both piles and to allow for simpler comparison, the two piles were simultaneously laterally loaded by jacking the piles apart, applying a maximum lateral load of 195 kips (867 kN). A constant axial load was applied to the combined test pile by kentledge prior to lateral loading and was maintained for the duration of the lateral load test. The total weight of the kentledge was 61.5 kips (274 kN). Fig. 2 shows the test setup."
Citation

APA: David S. Graham Paul J. Axtell Michael K. Muchard Joseph D. Bailey  (2017)  Effect of Axial Compression on Lateral Pile Response: Laterally Loaded Test Pile Comparison

MLA: David S. Graham Paul J. Axtell Michael K. Muchard Joseph D. Bailey Effect of Axial Compression on Lateral Pile Response: Laterally Loaded Test Pile Comparison. Deep Foundations Institute, 2017.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account